Recurring concern

Failure to maintain an open and accountable safety culture

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 10 Feb 2015•Latest report 1 Aug 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of organisational culture and leadership arrangements that suppress, discourage, dismiss or defensively respond to safety concerns, errors or poor practice, including lack of candour, fear of speaking up, failure to listen independently and failure to support accountable safety learning.

Not included

  • Excludes generic poor management, bullying, harassment or workplace dissatisfaction where no safety-concern, error-reporting, candour or accountable-response dimension is identified.
  • Excludes failures confined to a specific complaint, incident investigation, clinical pathway or operational process when organisational safety culture is not itself the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes ordinary disagreement or disputed professional judgement without evidence that the organisational culture suppresses or defensively handles safety concerns.
  • Excludes generic organisational learning or corrective-action failures where the specific unsafe condition is not an open and accountable culture for raising and addressing safety concerns.
Reports
15

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
17

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
31

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission3
Department of Health and Social Care3
NHS England2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Capital Care Group Limited1
Children's Commissioner for Wales1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Department for Education1
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Grange Clinic1
Gwent Police1
Health and Safety Executive1
Health Services Safety Investigations Body1
HM Prison and Probation Service1
Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Dorothy MEDLICOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Dorothy Medlicott, who lived with dementia, sustained a severe head injury after being deliberately pushed by another resident at Haresbrook Park Care Home on 23 April 2020. She died in hospital from complications of that injury on 3 May 2020. Concerns included the admission of residents despite agreed restrictions, failures to complete proper risk assessments and care plans, and whether staff were trained and supported to question unsafe decisions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide a working environment that enables staff to question unsafe decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “1) The resident whose actions caused Mrs. Medlicott’s fatal head injury had a clear and recent history of unpredictable physical aggression towards his wife. The decision to admit that resident to the care home was made by a member of senior management without the clinical qualifications to assess whether the care home could meet his care needs, and was in clear breach of a restriction agreed by the care home with Worcestershire County Council that no person was to be admitted who presented with “physically challenging behaviour”. Despite having concerns about the decision to admit him, no member of staff at the care home felt able to raise or question that decision with senior management. There is therefore a concern that staff at the care home may not understand that it is their professional duty to question such decisions, and that the care home is not providing a working environment which encourages them to do so; ”

    Source location

    Margaret Dorothy MEDLICOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide and disseminate whistleblowing and speak-up policies, escalation contacts, open-door access and shift-based opportunities to raise concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “QCS, an external provider, produces all of the Home's policies. The contract includes the routine review, update and distribution of the documents to ensure they remain in line with regulations, care standards and internal expectations. The Policies include Raising Concerns, Freedom to Speak Up and Whistleblowing Policies. These are all fit for purpose and are available to all staff on the electronic policies and procedures platform. The platform also produces a reading list for all managers to outline which staff have engaged with the Policy. Any staff failing to review the policies will be reminded of their importance and their professional obligations to consider, and adhere, to the documentation. Any continued shortfalls will be escalated.”

    Source location

    Response from Capital Care Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing policies, escalation routes and speaking-up practices are considered sufficient to equip staff to raise and escalate concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “QCS, an external provider, produces all of the Home's policies. The contract includes the routine review, update and distribution of the documents to ensure they remain in line with regulations, care standards and internal expectations. The Policies include Raising Concerns, Freedom to Speak Up and Whistleblowing Policies. These are all fit for purpose and are available to all staff on the electronic policies and procedures platform. The platform also produces a reading list for all managers to outline which staff have engaged with the Policy. Any staff failing to review the policies will be reminded of their importance and their professional obligations to consider, and adhere, to the documentation. Any continued shortfalls will be escalated.”

