Recurring concern

Unreliable shift handover processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Nov 2013•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of shift-change handover processes, including incomplete handover content, failure to review or communicate relevant information, and premature destruction or unavailable handover records where this impairs reference by responsible staff.

Not included

  • Excludes clinical handover failures between services or teams where no shift-change handover process is identified.
  • Excludes generic record-retention deficiencies involving records unrelated to shift handover.
  • Excludes failures of patient observations, care delivery or escalation where the shift-handover process is not itself deficient.
  • Excludes generic communication or documentation deficiencies that are not specifically part of a shift-change handover.
Reports
36

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
41

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
50

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

HM Prison and Probation Service4
Care Quality Commission2
Department of Health and Social Care2
Ministry of Justice2
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust2
Alternative Futures Group Limited1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Bedford Prison1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Bolton NHS Foundation Trust1
Care UK Limited1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
Devon Partnership NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Susan Dale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Susan Dale, a resident of Westfields Residential Home, fell while being assisted with her morning routine on 8 April 2026 and later deteriorated, was taken to hospital, and died on 18 April 2026. The principal concerns were inaccurate and inconsistent records about the fall, moving her despite a recorded possible head injury without prompt clinical assessment, and the absence of an effective handover to staff taking over her care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide handover information between care shifts

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The senior care worker who came on shift later that day said she did not receive any hand over from the staff going off shift. This is a concern as observations need to be carried out when someone has fallen and banged their head and a handover would detail such incidents and whether there are any concerns with residents. ”

    Source location

    Susan Dale · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace the paper diary with a structured handover process providing staff with shared resident information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A new structured handover process is now replacing the old paperback diary format at Westfield ensuring all members of staff can access the same information readily, to ensure all staff are well educated on each residents health.”

    Source location

    Response from Westfield Residential Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an unannounced inspection assessing record keeping, falls management and staff handover processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of the Regulation 28 Report, CQC have initiated a review of this incident in line with our specific incident guidance. CQC also conducted an unannounced inspection of Westfield Residential Home on 21 July 2026. The matters of concern highlighted in the Regulation 28 Report helped to inform our inspection activity and ensure there was a particular focus on record keeping, safe management of falls and handover processes.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No regulatory action is currently required because inspection found no ongoing risk issues relating to the concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During our unannounced inspection, in respect of any ongoing risk posed to service users, CQC did not identify any issues relating to the matters of concern raised that would require any regulatory action.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspection evidence identified no concerns with handover processes between staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to our recent inspection of the service last month, we reviewed handover processes as part of our assessment of whether the service was providing safe care and treatment to all who use the service. Evidence available and gathered in relation to handover processes between staff did not identify any concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response
  2. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruariri Thomas Stewart, aged 29, died from fatal cocaine toxicity at Weaver Lodge Independent Hospital on 31 July 2025 after a period of unescorted leave during which he probably obtained cocaine. The report identifies concerns about failures in documentation, communication, information sharing, leave decision-making, substance-misuse management, record keeping, and the quality of post-incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include recent drug-use information in shift handovers

    Wider context from the report

    “6. On multiple occasions information about recent drug use was not part of the shift handover notes ”

    Source location

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require material disclosures in handovers and MDTs, using an updated handover template with monthly senior-practitioner and registered-manager audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff are required, and have been reminded to record in handover notes and MDT meetings, all material disclosures. To help with this process, the handover template has been reviewed and updated, to ensure it adheres to national standards and guidance. The adequacy of handover notes, and sufficiency of information provided, is reviewed monthly by a senior practitioner, and are also audited by a service’s registered manager to ensure appropriate completion and provision of information.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response
  3. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    James Fitzpatrick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Fitzpatrick, an 89-year-old man with decompensated heart failure and respiratory illness, became unresponsive after coughing and was found with food material in his mouth; his death was confirmed on 14 February 2024. The principal concerns were the lack of written national and local guidance for care handovers, and the risk that incomplete or incorrect handover information could affect patient care and contribute to a future death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure accurate and complete handover information

