Recurring concern

Unreliable care-planning processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 Aug 2013•Latest report 2 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes missing, incomplete, unclear, outdated, uncoordinated, unreviewed or unimplemented formal person-level care plans and established named equivalents such as integrated care or care-and-crisis plans.

Not included

  • Excludes standalone procedural instructions, treatment steps, extubation plans and immediate deterioration-management plans unless the source explicitly identifies them as part of the person's formal care plan.
  • Excludes organisational improvement plans, staffing plans and operational contingency plans.
  • Excludes discharge planning, risk assessment, family involvement or generic records when that separate control is the concern and formal care-plan reliability is not directly asserted.
Reports
120

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
141

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
200

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care14
Care Quality Commission9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust7
NHS England7
Ministry of Justice5
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust4
Barts Health NHS Trust4
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust4
North East London NHS Foundation Trust4
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust3
Hc-One Limited3
HM Prison and Probation Service3
Office of the Chief Coroner3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Francis Leech · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Francis Leech, who had advanced dementia and other significant medical conditions, died on 26 August 2024 after a decline following severe facial injuries inflicted by another care home resident. The principal concerns were that the resident’s aggressive behaviour and associated risks were not properly reflected in updated care and behavioural support plans, and that management and the subsequent internal investigation failed to identify or address these deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of management system for checking and ensuring care and behavioural support plans are updated

    Wider context from the report

    “The care home resident who inflicted the facial injuries on Mr. Leech lived with advanced dementia, and over the six weeks leading up to that incident had been showing signs of unpredictably aggressive and violent behaviour. Although many of these episodes had been the subject of incident reports, neither his care plan nor his behavioural support plan had been properly updated to reflect these episodes, the risk which he presented, and measures to be taken to reduce that risk. The evidence at inquest showed that: (a) staff at the care home did not understand the importance of updating the care plan and behavioural support plan; (b) management at the care home had not instituted a system of checking and ensuring those plans were updated; and (c) the internal investigation carried out by the care home after the assault on Mr. Leech failed to recognize the deficiencies in those plans, or to put in place measures to ensure that those deficiencies were not repeated. ”

    Source location

    Francis Leech · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to update care and behavioural support plans to reflect aggression, risk and risk-reduction measures

    Wider context from the report

    “The care home resident who inflicted the facial injuries on Mr. Leech lived with advanced dementia, and over the six weeks leading up to that incident had been showing signs of unpredictably aggressive and violent behaviour. Although many of these episodes had been the subject of incident reports, neither his care plan nor his behavioural support plan had been properly updated to reflect these episodes, the risk which he presented, and measures to be taken to reduce that risk. The evidence at inquest showed that: (a) staff at the care home did not understand the importance of updating the care plan and behavioural support plan; (b) management at the care home had not instituted a system of checking and ensuring those plans were updated; and (c) the internal investigation carried out by the care home after the assault on Mr. Leech failed to recognize the deficiencies in those plans, or to put in place measures to ensure that those deficiencies were not repeated. ”

    Source location

    Francis Leech · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly audits of resident care and behavioural support plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home’s management and senior care team are principally responsible for the creation, review and amendment of resident care plans and Behavioural Support Plans. Following creation, resident care plans and Behavioural Support Plans are reviewed and updated on a monthly basis or as required in response to changing resident care needs. Support from an individual with dementia expertise is also available to the Home to draw upon as required.”

    Source location

    Response from Adept Care Homes (Bowood Court)
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue management instruction reaffirming plan reviews, amendments and supporting risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the conclusion of the Inquest into Mr Leech’s death, a further instruction was issued to the Home management and senior care team reaffirming the expectations in relation to the review and amendment of Behaviour Support Plans and the introduction of supporting risk assessments in reflection of lessons learnt. We would also note that a new Home Manager and Care Manager are now in place with oversight of the Home following the incident involving Mr Leech.”

    Source location

    Response from Adept Care Homes (Bowood Court)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Current arrangements for oversight of care and behavioural support plans are considered appropriate in all the circumstances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Accordingly, the Home has taken steps to review the arrangements in place for the oversight of care plans and Behavioural Support plans which are now considered to be appropriate in all the circumstances.”