    Source location

    Response from Capital Care Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response
  2. Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

    AI-generated summary

    Ida Jean Lock · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ida Jean Lock died on 16 November 2019 after suffering a lack of oxygen during delivery on 9 November 2019, resulting in severe hypoxic-ischaemic brain damage. The report describes missed opportunities for enhanced care and obstetric input, delays in responding to fetal distress, and initially ineffective neonatal resuscitation. The principal concerns include the Trust’s alleged lack of candour and transparency, deficient clinical and maternity governance, inadequate investigations, gaps in mandatory and remedial training, and inappropriate grading of the harm suffered.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a culture of candour

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I am concerned that there is not a culture of candour within University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust (Trust) and the impact that this has on safety, learning and implementing required changes to prevent deaths. Urgent action is required by the Trust to meaningfully embed the Duty of Candour ”

    Source location

    Ida Jean Lock · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed the Duty of Candour process across the Trust, with standardised letters, family contact arrangements and governance monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To reinforce a culture of candour within the Trust - where openness, honesty, and learning are embedded at all levels - we have implemented a range of measures that go beyond compliance and aim to change behaviours, mindsets, and systems. In addition, we continue to monitor the impact of these changes through ward to board governance arrangements. The changes we have made are detailed below.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen cultural leadership through visible executive engagement, leadership safety conversations, behavioural performance assessment and quarterly culture reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Cultural Leadership and Accountability”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement immediate changes to the Being Open policy following evidence given at the inquest.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Actions taken after the request:”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 26 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor the Duty of Candour improvement action plan through continued assurance, committee attendance, external challenge and scrutiny.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The ICB has identified that the Trust is currently showing common cause variation with the lower compliance attributed to staffing capacity. The capacity issue is being addressed through divisional reconfiguration and additional capacity was identified which came into effect on 1 April 2025. An audit has been undertaken and there is an associated action plan in order to improve compliance to ensure every patient/family is served Duty of Candour in a timely and compassionate manner. The ICB are committed to ensuring that compliance improves and will monitor the effectiveness of the action plan through continued mechanisms including attendance at the Trust Quality Assurance Committee providing external challenge and scrutiny.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    University Hospitals Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust and Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB will address specific changes arising from the report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My response therefore focuses on concern D and E. I note that you have also addressed this report to University Hospitals Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust (UHMBT) and NHS Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board (LSC ICB). These organisations will address specifics as to the changes being implemented as a result of the Report. NHS England’s response to you is also made on behalf of the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), and I understand that they will not therefore be issuing a separate response to the Coroner. With DHSC input, I have also addressed in this response some of your concerns regarding A and B.”

    Source location

    Joint response from DHSC and NHSE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2025

    Open published response
  3. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Nicola FORSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nicola FORSTER, a Metropolitan Police Service Sergeant, was found hanging by a ligature at her home on 28 September 2022, and her death was confirmed by paramedics. The inquest concluded that she intentionally took her own life following a deterioration in her mental health exacerbated by actions of her employer. The report raised concerns about poor management, institutional defensiveness, and a fear among junior officers of speaking out about management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Culture of poor management and institutional defensiveness

    Wider context from the report

    “Although I was informed during the Inquest process about various changes that have been made to MPS Employment Policy and Processes since Nikki's death, including the introduction of a new 'Raising Concerns' Policy in May 2023, I believe there remains evidence of a culture of poor management and institutional defensiveness, as highlighted in the Baroness Casey Review, which these changes do not address. There is no point in encouraging concerns to be raised whilst this culture persists. My investigation into Nikki’s death revealed clear evidence of officers, particularly the more junior ranking officers, having a fear of speaking out about their management and also an unwillingness, by the L&D Senior Management Team, to listen independently to the concerns raised. Furthermore the PSU (as well as the DPS investigation after Nikki’s death and your representation at the Inquest) appeared only to seek to support the role of senior management; even though the Inquest found that aspects of Nikki’s management had been seriously deficient and had contributed to her death. This appeared to me to confirm the criticism made by Baroness Casey that the MPS “starts from a position that nothing wrong has occurred” and their “systems support wrongdoers”. ”

    Source location

    Nicola FORSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide officers with a safe ability to speak out about management