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Two weeks prior to his death, Jim was moved to another ward within Alderney Hospital. There was a verbal handover undertaken which was recorded in the electronic patient records. No written handover was provided. The patient records referred to him being a “high risk of choking” and “on an unofficial soft diet”. This information was not true and was not recorded anywhere else in his records or risk assessments. (5) Further evidence was given that at the time of Jim’s death there were a number of agency workers at Alderney Hospital, and they would rely on information provided to them at the start of their shift during the handover as they would not have time to go through each patient’s records to appraise themselves of the patient’s history and risks. A daily written handover sheet was provided at the beginning of each shift which would be updated during the day, however from the daily handover sheet provided to the Court for the day of Jim’s death, pertinent general information about Jim was missing from that handover sheet. (6) The lack of written local and national guidance on the handover of a patient’s care creates a risk that incorrect or incomplete information can be passed to those caring for an individual which may impact upon the patient’s care and may lead to a future death. ”

    Source location

    James Fitzpatrick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen Good medical practice standards on continuity of care, information sharing, safe delegation and handover responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recently completed a review of Good medical practice and the latest version (effective from 30 January 2024) was developed following an extensive public consultation process, involving members of the professions, the public, patients and other stakeholders. Analysis of the responses revealed that team working and continuity of care were priority themes and we strengthened the guidance in several areas to reflect this.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from General Medical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Analyse consultation responses on Leadership and management and Raising concerns guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our review of our guidance on Leadership and management and Raising concerns”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from General Medical Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop updated Leadership and management and Raising concerns guidance following the consultation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have recently conducted a public consultation on these two pieces of guidance, and we are in the process of analysing the results. We intend to publish a report on the findings of the consultation later this year and will go on to develop an updated version of the guidance. We will consider the concerns raised in your report as part of this review process.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from General Medical Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver outreach talks and workshops supporting implementation of professional standards, including communication, teamwork, information sharing and patient safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Outreach teams across the UK regularly give talks and run workshops on the implementation of our guidance to our registrants. These workshops will often highlight the importance of communication, teamwork, ensuring effective information sharing and prioritising patient safety.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from General Medical Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore opportunities to promote handover, continuity of care, teamwork and communication expectations through Outreach when promoting updated guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will explore opportunities to promote our expectations regarding handovers, continuity of care, team working and communication with our Outreach team as we look to promote and implement our updated guidance on Leadership and management and Raising concerns.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from General Medical Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish a guideline recommending structured patient handovers during transitions of care for adults receiving emergency and acute medical care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NICE has published limited guidance in this area. NICE guideline Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation (NG94) covers organising and delivering emergency and acute medical care for people aged over 16 in the community and in hospital, and recommends the use of structured handovers during transitions of care. The NICE quality standard Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s (QS174) states in quality statement 4 that ‘Adults admitted with a medical emergency have a structured patient handover during transitions of care’. However, these recommendations do not quite apply to the circumstances of this report”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish a quality standard requiring structured patient handovers during transitions of care for adults admitted with a medical emergency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NICE has published limited guidance in this area. NICE guideline Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation (NG94) covers organising and delivering emergency and acute medical care for people aged over 16 in the community and in hospital, and recommends the use of structured handovers during transitions of care. The NICE quality standard Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s (QS174) states in quality statement 4 that ‘Adults admitted with a medical emergency have a structured patient handover during transitions of care’. However, these recommendations do not quite apply to the circumstances of this report”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and take SBAR-based inpatient handover guidance through internal governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are committed to ensuring that the development and implementation of the new pan-Dorset electronic health record in 2028 prioritises a robust, accurate, and live handover function to support safe and consistent practice across all services.