Recurring concern

Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 18 Dec 2013•Latest report 3 Sep 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the interagency safeguarding-information-sharing process, including obtaining relevant information, securing or recording appropriate consent for disclosure, communicating risk information across agencies, and ensuring that receiving agencies obtain complete and accurate information.

Not included

  • Excludes generic communication or information-management failures not materially connected to safeguarding risk information or interagency care.
  • Excludes failures confined to disclosure to a court, coroner or other legal inquiry rather than safeguarding or care coordination.
  • Excludes failures in making safeguarding referrals where the concern is the referral decision itself rather than the sharing of information between agencies.
  • Excludes clinical assessment, care ownership or discharge failures unless the unsafe condition is specifically the failure to share relevant safeguarding risk information between agencies.
Reports
23

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
26

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
45

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care7
Home Office4
Department for Education3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
Crown Prosecution Service2
Greater Manchester Police2
Ministry of Justice2
NHS England2
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Surrey County Council2
Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Bury Borough Council1
Catholic Safeguarding Standards Agency1
Church of England1
College of Policing1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Lucy-Anne DYSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lucy Rushton died on 23 June 2019 in the early hours of the morning following a prolonged, severe and brutal attack, with multiple blunt force injuries; the narrative conclusion recorded that she was unlawfully killed. The principal concerns were the lack of a national interface for sharing safeguarding information between schools and relevant agencies, and the lack of national guidance or standards governing safeguarding referrals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a national interface for safeguarding reporting and communication between schools and relevant agencies

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of a national interface to enable reporting/communication between schools using safeguarding record keeping systems (e.g. CPOMS) and relevant agencies, including Police and Children’s Services. ”

    Source location

    Lucy-Anne DYSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a consistent child identifier through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to enable secure cross-agency record matching.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Single unique identifier The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, introduced in Parliament on 17th December will protect children at risk of abuse, stopping vulnerable children falling through cracks in services, and deliver a core guarantee of high standards with space for innovation in every child’s education.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run local pilots testing the consistent child identifier with existing safeguarding systems and databases to inform national interoperability standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Pilots and Implementation Planning The Department has initiated a series of local pilots to test the implementation of the consistent child identifier and its interoperability with existing safeguarding systems (such as CPOMS) and local authority databases. Learning from these pilots will inform national standards for interoperability between systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop national data standards with education, local authority and technology partners for secure connections between school safeguarding systems and partner agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• System and Process Reform Alongside legislative changes, the Department is convening education, local authority, and technology partners to develop national data standards to enable secure, accurate connections between school safeguarding systems and partner agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2026

    Open published response
  2. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Ella Louise Murray · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ella Louise Murray was 13 years old when she died at Kings College hospital on 15 November 2023 following an episode of hanging, after a period of self-harm, suicidal ideation and deteriorating mental health. The report raised concerns about the adequacy of her risk assessment and the failure to take urgent protective action, including removing her from home or convening an urgent multi-agency response. It also identified the lack of shared information and records across health, social care and education services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of shared access to safeguarding records across agencies

    Wider context from the report

    “(1)During the course of the inquest it became clear that Ella was a child in a complex family situation and showing signs of deterioration of her mental health. Her school had raised concerns about her with social services and taken steps to make sure she was seen by healthcare professionals when she indicated to staff at school she wanted to end her life on 13 November 2023. She was assessed by mental health nursing staff and accepted to the caseload of the Intensive Home Treatment Team. She was seen the following day and told the staff nurse who saw her that she was frightened of her stepfather and had run away from home barefoot and police called but she was brought back home by her mother who “grabbed her face” the morning she was seen. She told the nurse that she did not want to be in the family home and would rather go to prison and would harm herself or others is she had to stay at home. (2) This disclosure led to the nurse making a Safeguarding Referral but this was made after she left Ella’s home and no urgent steps were taken to remove Ella either to a hospital bed or to ask social services to consider if she should be removed from the family home. Her school had raised concerns about her and she herself had indicated she wished to end her life. Evidence heard at the inquest was that this was the procedure in place and there is no shared access to records for all agencies and no way to convene an urgent multi-agency meeting to determine if Ella was safe to remain at home. Had steps been taken to share information between her school, social services and the mental health providers when she attend the emergency department on 13 November 2023 or early the following day rather than leave her at home she may have been removed from her home and may still be alive today. ”