    Wider context from the report

    “Although I was informed during the Inquest process about various changes that have been made to MPS Employment Policy and Processes since Nikki's death, including the introduction of a new 'Raising Concerns' Policy in May 2023, I believe there remains evidence of a culture of poor management and institutional defensiveness, as highlighted in the Baroness Casey Review, which these changes do not address. There is no point in encouraging concerns to be raised whilst this culture persists. My investigation into Nikki’s death revealed clear evidence of officers, particularly the more junior ranking officers, having a fear of speaking out about their management and also an unwillingness, by the L&D Senior Management Team, to listen independently to the concerns raised. Furthermore the PSU (as well as the DPS investigation after Nikki’s death and your representation at the Inquest) appeared only to seek to support the role of senior management; even though the Inquest found that aspects of Nikki’s management had been seriously deficient and had contributed to her death. This appeared to me to confirm the criticism made by Baroness Casey that the MPS “starts from a position that nothing wrong has occurred” and their “systems support wrongdoers”. ”

    Source location

    Nicola FORSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of senior management to listen independently to concerns raised

    Wider context from the report

    “Although I was informed during the Inquest process about various changes that have been made to MPS Employment Policy and Processes since Nikki's death, including the introduction of a new 'Raising Concerns' Policy in May 2023, I believe there remains evidence of a culture of poor management and institutional defensiveness, as highlighted in the Baroness Casey Review, which these changes do not address. There is no point in encouraging concerns to be raised whilst this culture persists. My investigation into Nikki’s death revealed clear evidence of officers, particularly the more junior ranking officers, having a fear of speaking out about their management and also an unwillingness, by the L&D Senior Management Team, to listen independently to the concerns raised. Furthermore the PSU (as well as the DPS investigation after Nikki’s death and your representation at the Inquest) appeared only to seek to support the role of senior management; even though the Inquest found that aspects of Nikki’s management had been seriously deficient and had contributed to her death. This appeared to me to confirm the criticism made by Baroness Casey that the MPS “starts from a position that nothing wrong has occurred” and their “systems support wrongdoers”. ”

