Recurring concern

Unreliable safety assessment of new care-home residents on admission

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Apr 2020•Latest report 11 Apr 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the care-home admission and immediate post-admission process to obtain relevant information about new residents and assess their safety risks, including infection, behavioural, clinical and care needs where those risks affect safe placement and care.

Not included

  • Excludes general care-plan, risk-assessment or documentation omissions unrelated to the admission or immediate post-admission assessment of a new care-home resident.
  • Excludes failures in ongoing resident-risk management after admission when the admission assessment and information process operated reliably.
  • Excludes generic care-home staffing, training, communication or placement-capacity deficiencies unless they directly impair safety assessment or information gathering for a new resident on admission.
  • Excludes hospital, prison, community-care and other non-care-home admission assessments unless the assertion explicitly concerns the same care-home admission process.
Reports
6

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
7

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2020–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
16

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Avery Healthcare Group1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Care Quality Commission1
Deerlands Residential Home1
Elvy Court Care Home1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Highfield Care Home, Wrexham1
NHS England1
Oak Court House1
Pelham House Residential Care Home with Dementia1
Public Health England1
The Vicarage1
Wolverhampton City Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Patricia Ann Catterall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Ann Catterall’s care was transferred to a nursing home on 11 June 2024 after 207 days at Mold Community Hospital. Her blood sugar levels, previously checked three times daily, were checked once daily at the nursing home; her condition deteriorated and she was admitted to hospital on 19 June with HHS and sepsis, dying a few days later. The principal concern was that the nursing home’s pre-transfer assessment was not sufficiently robust and did not identify all relevant care information, including the frequency of her blood sugar monitoring.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure receipt of all relevant patient-care information before transfer

    Wider context from the report

    “That the process of assessment by the Nursing Home prior to the transfer of care to them was not sufficiently robust so as to ensure that all relevant information required for the safe care of a patient had been received and assessed prior to the patient being received into their care. Evidence was received that in the majority of cases (post Covid) there are no face to face assessments prior to patient transfer and that the assessment is therefore dependent on the documentation supplied to the Nursing Home by the Health Board which in some cases may result in not all relevant information being provided. In this instance evidence was given that the Nursing Home did not know that the deceased’s blood sugar levels were monitored three times per days whilst in the care of Health Board. ”

    Source location

    Patricia Ann Catterall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the pre-admission assessment document with prompts to obtain all required information, including diabetes information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Our pre-admission assessment document has been updated and includes prompts to ensure all information is requested prior to admission, this includes a section for diabetes, see attached pre-admission assessment document.”

    Source location

    Response from Pendine Park Care Organisation
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a Task and Finish Group of Community Hospital Matrons and Discharge Nurses to review the care-home discharge plan form.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Task and Finish Group has been set up (consisting of Community Hospital Matrons and Discharge Nurses) to review the current form for suitability, and this work will specifically ensure that frequency of observations and medication is clearly defined within the document.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the care-home discharge plan form to define observation and medication frequencies clearly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the notice, our senior nursing team in the East Integrated Health Community have led work to understand the issue across the Health Board. This work has identified that whilst there is a standardised form for discharge plans into care homes, the level of detail is varied.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the finalized and approved form changes with the North Wales Care Home Forum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Changes to the form, once finalised and approved, will be shared with the North Wales Care Home Forum, with support from the Quality Development Team (this team supports improvements in quality across commissioned care home services).”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the new form and supporting examples with teams through Team Meeting Safety Briefs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The new form, and examples to support learning, will be shared with teams and will be included on Team Meeting Safety Briefs.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop audit questions, complete peer-review monitoring, and report findings through monthly Matron Reports to local quality groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Audit questions will be developed to monitor these changes which will be completed by Ward Managers and Matrons and included in the peer reviews across our services. The audit findings will be included in the monthly Matron Reports into local quality groups for assurance.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response
  2. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Maureen Alison Woollen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maureen Alison Woollen was discharged to Deerlands Residential Home after being identified as at high risk of falls. She was later found on the floor, developed facial bruising and reduced food and drink intake, and was admitted to hospital with an intracerebral haemorrhage, from which she died; concerns included missed opportunities to seek medical attention, inadequate care-note use, and failure to conduct a falls risk assessment on admission.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct falls risk assessments on admission

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest found there were missed opportunities to conduct a falls risk assessment on Mrs Woollen's arrival to Deerlands Residential home, to seek medical attention when she was found on the floor on 3 October 2023, to seek medical attention when a bruise on her face was noted on 6 October 2023 and to monitor the progression of her bruise. I am concerned there is no process in place to ensure medical attention is promptly sought for residents who require it, that care notes are not fully utilised, especially for the recording of injury and incidents, and that falls risk assessments are not being conducted on admission. ”

    Source location

    Maureen Alison Woollen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update admissions, falls prevention and risk-assessment policies to require timely assessment, injury monitoring and medical escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The admissions policy was reviewed and updated on 1 July 2024 to further outline that falls risk assessment are to be completed prior to or on admission to Sheffcare homes. This will include a”

    Source location

    Reponse from Sheffcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out refresher training on pre-admission assessments, detailed care notes, falls documentation and escalation, using anonymised scenarios and monthly monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The importance of maintaining care notes was discussed at the Deputy Managers’ meeting on 2 July 2024 [see document 9]. Sheffcare already have sophisticated Person–Centred Software, but this does not appear to have been used effectively at the time of Mrs Woollen’s care. Sheffcare has now improved the training sessions which already focus on the importance of keeping timely and accurate care notes by incorporating within the existing training real and anonymised scenarios to reinforce to staff understanding. The software includes training around ensuring a falls risk assessment is completed on admission. Falls (witnessed or otherwise) must be documented in the Person–Centred Care system and there is a monitoring and tracking section in the notes. This is audited.”

