Recurring concern

Inadequate fire detection and emergency notification for vulnerable people in housing

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Jan 2014•Latest report 26 Apr 2022

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of fire detection and emergency-notification controls specifically intended to protect vulnerable people in housing, including alarm installation and operation, automatic links to Alarm Receiving Centres or telecare systems, alarm-status communication, and arrangements that enable prompt emergency-service notification.

Not included

  • Excludes general fire-prevention, evacuation, sprinkler, building-design or fire-risk-assessment deficiencies unless they directly concern fire detection or emergency notification.
  • Excludes generic telecare, communication or emergency-response failures without a fire-detection or fire-notification connection.
  • Excludes failures limited to smoke-alarm interlinking status where the existing dedicated smoke-alarm interlinking concern is the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes fire-alarm deficiencies in prisons, workplaces or public venues unless the assertion concerns the same vulnerable-person housing context.
Reports
6

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
6

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2022

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
16

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Barnet Assist1
British Standards Institution1
Home Office1
Leeds City Council1
Liaise (London) Limited1
London Borough of Brent1
London Borough of Hackney1
London Fire Brigade1
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government1
National Fire Chiefs Council1
Sovereign Network Homes1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Ashlie Timms · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ashlie Timms, a 46-year-old woman living in supported accommodation, died on 20 April 2018 after a fire started when fabric materials came into contact with a portable fan heater. Staff delayed calling the emergency services, did not evacuate her, and the fire safety arrangements, alarm system, evacuation procedures and door lock were identified as concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Non-compliant fire alarms lacking automatic links to an Alarm Receiving Centre

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Fire Alarms in three units operated Sequence Care Group remain non-compliant with the 2013 British Standard Guidance, which recommends that they should have a link to an Alarm Receiving Centre (“ARC”) which automatically contacts the emergency services when a fire alarm is activated. ”

    Source location

    Ashlie Timms · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Report the alarm connection concern to relevant British Standards committees to encourage debate and pursue improved outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NFCC represent FRS on BSI committees including the overarching committees for fire detection and alarm systems (FSH12) and fire precautions in buildings (FSH14).”

    Source location

    Response from National Fire Chiefs Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue advocating with government, regulators and the sector for legislative change enabling enforcement of relevant British Standard requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The issue appears to be a lack of a direct enforcement mechanism for British Standards. That is a matter my officers have previously raised through the coronial system and with government. If a specific requirement is to be enforceable it will require legislative change. We will continue to advocate for this in appropriate cases as part of our ongoing work with government, other regulators and the sector itself.”

    Source location

    Response from London Fire Brigade
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider strengthening standards commentary on zone plans, including their life-safety importance and potential non-conformity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. While BS 5839-1 already details a need for users of the standard to check zones and confirm zone plans, it is proposed that commentary be added to 46.2 and/or 23.1 making the risk to life from a lack of a zone plan very clear. The text could also list the lack of a zone plan as a major non-conformity OR the lack of a zone plan immediately rendering the system non-compliant. This may include the absence of an ARC.”

    Source location

    Response from British Standards Institution
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider recommending that users establish local fire-and-rescue-service policies for automatic fire-alarm responses and confirm premises coverage.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Regarding ARC connections, the committee noted, many Fire & Rescue Service (FRS) are operating a nil-response policy to AFAs (AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARMS). The standard may include a recommendation the user to determine what the policy is for the local FRS and confirm whether the premises are included or exempt.”

    Source location

    Response from British Standards Institution
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and activate the Alarm Receiving Centre link for one home’s fire alarm system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Sequence Care has now arranged for the fire alarm systems at these homes to be updated so that they are compatible and for an ARC link to be installed.”

    Source location

    Response from Kennedys
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update two homes’ fire alarm systems and install Alarm Receiving Centre links, with completion scheduled for 24 June 2022.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Sequence Care has now arranged for the fire alarm systems at these homes to be updated so that they are compatible and for an ARC link to be installed.”

    Source location

    Response from Kennedys
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enforcement of fire safety regulations is outside the organisation’s functions because it is not an enforcing authority and has no regulatory functions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For the sake of clarity, the NFCC is not an enforcing authority under the principal fire regulations relevant to the premises in issue; it does not have regulatory functions.”

