Recurring concern

Unreliable emergency access to hospital care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 25 Feb 2014•Latest report 5 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls dedicated to emergency hospital access, including recognition of need, escalation, approval for release or transfer, ambulance activation and coordination where these affect timely access to hospital care.

Not included

  • Excludes generic training, staffing, communication or protocol deficiencies not explicitly tied to emergency access to hospital care.
  • Excludes routine or non-emergency referrals and transfers.
  • Excludes unrelated emergency procedures or transport arrangements that do not concern access to hospital care.
Reports
50

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
60

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
99

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England10
Department of Health and Social Care6
Care Quality Commission5
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust4
East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust3
HM Prison and Probation Service3
College of Policing2
Recipient name withheld2
South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives1
Asthma + Lung UK1
Beech Cliffe Grange1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Prabhabi Cangi · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Prabhabi Cangi died in Harefield Hospital on 12 August 2025 after an ST elevation myocardial infarction, following an ambulance attendance at her home where she had chest pain, breathlessness and an abnormal ECG. The principal concerns were the lack of a clear pathway for specialist interpretation of abnormal ECGs when paramedics did not convey patients to hospital, and the failure to ensure that intermittent chest pain, breathlessness and abnormal ECG findings resulted in hospital assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to convey patients with intermittent chest pain, breathlessness or abnormal ECG with ST elevation to the nearest emergency hospital

    Wider context from the report

    “That Intermittent symptoms of:- - Chest Pain - Breathlessness - Abnormal ECG with some ST elevation (using one or more leads) did not result in the patient being taken to the nearest emergency hospital. ”

    Source location

    Prabhabi Cangi · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver further ECG-focused training and updated myocardial infarction guidance through the 2026–2027 Core Skills Refresher cycle.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “LAS provides ongoing training and reinforcement of ECG interpretation through:”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce guidance and training on intermittent symptoms and presentations suggestive of acute coronary syndrome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Conversely, where ECG abnormalities are new, unexplained, or accompanied by symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, conveyance or onward referral is clearly indicated. LAS clinicians are therefore required to apply clinical judgement in interpreting ECG findings within the wider clinical context, rather than relying solely on automated ECG interpretation or isolated abnormalities.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commence a trial transmitting ECGs to Heart Attack Centre clinicians for early interpretation and specialist referral.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, clinicians have access to real-time clinical support. This includes the LAS Clinical Hub, which is staffed by experienced Clinical Support Managers, and an on-call clinical advice line involving senior paramedics and doctors where escalation is required. In the latter part of this year, the LAS is due to commence a trial of ECG transmission to HAC clinicians for assistance with interpretation. This will facilitate early cardiology review and admission to specialist units as required.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing paramedic training, national guidance and holistic clinical assessment are considered sufficient for recognising and managing suspected acute coronary syndrome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Paramedics are required to complete an approved Bachelor of Science degree prior to registration with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). Training in ECG acquisition and interpretation is a core component of paramedic education and includes recognition of features consistent with myocardial ischaemia and infarction, including STEMI.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local ambulance services are responsible for the operational concerns and are best placed to respond to them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having reviewed these concerns, and shared them with the ambulance team for comment, we consider that they relate to specific operational matters, which are the responsibility of the local ambulance service. We note that your report has also been addressed to London Ambulance Service, and so we have agreed that they are best placed to respond to your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roman Louie Barr suffered an asthma attack on 14 December 2023 and died after no ambulance was available for several hours, leading his family to transport him to hospital. The principal concerns were limited awareness and follow-up of excessive salbutamol use, ambulance handover delays affecting emergency availability, risks to families transporting critically unwell patients, and unclear NHS Pathways triage wording.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk to critically unwell patients and families when families transport patients to hospital during time-critical emergencies

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Risks when families transport critically unwell patients The absence of an available ambulance for several hours resulted in the family transporting Roman to hospital themselves, exposing both him and his family to significant risk during a time-critical medical emergency. ”