    Source location

    Nicola FORSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the Culture programme to build staff confidence to raise concerns and improve managers’ and leaders’ responses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MPS recognises that changes to policy and practice alone, will not change culture within the MPS. The MPS has a dedicated Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Assistant Commissioner for Trust and Legitimacy, and established a Culture programme as part of the New Met for London commitments, focused on driving the culture changes we recognise are needed across the organisation. The Culture programme seeks to build staff confidence to speak up and raise concerns, and for managers and leaders to listen and respond. Activity includes:”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a dedicated Trust and Legitimacy leadership structure and a new directorate to drive cultural transformation and improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MPS recognises that changes to policy and practice alone, will not change culture within the MPS. The MPS has a dedicated Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Assistant Commissioner for Trust and Legitimacy, and established a Culture programme as part of the New Met for London commitments, focused on driving the culture changes we recognise are needed across the organisation. The Culture programme seeks to build staff confidence to speak up and raise concerns, and for managers and leaders to listen and respond. Activity includes:”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory leadership training covering trauma, wellbeing, supportive leadership and referral mechanisms, including programmes for first-line and senior leaders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In April 2023, the MPS introduced new leadership training for all first line leaders. This is mandatory and equates to between 3 and 8 days of training depending on the role being performed. A dedicated module focused upon trauma and wellbeing is included within this new leadership programme. Between April 2023 and April 2024, 6260 leaders across the MPS have completed this training. Based on a 98% course feedback response rate, 93% said they found the course valuable and would recommend to colleagues. Informal weekly feedback from course facilitators consistently highlighted trauma and wellbeing as a priority theme that delegates found valuable.”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen Learning and Development leadership through revised senior leadership, supervision and wellbeing oversight arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside broader cultural reforms across the MPS set out in a New Met for London, specific changes have been implemented within Learning and Development (“L&D”) over the past 12 months. These have focused on creating a positive and supportive culture for all colleagues working within L&D. Significantly, this has included a number of changes to the L&D Senior Leadership Team, bringing in experience of delivering cultural reform from elsewhere in the MPS and outside of the policing, strengthened supervision and greater levels of oversight with regards to supporting the wellbeing of colleagues across L&D.”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the L&D People Strategy with coordinated wellbeing support, recognition, senior leadership engagement and oversight of professional standards and culture.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Investment in a new L&D People Strategy in 2023 was in direct response to staff feedback from the 2022 staff survey and aims to makes a positive difference for those working in L&D, as well as fostering a culture of trust. Significant improvements include a more structured, co-ordinated and comprehensive programme of wellbeing and welfare support for L&D staff; recognition for those staff who go ‘above and beyond’ in embodying the MPS’s guiding principles and values; visible Senior Leadership Team engagement across all teams and locations; and an increased focus in identifying common themes with regards to professional standards and culture which are overseen by the Director L&D.”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the Raising Concerns policy with expanded reporting scope, clearer guidance, defined manager responsibilities and support for people raising concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As set out in the letter from the MPS dated 23 May 2024, the MPS introduced a new “Raising Concerns” policy regarding the reporting of wrongdoing within the MPS. The new policy, introduced in May 2023, is directly focussed on supporting officers and staff who may have a concern about a colleague. Changes include:-”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the public-facing complaints and conduct reporting service with Crimestoppers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst staff are encouraged and supported to report concerns openly in person, there are a number of ways a report can be made, including via anonymised telephone and online reporting. To ensure individuals have the flexibility to choose the most appropriate method of reporting for them. In November 2022, the MPS was the”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the Upstander programme to improve staff confidence and capability to challenge inappropriate behaviour and help leaders resolve issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The launch of the Upstander programme: designed to improve the confidence and capability of staff to challenge behaviours that are inappropriate and not aligned with our values. The Upstander programme is also designed to increase the understanding and capabilities of leaders to support staff and resolve issues.”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create an L&D strategy and performance function informed by colleagues’ input and suggestions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Looking ahead, L&D are in the process of creating a new strategy and performance function. To inform this work senior leaders are actively seeking colleagues’ inputs and suggestions on what more leaders can do to better support colleagues.”

    Source location

    Response from Metropolitan Police
    Page 5 · response
    Published 27 June 2024

    Open published response
  4. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Benjamin David Leonard, aged 16, died after slipping and falling from a cliff while descending the Great Orme during an Explorer Scout trip in North Wales. The report identifies concerns about inadequate planning, risk assessment, briefing, supervision, training, safeguarding, first-aid provision, oversight and the Scouts Association’s response to the death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a culture of candour

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I am concerned that there is not a culture of candour within The Scouts Association (‘TSA’) and the impact that this has on safety and safeguarding. ”