    Source location

    Response from Adept Care Homes (Bowood Court)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katharine Emma Corrigan, a patient detained under the Mental Health Act, died by suicide after failing to return from unescorted leave on 22 July 2023. The report identifies concerns about failures in the management and recording of Section 17 leave, inadequate risk assessments and care planning, staffing and oversight, and failures concerning access to recognised treatment for a pre-existing hormonal imbalance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain collaborative, complete and accurate risk assessments and care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Ms Corrigan’s risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that: a. They had not been developed in collaboration with her and did not contain: i. Early warning signs and triggers ii. Which mitigations were appropriate iii. Rationale as to why section 17 leaves were granted and/or rescinded b. With accurate risk information of her presentation and deterioration on the ward and with concerns raised by Family which were put in writing to the responsible clinician c. They contained inaccurate information on fire safety that had never been a part of her presentation . It was not understood where this had emanated from. d. That Ms Corrigan had tried to get rid of all her clothes and this was behaviour Ms Corrigan had previously displayed before attempting to end her life. e. That her mental health deteriorated in the days prior to her death and staff were concerned about the risks to herself due to her low mood. Nursing staff instigated the risk protocol such that Ms Corrigan should not have been able to access section 17 leave until reviewed by the multidisciplinary team and there was confusion about the Level of observations that had been put in place for Ms Corrigan on 21 July. Medical records and section 17 leave forms were not amended to ensure that staff could understand that due to her low mood with consequent risks, leave must not take place until a medical review. ”

    Source location

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Amy Clare CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amy Clare Chapman, who was experiencing a mental health crisis and assessed as at high risk of suicide, was admitted to the Haven Unit at Millview Hospital on 23 March 2025. On 27 March, she was permitted to leave the unit twice without adequate checking of her records, family contact, or documentation, and later jumped from a bridge, dying from her injuries. The principal concerns included insufficient risk assessment and planning for trips out, failures to read and record notes, inadequate family involvement, uncertainty over care and safety plans, and gaps in training, alerts, checklists, and auditing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Uncertainty about when formal safety plans or care plans should be completed

    Wider context from the report

    “5. I am concerned about what seems to be a lack of certainty concerning when formal safety plans (and/or care plans) should be completed. An informal one on admission followed by a full one after 24 hours seems reasonable, but the process and expectations ought to be clarified. ”

    Source location

    Amy Clare CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Haven Operational Policy to clarify care-plan timing and require recorded care planning from admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action has also been taken to ensure there is certainty about when a formal care and safety plan should be completed. The Haven Operational Policy has been updated (to be ratified imminently) to include the following specificity:”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 June 2026

    Open published response
  4. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Kiefer Kiam Bolangi Fraser-Phillips · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kiefer Kiam Bolangi Fraser-Phillips, who had treatment-resistant paranoid schizophrenia and several physical health conditions including sleep apnoea, was found deceased in bed at a mental health unit on 18 September 2025. The post-mortem medical cause of death was recorded as sudden unexplained death in schizophrenia. Concerns included incomplete recording of therapeutic observations because of Wi-Fi problems and the absence of a care plan addressing physical health risks associated with his medication and sleep apnoea.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of care plans addressing identified physical healthcare risks

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Many patients with enduring mental health conditions on long term medication will have significant physical health conditions due to the side effects of the medication. These often include considerable weight gain, and in Mr Fraser-Phillips' case sleep apnoea and the associated risk of position asphyxia. There was no care plan in place to address these risks. Consideration needs to be given to ensuring patients with significant physical healthcare needs have adequate care plans in place to address any risks identified. ”

    Source location

    Kiefer Kiam Bolangi Fraser-Phillips · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement Dialog+ Care Planning across inpatient services to document physical-health risks, mitigation actions and review plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care Planning Improvements: Implementation of Dialog+ Care Planning”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen ward-level Dialog+ audits, including checks that physical-health risks have documented action plans and follow-up, with feedback to clinical teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Audit and Assurance Framework”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and audit Inpatient MDT standards to support follow-up of actions identified in physical-health action plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. In response to the Coroner’s concerns, the Trust has strengthened its Audit and Assurance Framework for Dialog+ Care Planning at ward level. This framework includes: - Routine ward-level audits of Dialog+ care plans - Specific checks that relevant domains are being appropriately used, including the Physical Health domain - Assurance that identified physical health risks are clearly reflected in the action plan, with proportionate and documented follow-up arrangements - Feedback to clinical teams and incorporation of findings into local quality improvement activity”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share learning from the case across inpatient teams on medication-related physical-health risks and documenting risks such as sleep apnoea, obesity and positional asphyxia.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Learning and Prevention of Future Risk”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response
  5. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruariri Thomas Stewart, aged 29, died from fatal cocaine toxicity at Weaver Lodge Independent Hospital on 31 July 2025 after a period of unescorted leave during which he probably obtained cocaine. The report identifies concerns about failures in documentation, communication, information sharing, leave decision-making, substance-misuse management, record keeping, and the quality of post-incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to create and complete required care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “9. Care plans that should have been in place were either not created at all or were not fully completed. ”