    Source location

    Response from National Fire Chiefs Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    British Standard recommendations cannot be directly enforced without legislative authority or a demonstrable safety risk arising from non-compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regulators cannot directly enforce the recommendations of a British Standard unless it is cited as a required standard in relevant legislation or unless the arrangements actually in place can be shown to create a “risk gap” from the level expected by that standard. I understand the suggestion here was that the alarm did not include a link to an ARC because the premises had 24/7 staffing in place. LFB might consider this to be non-compliance with Article 13 of the FSO, although this would have to be considered in the light of the circumstances of an individual premises including the arrangements for staff training and testing of the arrangement. It would then be raised with the responsible person as part of any follow up to the regulatory audit.”

    Source location

    Response from London Fire Brigade
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Where alternative arrangements provide an equivalent safety level, no enforceable risk exists requiring compliance with British Standard ARC recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The ethos of the FSO is one of risk-based fire safety preventative and protective measures. Under Government guidance that does mean that it is not a prescriptive regime. Alternative means can be used to demonstrate compliance rather than adherence to a British Standard.”

    Source location

    Response from London Fire Brigade
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fire detection installation and servicing issues should be examined by subcommittee FSH/12/1, which is responsible for the relevant standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The committee experts believe the committees which should examine the issues more closely are:”

    Source location

    Response from British Standards Institution
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The three homes did not follow British Standards guidance but were not non-compliant with the applicable requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Second Statement confirmed that, at that time, there were three homes within the Group which did not have fire alarm systems linked with an ARC as recommended in British Standards BS 5839-1. Whilst the three homes did not adhere to the guidance provided by the British Standards, it is not correct to say that they were non-compliant.”

    Source location

    Response from Kennedys
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Completion of alarm system upgrades at two homes was delayed because the implementing team was absent due to Covid-19.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ii. ████████ - works due to be completed on 24 June 2022, the delay being due to the implementing team being absent due to Covid-19;”

    Source location

    Response from Kennedys
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response
  2. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Sean Ennis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sean Ennis was found in his flat after a fire and died in hospital from the consequences of smoke inhalation. The principal concerns included incomplete fire-risk assessment and inadequate smoke detection and telecare arrangements for a vulnerable resident, including the alarm centre not knowing he was a smoker and not responding when he did not answer calls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate fire detection systems in premises housing vulnerable individuals

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Premises that knowingly house and provide a service for vulnerable individuals should ensure that their fire prevention, detection and response systems are adequate and appropriate. ”

    Source location

    Sean Ennis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pursue with the London Borough of Barnet a requirement for sheltered housing tenants to receive local fire and rescue service home fire safety visits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5) Barnet Homes manages properties on behalf of the London Borough of Barnet (LBB) with whom the tenants have their tenancy agreements. Barnet Homes will pursue the recommendation with LBB to incorporate the requirement for Sheltered Housing tenants to have a home fire safety visit by the local fire and rescue service. Barnet Homes already has a memorandum of understanding with the London Fire Brigade (LFB), which includes a programme of staff training in identifying vulnerable residents and fire safety visits for its residents.”

    Source location

    2022-0054-Response-from-Barnet-Homes_Published.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Matters of Concern 2, 3 and 4 are not issues for the landlord to address.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Matter of Concern 2:”

    Source location

    2022-0054-Response-from-Network-Homes_Published.pdf
    Page 7 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing fire prevention, detection and response systems are considered adequate and appropriate under applicable law and guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Matter of Concern 7:”

    Source location

    2022-0054-Response-from-Network-Homes_Published.pdf
    Page 9 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    James Golds · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Golds was rescued from a flat fire on 28 September 2020 after sustaining significant fire-related injuries and later died in hospital from complications of smoke inhalation. The report raised concerns about limited guidance for managing and escalating fire risks in supported accommodation, the absence of a statutory requirement for sprinklers, and smoke detectors not activating until a cigarette-related fire was well established.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of smoke detection systems to provide sufficiently early warning of cigarette-related fires

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In addition in relation to the design and fire prevention features for such accommodation the inquest heard that there was no statutory requirement for sprinkler systems. Smoke detectors were in the hallway areas of each flat but because of the way in which a cigarette related fire developed the detector would not be triggered until the fire was well established. This made it difficult to escape and increase the risk of the fire spreading further. ”