    Source location

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and approve a Duty of Candour Policy, with its principles implemented immediately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. To underpin our commitment to transparency, the Board have agreed to develop and adopt a new Duty of Candour Policy to be approved in our July Board 2024 (with these principles implemented immediately).”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 6 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish an annual Safety Report covering learning reviews, lessons learned and actions taken.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Starting in 2025, each year we will publish a new annual Safety Report that outlines our in-year learning reviews, lessons learned, and actions taken, further building a culture of candour in relation to Safety & Safeguarding (first publication April 2025).”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 6 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish quarterly progress against the delivery plan and provide ongoing annual Safety Report updates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will publish our progress against the plan on a quarterly basis in 2024 as part of our commitment to transparency and accountability. We will then include ongoing updates on progress as part of our new annual Safety Report. We understand our response must be more than simply a plan; it has to be a comprehensive response to this tragedy, and a significant moment in our history which leads to an overhaul of our culture and systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Department cannot comment on the Scout Association’s internal structure, workings, or implementation of internal policies and procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. Finally, we would note that various matters identified in your report concern the internal structure and workings of the Scout Association (for example their internal FAIP process). Where feasible, we have sought to address all matters of concern, but unfortunately we cannot comment on the internal set-up and structure of individual organisations, or charities in the case of the Scout Association. We understand that the Scout Association will provide a response to your report which we expect will address these issues. Similarly, we understand that the Charity Commission will provide a response which we expect will address matters relating to charity trustees’ legal duties and responsibilities in managing their charity.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Scout Association and the Charity Commission are expected to address matters concerning internal operations and charity trustees’ legal duties, respectively.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. Finally, we would note that various matters identified in your report concern the internal structure and workings of the Scout Association (for example their internal FAIP process). Where feasible, we have sought to address all matters of concern, but unfortunately we cannot comment on the internal set-up and structure of individual organisations, or charities in the case of the Scout Association. We understand that the Scout Association will provide a response to your report which we expect will address these issues. Similarly, we understand that the Charity Commission will provide a response which we expect will address matters relating to charity trustees’ legal duties and responsibilities in managing their charity.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response
  5. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Mouayed Mamoun Bashir · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mouayed Mamoun Bashir took an unknown quantity of cocaine and developed symptoms consistent with Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD). After police restraint and transfer to an ambulance, he suffered cardiac arrest and died despite CPR and attempts at hospital revival. The report raised concerns about insufficient knowledge of ABD and ambiguity about whether officers recognised or communicated their concerns about it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of officers to speak up about ABD concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “At the inquest all the police officers who attended MB gave evidence and they all stated under oath that they did not consider that MB was suffering from ABD at the time. However, when completing the Use of Force forms afterwards, all bar one of the officers involved in restraint indicated that ABD had been an impact factor. There is an ambiguity which could not be properly explored at the inquest, largely due to the passage of time. However, this suggests that officers may have thought about ABD but did not mention it to others, which would be contrary to the “Speak Up and Speak Out” principle. This is a principle, the inquest heard, that is critical to ensuing that the voices of junior officers are heard in these difficult and potentially life-threatening situations. ”

    Source location

    Mouayed Mamoun Bashir · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review national training for all police officers on Acute Behavioural Disturbance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    ““Confirmation as to whether the training on ABD has been reviewed and the principle of “Speak Up and Speak Out” enshrined therein, reflecting the acknowledged difficulties in identifying ABD even by experienced officers.””

    Source location

    Response from Heddlu Gwent Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and publish a new Acute Behavioural Disturbance learning package through the College Learn system for officers and relevant police staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I confirm that the national training for all police officers on Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD) has been reviewed. The College of Policing has introduced a new learning package, specifically on ABD. The training package consists of an ABD PowerPoint which has been uploaded onto the “College Learn” system and made available to police officers and relevant police staff officers from 14 February 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Heddlu Gwent Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorporate the Acute Behavioural Disturbance package into mandatory Public and Personal Safety Training and First Aid Training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have attached the training package consisting of Power Point Presentation and accompanying Training Notes, which you will see is extensive. I confirm that training package this has been incorporated into the mandatory Public and Personal Safety Training programme and First Aid Training. This in effect means that from 14 February 2024 all officers and relevant police staff will have access to important updated training.”

    Source location

    Response from Heddlu Gwent Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide bespoke standalone Acute Behavioural Disturbance training to frontline officers who recently completed mandatory safety and first aid training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, as from 3 April 2024 onwards, in Gwent Police all frontline police officers who have only recently completed their mandatory Public and Personal Safety Training and First Aid Training will receive bespoke standalone specific ABD training using the College of Policing Power Point.”