    Source location

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require admission care plans, 72-hour manager review, at least monthly named-nurse updates, and monthly audits of care-plan reviews and accuracy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Before a new service user is accepted into a service, an admission care plan is carried out, and this is uploaded to the DSR system. Within 72 hours of admission, the registered manager reviews the admission care plan to ensure that the correct care plan is in place and meets the individual’s needs. Following admission and initial review, the DSR system creates a prompt, assigned to a patient’s named nurse, to review and where necessary update the care plan on an at least monthly basis. Care plans will also be updated on a shorter timescale if there is a clinical need, for example an adverse event or change in a patient’s presentation/ risk profile. Care plan reviews and updates are audited on a monthly basis to ensure continuing compliance, so that any remedial actions can be taken swiftly if required.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a monthly clinician-led quality and practice development forum to coach and mentor nurses in care-plan best practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is also a clinician-led quality and practice development forum in place to coach and mentor nurses on care plan best practice, which meets monthly.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response
  6. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urmila Patel, aged 78, was admitted to hospital with suspected sepsis and later fell in a ward toilet on 29 June 2025. She subsequently deteriorated and died in hospital on 7 July 2025 after a CT scan identified a significant subdural haematoma. The concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, mobility care planning, supervision, assessment for intracranial bleeding, timely CT referral, and review of her warfarin after the fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to produce meaningful mobility care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The failure of nurses on the ward to instigate an adequate falls risk assessment of Mrs Patel. 2. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to produce a meaningful care-plan for Mrs Patel’s mobility. 3. The failure of Trust staff to note a fall on 23rd June 2025 and reassess risk of falls. 4. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to monitor and supervise Mrs Patel on the afternoon of 29th June 2025. 5. The failure of Trust staff to adequately assess the likelihood of a traumatic intra-cranial bleed following the fall on 29th June 2025. 6. The failure of the duty doctor to act decisively and refer Mrs Patel for an urgent CT Head scan on 29th June 2025. 7. The failure of the duty doctor to review Mrs Patel’s warfarin prescription after the fall. 8. The failure of ward staff on the ward round on 30th June 2025 to read the clinical records from the previous day to alert them to Mrs Patel’s fall on 29th June 2025. ”