    Source location

    Ella Louise Murray · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide agencies with access to all relevant cross-sector safeguarding information

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Whilst there were concerns about the level of risk assessment undertaken on 14 November 2023 senior staff at the Trust gave evidence that she did not meet the criteria for admission to a hospital bed. This was difficult to reconcile with the documentary evidence as she was clearly crying out for help and her school had recognised this. No one agency involved had access to all the relevant information and concerns about Ella across the health, social care and education arenas. Evidence given suggested that shared records would assist but the ability to respond to urgent concerns would require a system change. (4)It was brought to the court’s attention that the new Children’s Wellbeing and Schools bill includes a duty to share information to promote safeguarding. In addition the local authority may convene a strategy meeting under s47 of the Children Act 1989 although the speed of convening a meeting would depend on availability and would obviously not be as swift as for example attending an accident and emergency department. If a multiagency meeting had been convened this may have prevented Ella’s death and such action may reduce the risk of death for other children being in a similar position. ”

    Source location

    Ella Louise Murray · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the national rollout of reforms to family help, multi-agency child protection and family group decision-making, including multi-agency child protection teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of this, the Government’s Families First Partnership programme is delivering the national rollout of reforms to family help, multi-agency child protection and family group decision-making, including delivery of MACPTs. The programme guide sets out the responsibilities of the MACPT members, including to facilitate better communication and information sharing among practitioners and agencies. This is available at: Families First Partnership programme - GOV.UK”

    Source location

    2025-0182 Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver system-wide learning events on provider learning, family perspectives and inter-agency working following children’s and young people’s suicides.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the ICBs response to a number of suicides of children and young people during 2023, a series of learning events have taken place. The first focused on North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT - our children and young people mental health services provider) and their learning as an organisation. The second focused on the patients’ and their families’ perspective to ensure their voices were engaged as part of wider learning. The third focused on system wide/inter agency working in November 2024. This event will culminate in a system wide improvement plan that will include a focus on agency information sharing, risk assessments and decision making among others. Work on a shared risk protocol across system partners has already commenced.”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a system-wide improvement plan addressing agency information sharing, risk assessments and decision-making.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the ICBs response to a number of suicides of children and young people during 2023, a series of learning events have taken place. The first focused on North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT - our children and young people mental health services provider) and their learning as an organisation. The second focused on the patients’ and their families’ perspective to ensure their voices were engaged as part of wider learning. The third focused on system wide/inter agency working in November 2024. This event will culminate in a system wide improvement plan that will include a focus on agency information sharing, risk assessments and decision making among others. Work on a shared risk protocol across system partners has already commenced.”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Kent and Medway Care Record to enable inter-agency access to health and social care records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, Kent & Medway ICB has implemented the Kent and Medway Care Record (KMCR), which supports inter agency access to health and social care records. The level of visibility recommended is largely in place, although continued work to support use of the system is ongoing. There are no current plans to have a direct interface between education and the KMCR, but Kent County Council front door teams, who act as a single point of contact for requests for support at an intensive level or above for children, young people and families, ensuring these requests are directed to the appropriate service for ongoing support”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue work supporting use of the Kent and Medway Care Record across relevant services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, Kent & Medway ICB has implemented the Kent and Medway Care Record (KMCR), which supports inter agency access to health and social care records. The level of visibility recommended is largely in place, although continued work to support use of the system is ongoing. There are no current plans to have a direct interface between education and the KMCR, but Kent County Council front door teams, who act as a single point of contact for requests for support at an intensive level or above for children, young people and families, ensuring these requests are directed to the appropriate service for ongoing support”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No direct education interface with the Kent and Medway Care Record is currently planned because County Council front-door teams provide an alternative information-sharing route.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, Kent & Medway ICB has implemented the Kent and Medway Care Record (KMCR), which supports inter agency access to health and social care records. The level of visibility recommended is largely in place, although continued work to support use of the system is ongoing. There are no current plans to have a direct interface between education and the KMCR, but Kent County Council front door teams, who act as a single point of contact for requests for support at an intensive level or above for children, young people and families, ensuring these requests are directed to the appropriate service for ongoing support”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response
  3. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Mark-Anthony SUMMERSETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark-Anthony Summerset attended Worthing Hospital Emergency Department on 5 February 2024 after expressing suicidal thoughts, but left before triage or assessment and was found deceased in his car in Arundel on 7 February 2024. The principal concern was insufficient recording, information flow and information sharing between the agencies involved, including failures to notify Police that he had left the Emergency Department, which may have limited efforts to locate, contact and urgently treat him.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of sufficient recording, flow and sharing of information across agencies and teams