    Source location

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fund urgent and emergency care capacity expansions, connected ambulance care records, and replacement ambulances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over £450m of capital investment last year supported expansions to urgent and emergency care capacity, including new and expanded Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) and Urgent Treatment Centres (UTCs), connected care records for ambulance services, and nearly”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Release to Rescue approach across trusts, beginning handover at 30 minutes and completing it by 45 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure timely patient care and release ambulances back into the community, the plan mandated the “Release to Rescue” approach which will be continually implemented across all trusts. This requires the handover process to begin at 30 minutes and be completed by 45 minutes. There is significant progress still to be made on this commitment, the most recent performance figures show that average handover time in the West Midlands Ambulance Service was 54 minutes and 30 seconds. NHSE continues to work with the most challenged trusts, with the Medium-term Planning Framework (2026/27–2028/29) setting further ambitions for acute and ambulance collaboration to further improve performance, including progress toward the 15-minute handover standard and reducing pressure in hospitals.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Release to Rescue programme and work with regional partners to reduce ambulance handover delays to a 45-minute maximum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure timely patient care and release of ambulances back into the community, the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan mandates the “Release to Rescue” approach. The “Release to Rescue” approach will be triggered once a handover reaches 30 minutes and means that all ambulances must complete their handover and leave the hospital site at 45 minutes. NHS England continues to work with ICBs, acute trusts, and ambulance services to deliver the 45-minute maximum handover requirement, strengthen urgent community care, and improve hospital flow and discharge. Risks associated with long community waits for ambulances are regularly discussed at national forums to support shared understanding and coordinated action across the urgent and emergency care system.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England will address the report’s other concerns in a separate response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The report raises concerns over the continued pressure caused by prolonged ambulance handover times at local hospitals which reduced emergency capacity to respond in the community, risk of patient’s family transporting Roman to hospital themselves and clarity of NHS Pathways triage wording. NHS England will reply separately on other concerns in your report.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinicians, not non-clinical call handlers, are responsible for deciding whether higher-category patients may travel to hospital independently.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For higher-category patients, the arrangement of an ambulance remains the standard response and priority. Only in exceptional circumstances, after a remote clinical assessment has been completed, which determines that it is clinically appropriate, and that a timely resource is not available, may a clinician advise a higher-category patient to make their own way to hospital. This decision must be recorded on the electronic patient record. Clinicians should use Service Finder (directory of services) to identify the most appropriate service and communicate this to the patient. Non-clinical call handlers must not make this decision, although they may record when a caller chooses to make their own way to hospital.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Haaris Amin BHATTI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Haaris Amin BHATTI took drugs before entering Fold Nightclub and took more drugs while inside. He became seriously unwell, but nightclub staff delayed calling an ambulance; the report states that this delay decreased his chance of survival and reflected the club’s training and culture.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to call an ambulance promptly for a medical emergency

    Wider context from the report

    “At approximately 4.45am, Haaris was noted by nightclub staff to be unwell and was taken to the welfare room in a wheelchair. He was very hot, had an extremely fast heart rate and extremely high blood pressure, and appeared to the club first aider to be psychotic. He was monitored and he later explained that he had taken ████████. However, there was a failure by club staff to call an ambulance until 5.57am. Staff agreed with me at inquest that they should have called an ambulance as soon as they got Haaris into the welfare room and saw his condition. The delay in seeking definitive medical care decreased Harris’s chance of survival. The delay did not seem to me to be simply about any individual member of staff, but rather it reflected the club’s training and culture as a whole. Staff were concerned for Haaris, but this concern did not translate into effective management of his medical emergency. ”

    Source location

    Haaris Amin BHATTI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and strengthen welfare escalation procedures for prompt emergency-service contact when guests present serious symptoms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the concern identified during the inquest that emergency medical services should have been contacted earlier once Haaris was brought to the welfare area. Following the events of July 2025 we reviewed our escalation procedures to ensure that emergency medical services are contacted promptly where a guest presents with serious symptoms.”

    Source location

    Response from FOLD nightclub
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require immediate ambulance calls when a guest’s vital signs and temperature are high, regardless of hallucinations or antidepressant history.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This prompted us to adapt our welfare protocols to immediately call an ambulance if the combination of a guests’ vitals and temperature are high, irrespective of the hallucinations presented or previous history with anti-depressants. This approach is intended to remove uncertainty and ensure that guests receive prompt access to professional medical care where necessary.”

    Source location

    Response from FOLD nightclub
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contract and deploy Frontline Medical Response medical staff and life-support equipment at all nighttime events to support welfare assessment and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have contracted the services of Frontline Medical Response LTD, to be present for all nighttime events moving forward. In addition to their medical staff being present on all events, with additional life-supporting equipment, their medical staff will work alongside our welfare team and assist with medical assessment and escalation where required.”

    Source location

    Response from FOLD nightclub
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response
  4. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Brian Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Lloyd died in hospital on 18 July 2025 from an infection following an injury caused by the insertion of a urethral catheter after unsuccessful catheterisation attempts at his care home. The substantive concern was that after two unsuccessful attempts to insert a replacement catheter, arrangements should be made to take the patient to hospital without delay.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange prompt hospital transfer after two unsuccessful replacement catheter insertion attempts

    Wider context from the report

    “Where there are two attempts at inserting a replacement catheter, either the same catheter, or a second catheter and both these are unsuccessful the patient will need to be taken to hospital and arrangements for this should be made as without delay. ”

