Recurring concern

Failure to reliably preserve handover records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Feb 2016•Latest report 14 Sep 2023

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically intended to retain, protect, preserve, retrieve or assure the availability of handover records across care settings and staff transitions, including overwritten or destroyed records and inadequate retention arrangements.

Not included

  • Excludes failures in the content, completeness or communication of a handover where the handover record was reliably preserved.
  • Excludes general clinical or care record-keeping deficiencies where handover records are not the material object.
  • Excludes failures to transfer handover information between staff or services when the record-retention or preservation process is not deficient.
  • Excludes records unrelated to handover, including supervision, incident, medical or administrative records unless the assertion explicitly concerns preserving the handover record.
Reports
5

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
6

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2023

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
6

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Copperfields1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Exemplar Health Care Services Limited1
Glangwili General Hospital1
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Hywel Dda University LHB1
NHS England1
Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust1
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust1
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Jack FARRINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack Farrington, who had a long history of mental health difficulties and was detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act, died on 2 January 2020 after running from an emergency department and falling from a road bridge. The report raised concerns about fragmented access to medical records, inadequate handovers and record keeping, insufficient flagging and assessment of absconding and self-harm risks, and the implementation of measures intended to keep him safe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and store mental health unit handover records in SystmOne

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that the staff within the secure mental health unit rely very heavily on information given at handovers at the start of a shift and they do not have time to review the patient records in detail. At the time of Jack’s death records of these handovers were not stored in the same way as other patient records and, in Jack’s case, were missing entirely. This significantly hampered the investigation and inquest. I am pleased to hear that Solent NHS Trust have now changed their document storage policy in this regard and these records will now be added to and stored on SystmOne. However the handover records are not currently completed within SystmOne. This gives rise to the continuing risk of this information not being correctly recorded or correctly stored. I understand that this requires a change to SystmOne which is not yet complete. ”

    Source location

    Jack FARRINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Transfer inpatient handovers from Word documents to SystmOne and train staff in the new process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Work is continuing to transfer the handover from a Word document onto SystmOne. This was due to be completed by 01st October 2023, however due to changes in key staff members undertaking this change and the handover document provided on SystmOne that is in use in other clinical areas of Solent not being suitable for use in an acute psychiatric ward, there has been a delay to progress. Work is underway and expected to be completed, with staff trained in its use by the Clinical Practice Education Team by the end of January 2024. I am regretful that the service has not been able to deliver this change in handover process by the date previously proposed in my Witness Statement dated 09th August 2023. If HM Coroner would find it useful, I can provide a further update at the end of January when the SystmOne handover is live and in use.”

    Source location

    Response from Solent NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Attend inpatient handovers, audit clinical records, and escalate audit outcomes through governance meetings to assure handover quality and accuracy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to mitigate the risk that the continued use of the handover outside of SystmOne presents, our Clinical Leadership Team are attending handovers to ensure good quality conversation and accuracy of information handed over and undertaking a quality audit of the clinical records. The outcomes from audits are then presented at the Inpatient Governance Meeting and can be escalated to the Mental Health Service Senior Leadership Team at Integrated Governance Meeting if required.”

    Source location

    Response from Solent NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the Integrated Care Board and regional acute trusts towards a paper-free electronic patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust fully agrees that the current hybrid between paper and electronic records creates greater complexity and inefficiency, impacting the ability of the multidisciplinary teams to locate all necessary information for each patient. The ambition of PHU and similar NHS Trusts who have not already done so is to move to a true paper free Electronic Patient Record (EPR). We are working with the Integrated Care Board (ICB) and other Acute Trusts in Hampshire and Isle of Wight to achieve that goal over time.”

    Source location

    Response from Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response
  2. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Anthony Athias had multiple physical and mental health issues, including recurring urinary infections and problems with a long-term catheter. After difficulties with his catheter on 2 July 2021, he was admitted to hospital, where his condition deteriorated and he died on 6 July 2021. Concerns included a lack of sterile replacement catheters, inadequate monitoring records, and a missing handover record, with risks arising from deficient record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delayed managerial detection of missing handover records

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The handover record for 2 July 2021 was missing, having allegedly been overwritten. The managers in the nursing home did not appreciate this until an Adult Safeguarding Investigation was underway. ”

    Source location

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to preserve handover records

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The handover record for 2 July 2021 was missing, having allegedly been overwritten. The managers in the nursing home did not appreciate this until an Adult Safeguarding Investigation was underway. ”