    Source location

    Response from Heddlu Gwent Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response
  6. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Kane Christopher Boyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kane Christopher Boyce, a serving prisoner at HMP Lowdham Grange, was found with a ligature around his neck on 3 October 2021 and could not be resuscitated. The jury found that alcohol intoxication and the failure of staff to share information, open an under-the-influence log, adequately monitor him, and consider risk when isolating cell power and ignoring cell bells contributed to his death. The report raised concerns about these practices, staff understanding of relevant policies, learning from deaths in custody, and organisational candour.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a culture of candour and staff reflection after deaths in custody

    Wider context from the report

    “7. A Lack of Candour – both organisationally and individually I would be very interested to understand how the duty of candour applies to the prison service and those individuals within the employ of the service (whether employed directly or through a private provider, as in this case). There is a statutory duty of candour applicable to healthcare organisations and professionals, as well as a more recent agreement by the College of Policing for members to adhere to a Code of Candour. In practise, candour creates a culture of being open and honest with all stakeholders by accepting when things go wrong, taking remedial steps as soon as practicable, and thus reducing the risk of events repeating themselves. In the context of a death, candour from the outset is essential in order to support the bereaved family. The position adopted by Serco in this inquest, as it has in other inquests, could be said to represent the very opposite of candour. Having heard evidence supplied on oath by their own staff members that there were multiple failures to open an under the influence log (evidence which was not contested) the organisation nevertheless required the Jury to return a finding on this issue, and each and every issue, instead of a factual finding being presented to the jury as agreed by all Interested Persons. The inquest is not an adversarial process, there is no burden of proof. The Interested Persons are under a duty to assist the investigative process in an open and honest manner. By identifying those issues that genuinely require determination by the jury, and those on which there is agreement. Sadly, in my extensive experience of conducting Article 2 inquests locally, this is not an isolated example of the uncomfortable position adopted by the prison service in failing to put forward sensible and reasonable factual admissions of shortcomings. I am concerned by the apparent absence of a culture of candour supporting those staff who work within the prison service. Many of the staff members giving evidence explained that the inquest was the first time it had been suggested to them that they had not adhered to policy. In the intervening period of over two years between Kane’s death and the inquest, no-one at the prison had asked key staff to reflect on the care they provided to Kane that night and consider areas of learning. Again, this is not a position unique to this inquest, and is of great concern in the context of a rising number of self-inflicted prisoner deaths at HMP Lowdham Grange since Kane’s tragic death in 2021. I would be grateful if your response could address what steps have been, or are being taken, to ensure that candour is applied throughout the death in custody process. ”

    Source location

    Kane Christopher Boyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Phoenix Grace CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Phoenix Grace Chapman was born unexpectedly at home and died following cord compression during the second stage of labour. The report identified concerns about differing understandings among clinicians regarding the appropriate response to precipitous labour and about midwives’ views not being sufficiently heard before protocols were established.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that midwives’ views and differing opinions about precipitous labour are communicated and addressed

    Wider context from the report

    “The reason I make a report to the Homerton, is because it seemed to me at inquest that there were two matters that had not yet been resolved. i) At inquest, there was not a shared understanding among the clinicians within the trust about how such a situation should be approached. The obstetricians were clear that, given her very high risk status, Phoenix’ mum needed to come in to hospital as soon as she showed the first signs of labour. And even if she had started to deliver, she could still only be treated effectively and Phoenix given the best chance of a good outcome in hospital. However, some of the midwives felt strongly that, when Phoenix’ dad could see the baby’s leg emerge, they should have been allowed to go out to the home to give whatever assistance they could. All the clinicians need have the same understanding of the correct protocol. ii) A related point is that, before Phoenix was born, some of the midwives felt that their views of what should happen in the event of precipitous labour had not been taken seriously. If they are to be effective in their role, and if necessary to understand why a protocol does fully reflect their feelings and views, the midwives’ ability to communicate with senior management needs to be enhanced. If the team as a whole is to move forward in a way that provides the best possible care for women in labour and their babies, questions and differing opinions need to be in some way acknowledged and dealt with before the correct protocol can be embedded. ”