    Source location

    Brian Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and implement a full clinical protocol for catheterisation emergencies and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Creation and implementation of a Catheterisation Emergency & Escalation full clinical protocol (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute a quick-reference catheterisation emergency poster to all nursing stations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Distribution of a Quick Reference Poster to all nursing stations for immediate guidance in urgent situations (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review clinical documentation and escalation procedures to improve clarity and accountability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of clinical documentation and escalation procedures to ensure clarity and accountability. 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and implement an escalation protocol.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Creation and implementation of an Escalation protocol (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute a quick-reference escalation flowchart to team leads.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Distribution of a Quick Reference Flowchart for team leads (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide face-to-face refresher training in catheterisation for all nurses and team leads.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We provided a face to face refresher training session for all nurses and team leads in catheterization 12.11.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limit replacement-catheter insertion to two attempts, stop sooner for resistance, pain, or bleeding, and call 999 after two failures or earlier if sepsis is suspected.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary in future the home will ensure that protocol is followed and there will be a maximum of 2 attempts at inserting a replacement catheter. The attempts will immediately cease in the event of resistance, pain or bleeding and 999 will be called immediately after 2 failed attempts or sooner if sepsis is suspected.”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record each 999 call reference number and assign a staffed phone to respond promptly to emergency-service return calls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, in all future emergencies, once the home contacts 999, a 999 call reference number will be recorded, and a designated staff member with an allocated phone will remain available to respond promptly to any return calls from emergency services.”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  5. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Brian Ingram · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Ingram, an 85-year-old man with dementia and vascular Parkinsonism, fell and was taken to a minor injuries unit after a delay. His hip fracture was not identified there, and he was discharged before later admission to hospital, where he underwent surgery and died. Concerns included the lack of a physical assessment, failure to identify groin pain and obtain a hip x-ray, assumptions about the ambulance staff’s clinical role, exclusion of his family member, and information-sharing between organisations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess need for hospital conveyance during nurse clinician review

    Wider context from the report

    “5) The nurse clinician was asked to review the x-ray only. There did not appear to have been any check as to whether Brian needed to be conveyed to RCHT which may have been appropriate if the complaint of groin pain had been noted. ”

    Source location

    Brian Ingram · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share CFT’s MIU ambulance-receiving procedure with LML and reinforce ambulance-based assessment, handover, family involvement and suitability decisions through staff communications and learning forums.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.3 Whilst CFT was not aware that Mr Ingram’s daughter was waiting in the ambulance in this case, we appreciate that had our Minor Injuries Unit (MIU) staff come to the ambulance to carry out an initial assessment of Mr Ingram and consider his suitability for review and/or treatment in the MIU, they would have discovered her waiting there, and had the opportunity to take any relevant history. It is established MIU practice to assess patients in the ambulance, prior to checking them in. This is expressly stated in the MIU Operational Policy, which sets out the procedure for patients being brought into the MIU by ambulance, as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require CFT MIU teams to assess ambulance arrivals and obtain handover, history and records before accepting or booking patients into the unit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.6 There has been a team-wide communication to all MIU staff, reiterating the requirement for all patients arriving by ambulance (SWAST or otherwise), to be physically assessed and have a handover and history taken in the back of the ambulance, before the patient is accepted into the MIU. It has been clarified that the patient should only be booked in to the MIU, once the clinician has confirmed their acceptance with the admin team. Patients arriving by ambulance are not to be booked in until they have been assessed as suitable for treatment at the MIU.”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate inquest learning on ambulance patient assessment, family and carer involvement, handover and safe escalation through CFT meetings, forums, staff communications and governance groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.5 The facts relating to Mr Ingram’s inquest have also been used as a case study and presented at the Learning from Experience (LFE) Forum, a meeting attended by all MIU clinical leads, to discuss any collective issues to be addressed, and to share learning and best practice across CFT. It was reiterated at the LFE Forum, that in accordance with policy, all patient arrivals via ambulance should be initially assessed in the ambulance, and a full assessment of the patient should be carried out by an MIU clinician (discussed further below).”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response
  6. Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Azroy Dawes-Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Azroy Dawes-Clarke died in hospital on 10 November 2021 after self-ligaturing in HMP Elmley, followed by restraint, cardiac and respiratory arrest, and further arrests during conveyance and treatment. The substantive concerns included inadequate communication and healthcare involvement, disproportionate and prolonged restraint, delays in recognising the arrest and starting CPR, unsuitable ligature-resistant materials, and gaps in staff training on ACCT procedures, first aid, basic life support, and the legal framework for medical emergencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear prison officer roles in conveying prisoners lacking capacity to hospital