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst I heard evidence that the UHS Foundation Trust has a Missing Person policy – Walkouts/absconding patients (approved 23 May 2024), in Mr Summerset’s case there was a lack of recorded and/or shared information across all the agencies and teams with whom he had contact, or to whom he was known, such that an accurate and fully reflective risk assessment was not achieved, exacerbated by delays in the triage process in the ED. Mr Summerset was not notified to Police as a missing person and nor were Police informed he had left the ED, despite them simultaneously raising a safeguarding risk via a Vulnerable Adult Single Combined Assessment of Risk Form. In sum, there was therefore a lack of information sufficiency, flow and sharing across the agencies whilst he was present in, and at and after the point he left, the ED, which might have enabled greater efforts to locate, contact and more urgently treat him. ”

    Source location

    Mark-Anthony SUMMERSETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement direct handover of police-conveyed patients to Trust staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the investigation report into Mr Summerset’s attendance and suicide in February 2024, I would firstly confirm that the two key actions in the action plan (support for triage at times of high demand and handover from police to Trust staff) have been addressed.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and implement the Trust-wide Missing Persons policy, including risk assessment, detention, communication, escalation and post-departure procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has fully reviewed and revised the Missing Persons policy, with more information around the required processes in relation to patients who are at risk of absconding, and actions to be taken when patients do leave. This was done collaboratively across primarily the medical divisions and ED teams, but also with the other Divisions. There is detailed information around the legal principles and powers available to staff to detain and prevent patients from leaving (Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act) alongside more detailed information about the police response to missing persons, and criteria of those patients of critical concern who they will respond to. There are clear guidelines, flow charts and documentation to be used for the assessment of vulnerable patients, a process if concern are intending to leave and once have left.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate Missing Persons policy guidance, flow charts and documentation to wards, emergency departments and clinical staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The policy essential documentation and guidelines therein, were circulated to all wards and EDs before May 25th when phase 2 of RCRP was introduced across Sussex, and the main documents and flow charts to be used sent as separate, ready to hand information. These were further recirculated in Q2 (following slight update/ minor amendments to the policy early September, which included the system escalation responses) to ensure there was a renewed focus for clinical teams.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update emergency-department triage, mental-health liaison, observation and communication documentation with partner clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Divisions of Medicine have continued to work collaboratively with SPFT colleagues over the year reviewing ED documentation (reviewing assessments of both triage and Mental Health Liaison Team (MHLT), enhanced observation processes, and the communications between the EDs and the”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send daily reports of police-referred missing patients to Trust and emergency-department nursing leaders for risk review, feedback and learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since May 2024, UHSx have worked further with Sussex Police to review missing patients who have been referred to police for follow up post absconding. Daily reports are sent to the hospital nurse directors, medicine divisional directors of nursing, and ED matron/heads of nursing, in order to review the patients, to confirm if request for police follow up was appropriate in terms of risk of patient or not, and also to share any feedback and learning.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold fortnightly multidisciplinary missing-patient meetings involving nursing, emergency, police, mental-health and security teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has commenced on the Royal Sussex County Hospital and Princess Royal Hospital sites a fortnightly meeting to discuss cases with senior nurse leads/ED, police, SPFT and security teams present. This is helping to inform learning and improve processes and communication between all system partners. Similar meetings will be set up for Worthing Hospital and St Richard’s Hospital sites to facilitate the same shared learning and improvements in processes. It is hoped these can commence in March 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and recirculate quick-reference absconding guidance, flow charts and missing-person documentation for wards and emergency departments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Post coroner’s inquest, the Divisional Director of Nursing for Medicine, Worthing, has further followed up with lead in SPFT for Worthing site, and having reviewed the guidelines produced for MHLT colleagues, has developed some similar bullet point guidelines for wards and EDs for quick easy reference, and is recirculating these across the Trust with the key flowcharts and missing person documentation from the policy. This will provide further quick reference laminated guidance at point of care to help staff at the time when faced by an absconding patient, to ensure correct processes are followed to promote the patient’s safeguarding to reduce potential harm after leaving the department. This can be provided as evidence should HM Coroner request this.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
  4. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Jennifer Sharren Chalkley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jennifer Sharren Chalkley, aged 17, died by suicide on 12 October 2021 after being found hanging in her bedroom. The report identifies concerns about delays and misconceptions affecting Education, Health and Care Plan assessments, failures to transfer safeguarding information promptly when she changed college, and shortcomings in multi-agency assessment, information sharing and support for her mental health needs and suicide risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a national system for guaranteed transfer of safeguarding information