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prioritise a robust, accurate, live handover function in the pan-Dorset electronic health record planned for 2028.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are committed to ensuring that the development and implementation of the new pan-Dorset electronic health record in 2028 prioritises a robust, accurate, and live handover function to support safe and consistent practice across all services.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Scope handover processes across all mental health inpatient units by June 2026 to identify required changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside this immediate action to develop this guidance we have adopted a focus on handovers as a Trust Quality Priority for 2026/27. As part of this work, the first action is to scope the handover processes across all mental health inpatient units by June 2026. This will allow us to understand current approaches, the reasoning behind them, and what changes are required in light of the learning from this inquest whilst we await the new electronic health record. Establishing the Quality Priority for “Improving Inpatient and Transfer of Care Handovers”, means that audits of any incidents relating to concerns regarding handover processes will be reviewed and reported through the Directorate Management Groups for oversight and assurance. The auditing processes will be undertaken between June 2026 and March 2027.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit handover-related incidents across inpatient wards, report findings through governance groups, and monitor progress quarterly through March 2027.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside this immediate action to develop this guidance we have adopted a focus on handovers as a Trust Quality Priority for 2026/27. As part of this work, the first action is to scope the handover processes across all mental health inpatient units by June 2026. This will allow us to understand current approaches, the reasoning behind them, and what changes are required in light of the learning from this inquest whilst we await the new electronic health record. Establishing the Quality Priority for “Improving Inpatient and Transfer of Care Handovers”, means that audits of any incidents relating to concerns regarding handover processes will be reviewed and reported through the Directorate Management Groups for oversight and assurance. The auditing processes will be undertaken between June 2026 and March 2027.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing guidance from the NMC, GMC, NHS England and CQC is sufficient, so further NICE guidance on handovers is unlikely to improve safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have carefully considered this request, and our conclusion is that further NICE guidance in this area would not add to the guidance already available from other organisations such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) the General Medical Council (GMC) and NHS England and overseen by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). I have explained our reasoning for this below”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The NMC is responsible for responding to concerns about incorrect information handed over during a previous patient transfer.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. In a previous transfer, incorrect information was handed over about the person concerned This area of concern is for the NMC to respond to.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    An additional general recommendation to include all pertinent information in written handover sheets is unlikely to be effective.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Staff relied on information provided to them at the start of their shift during the handover and a daily written handover sheet, provided at the beginning of each shift and updated during the day I have addressed this point above in explaining the various guidelines that exist for healthcare practitioners. We do not feel that an additional general recommendation to ‘ensure all pertinent information is included in written handover sheets’ is likely to prove effective.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing professional standards adequately address communication, handover, record keeping, risk escalation and safe transfer of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While we recognise the concerns raised, we consider that communication, handover, record keeping, escalation of risk, and the safe transfer of responsibility for care are already addressed adequately within the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s professional standards, including The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates and the Standards of proficiency for registered nurses.”