    Source location

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver targeted falls-prevention education through ward teaching, safety huddles, induction and refresher training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Targeted education has been delivered to nursing staff, focusing on the timely completion of falls risk assessments on admission, recognition of dynamic risk, and the importance of translating assessed risk into clear and practical care plans. This has been reinforced through ward-based teaching, safety huddles, and incorporation into local induction and refresher training.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require ward managers and nurses in charge to review new admissions each shift for completed falls assessments and care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Accountability has been strengthened through clearer expectations of ward leadership. Ward managers and nurses in charge are now required to review new admissions each shift to confirm that falls risk assessments and associated care plans have been completed, with prompt action taken where gaps are identified.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce routine ward-level audits of falls assessments and care plans, with governance escalation, tracked actions and re-audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A programme of routine audit has been introduced to review both completion and quality of falls risk assessments and care plans. Findings are reviewed at ward level and escalated through Divisional Governance where required, with actions agreed, tracked, and re-audited.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a multidisciplinary falls quality-improvement programme covering footwear, medication review and post-fall multidisciplinary review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Falls prevention has also been strengthened through a multidisciplinary quality improvement programme, recognising the contribution of nursing, medical, therapy, and pharmacy teams. This includes initiatives focused on appropriate footwear, structured medication review (including medicines associated with increased falls risk), and consistent post-fall multidisciplinary review. To support assurance, a ward-level falls audit programme commenced on 2 February 2026, with the most recent audit completed on 14 April 2026. Early findings demonstrate high compliance with falls risk assessment (97.2%), improved initiation of falls care plans (83.3%), improved completion of lying and standing blood pressure (78%), and timely medical review following falls. These findings are reviewed through ward and divisional governance processes to support sustained improvement.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England, which oversees the issues raised, is responsible for responding directly to the Prevention of Future Deaths report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Given the concerns you have raised I feel it is important that you receive a response directly from NHS England as it has oversight for the issues you raise. Therefore, my officials have contacted NHS England who have agreed to respond to you directly about the Prevention of Future Death report concerning Mrs Patel.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response
  7. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Emmett Peter MORRISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emmett Peter Morrison, a serving prisoner at HMP Long Lartin, was found suspended by a ligature in his cell on 13 October 2024 and died from his injuries at hospital on 16 October 2024. The report raised concerns about the continued influx of illicit drugs into the prison and failures to record support actions in ACCT care plans and arrange a further ACCT review sooner.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record and implement support actions in ACCT care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “2) Failures in ACCT process Emmett was a prisoner with a considerable history of substance misuse and self-harm while in custody. Of the eight ACCT reviews which were conducted after Emmett's ACCT document was re-opened on 10.9.24, not one resulted in any support actions being entered onto the ACCT care plan. The ACCT care plan is a key part of the ACCT process, which requires those taking part in ACCT case reviews to set in train actions designed to reduce the prisoner’s risk of suicide or self-harm. As the guidance then in force made plain, it is a mandatory part of the ACCT process. The reasons given by staff who took part in these ACCT reviews for not having done this included: (i) being sure that they had talked about it, but had not noted anything down; (ii) thinking that, if EM didn’t attend an ACCT review, they couldn’t put any actions in place because that could only be done with his agreement; and (iii) they were so weighed down by the number of ACCT reviews which they had to carry out and the rest of their workload, that they simply had no time to complete this part of the review. Most worryingly, two of those witnesses who cited a heavy workload and pressures of work for Care Plans not being completed, made clear that not only this was commonplace at the time of these events but also that it is still an issue. Despite hearing evidence that measures have been put in place to train officers conducting ACCT reviews, and to conduct Quality Assurance checks on open ACCT documents, I was left with the clear impression that ACCT Care Plans are still being overlooked. I also note that as long ago as 2021 this court heard an inquest into the death of a prisoner at the same prison in 2018, following which I wrote a Prevention of Future Deaths report to the then Governing Governor of the prison, indicating my concern that ACCT Case Reviews for that prisoner had, on several occasions, failed to review or add actions to the ACCT Care Plan. It is therefore a concern that, 6 years on from that prisoner's death, the same issue arose in Emmett's case. As long as that remains the case, the lives of those vulnerable prisoners whom the ACCT process is designed to protect will continue to be put at risk. ”

    Source location

    Emmett Peter MORRISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Prison Safety Policy Framework requiring ACCT teams to identify, review and record support actions and care-plan decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding your concern about the ACCT process, the Prison Safety Policy Framework which was implemented on 1 January 2025, and superseded PSI 64/2011, requires that an ACCT case review team must set and review support actions to mitigate the risks identified. The ACCT Case Co-ordinator is expected to record the areas of risk discussed at a case review, update the Care Plan, including the support actions and note the rationale for the decisions of the case review team.”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and complete four local ACCT quality-assurance checks covering opening, reviews, complex-case oversight and closure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the death of Emmett Morrison, locally, the Quality Assurance processes have been updated, with four Quality Assurance checks introduced in line with the Prison Safety Policy Framework. These new checks are now completed at HMP Long Lartin as follows:”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor and upload ACCT assurance findings, sharing them for follow-up through case management and monthly Safety Meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Findings from these assurance checks are shared with the case co-ordinator, line manager and Safer Custody Managers for further action where required. All Quality Assurance checks are monitored and uploaded onto a Quality Assurance analysis tool, with findings fed back at the monthly Safety Meeting for follow-up action where appropriate.”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a single ACCT case-management allocation system assigning open cases to trained Supervising Officers or Custodial Managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, since the death, the prison has implemented a new single case management allocation system. All open ACCTs are now assigned to a Supervising Officer or, for complex cases, a Custodial Manager. Only staff who have completed the required two-day ACCT case review team course can be allocated ACCTs or conduct reviews.”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Schedule ACCT reviews around allocated coordinators’ duties and use a buddy system to maintain continuity and prevent over-allocation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As of 19 February 2026, the prison has 20 open ACCTs, each managed by an individual Case Co-ordinator. Reviews are scheduled for times when the allocated Case Co-ordinator is on duty, with others stepping in only in exceptional circumstances. A buddy system has also been introduced so a nominated colleague can cover tasks during absences, ensuring continuity of care and preventing over-allocation.”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Book refresher training for staff who misunderstood care-plan requirements when prisoners missed reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Witnesses who believed they could not add Care Plan actions because the prisoner had not attended the review are being booked onto refresher training, and the prison has also prioritised Suicide and Self-Harm Awareness Training (SASH) on monthly lockdown training days.”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide one-to-one ACCT coaching to 21 Case Coordinators with support from Safety Leads.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, National Safety Team colleagues provided one-to-one ACCT coaching to 21 Case Co-ordinators, supported by Safety Leads, in January 2026.”

