Recurring concern
Failure to provide feedback and learning to clinicians after safety-relevant clinical errors
First reported 19 Oct 2015•Latest report 5 Dec 2023
What this concern includes
Includes failures of the clinical feedback and learning process after safety-relevant clinical errors or consequential clinical decisions, including explaining the rationale for a consultant overruling a junior doctor and providing direct feedback or learning opportunities to clinicians after identified errors.
Not included
- Excludes generic organisational learning, incident investigation or action-implementation failures where direct feedback or learning to clinicians after a clinical error is not the unsafe condition.
- Excludes feedback concerning non-clinical staff, criminal-justice decisions, patient explanations or routine performance development unrelated to a safety-relevant clinical error or consequential clinical decision.
- Excludes deficiencies in supervision, training or clinical decision-making where no failure to provide post-error or post-decision feedback and learning is identified.
- Reports
- 3
- Individual concerns
- 3
- Date range
- 2015–2023
- Stated actions
- 3
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to adequately explain learning to junior doctors after consultant overruling
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Action
Provide additional time for specialty clinical tutor posts supporting educational faculty and trainee development.
Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Introduce appraisal-linked requirements for consultants to evidence Clinical and Educational Supervisor upskilling.
Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Embed improved supervision training for all supervisors to make clinical contacts learning opportunities.
Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised1
Uncertainty about provision of direct feedback and learning opportunities after identified clinical errors
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to provide appropriate feedback after a clinical error
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Data last updated 7 September 2026