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Whilst the use of force paperwork completed following Mr Dawes-Clarke’s physical restraint made mention of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, none of the officers (including the individual who completed the paperwork) appeared to have any basic understanding of the circumstances when the Mental Capacity Act may apply in a custodial setting. Equally, many were unclear as to what their role would be in conveying a prisoner who lacked the capacity to consent to their conveyance to hospital in a medical emergency. Answers in respect of handcuffing prisoners for the purpose of conveying them to hospital in a medical emergency varied. Answers in respect of the legal framework which applied when prison officers are involved in care and treatment of a prisoner (the particular issue in the present case being the conveyance to hospital and the decision to dress him) were inconsistent or incomplete. ”

    Source location

    Azroy Dawes-Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    John Stephen England · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Stephen England developed abdominal pain and increasing distention while on holiday in Cornwall on 12 March 2023, after a history of recurrent sigmoid volvulus. Delays occurred in ambulance arrival, transfer into hospital, and escalation of the CT findings; he underwent surgery for ischaemic and gangrenous bowel and died in hospital on 15 March 2023 after an acute collapse during placement of a naso-gastric tube. The principal concern was whether the ambulance dispatch system could distinguish surgical emergencies requiring conveyance within an appropriate timeframe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the ambulance triage system to distinguish abdominal complaints and assign timely hospital-conveyance dispositions

    Wider context from the report

    “1) At the time of the initial call to South West Ambulance Service Trust, Mr England reported that he thought he had a ‘twisted bowel.’ This had happened to him on five previous occasions in Gloucester when medical intervention had been required four times to decompress a sigmoid volvulus. The call handler, using the MDPS system, reached a Category 5 disposition. Two experts who gave evidence at inquest, ████████, a Consultant Surgeon, and ████████, a Consultant Gastroenterologist, both felt Mr England needed to be conveyed to hospital within two hours which I believe would have required a Category 3 disposition. As both the fact of a delay and its causative relevance were admitted by the Trust, the detail of the call and the questions asked to reach a disposition were not enquired into at inquest. Evidence was heard, however, that upon audit it was felt the call handler had achieved a high degree of compliance with expected standards. This raises a concern whether the system is sufficiently nuanced to distinguish between different types of abdominal complaints and to ensure that those who need to be recognised as a surgical emergency receive a disposition resulting in a patient being conveyed to hospital within an appropriate timeframe. ”

    Source location

    John Stephen England · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the abdominal pain case within the AMPDS clinical coding subgroup with PDC to identify opportunities to improve assessment and differentiation of surgical emergencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To respond directly to the Coroner’s concerns on abdominal pain, NHS England has obtained the specific details of this case from SWASFT, which will be discussed within the NHS England AMPDS clinical coding sub-group, in collaboration with PDC, to determine if there are opportunities to improve the assessment and differentiation of abdominal pain presentations within the AMPDS triage system. NHS England has additionally shared the Coroner’s concerns with PDC, who have outlined that they welcome the opportunity to review any dispatch-specific, non-visual interrogation suggestions to further improve the discovery of surgical emergencies associated with the complaint of abdominal pain.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Telephone triage cannot make differential diagnoses requiring visual, historical and diagnostic information unavailable during the call.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “symptoms of severe blood loss, such as a decreased level of consciousness, fainting or near fainting, or an ash-grey colour, are prioritised. Moreover, patients within a common cardiac age range (patients aged 35 years and older) are further assessed and coded based on their age and the location of the pain. However, whilst the AMPDS system’s Abdominal Pain Protocol is able to identify and prioritise based on priority symptoms, triage systems are not designed to make differential diagnoses that would require additional visual, historic and diagnostic information that cannot be provided via telephone triage.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Priority Dispatch Corp manages AMPDS protocols and questions, including responsibility for making changes to the commercial international system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• As regards to SWASFT being users of the AMPDS system, the Priority Dispatch Corp (PDC) is responsible for and manages the commercial international AMPDS system, including making any changes to the protocols and questions asked. This may be on the basis of a recommendation from NHS England’s ECPAG, or as part of PDC’s own improvement and triage development work, which draws on its international user base.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual ambulance services are responsible for processes and timescales enabling timely clinical navigation and validation of calls requiring further assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During this clinical assessment, the patient’s current condition should be explored as well as considering the past medical history to be able to determine if an ambulance response is required. At the conclusion of the clinical assessment, additional information can be provided to the clinician to the caller about what actions to take if the patient’s condition appears to be worsening or there are any other concerns. Individual ambulance services should have appropriate processes in place to facilitate the timely clinical navigation and validation of all calls that require further clinical assessment. It is critical that services consider their clinical navigation and validation timescales and processes in full to prevent patients from experiencing delays in receiving clinical assessment to identify the appropriate outcome required to meet their clinical needs.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response
  8. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Keith David FOORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith David FOORD died on 3 May 2022 after suffering an acute type A aortic dissection and undergoing emergency repair. The principal concern was that ambulance transfers for aortic dissection requiring emergency surgery should be categorised as category 1 rather than category 2.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to classify transfers for aortic dissection requiring emergency surgery as category 1