    Source location

    2026-0071 - Response from Director General of Operations HMPPS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 February 2026

    Open published response
  8. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela George, aged 70, died at Derriford Hospital on 30 June 2023 after being urgently admitted with suspected sepsis. The report identified missed opportunities to carry out required blood tests, manage a breast infection, document and escalate a fall and medical concerns, assess and record capacity, and maintain relevant care-home policies and records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document capacity appropriately in care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “5. There was little or no evidence that capacity had been appropriately documented with care plans remaining silent on the issue and records not analysing carefully what steps had been taken to help Miss George make decisions. ”

    Source location

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver further mental capacity and Mental Capacity Act training to trained staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All trained staff are completing further mental capacity and MCA training, delivered in-house or via Plymouth City Council.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a formal mental capacity assessment procedure covering documentation, care-plan recording and best-interest processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A formal Mental Capacity Assessment Procedure is now in place requiring:”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response
  9. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    George Lawrence RITCHIE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Ritchie suffered an unwitnessed fall at The Meadows Nursing Home, sustaining a fractured hip that was surgically fixed; he later died on 29 April 2025 after further treatment for infections and continued decline. Concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessments and care plans, insufficient oversight, and concerningly low night-time staffing levels at The Meadows Nursing Home, with potential risks to residents at other homes operated by Cardinal Healthcare.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete falls risk assessments and care plans properly

    Wider context from the report

    “Although The Meadows Nursing Home's former Care Home Manager and former Clinical Lead and Deputy Manager accepted in evidence that Mr. Ritchie was a high risk of falling, the falls risk assessments and care plans in place for him from December 2024 onwards were wholly inadequate. Not only were those documents not completed properly, but there was no system of checks and oversight in place to ensure that they were being completed properly. One of those who failed to complete the falls risk assessment correctly was the Clinical Lead and Deputy Manager. There was no system in place from above her to ensure that she was doing her job correctly. From January 2025 Cardinal Healthcare's newly appointed Operations Manager, with a wealth of experience as a Care Home manager herself, was meant to address the many concerns about the Meadows Nursing Home raised in recent CQC inspections. There was no evidence that she had ever attempted to put in place some sort of supervision or oversight at The Meadows Nursing Home to ensure that important documents like these, which played a key part in keeping residents safe, were completed properly. I am also concerned that there appears to have been no recognition by Cardinal Healthcare that night-time staffing levels at The Meadows Nursing Home at the material time were concerningly low, and required addressing. The Meadows Nursing Home may now have closed, but Cardinal Healthcare continues to operate other nursing homes in other parts of the country. I am concerned that if Cardinal Healthcare failed to put in place at The Meadows Nursing Home sufficient oversight to ensure documentation was being completed correctly, and failed to recognise and act upon low staffing levels, there will remain a risk that the lives of residents at their other nursing homes may be put at risk. ”