    Source location

    Reponse from Sheffcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss falls, documentation and escalation requirements with staff through huddles, supervision and management briefings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Directly after the incident with Mrs Woollen, the service met with staff at Deerland and what is known as “huddles” were carried out [see document 7]. A huddle is an informal meeting at which matters to celebrate as well as concerns are raised directly with staff. The incident with Mrs Woollen was discussed and staff were reminded of the policies in relation to falls risk, documentation, and escalation it has also been part of their mandatory training and discussed in supervisions. [see document 8].”

    Source location

    Reponse from Sheffcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Analyse Person-Centred Care falls-assessment data and present findings to the Quality Committee.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ met with Care Plan Coordinators on 16 July 2024. The Care Plan Coordinator role and remit is to upload the PCS notes from assessment and ensure that all assessments are undertaken. They support the operational management team in building care plans on PCS and ensure care plans are kept under close review. The meeting focussed on ensuring that falls risk assessments are in place prior to admission or on admission day, along with care plan review processes. ████████ is undertaking an analysis of PCS falls assessment data, which will provide additional reassurances that all residents have falls risk assessments in place and any additional information around the management of falls is appropriately reviewed. The initial findings will be presented at the 22 August 2024 Quality Committee meeting, and this will be completed by 31 August 2024.”

    Source location

    Reponse from Sheffcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response
  3. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Catherine Jux · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Catherine Jux died aged 86 on 5 April 2021 while being transported to hospital by ambulance after choking on food at Elvy Court Nursing Home. The substantive concerns were that a risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours of admission, staff did not identify this omission, and the home lacked an adequate auditing process for completed assessments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete risk assessments within 24 hours of admission

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was given by Nursing Home manager and Nursing staff at the Elvy Court Nursing Home that: (1) Due to an oversight by the home a risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours of the patient being admitted to the home. (2) None of the Care Home staff who attended to the patient and who would refer to this risk assessment to assess a patient’s daily needs and requirements noticed the oversight in respect of this. (3) There is not an adequate process in place for auditing that assessments have been completed particularly given the homes policy that they are completed within 24 hours of admission. ”

    Source location

    Catherine Jux · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony Slack · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony Slack, who had underlying health issues including asbestos-related pulmonary fibrosis, suffered an unwitnessed fall at a care home and waited over four hours for an ambulance. He later deteriorated, was transferred to hospital, and died on 13 April 2020. Concerns included limited care-home documentation and observations, unclear Covid-19 admission risk assessment and PPE arrangements, and ambulance delays linked to pandemic-related capacity pressures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of risk assessment for admission of new residents

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The inquest heard that after the home went into lockdown Covid 19 was found in residents within the home. At the inquest the home were unclear if staff had brought it into the home or if the admission of residents from the community who were not tested for Covid 19 before admission were the cause of the entering the home. There was no risk assessment in place relating to admission of new residents. ”

    Source location

    Anthony Slack · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support development of adult social care guidance on admissions, hospital discharges, infection prevention and control, PPE and visiting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “PHE has supported DHSC and NHS England in the development of a number of guidance documents to support the adult social care sector in responding to the pandemic, including guidance on admission and care of residents, discharge of residents from hospital, infection prevention and control, personal protective equipment and visiting.”

    Source location

    2020-0264-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake an unannounced focused inspection of the care home covering infection control, risk management, falls, records and access to health support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of the concerns raised by the Coroner at the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Mr. Slack which resulted in the prevention of future deaths report, CQC undertook an unannounced, focused inspection of The Vicarage Residential Care Home. This was undertaken to ensure that the circumstances of Mr. Slack’s death did not raise concerns about any ongoing risk to current service users”

    Source location

    2020-0264-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the admissions policy using current infection-control and public-health guidance, including testing requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed our admission policy and are keeping it under regular review adding to it based on new guidance being provided by the local authority, PHE and our local infection prevention team based at Tameside General hospital. | Continue to monitor”

    Source location

    2020-0264-Response-from-Vicarage-Care-Home-Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other named organisations, including the care home, regulators, NHS England, and the local partnership, were responsible for commenting on remaining concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “PHE understands that the Regulation 28 Report has been sent to the Care Quality Commission, The Vicarage Residential Care Home, NHS England, Greater Manchester Health and social care partnership who will be able to comment on the remaining concerns. Additionally, PHE has shared this report with the DHSC who will provide further comment.”