    Wider context from the report

    “namely that for aortic dissection requiring emergency surgery and inter facility transfer, the category of this type of case for transfer should be raised to category 1. ”

    Source location

    Keith David FOORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inter-facility transfers requiring immediate treatment at a receiving facility are categorised by clinical condition and urgency, rather than diagnosis, as Category 2.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “IFT Level 2 (IFT2) Category 2”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response
  9. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Nimo OSMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nimo Osman was in state detention under a Hospital Order and receiving psychiatric inpatient care when she collapsed on the ward on 21 April 2022. She was unresponsive for over half an hour before an ambulance was called and died in hospital on 23 April 2022 from hypoxic ischaemic brain injury. The principal concerns were delays in recognising the emergency and calling an ambulance, whether learning had been embedded among staff, completion of venous thromboembolism assessments, and ambiguity in the Trust’s venous thromboembolism policy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nursing staff to call ambulances without prior senior clinician approval

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the discovery of Ms Osman’s collapse on Rosebank Ward on 21 April 2022, it took staff a significant number of minutes to recognise that instead of just lying on the floor, Ms Osman was actually unrousable. A few minutes later a nurse arrived on the scene, who decided to summon the duty senior nurse (DSN) by radio, rather than activating the alarm system, which would have summoned the rapid response team sooner. The DSN contacted the duty doctor to inform them that there was a medical emergency, prior to calling an ambulance. In total, Ms Osman had been on the floor and unresponsive for over half an hour before an ambulance was called. I also viewed the CCTV evidence covering this course of events. I heard evidence from a consultant neurosurgeon and a consultant neuroradiologist. Their evidence was such that, in Ms Osman’s case this delay would not have made a difference because she had suffered a catastrophic brain injury and her condition was likely to have been unsalvageable from the moment she was found unresponsive on the floor. However, I consider that a delay of circa 30 minutes in calling an emergency ambulance raises a considerable risk, if repeated in the case of another patient requiring emergency treatment at hospital. I was initially reassured by the evidence of a very senior member of nursing staff (Nurse A) about the work that has been done to educate all staff that anyone can call 999 for an ambulance if they consider it necessary, without seeking the advice of colleagues or the specific approval of a doctor. I was told by Nurse A that they were confident that the education and training undertaken with staff had had a positive impact and that a delay of this kind was unlikely to be repeated in the future. However, a senior nurse (Nurse B) who was on duty at the time of Ms Osman’s collapse told me in their evidence (over two years after Ms Osman’s death) that nursing staff cannot and would not call an ambulance of their own volition. Nurse B told me that she would only ever call an ambulance if told to do so by a more senior clinician. Nurse B went on to tell me that it was often the case that by the time an ambulance had been called and arrived, a patient would die; the manner in which this evidence was given led me to form the view that the Nurse B seemed to think that this was ‘just one of those things that happens’. While I was told by Nurse A (who seemed genuinely concerned) that this matter would be escalated and addressed, I was concerned that over two years since Ms Osman’s death this view was still held by a senior and experienced member of the nursing team who led a team of more junior nurses. My concern was such that I am not reassured that sufficient steps have been taken to prevent the recurrence of such a risk in the future. ”

    Source location

    Nimo OSMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in calling emergency ambulances

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the discovery of Ms Osman’s collapse on Rosebank Ward on 21 April 2022, it took staff a significant number of minutes to recognise that instead of just lying on the floor, Ms Osman was actually unrousable. A few minutes later a nurse arrived on the scene, who decided to summon the duty senior nurse (DSN) by radio, rather than activating the alarm system, which would have summoned the rapid response team sooner. The DSN contacted the duty doctor to inform them that there was a medical emergency, prior to calling an ambulance. In total, Ms Osman had been on the floor and unresponsive for over half an hour before an ambulance was called. I also viewed the CCTV evidence covering this course of events. I heard evidence from a consultant neurosurgeon and a consultant neuroradiologist. Their evidence was such that, in Ms Osman’s case this delay would not have made a difference because she had suffered a catastrophic brain injury and her condition was likely to have been unsalvageable from the moment she was found unresponsive on the floor. However, I consider that a delay of circa 30 minutes in calling an emergency ambulance raises a considerable risk, if repeated in the case of another patient requiring emergency treatment at hospital. I was initially reassured by the evidence of a very senior member of nursing staff (Nurse A) about the work that has been done to educate all staff that anyone can call 999 for an ambulance if they consider it necessary, without seeking the advice of colleagues or the specific approval of a doctor. I was told by Nurse A that they were confident that the education and training undertaken with staff had had a positive impact and that a delay of this kind was unlikely to be repeated in the future. However, a senior nurse (Nurse B) who was on duty at the time of Ms Osman’s collapse told me in their evidence (over two years after Ms Osman’s death) that nursing staff cannot and would not call an ambulance of their own volition. Nurse B told me that she would only ever call an ambulance if told to do so by a more senior clinician. Nurse B went on to tell me that it was often the case that by the time an ambulance had been called and arrived, a patient would die; the manner in which this evidence was given led me to form the view that the Nurse B seemed to think that this was ‘just one of those things that happens’. While I was told by Nurse A (who seemed genuinely concerned) that this matter would be escalated and addressed, I was concerned that over two years since Ms Osman’s death this view was still held by a senior and experienced member of the nursing team who led a team of more junior nurses. My concern was such that I am not reassured that sufficient steps have been taken to prevent the recurrence of such a risk in the future. ”

