Recurring concern

Failure to prevent unsafe unaccompanied exit by vulnerable care-home residents

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 Oct 2021•Latest report 26 Oct 2022

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of care-home arrangements specifically intended to prevent, detect or promptly respond to unsafe unaccompanied exit by residents who lack capacity, cannot assess risk, wander or otherwise have a recognised risk of leaving alone, including exit security, reception coverage, staff monitoring, alerts and comparable safeguards.

Not included

  • Excludes ordinary resident supervision, observation or welfare-check failures where unsafe exit prevention or detection is not the identified condition.
  • Excludes general staffing, training, care-planning or safeguarding deficiencies unless they directly impair a dedicated care-home exit-prevention or alerting control.
  • Excludes hospital ward, prison, hotel and public-site exit controls unless the assertion explicitly concerns the same care-home resident exit process.
  • Excludes the underlying fall, wandering episode or other harm where no continuing deficiency in care-home exit controls is identified.
Reports
2

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
3

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2021–2022

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
7

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission1
St Johns Nursing Home Limited1
Westlands Retirement Home1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Hazel Lillian MAYHO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hazel Lillian MAYHO, aged 82, died on 27 May 2022 after suffering a brain injury when she fell in the garden of a nursing home. The report raised concerns about hazards in the garden, staff being unable to effectively observe vulnerable residents, and the absence of an effective exit control or alert system for residents at risk of entering the garden alone.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of an effective exit control or alert system for residents at risk of entering the garden alone

    Wider context from the report

    “The deceased was 82 years of age, was severely frail and suffered from dementia. The deceased was assessed as being at high risk of falls and a reputation for wandering around the establishment. The deceased was not unique amongst the other residents in having such vulnerabilities. The lounge areas of the nursing home have doors leading to the garden. The garden has within it potential hazards to a vulnerable resident with a high risk of falls. The doors are kept wide open in warm weather. Whether a resident has entered the garden is only known if they are observed by a member of staff to do so. Members of staff are frequently distracted by other duties hindering their ability to fully and effectively observe vulnerable residents entering the garden. There is an absence of an effective exit control process to ensure that those with a recognised risk of entering the garden alone are prevented from doing so or an effective alert system is triggered when they do so. ”

    Source location

    Hazel Lillian MAYHO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install an additional beam to detect garden entry when doors are open.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An additional beam has been installed (8th December 2022) – this allows the doors to be open when required in hot weather at residents’ request but it now allows for staff to know if someone has entered into the garden without them being observed should they be busy and not able to see if this has happened as mentioned in your report, this is a separate beam to the door opening and closing.”

    Source location

    Response from Westlands Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 October 2022

    Open published response
  2. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen Martin Verrall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen Martin Verrall fell from the window of his first-floor room at St John’s Nursing Home and died from his injuries two days later. Concerns included an inadequate window restrictor, lack of a window-maintenance risk assessment, unrestricted windows remaining years later, and risks of residents leaving the home unaccompanied.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of weekend reception monitoring to prevent residents following visitors through the exit door

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) St John’s Nursing Home – I heard that Stephen had managed to leave the home unaccompanied on several occasions. The opportunity to do so for those without capacity and without the ability to assess risk poses a risk to their lives. I was told that the reception is not manned on the weekends and there is a risk that residents may follow visitors through the door when they leave. ”

    Source location

    Stephen Martin Verrall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent unaccompanied exit by residents without capacity or ability to assess risk

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) St John’s Nursing Home – I heard that Stephen had managed to leave the home unaccompanied on several occasions. The opportunity to do so for those without capacity and without the ability to assess risk poses a risk to their lives. I was told that the reception is not manned on the weekends and there is a risk that residents may follow visitors through the door when they leave. ”

    Source location

    Stephen Martin Verrall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Restrict visitor access codes and require staff accompaniment for entry and exit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “i. Visitors are not given the key code, which is changed regularly, for entry or exit so are accompanied by a member of staff;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advise staff about unauthorised exits and require secure door closure and vigilance around reception.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ii. All staff have been advised of the potential problem of residents leaving through the front door. When letting visitors in and out of the building staff ensure the door is securely closed behind them and they have been advised to be alert around the reception area during the course of their working day/night;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advertise for a weekend receptionist to monitor the door at weekends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iv. We are advertising for a weekend receptionist to ensure going forwards the door is monitored at weekends. In the interim, all staff are ensuring the door is closed securely behind them;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check at the next inspection that St John’s Nursing Home has embedded its premises-security changes and is effectively minimising identified risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to inspecting St John’s Nursing Home on 13 October 2021, we also wrote to the registered provider on 21 October 2021 and asked them to provide any further information and supporting evidence about the action they have taken or intend to take in response to your report. We received a response from the registered provider on 22 October 2021.”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Station the administrator in reception during normal working hours to monitor the entrance and secure door closure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii. During normal working hours, the administrator is situated in the reception area and ensures staff securely closes the door behind them;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Position a staff member by the side gate during fire drills and disable the gate's exit code.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “v. We ensure that when there is a fire drill a member of staff stands by the side gate. This gate is key coded for exit, which is disabled during fire drills. The member of staff ensures residents do not leave the premises;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026