    Source location

    2026-0087 - Response from Nursing and Midwifery Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian tied a fatal ligature in her room on Longview Ward on 17 April 2021 and died two days later in hospital. The principal concerns included inadequate and falsified observations, insufficiently trained and staffed ward personnel, poor communication about ligaturing and self-harm, medication-recording errors, failures involving Oxevision, and other care and record-keeping deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to hand over vital self-harm and ligature information at shift change

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was poor communication between ward staff and vital information about self-harm and ligaturing was not handed over on shift change. It was undisputed that Elise tied 12 Ligatures between 7ᵗʰ and 14ᵗʰ April and ████████ on 15 April. The Datix incident recording gave minimal details and only the ligatures from the 13ᵗʰ and 14ᵗʰ were recorded on the whiteboard in the nurse’s office. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic SBAR handovers to improve communication of patient safety information between shifts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has also implemented changes to handover process using SBAR – an electronic handover system.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response
  5. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Steven HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Hart was remanded to HMP Bedford in November 2022 and, after episodes of self-harm and deterioration in his mental health, was found unresponsive in his cell on 25 March 2023 after using a ligature attached to a faulty observation panel. He was taken to hospital and died on 29 March 2023 from asphyxiation due to hanging. The principal concerns were failures in cell safety, communication and handovers, mental health assessment, and the carrying out and escalation of observations after self-harm incidents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate relevant risk information through handovers and records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Failure to Adequately Monitor and Audit Cells for Ligature Points Mr Hart was placed in a “safer cell” designed to have no ligature points. However, the observation panel ████████ was broken, ████████ which he was able to thread a ligature and hang himself. Staff and witnesses confirmed that the damage to the cell door was known, and that maintenance was generally responsive, but the cell was not taken out of use despite the increased risk. The prison’s own post-inquest review acknowledged that the design of the observation panels allowed prisoners to open them from inside, creating an opportunity for self-harm. Interim and permanent solutions were only implemented after the Inquest had commenced nearly two and a half years after Steven's death indicating a likely failure to tackle safety concerns promptly or appropriately. 2. Failure to Effectively Communicate Risk and Incidents There was a general failure to distribute and communicate relevant observations and concerns regarding Mr Hart’s mental state. Staff often did not have time to receive handovers or read current and previous ACCT (Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork) documents during their shift. After a serious self-harm incident with Steven involving ████████ the officer involved failed to report the incident to OSCAR 1 (the officer in charge), as required by protocol. He simply removed the ████████ and did not conduct any further assessment or review of Steven. This failure prevented a multi-disciplinary review and possible escalation of risk management. The night shift handover on 25 March 2023 was insufficient, with lack of vital information provided to the receiving officer, leading to inadequate understanding of Mr Hart’s risk. 3. Failure to Carry Out Appropriate Observations Observations of Mr Hart were reduced from constant supervision to four irregular checks per hour, despite ongoing risk factors and recent self-harm attempts. CCTV evidence suggested that required observations were not always carried out to the proper standard, and some checks may not have been performed at all. The officer insisted they were carried out, although CCTV evidence strongly suggested that was improbable. The jury found that the failure to call OSCAR 1 after the telephone cord incident directly impacted Mr Hart, as it possibly prevented a further ACCT review and escalation of observations or removal of ligature materials. The death of Steven Hart was contributed to by systemic failings in cell safety, communication, and observation practices. There were, paradoxically, along-side poor practice and care, examples of exceptionally good practice by a group of officers of which several have left the prison service. There was generally a failure to implement robust systems for cell safety audits, enforce effective communication and handover protocols, and ensure strict compliance with observation requirements for vulnerable prisoners. ”

    Source location

    Steven HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen shift handovers through clearer risk-information sharing expectations and allocated time for comprehensive handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Handover procedures have also been strengthened to ensure that vital information is communicated effectively. Staff are supported through clearer expectations in relation to information sharing when there is evidence of a prisoners change to risk or presentation. Time has been allocated to facilitate comprehensive handovers between shifts, particularly in relation to those who are being supported by the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 October 2025

    Open published response
  6. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Edith Theresa PYE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edith Theresa PYE sustained a fracture after rolling from her bed at Chandler Court Care Home on 29 March 2024 while receiving personal care from one carer instead of the required two. She underwent an above-knee amputation, developed a chest infection and pulmonary emboli, and died at the care home on 28 April 2024. Concerns included ambiguous care-plan and handover information, inadequate staff awareness and compliance, lack of auditing, and weaknesses in the internal investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of handover documents to communicate required personal-care staffing arrangements

    Wider context from the report

    “3) At the inquest, I was shown a handover document which had been drafted by the home’s Deputy Manager, and was told that a nurse in charge would have gone through this document with all carers at the beginning of the relevant shift. The document was meant to highlight each resident’s care needs, based on their respective care plans. It did not make clear that Mrs. Pye required two carers for the provision of personal care, or that at least one of those carers should be female; ”

    Source location

    Edith Theresa PYE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce key workers, alongside shift leads, to maintain knowledge of residents’ care needs and disseminate key information to teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, Chandler Court now involves key workers who, along with the shift leads, are responsible for having a sound knowledge of the residents’ care needs and disseminating key information to their teams.”

    Source location

    2024-0706 - Response from Care UK Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review handover templates so they highlight key aspects of each resident’s care needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care UK has reviewed our handover templates to ensure that they highlight the key aspects of each resident’s care needs.”

    Source location

    2024-0706 - Response from Care UK Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review handover sheets weekly and update them when residents’ care needs change, under management supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At Chandler Court, handover sheets are now reviewed by the Deputy Manager at the weekly clinical review meetings to ensure accuracy. In addition, any changes to a resident’s care needs are reported during the daily morning meetings and the person in charge of the suite, which would either be the Team Leader and/or Registered Nurse, is directed to complete the relevant update under the supervision of either the Deputy Manager or the Home Manager.”