    Source location

    Nimo OSMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete refresher Intermediate Life Support training for the nurse involved.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. I can confirm, that at the time of Ms Osman’s death and at the inquest, Nurse B’s Intermediate Life Support (ILS) training was up to date. This training is clear in highlighting the expectations of a staff member attending a medical emergency. These expectations include that the staff member will undertake an initial check of the service user, summons help internally, and ensure an ambulance is called. No permission is required from a senior staff member. Following the inquest, the BLN spoke to Nurse B and Nurse B confirmed that she recognised the need for escalation immediately in medical emergencies as opposed to waiting for senior input. The BLN and Nurse B agreed that Nurse B will complete refresher ILS training. In the meantime, Nurse B has also completed a reflective piece in relation to this matter.”

    Source location

    Response from East London Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate to nursing staff that emergency services may be called without senior permission and physical health may contribute to behaviour.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. This matter was also brought up with all the Lead Nurses at the Trust shortly after the inquest to ensure that the message that ‘permission from senior staff is NOT required to call emergency services’ was disseminated to all nursing staff. As a reminder, this was followed up at the Lead Nurses meeting on 28 August 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from East London Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Nursing staff do not require senior permission to call emergency services; this is not agreed Trust practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. I share your concerns that one of the Trust’s nurses was under the impression that an ambulance could only be called if under the instruction of a more senior nurse. This is”

    Source location

    Response from East London Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response
  10. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Dennis John William KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dennis John William KING suffered a myocardial infarction after experiencing chest pain on 9 December 2022 and died on 13 December 2022 following recognised complications of emergency treatment. The report raised concerns about delays in ambulance responses and inter-hospital transfers, confusion over transfer categorisation, and the adequacy of arrangements for urgent care at regional specialist centres.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ambulance transfer triage to prioritise urgent clinician-requested transfers

    Wider context from the report

    “a. Availability of ambulances to carry out transfers in a timely manner, in urgent cases, between NHS Hospitals and in responding to 999 and 111 calls in the community. b. Confusion as between ambulance and hospital staff and a lack of clarity in the purpose of and process for the categorisation of transfers (particularly in urgent situations) between NHS hospitals. c. The suitability of the NHS approach to centralising exigent care in regional centres (such as the Royal Papworth Hospital for cardiac conditions) if the means to deliver such an approach are inadequate. d. Adequacy of the action plan provided to the court in addressing the concern at (a) above and that of ambulance attendances to 999 and 111 calls; the plan is generalised, lacking detail and any means of measurement of progress. Evidence received at Inquest identified waits for ambulance attendance of between 5-6 hours on the evening of 9th/10th December 2022. This, in circumstances where there call relating to Mr. KING had been categorised as a category 2 response. In Mr. KING’s case he was exhibiting symptoms of having suffered/was suffering a heart attack. In Mr. KING’s case he had arrived at hospital been triaged, assessed and arrangements for urgent lifesaving care made by competent emergency clinicians in conjunction with experts from the regional cardiac unit. This included the requirement for an urgent transfer to the regional cardiac centre. A request for an emergency transfer from West Suffolk Hospital to The Royal Papworth Hospital was subject to further computer algorithm-based triage by the ambulance service. This resulted in a several hour delay to Mr. KING’s transfer, notwithstanding the protests from competent clinical staff in the Accident and Emergency Department at West Suffolk Hospital. The circumstances of this case raise concerns about the NHS approach to centralising exigent care in regional centres (such as the Royal Papworth Hospital for cardiac conditions) if the means to deliver the approach are inadequate. East of England Ambulance Service provided evidence to the Inquest, including a Report concerning its response. This plan is generalised, lacking detail and any means of measurement of progress and is inadequate in addressing the concerns raised at the Inquest. ”

    Source location

    Dennis John William KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of ambulances for timely urgent transfers and emergency call attendances

