Recurring concern
Unreliable duty system arrangements for safe clinical coverage
First reported 7 Sep 2016•Latest report 20 Oct 2023
What this concern includes
Includes failures in explicitly identified duty-system arrangements that affect safe clinical coverage, including inadequate robustness, insufficient time within duty-doctor arrangements, unclear coverage or operational weaknesses that leave patients without an effective duty response.
Not included
- Excludes generic staffing, workload or workforce-capacity concerns where no duty-system arrangement is identified.
- Excludes individual clinical assessment, treatment or escalation failures that are not part of a deficient duty system.
- Excludes ordinary shift, rota or break arrangements where they do not affect the safety or effectiveness of duty-system clinical coverage.
- Excludes non-clinical duty systems and operational command arrangements unrelated to clinical patient coverage.
- Reports
- 3
- Individual concerns
- 3
- Date range
- 2016–2023
- Stated actions
- 2
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient time in the duty doctor system to deal with patients appropriately
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Action
Add three unbooked telephone slots and three face-to-face slots to each duty doctor’s shift.
Stated by Church Lane Surgery
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to provide timely access to the Duty Doctor for deteriorating patients
This report raised 7 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Action
Implement a dedicated NHS wireless network enabling junior doctors’ smartphones to use Wi-Fi calling at identified Kingsmill locations, and distribute user guidance.
Stated by Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Position
A crash bleep was discounted because the duty doctor covered multiple sites and could not provide an immediate response.
Stated by Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised1
Failure of effective and robust duty system arrangements
This report raised 5 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Data last updated 7 September 2026