Recurring concern
Unreliable operation of Suicide Vulnerability Risk Assessment processes
- Reports that mention this concern
- 3
- Times this concern has been raised
- 3
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 4
What this concern includes
Includes failures in the named Suicide Vulnerability Risk Assessment or VRM process, including training and refresher training, understanding of its purpose, implementation of post-assessment measures, risk-reduction actions and related competence assurance.
What is not included
- Excludes generic suicide-risk assessment, self-harm prevention or prison ACCT concerns where the Suicide Vulnerability Risk Assessment or VRM process is not identified.
- Excludes generic staff training, supervision or communication deficiencies unless they directly impair operation of the VRM process.
- Excludes failures in downstream care or protective action after VRM measures have been reliably assessed and implemented, unless the VRM process itself is deficient.
- Excludes unrelated risk-assessment systems, hazards and beneficiary groups without an explicit connection to the same VRM or Suicide Vulnerability Risk Assessment process.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient focus in VRM training on reducing risk and preventing suicide
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Ministry of Defence
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Ministry of Defence
Establish a working group to review all aspects of mental-health and wellbeing training, including suicide prevention, risk understanding and Vulnerability Risk Management.
-
Ministry of Defence
Publish recommendations from the mental-health and wellbeing training review.
-
Ministry of Defence
Update training policy using the published recommendations.
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient DCMH clinician influence in vulnerability risk management for suicidal soldiers
This report raised 10 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Ministry of Defence
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Ministry of Defence
Operate VRMIS with clinician and supporting-professional access to care action plans, subject to consent, within a multidisciplinary vulnerability-risk-management process.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Ministry of Defence
The VRM process requires medical involvement, including attendance at risk conferences and reviews, so clinicians are not excluded from managing suicidal vulnerability.
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient training and follow-up training for staff implementing Suicide Vulnerability Risk Assessment measures
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026