    Wider context from the report

    “a. Availability of ambulances to carry out transfers in a timely manner, in urgent cases, between NHS Hospitals and in responding to 999 and 111 calls in the community. b. Confusion as between ambulance and hospital staff and a lack of clarity in the purpose of and process for the categorisation of transfers (particularly in urgent situations) between NHS hospitals. c. The suitability of the NHS approach to centralising exigent care in regional centres (such as the Royal Papworth Hospital for cardiac conditions) if the means to deliver such an approach are inadequate. d. Adequacy of the action plan provided to the court in addressing the concern at (a) above and that of ambulance attendances to 999 and 111 calls; the plan is generalised, lacking detail and any means of measurement of progress. Evidence received at Inquest identified waits for ambulance attendance of between 5-6 hours on the evening of 9th/10th December 2022. This, in circumstances where there call relating to Mr. KING had been categorised as a category 2 response. In Mr. KING’s case he was exhibiting symptoms of having suffered/was suffering a heart attack. In Mr. KING’s case he had arrived at hospital been triaged, assessed and arrangements for urgent lifesaving care made by competent emergency clinicians in conjunction with experts from the regional cardiac unit. This included the requirement for an urgent transfer to the regional cardiac centre. A request for an emergency transfer from West Suffolk Hospital to The Royal Papworth Hospital was subject to further computer algorithm-based triage by the ambulance service. This resulted in a several hour delay to Mr. KING’s transfer, notwithstanding the protests from competent clinical staff in the Accident and Emergency Department at West Suffolk Hospital. The circumstances of this case raise concerns about the NHS approach to centralising exigent care in regional centres (such as the Royal Papworth Hospital for cardiac conditions) if the means to deliver the approach are inadequate. East of England Ambulance Service provided evidence to the Inquest, including a Report concerning its response. This plan is generalised, lacking detail and any means of measurement of progress and is inadequate in addressing the concerns raised at the Inquest. ”