    Source location

    James Golds · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    William THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Thompson died in a fire at his supported-housing home after discarded cigarette ignited his bedding, and he was killed by smoke inhalation. Although smoke and heat detectors were installed in the hall and kitchen, there was no smoke detection system in his bedroom. The report raised concern that his social workers had not considered bedroom smoke detection despite his significantly raised fire risk from smoking, drinking and immobility.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a smoke detection system in the bedroom

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence I heard at inquest was that, whilst smoke and heat detectors were installed in Mr Thompson’s hall and kitchen, there was no smoke detection system in his bedroom. He was known to be at significantly raised fire risk because of his smoking, drinking and immobility (he used a Zimmer frame). London Fire Brigade had been called to his home more than once in the past. However, his social workers never addressed their minds to the question of whether there was a smoke detector in his bedroom and, if not, whether that might be useful. This seems to be an area that would benefit from exploration for particularly high risk service users. ”

    Source location

    William THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Anne Elizabeth Fowler · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Anne Elizabeth Fowler died in a house fire. A dust cover had been left over the smoke alarm nearest the fire and the deceased, preventing it from sounding as early as it otherwise would have; the report also raised concern that alarms may be inaccessible to elderly or immobile occupiers and that protective covers should be removed before properties are occupied.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Installation of alarms in locations inaccessible to elderly or immobile occupiers

    Wider context from the report

    “The cover was in place. The alarm was as is usual, installed on the ceiling where it would be inaccessible to many elderly or other immobile occupiers. It was stated that the cover was left in place to protect the alarm from the ingress of dust etc following fitting. Therefore, you may consider that legislation should be enacted to require builders, landlords and others to remove such covers, cleaning around the alarm where necessary, prior to allowing the occupier to take possession. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Anne Elizabeth Fowler · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Julie Ann Camm · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julie Ann Camm, aged 49, was found dead at her home after deliberately starting a fire and sustaining multiple deep incised wounds. The principal concern was that the property had no smoke detectors, despite her vulnerability as a tenant; the report stated that a detector might have alerted others in time for her to be rescued.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure smoke detectors are fitted in housing properties

    Wider context from the report

    “The Fire Service Report revealed that there were no smoke alarms fitted to the property. This property was originally in the ownership of a Housing Association and it was established that there had been a partial re-wire, kitchen sockets only in 2008. Had it been due for a full re-wire then hard-wired smoke detectors would have been installed. The Housing Association’s procedure at the time was to encourage their tenants to refer to the West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service to have a home fire safety check, but this was not in place when Miss Camm took out this tenancy. I am aware that the Fire Service provide fire safety advice to all members of the community and will provide and fix smoke detectors free of charge where necessary. A considerable amount of work has been carried out to forge links with other agencies and provide them with education in risk identification with regard to fire safety. The Fire and Rescue Service would encourage individuals or agencies to refer any member of the community to them, particularly those most vulnerable in the first instance through their local Fire Service. This property is now within the ownership of Leeds City council. Originally it was owned by a Housing Association - Leeds West North Homes. The Council took over on 1 October 2013. It is a matter of grave concern to me that there were no smoke detectors in the property, notwithstanding the vulnerability of Miss Camm as a tenant. I, therefore, recommend that the owner of this property inspect all their housing stock and arrange for either hard-wired detectors to be fitted at the earliest opportunity. Until this can be achieved I further recommend that the landlord contact the West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service for home assessment teams to carry out the necessary assessment and, where appropriate, fit battery operated smoke detectors until such time as permanent hard-wired detectors can be installed. Had a smoke detector been in place, it is likely that neighbours and members of the public in the vicinity would have been alerted to the fire in sufficient time for Miss Camm to be rescued and her death could have been avoided. ”