    Source location

    2024-0706 - Response from Care UK Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response
  7. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Michael John BURKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael John Burke, who had advanced lung disease and COPD, died on 2 February 2023 after developing pneumonia and sustaining a fractured neck of femur in a fall on a hospital ward. The principal concern was that Ipswich Hospital lacked adequate arrangements for completing, highlighting and handing over falls-risk assessments, leaving the assessment incomplete when he fell.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate handover arrangements for outstanding falls assessments between shifts

    Wider context from the report

    “The Court heard evidence that risk assessments were to be carried out regularly on patients in relation to their falls risk. This is particularly important in circumstances where a patient was being transferred between wards/units within the hospital and where the risk to the patient may change due to the change in environment. Mr. BURKE was such a risk from falling whilst on the ward and therefore arrangements were required to be put in place to manage this risk, informed by a risk assessment. He had been admitted to Ipswich Hospital on 26th January 2023 following an unimpressed fall at rehabilitation centre where he had been discharged to from Ipswich Hospital the previous day; 25th January 2023. Mr. BURKE was moved to a new ward on the 30th January 2023 following his admission, assessment and initial treatment. He was not risk assessed when transferred to the ward and the outstanding task to carry out the risk assessment had not been completed by the end of the shift during which he had been transferred onto the ward. This requirement was not handed over to the on-coming shift and a falls risk assessment had not been completed at the time Mr. BURKE sustained a fall on the ward. I am concerned that Ipswich Hospital has inadequate arrangements in place to both highlight circumstances where the requirement for risk assessments have not been completed and in the arrangements for the handover of tasks (particularly falls assessments) between shifts. I am further concerned that the failure to have adequate arrangements in place to address this raises a risk of future deaths which I am under a duty to bring to your attention. ”

    Source location

    Michael John BURKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Ellen Ocean WOOLNOUGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ellen Ocean WOOLNOUGH was found suspended by a ligature at her home on 20 July 2022 after concerns had arisen about her physical and mental health. Resuscitation restored circulation, but she suffered an irreversible hypoxic brain injury and died in hospital on 28 July 2022. The principal concerns relate to mental health service discharge decisions after failed engagement, the response to urgent referrals including risk assessment and safety planning, the implementation of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, and the preservation of call recordings and other evidence.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of a handover document between shifts for urgent referral downgrading

    Wider context from the report

    “ii. Whilst the downgrade policy concerning urgent referrals has been tightened up, key parts of the process, such as the handover document between shifts, is still to be introduced. ”

    Source location

    Ellen Ocean WOOLNOUGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed the updated handover document in East CRHTT practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Whilst the downgrade policy concerning urgent referrals has been tightened up, key parts of the process, such as the handover document between shifts, is still to be introduced.”

    Source location

    Response from Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit handover-document use monthly and report findings through local and Trust quality-assurance structures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To secure assurance that we are adhering to required practice when a referral is being considered for regrade, we have commenced an audit of the hand over document. An audit commenced week commencing 13.05.24. This audit will continue on a monthly cycle for assurance and improvement purposes.”

    Source location

    Response from Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response
  9. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann Hatch · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann Hatch underwent repeat hiatus hernia surgery at a private hospital on 31 August 2022 and became unwell overnight. She was transferred to an NHS hospital, treated for septic shock and organ failure for six weeks, and died on 18 October 2022. The report identifies concerns about overnight monitoring, escalation, staffing competence, record-keeping, and delays in investigations and treatment; evidence at the Inquest indicated that the failings contributed to her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assure agency nurses’ competence, induction and handover

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Mrs Hatch was cared for during the night by an agency nurse who had not worked at the hospital previously. No records were produced to the Inquest to demonstrate she was (a) competent (b) had an induction to the hospital or (c) received a handover at the start of the shift. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Hatch · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share and discuss RCA findings with the nursing agency and implement a competency checklist signed by agency staff and the supplier.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the learning from this event, the team at Spire Leeds have shared and discussed the findings in the RCA with this nurse’s agency. The core supplier competency checklist includes requires that agency staff are competent in the management of the deteriorating patient. The new checklist must be signed by the candidate as well as the agency to ensure both are confirming the information is correct.”