    Source location

    2020-0264-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing admission controls, including government guidance, isolation and regular testing, are considered sufficient to manage infection risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Throughout the Covid 19 pandemic government guidance has been issued to providers on admissions to care homes and testing of staff. This did not at the time of Mr Slacks death include the requirement to test staff or residents before admission.”

    Source location

    2020-0264-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response
  5. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Mildred Horrex · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mildred Horrex suffered an unwitnessed fall while sleeping in a chair at Pelham House on 30 December 2017, sustaining fractures to her C1 and C2 vertebrae, and died in hospital on 18 January 2018. The concerns identified were poor and sometimes inaccurate record keeping, insufficient information for an adequate fall-risk assessment, and discrepancies between medication records and the amount of medication held that were not detected by audits.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain sufficient and accurate information before admission

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the Inquest it was clear that overall the record keeping in respect of Mildred was poor. There was insufficient information taken about Mildred by the home before her admission to Pelham House, the information that was taken was at times inaccurate and this lead to an inadequate fall risk assessment being insufficient. ”

    Source location

    Mildred Horrex · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Restructure the pre-admission assessment process, expand forms to capture activities of daily living, and obtain family sign-off.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Pelham house response of actions taken. POINT 1 Pelham house restructured the whole pre-assessment process the paper work was updated and now reflects all aspects of an individual’s ADL as well as the existing questions (this was already in place just with some more information areas”

    Source location

    2020-0126-Response-from-Pelham-House.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record admission-related telephone calls to preserve relevant information about residents’ history and needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “to highlight and family members are now signing the pre-assessment forms to agree to what has been documented) family members continue to sit with management and go through the individuals life and health history the family still continue to assist with the care planning with the individual present so we can get a good understanding of need, we also now have recorded calls something that would have been very beneficial at the time of the MH arrival and passing, we also have a new care plan system that is recognised by CQC and this is working very well and has all information risk assessments and an audit trail, it allows a gateway should relatives wish to log in and see what’s happening on a daily basis, Pelham house also employs an external auditor who comes to audit monthly and sooner where needed and is always available for advice all care plans and risk assessments are reviewed”

    Source location

    2020-0126-Response-from-Pelham-House.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Obtain patient summaries from GPs for current and newly admitted residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “POINT 2 medication Medication is audited monthly CCG / Kamsons pharmacy myself and the GP have worked together to ensure safe practices are ongoing. Home manager Audits internally alongside the deputy manager and there is a visible summary at the end of the audit to highlight any potential concerns. External auditor also audits medication and administration when he visits. There is ongoing support from the CCG and Kamsons pharmacy After a request from myself GPs now provide patient summaries for all residents that are currently in Pelham house and coming in to Pelham house.”

    Source location

    2020-0126-Response-from-Pelham-House.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The available admission information supported a sufficient falls risk assessment, disputing that inadequate information caused an insufficient assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response Prior to admission the family had a meeting with the manager of the home and the deputy manager, they themselves provided all the information to us everything they believed relevant, my deputy questioned them about falls history and they said mum is NOT a high risk of falling having only one fall whilst in her own home, all information was provided by themselves, the risk assessment was sufficient at the time it was extremely difficult to explain the workings of the system in a court room with individuals that have never used a care plan system before I believe this is why the coroner made the comment about record keeping, ( the paramedic in the court room understood perfectly well as he was familiar with the system) the system we used took the information provided by the family and generated a falls score, MH had not fallen in Pelham prior to her death and this meant that a”

    Source location

    2020-0126-Response-from-Pelham-House.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response
  6. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edna May Davenport, a resident of Oak Court House residential care home, sustained head injuries during an unwitnessed assault by another resident and died in hospital on 12 December 2019. The report raised concerns about the removal of her alarm without documented alternative arrangements, inadequate recording and monitoring of observations, insufficient risk assessment of the other resident, and delays in responding to signs of head injury and deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake violence risk assessments after admission or incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) I heard evidence during the inquest that the other resident suspected to have been the assailant was a new referral to the home and that there was a lack of information on her admission. The evidence at inquest was that staff were unaware that she was aggressive as a result of her vascular dementia. There was some evidence identified during the police investigation that this resident had attacked a member of staff shortly after her admission and that she had been inappropriately placed at Oak Court house. There was no evidence that any risk assessment had been undertaken after that resident’s admission or after the first alleged attack to address the risk of violence that the resident posed to others by virtue of the extent of her dementia; ”

    Source location

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of information on admission of new residents

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) I heard evidence during the inquest that the other resident suspected to have been the assailant was a new referral to the home and that there was a lack of information on her admission. The evidence at inquest was that staff were unaware that she was aggressive as a result of her vascular dementia. There was some evidence identified during the police investigation that this resident had attacked a member of staff shortly after her admission and that she had been inappropriately placed at Oak Court house. There was no evidence that any risk assessment had been undertaken after that resident’s admission or after the first alleged attack to address the risk of violence that the resident posed to others by virtue of the extent of her dementia; ”

    Source location

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026