    Source location

    Julie Ann Camm · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install hard-wired smoke detection in approximately 1,200 properties subject to fire-risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the forthcoming 18 month period, hard-wired smoke detection equipment will be installed to all properties subject to a fire risk assessment. Detection will be installed in high & low rise properties and will consist of a mains powered optical smoke alarm with rechargeable lithium cells in the hallway and powered heat alarm with rechargeable lithium cells in the kitchen. This equates to some 1200 properties in the Housing Leeds region with a programme value of c.£200k. 4300 dwellings in Sheltered Housing Complexes and Sheltered Housing Dispersed Schemes citywide are also to receive smoke detection equipment via the CareRing system in FY2014/15 in £1.3m project.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install smoke detection through the CareRing system in 4,300 sheltered-housing dwellings during FY2014/15.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the forthcoming 18 month period, hard-wired smoke detection equipment will be installed to all properties subject to a fire risk assessment. Detection will be installed in high & low rise properties and will consist of a mains powered optical smoke alarm with rechargeable lithium cells in the hallway and powered heat alarm with rechargeable lithium cells in the kitchen. This equates to some 1200 properties in the Housing Leeds region with a programme value of c.£200k. 4300 dwellings in Sheltered Housing Complexes and Sheltered Housing Dispersed Schemes citywide are also to receive smoke detection equipment via the CareRing system in FY2014/15 in £1.3m project.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Rewire approximately 1,100 properties during FY2014/15, including hard-wired smoke detection in each property.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, £2.55m has been allocated to full re-wire of dwellings in the Housing Leeds for FY 2014/15. This equates to the re-wiring of around 1100 properties and will include the installation of hard-wired smoke detection equipment in all cases. Additional funding programmes of this nature are also secured for the other regions of Housing Leeds.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Identify approximately 40 properties for the ring-fenced March–April 2014 rewiring programme, which will include hard-wired smoke detection.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, an additional £100k of funding has been ring-fenced for full rewires between March 2014 and April 2014. Housing Leeds is currently identifying which properties will benefit from this programme, anticipated to be in the region of 40 properties. Again, this work will include the installation of hard wired smoke detection equipment in all cases.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install battery smoke detection in remaining properties without detection over the next 12 months, using a targeted plan developed with West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Of the remaining properties with no smoke detection equipment, Housing Leeds plan to install, as a minimum, battery detection equipment over the next 12 month period. This will be done in consultation with West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service to produce an efficient, coherent and targeted plan.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the Electrical Specification to require hard-wired smoke detection when major electrical works are completed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Electrical Specification issued to contractors operating for and on behalf of Housing Leeds is presently being fully reviewed and, where applicable, updated. I can confirm that part of this updates includes for the installation of hard-wired smoke detection in the event that any major electrical works are completed within the dwelling. This replaces the existing document which specifies the installation of hard-wired detection equipment as part of a full re-wire only.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install battery and, where applicable, carbon-monoxide detection in sheltered dwellings lacking existing detection.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Battery detection installation schemes have already been completed in 2013 in the West of the city, specifically targeting sheltered accommodation whereby battery detection and carbon monoxide detection equipment (where applicable) was installed in all sheltered dwellings with no existing detection equipment. Additionally, following a fire to a privately owned Caspon-type property in 2012, all properties of this construction type owned by LCC have had battery detection installed (where existing not present) in addition to the ‘hot strip’ completed by West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service following this fire. Both these programmes have been accounted for in the above data and recorded on Keystone.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install battery detection in LCC-owned Caspon-type properties lacking existing detection, alongside the completed fire-safety works.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Battery detection installation schemes have already been completed in 2013 in the West of the city, specifically targeting sheltered accommodation whereby battery detection and carbon monoxide detection equipment (where applicable) was installed in all sheltered dwellings with no existing detection equipment. Additionally, following a fire to a privately owned Caspon-type property in 2012, all properties of this construction type owned by LCC have had battery detection installed (where existing not present) in addition to the ‘hot strip’ completed by West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service following this fire. Both these programmes have been accounted for in the above data and recorded on Keystone.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add smoke-detection identification to annual tenancy visits and refer properties without detection to West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service for interim detectors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of its commitment to delivering a customer focused service, Housing Leeds targets to visit 100% of customers in their homes on an annual basis. This visit is known as the Annual Tenancy Visit and focusses on a number of areas, including vulnerability, safeguarding and compliance with statutory inspections (for example the annual gas safety visit). With effect 1st April 2014, the Annual Tenancy Visit will now include the identification of smoke detection equipment. In cases where smoke detection is not present, these properties will be referred to West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service for provision of smoke detectors until such time that hard wired detection equipment is provided.”

    Source location

    2014-0023-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 January 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026