    Source location

    Response from Spire Healthcare Limited
    Page 4 · response
    Published 7 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide deteriorating-patient training to agency staff through the supplier competency process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the learning from this event, the team at Spire Leeds have shared and discussed the findings in the RCA with this nurse’s agency. The core supplier competency checklist includes requires that agency staff are competent in the management of the deteriorating patient. The new checklist must be signed by the candidate as well as the agency to ensure both are confirming the information is correct.”

    Source location

    Response from Spire Healthcare Limited
    Page 4 · response
    Published 7 July 2023

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    James John Jude Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Booth, who had longstanding mental ill-health and was detained at The Priory, Altrincham, absconded on 7 October 2020 and was found dead on 14 October 2020; the medical cause of death was hanging. The principal concerns were inadequate security of the ward garden, including the fence, inadequate risk assessments, and failures to communicate and document repeated incidents and emerging risk between shifts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and transfer adverse-event information through shift handovers

    Wider context from the report

    “Matter Two The evidence showed that there was no appreciation of the emerging pattern of behaviour. A major contributing factor was the lack of exchange and transfer of information at the handover between the consecutive shifts. In particular, the form specifically designed for this with a section for completion – ‘incidents in last 7 days’ which would have provided an information flow through was not completed. Whilst I heard evidence of steps taken to improve information exchange at a higher level than between ward staff (nurses and HCAs) I was very surprised to hear that no audit of these ‘handover documents’ had been carried out. Given the fundamental importance of the exchange of information between each shift and consecutive shifts I am of the opinion that The Priory have not carried out a sufficiently robust review. Until this failure is addressed there is a significant risk of a breakdown in the communication of adverse events across the shift pattern of several days. The risk of a lack of appreciation of an emerging pattern of behaviour remains. ”

    Source location

    James John Jude Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Attend weekly ward shift handovers and check their content, accuracy and detail.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Both ████████ and the Altrincham Hospital Director of Clinical Services, ████████, will continue to attend shift handovers on each of the wards on at least a weekly basis and continue to check the content, accuracy and detail of those handovers. Your concern and the matter of conducting robust shift handovers has also been raised across the Priory Healthcare portfolio via safety bulletins issued to hospital staff reminding them to ensure that shift handovers make sufficient reference to previous incidents. Our internal compliance team and the divisional quality team have also continued to monitor the quality of handovers during their inspections. Again, where matters of concern have been identified these have been brought to the immediate attention of the hospital SMT.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate safety bulletins across Priory hospitals reminding staff to record previous incidents in shift handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Both ████████ and the Altrincham Hospital Director of Clinical Services, ████████, will continue to attend shift handovers on each of the wards on at least a weekly basis and continue to check the content, accuracy and detail of those handovers. Your concern and the matter of conducting robust shift handovers has also been raised across the Priory Healthcare portfolio via safety bulletins issued to hospital staff reminding them to ensure that shift handovers make sufficient reference to previous incidents. Our internal compliance team and the divisional quality team have also continued to monitor the quality of handovers during their inspections. Again, where matters of concern have been identified these have been brought to the immediate attention of the hospital SMT.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor handover quality through internal compliance and divisional quality inspections.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Both ████████ and the Altrincham Hospital Director of Clinical Services, ████████, will continue to attend shift handovers on each of the wards on at least a weekly basis and continue to check the content, accuracy and detail of those handovers. Your concern and the matter of conducting robust shift handovers has also been raised across the Priory Healthcare portfolio via safety bulletins issued to hospital staff reminding them to ensure that shift handovers make sufficient reference to previous incidents. Our internal compliance team and the divisional quality team have also continued to monitor the quality of handovers during their inspections. Again, where matters of concern have been identified these have been brought to the immediate attention of the hospital SMT.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and trial an electronic handover template that consolidates patient and incident information and enables contemporaneous content audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, a detailed handover template is being introduced across the Priory Healthcare sites (and this is currently being trialled on Rivendell ward at Altrincham in response to your Regulation 28 report). The handover template has the capacity to download information from different applications including the electronic patient record (CareNotes) and the incident reporting system (Datix). This will give a detailed picture of the patient’s current health and”

    Source location

    Response from Priory
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026