    Source location

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Preserve handover records through electronic monthly files, printed management-office copies, archiving and monthly completeness checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You heard evidence from Ms ████████ that Exemplar Health Care had changed its system to use word templates across the entire organisation. It is therefore no longer possible for documents such as handovers to be overwritten. In addition, each handover is now saved electronically in a specific month document file and a copy is printed off and retained in the management office at Copperfields in paper form with a date tracker.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing management oversight, quality assurance and governance processes are considered sufficient to ensure records are kept, retained and reviewed for trends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have detailed above the relevant management structure changes and quality assurance systems in place to ensure that all record keeping is appropriate and accurate. In summary:”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Electronic storage, printed copies and monthly checks ensure handovers cannot be overwritten and remain accessible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You heard evidence from Ms ████████ that Exemplar Health Care had changed its system to use word templates across the entire organisation. It is therefore no longer possible for documents such as handovers to be overwritten. In addition, each handover is now saved electronically in a specific month document file and a copy is printed off and retained in the management office at Copperfields in paper form with a date tracker.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response
  3. Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emily Katherine Inglis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emily Katherine Inglis was found deceased in her bedroom at Prince Philip Hospital on 22 April 2016, with a plastic bag over her head; the cause of death was given as plastic bag asphyxia. The inquest identified concerns about the absence of an overarching risk management plan and deficiencies in record-keeping, including risk management strategies and handover records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to preserve handover records

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The inquest further identified that there were deficiencies in record-keeping, both in terms of ensuring that risk management strategies remained up-to-date and in preserving handover records. ”

    Source location

    Emily Katherine Inglis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ranjan Raman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The report states that the deceased was admitted to hospital with low sodium levels and high blood pressure, fell three times, and sustained a head injury followed by a fatal bleed. Concerns included insufficient falls-risk assessment, missing or incomplete neurological observation charts, poor communication between medical and nursing staff, destruction of shift hand-over sheets, and inadequate incident-report details.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to retain shift hand-over sheets

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The hand-over sheets for each shift were being shredded by the nurses as soon as the shift was completed. Whilst it is appreciated that these cannot be placed on the record of an individual patient for reasons of confidentiality, there is no reason why they could not be filed on the wards and retained for say 14 days which would allow further reference to be made to them, should this be deemed necessary or helpful. ”

    Source location

    Ranjan Raman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider introducing electronic archiving of ward and departmental handover sheets.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Coroner’s observations are noted and the Trust acknowledges that the Trust does not keep an archived copy of handover sheets, this is for many reasons including confidentiality and to ensure that the sheet being referred to is an up to date one and not one from a previous date. However following the Coroner’s observations the Trust recognises that there is no reason why handover sheets which are electronically produced could not be electronically archived to provide a record of what information was being communicated at handover at a point in time. This would as the Coroner observes provide a record should it be necessary to refer to them.”

    Source location

    R-Mistry-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Paper handover sheets are not archived because confidentiality and maintaining reliance on the current sheet create practical constraints, although electronic archiving may be introduced.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Coroner’s observations are noted and the Trust acknowledges that the Trust does not keep an archived copy of handover sheets, this is for many reasons including confidentiality and to ensure that the sheet being referred to is an up to date one and not one from a previous date. However following the Coroner’s observations the Trust recognises that there is no reason why handover sheets which are electronically produced could not be electronically archived to provide a record of what information was being communicated at handover at a point in time. This would as the Coroner observes provide a record should it be necessary to refer to them.”

    Source location

    R-Mistry-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 March 2016

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Freda Weston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Freda Weston was treated for septic arthritis in a replacement knee and died in hospital on 29 April 2015. The report states that Septrin led to disseminated intravascular coagulation and identifies concerns including delays in antibiotics, insufficient time to assess whether the new drug suited her, inadequate staffing, and failures in communication and escalation procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to retain ward handover sheets for reference

    Wider context from the report

    “9. The handover sheets on the ward are “shredded by the nurses” immediately after handover. Why cannot these be kept in a folder on the ward for at least 14 days should they be needed for reference purposes? I was told of the transition from paper to electronic notes. This seems to have been happening for a very long time and one wonders when it will be complete. ”

    Source location

    Freda Weston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide electronic handover access across Medicine Business Group wards, enabling retrospective access to patient handover information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that all wards in the Medicine Business Group have access to an electronic handover. Staff print these for each shift so they can be viewed as they move around the wards. The handover sheets are shredded at the end of each shift to make sure information is not taken home by staff, which would compromise patient confidentiality and make sure that incorrect information is not used on the ward. The information, per patient, can be accessed electronically retrospectively.”

    Source location

    Weston-Response
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Electronic handover records can be accessed retrospectively, so retaining shredded paper handover sheets is unnecessary and risks confidentiality and outdated information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9) The handover sheets on the ward are “shredded by the nurses” immediately after handover. Why cannot these be kept in a folder on the ward for at least 14 days should they be needed for reference purposes? I was told of the transition from paper to electronic notes. This seems to have been happening for a very long time and one wonders when it will be complete.”

    Source location

    Weston-Response
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 February 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026