    Source location

    George Lawrence RITCHIE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY, who had a history of mental health issues and significant cocaine misuse, was remanded to HMP Chelmsford on 27 January 2024 after expressing an intention to end his life. He was found suspended in his cell about seven hours after arrival and died at Broomfield Hospital on 1 February 2024; the medical cause of death was hanging and the jury concluded suicide. The principal concerns included failures in mental-health care, communication and risk documentation, failure to share information about his extreme suicide risk, inadequate assessment and supervision in prison, and the accessibility of cell-window ligature points.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to update and document care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “CONCERN: During Mr Berry’s inquest, once again, many of the continuing failings under precisely the themes identified in the 2024 ‘Thematic Review’ and in PFDR responses prior to that review as well as in the period since that Review, have been identified as having informed the causative features contributing to the death of a patient under EPUT’s care. In my opinion, the actions taken by EPUT to date to address the acknowledged failings reflected under the themes and issues referred to above have been, and remain, inadequate and incomplete, specifically: (a) Failures in the performance of the CMHT and the allocated Care Coordinator as required under the Care Programme Approach (CPA) and as mandated by EPUT policy. These failures indicated significant human error not detected by an insufficiently robust system and not therefore corrected prior to the death: (b) Failures in Care Planning: specifically, a failure to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to Mr Berry’s Care Plan consistent with Trust policy. (c) Failures in Risk Assessments: specifically, failures to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to Mr Berry’s risk assessment consistent with Trust policy. (d) Failures in Documentation: in a number of acknowledged respects the electronic records were inadequate - and inconsistent with EPUT policy. (e) Failure of joint working internally: the CC did not attempt to escalate or consult with EPUT colleagues via the regular weekly MTD meeting or any other type of Professionals’ Meeting. (f) Failure of joint working externally: the CC did not liaise at all with the external specialist substance misuse team, even though the cocaine misuse was a central aspect of his presentation and mental health deterioration. (g) Failures in Communication within and between teams as above but also, crucially, including a failure to appropriately liaise with the deceased’s Family to gather collateral information and to provide a carer’s assessment and/or support to Mr Berry’s family. ”

    Source location

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mandate and deliver care-planning training for community and primary-care staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of strengthening practice, EPUT has developed a Care Planning Training Package, initially piloted in North East Essex and reviewed across the EPUT-wide safeguarding forums during 2024/25. The pilot was complex, partly due to delays in the release of updated national CPA guidance from NHS England. In response, EPUT adopted a pragmatic interim approach, embedding the updated care planning principles into a holding training package. This approach has been agreed collaboratively with regional colleagues through NHS England forums to ensure best practice while awaiting the final national framework.”

    Source location

    2026-0015 - Response from Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and roll out the organisational Care Planning Framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This ensures that new colleagues not only receive structured learning but can also evidence their skills, knowledge, and decision-making in practice. In parallel with the interim Care Planning Training Package, the Trust has been contributing to the development of a new Care Planning Framework, which is currently in the final stages of review. The full organisational roll-out is scheduled to commence in Summer 2026. This framework is intentionally aligned with the national shift away from the traditional CPA model and towards a more personalised care agenda. As such, significant time and collaboration have been invested to ensure that the framework is authentic, meaningful, and genuinely reflective of modern person-centred practice, rather than creating a task-based or overly procedural approach to competencies.”

    Source location

    2026-0015 - Response from Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review existing EPR capability for consolidated personalised-care and safety-planning records and update standard operating procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Until NOVA is fully operational, EPUT continues to maintain robust interim monitoring arrangements to support safe and timely documentation. Alongside this, the Trust is currently reviewing the requirements for personalised care planning and safety planning documentation, with the aim of determining whether the existing EPR can accommodate a single, consolidated place for recording and update associated standard operating procedures. This work is intended to reduce the burden associated with navigating multiple tabs and scattered documentation fields, making it easier for clinicians to record care consistently and for teams to access essential information quickly.”

    Source location

    2026-0015 - Response from Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns reflect professional practice failures rather than a systemic organisational failure of care-planning systems or governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “b. Failures in Care Planning In reviewing Mr Berry’s case, there is no evidence to suggest a systemic organisational failure. The required systems, governance structures, and escalation processes were in place and functioning. The concerns identified relate to professional practice, rather than a failure of the systems themselves.”

    Source location

    2026-0015 - Response from Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinicians, rather than monitoring systems, remain responsible for identifying clinical-risk changes and initiating out-of-cycle care-plan updates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mr Berry had been known to the Team for just over three months. During this period, the Management and Supervision Tool (MaST) showed that documentation was in date. However, MaST only identifies whether Care Plans or reviews meet the mandated six-monthly cycle. It does not analyse the content of those documents and therefore cannot detect when a review should be completed earlier due to a change in clinical risk. Identifying such changes and initiating an out-of-cycle update remains a core clinician responsibility.”

    Source location

    2026-0015 - Response from Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026