    Source location

    Phoenix Grace CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formulate escalation processes and criteria enabling midwives to raise concerns about birth plans for patients choosing birth outside guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this, our Birth Options Midwife and the community matron have formulated a process and criteria within times for midwives to escalate the out of guidance patients if there are any concerns regarding the current birth plan that is in place. This is again to ensure that there is a clear understanding regarding the birth plan.”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign a senior consultant obstetrician to the homebirth midwifery team and its monthly meetings to support case discussion, collaboration and sharing of learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We would also like to reassure you that the homebirth midwifery team already meet monthly, and that meeting is attended by all the homebirth midwives unless they are attending a homebirth or on annual leave, in which case they can review the outcomes of the meeting on a shared drive. During this meeting they discuss any management issues or service updates, for example if there are any new guidelines. At this meeting, they also discuss all women booked in with them that are out of criteria for homebirth and review any new referrals that are out of criteria. This information is held and updated on a spreadsheet in a shared drive. The Matron for the Community Midwifery team attends this meeting, together with the Director of Midwifery, the Birth Options Midwife, and the named Midwife for Safeguarding.”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish monthly meetings between senior nursing leadership and the homebirth midwifery team to provide a forum for discussing staff concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following this inquest, our Chief Nurse / Director of Clinical Governance has met with the homebirth midwifery team specifically to listen to how they feel and to see what support can be provided to them. The new Director of Midwifery started at the beginning of September and will lead further meetings with the homebirth midwifery team, together with the Chief Nurse monthly so that there is a forum to discuss any concerns that the midwives have. The next meeting is scheduled for 13th September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appoint a new Director of Midwifery to lead ongoing meetings with the homebirth midwifery team and Chief Nurse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following this inquest, our Chief Nurse / Director of Clinical Governance has met with the homebirth midwifery team specifically to listen to how they feel and to see what support can be provided to them. The new Director of Midwifery started at the beginning of September and will lead further meetings with the homebirth midwifery team, together with the Chief Nurse monthly so that there is a forum to discuss any concerns that the midwives have. The next meeting is scheduled for 13th September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind all Trust staff through the daily live communication that they can confidentially access the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust has a Freedom to Speak Up Guardian, and six Freedom to Speak up Champions who are there to provide confidential advice and support to staff regarding concerns they may have, assist staff to raise concerns in the Trust and to make sure that staff receive feedback about the concerns that they have raised. The Trust Executive Team has a daily live communication on MS Teams for all Trust staff called 12 at 12. This is a live broadcast that takes place daily at midday for 12 minutes. Following this inquest, this communication reminded all Trust staff that they have access to the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian service if they would like to confidentially discuss any concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony Wilkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony Wilkinson died on 4 April 2018 after choking, with the inquest concluding that he was unlawfully killed as a result of foreign body obstruction of the airway. The report identifies concerns about the failure to incorporate Speech and Language Therapy advice on diet and supervision into care plans, risk assessments and staff communications, alongside wider concerns about care-provider governance and regulatory oversight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a transparent and candid organisational culture

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Stars Social Support Limited have a culture which does not encourage transparency or embrace the duty of candour. This was evidenced throughout the inquest proceedings and in the lack of engagement with CQC during the inspection regime. ”

    Source location

    Anthony Wilkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A decision to cease operating prevents provision of a detailed response to the indicated corrective actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A decision has been taken by the Registered Manager and Director of Stars Social Support Limited for the organisation to cease to continue. The Registered Manager and Director at Stars Social Support Limited has contacted the Local Authority and the Care Quality Commission to notify them that Stars Social Support Limited will cease to continue.”

    Source location

    2021-0102-Response-from-Stars-Social-Support-Ltd-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 April 2021

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mr William Ivan McKibbin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr William Ivan McKibbin died at Trafford General Hospital on 20 August 2018 following complications of a traumatic brain injury sustained in an unwitnessed fall in hospital. The report raised concerns about bed-rail and bed-brake checks, the culture of openness and candour, communication between specialists and hospital sites, incident investigations, and the process for learning from deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain a culture in which staff can speak up about errors and poor practice