    Source location

    Dennis John William KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain and update the national framework for inter-facility ambulance transfers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The National framework for inter-facility transfers was published by NHS England in July 2019 and updated in March 2021. The framework is intended for patients who require transfer by ambulance between facilities due to an increase in either their medical or nursing care need. The framework states that patients going directly to theatre for primary percutaneous coronary intervention should receive an IFT Level 2 (IFT2) Category 2 response and that the clinical staff responsible for the patient”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the National Framework for Inter-Facility Transfers with NHS England in light of the death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The National Framework for Inter-Facility Transfers is produced by NHS England and we will endeavour to review this framework with NHS England in light of Mr King’s death.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish the Delivery Plan for Recovering Urgent and Emergency Care Services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I recognise the pressures our A&E and ambulance services are facing and the impact of waiting times for patients. That is why we published our ambitious Delivery Plan for Recovering Urgent and Emergency Care Services which aims to deliver sustained improvements in waiting times. The ambition is for 76% of patients to be admitted, transferred, or discharged from A&E within four hours by March 2024, and to reduce Category 2 ambulance response times to 30 minutes on average this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £200 million of additional ambulance funding to expand capacity and improve response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that EEAST were under high demand at the time of the incident. A primary aim of the delivery plan is to boost ambulance capacity. Ambulance services are receiving £200 million of additional funding this year to expand capacity and improve response times alongside the delivery of new ambulances and specialist mental health vehicles. With more ambulances on the road, patients will receive the treatment they need more swiftly.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver new ambulances and specialist mental health vehicles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that EEAST were under high demand at the time of the incident. A primary aim of the delivery plan is to boost ambulance capacity. Ambulance services are receiving £200 million of additional funding this year to expand capacity and improve response times alongside the delivery of new ambulances and specialist mental health vehicles. With more ambulances on the road, patients will receive the treatment they need more swiftly.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £1.6 billion over two years to support timely and effective hospital discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I recognise that ambulance trusts work within a health and care system and issues such as delayed patient handovers to hospitals can impact on capacity and response times. That is why a key part of the delivery plan is about improving hospital’s patient flow and bed capacity. We have met our planned targets of delivering 5,000 more staffed, permanent hospital beds, supported by £1 billion of dedicated funding, and increased virtual ward bed capacity to over 10,000 ahead of winter. This builds on the £500 million used last winter and a further £1.6”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase the NHS ambulance and support workforce.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding staffing capacity, we have made significant investments in the ambulance workforce – the number of NHS ambulance staff and support staff has increased by over 50% since 2010. To help ensure we have the ambulance workforce to meet the future demands on the service, the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan sets out plans to boost the number of paramedics by up to 15,600 to deliver services in ambulance and other care settings.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Boost the number of paramedics by up to 15,600 through the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding staffing capacity, we have made significant investments in the ambulance workforce – the number of NHS ambulance staff and support staff has increased by over 50% since 2010. To help ensure we have the ambulance workforce to meet the future demands on the service, the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan sets out plans to boost the number of paramedics by up to 15,600 to deliver services in ambulance and other care settings.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve ambulance performance and response times across England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the significant pressure on ambulance services since the Covid-19 pandemic, which has seen longer response times across all categories than before the pandemic, including transfers between NHS hospitals. Given that patient safety risks for both NHS hospital transfers and 999 patient calls from the community can be reduced by faster ambulance response times, NHS England have continued to focus on improving ambulance performance overall for 2023/24, supported by the Delivery Plan for Recovering Urgent and Emergency Care Services.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase ambulance capacity by growing the workforce.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services, including improving ambulance response times (specifically for Category 2 patients), increasing ambulance capacity through growing the workforce, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Speed up hospital discharges to support ambulance availability and urgent care flow.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services, including improving ambulance response times (specifically for Category 2 patients), increasing ambulance capacity through growing the workforce, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit additional frontline clinicians to increase ambulance staffing, targeting more than 300 clinicians in place by March 2024.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional recruitment with the aim for there to be over 300 more frontline clinicians in place by March 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit additional control-room clinicians to expand clinical triage and enable safer transfers to alternative services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional recruitment of clinicians within our control environment, allowing for greater volume of clinical triage to improve patient safety and to transfer patients to alternative services where appropriate. This is supported by the establishment of an Unscheduled Care Coordination Hub within Suffolk where we are working with the Integrated Care Board, the 111 provider and community services to increase referrals of appropriate patients to alternative services and to provide remote support to crews on scene.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and operate the Suffolk Unscheduled Care Coordination Hub with healthcare partners to increase appropriate referrals and provide remote crew support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional recruitment of clinicians within our control environment, allowing for greater volume of clinical triage to improve patient safety and to transfer patients to alternative services where appropriate. This is supported by the establishment of an Unscheduled Care Coordination Hub within Suffolk where we are working with the Integrated Care Board, the 111 provider and community services to increase referrals of appropriate patients to alternative services and to provide remote support to crews on scene.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Operational Performance and Improvement Plan to improve organisational efficiency and maximise ambulance availability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The implementation of our Operational Performance and Improvement Plan, which is our plan to improve our own efficiency as an organisation and to maximise ambulance availability. I attach a presentation on OPIP with this letter to provide an update on this work.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with local acute trusts to reduce hospital delays affecting ambulance availability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specifically in Suffolk, we have been engaging with the local Acute Trusts to reduce delays, which has started to have a positive effect on the number of our vehicles delayed at hospital. The Trust is also working with our ICB colleagues in Suffolk and across the region to implement the ‘Call before you convey’ programme. This allows frontline clinicians to speak with senior clinical advisors before making a decision on conveyance and check the most appropriate pathway for the patient is being followed. In the past month, the Trust has implemented the same-day emergency care team at West Suffolk Hospital to ensure patients are attending the right facility at the right time to avoid unnecessary handover delays in the Emergency Department.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Call before you convey programme with healthcare partners to support appropriate conveyance and pathway decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specifically in Suffolk, we have been engaging with the local Acute Trusts to reduce delays, which has started to have a positive effect on the number of our vehicles delayed at hospital. The Trust is also working with our ICB colleagues in Suffolk and across the region to implement the ‘Call before you convey’ programme. This allows frontline clinicians to speak with senior clinical advisors before making a decision on conveyance and check the most appropriate pathway for the patient is being followed. In the past month, the Trust has implemented the same-day emergency care team at West Suffolk Hospital to ensure patients are attending the right facility at the right time to avoid unnecessary handover delays in the Emergency Department.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a same-day emergency care team at West Suffolk Hospital to direct patients to appropriate facilities and reduce emergency-department handover delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specifically in Suffolk, we have been engaging with the local Acute Trusts to reduce delays, which has started to have a positive effect on the number of our vehicles delayed at hospital. The Trust is also working with our ICB colleagues in Suffolk and across the region to implement the ‘Call before you convey’ programme. This allows frontline clinicians to speak with senior clinical advisors before making a decision on conveyance and check the most appropriate pathway for the patient is being followed. In the past month, the Trust has implemented the same-day emergency care team at West Suffolk Hospital to ensure patients are attending the right facility at the right time to avoid unnecessary handover delays in the Emergency Department.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England and the ambulance trust are responsible for responding to the report’s specific concerns within their respective remits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report raised concerns about ambulance response times, delays in transferring patients to specialist units within the East of England, the centralisation of services and the action plan provided by the local ambulance trust. I understand that NHS England (NHSE) has written to you to respond to those specific concerns within their remit as have East of England Ambulance Service Trust (EEAST) on action being taken locally. NHSE note in their response note if ambulances are not available immediately for patient transfers, the incident should be escalated to ensure an appropriate response.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026