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The evidence heard at this inquest left me with residual concerns as to the prevailing culture at the Trust, and by extension, within the NHS. It was clear from the evidence that by the time of Mr McKibbin’s death, Managers from the Trust were aware at the very least that the brakes simply cannot have been applied to his bed at the time he sustained the fall which led to his death. Despite this, no confirmation of this fact was made to Mr McKibbin’s family, or in the report of his death to the Coroner. Similarly, this conclusion was not drawn by a number of internal investigations undertaken by the Trust, or indeed in evidence given to the court by Professor ████████, Chief Nurse and a member of the Trust’s board. For a duty of candour to have meaning, it is essential the prevailing culture of an organisation is one where staff have freedom to speak out. For the reasons set out by Sir ████████ QC in his PFD Report into events at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, unless staff of all levels feel able to speak up about their own errors, and to point out to highlight poor practice of others, a significant risk of future deaths will remain. ”

    Source location

    Mr William Ivan McKibbin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Promote and encourage NHS employers to complete Just and Learning Culture training and accredited learning packages.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have been sighted on the Trust’s comprehensive response and that as part of our commitments in the People Plan, NHS England and NHS Improvement is promoting and encouraging NHS employers to complete the free online Just and Learning Culture training and accredited learning packages to help them become fair, open and learning organisations where colleagues feel they can speak up.”

    Source location

    2020-0185-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust’s Duty of Candour policy and reported compliance, rated Good by the CQC, are considered sufficient arrangements for openness and transparency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note your residual concerns as to the prevailing culture at the Trust, and by extension, within the NHS with regard to the Duty of Candour.”

    Source location

    2020-0185-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about the wider NHS culture fall outside the Trust’s ability to comment; its response addresses culture within the Trust and Trafford General Hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst I cannot comment on the concerns about the wider NHS, I am confident that at a Trust level and locally at Trafford General Hospital the prevailing culture is one of openness and transparency. I am deeply sorry, as stated earlier, that the substandard management of the investigation and the poor communication with Mr McKibbin’s family left them and yourself with a different view. It is clear that the delays in sharing the report resulted in a lack of timely openness on our part but we sought to be honest at all times.”

    Source location

    2020-0185-Response-from-Manchester-University-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted.pdf
    Page 5 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response
  10. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Calary Fern Davis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Calary Fern Davis was delivered by emergency Caesarean Section on 31st December 2017 after fetal bradycardia caused hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and very serious brain damage, and she later died from that condition. The report identified concerns about failures in the induction pathway, including a lack of planned obstetric review, delay in artificial rupture of membranes, insufficient staffing and leadership, poor communication and safety briefings, and a culture against performing artificial rupture of membranes at night.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reluctance of mid-ranking midwife staff to challenge labour ward coordinator decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) There was a reluctance from mid ranking midwife staff to challenge decisions made by the labour ward coordinators ”

    Source location

    Calary Fern Davis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the organisational development plan and continue multidisciplinary work to improve challenge, openness, culture and team working.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. In Mrs Davis’ case proceeding to Artificial Rupture of Membranes would have been possible but there was a culture in the unit not to perform this at night. All delays for planned activity are now monitored and datix reported. The Health Board is introducing a live acuity tool which allows for delays to be captured. The Senior Midwife is responsible for ensuring that all delays are escalated. This is then reviewed during the weekly incident reporting meeting. The Organisational Development Plan is centred around addressing custom and practice leading to ineffective cultures. The plan has already been implemented and work will continue with all disciplines through the year.”

    Source location

    2019-0043-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and operate an escalation policy enabling midwives to contact the on-call Obstetric Consultant and Senior Midwife directly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. There was a reluctance from mid ranking midwife staff to challenge decisions made by the labour ward coordinators. The Health Board has developed an Organisational Development Plan addressing human factors and to work with all staff grades to develop a positive culture of challenge and openness. The Health Board also implemented a new Escalation Policy with work specifically focussed on midwives being able to jump call to the Obstetric Consultant and Senior Midwife on call. The Clinical Supervisor for Midwives is undertaking escalation work within group settings.”

    Source location

    2019-0043-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026