    Wider context from the report

    “I also heard that there is no centralised system that stores and transfers learning support and safeguarding information between schools and colleges, or other agencies who are supporting young people. Rather, the transfer of documents is undertaken by the individual schools and colleges concerned, with, I heard, variable levels of efficiency and reliability. In the circumstances, I am concerned that there is not a national system in place to require and facilitate the guaranteed transfer of safeguarding information in advance of a child or young person starting a new school or college at the start of a new term or academic year, and that this exposes a suicidal child or young person to additional and avoidable risk. ”

    Source location

    Jennifer Sharren Chalkley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review statutory safeguarding guidance for opportunities to strengthen or clarify information-sharing requirements, including this section following the case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is therefore a national process for sharing information between schools and colleges, and the guidance on the timing of the sharing of relevant information is clear. We are very saddened to hear that, in Jennifer's case, her new college had not received the information within the specified time to ensure continuity of support for Jennifer. This was not in line with the duties and responsibilities placed on schools and colleges. We do regularly review the statutory safeguarding guidance to see where it could be strengthened or further clarification is needed, which is subject to public consultation. In view of this very tragic case, we will keep this section under review.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A national process exists for transferring safeguarding information, with clear guidance on required timing between schools and colleges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is therefore a national process for sharing information between schools and colleges, and the guidance on the timing of the sharing of relevant information is clear. We are very saddened to hear that, in Jennifer's case, her new college had not received the information within the specified time to ensure continuity of support for Jennifer. This was not in line with the duties and responsibilities placed on schools and colleges. We do regularly review the statutory safeguarding guidance to see where it could be strengthened or further clarification is needed, which is subject to public consultation. In view of this very tragic case, we will keep this section under review.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 October 2024

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Helen Jane Kerr · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Helen Jane Kerr had a history of drug and alcohol abuse, developed psychosis, and died by hanging after being found dead at a refuge on 3 April 2023. The report identified concerns about failures to respond appropriately and promptly to information about her deteriorating mental health, inadequate assessment and treatment, limited out-of-hours information sharing, and failure to inform the refuge about risks associated with her presentation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of timely out-of-hours information sharing between police, mental health agencies and adult safeguarding

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The SCARF process does not enable information sharing between the Police, Mental Health Agencies and Surrey Adult Safeguarding out of hours. It is under review. It remains unclear how information sharing out of hours is to be achieved in a timely fashion to safeguard individuals and the public. ”

    Source location

    Helen Jane Kerr · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing emergency communication routes provide sufficient means to share information and formulate safety plans for imminent out-of-hours risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are numerous things that officers can do in terms of informing our partners about more imminent risk. The primary one is the Emergency Duty Team (EDT) – this process is long established for response officers. This is person-to-person communication between agencies, where agreements can be made and issues escalated. Likewise, there are other methods, such as the professionals / crisis line / Accident and Emergency departments etc. All of these are 24/7 where ‘real time’ concerns can be discussed and safety plans formulated.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Professionals and Crisis Lines provide the appropriate urgent information-sharing and crisis referral pathways, so SCARF need not provide crisis access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The PFD Report also outlines a concern that the Single Combined Assessment of Risk Form, known as a SCARF, does not enable information sharing between organisations out of hours. The purpose of a SCARF is to help police officers to record and raise safeguarding concerns and observations about the needs, vulnerabilities and risk issues relating to those who come into contact with the police. A SCARF is not designed to be used to access crisis support or obtain emergency assistance. If the police have concerns which require urgent attention or advice, there is a dedicated Professionals Line which operates 365 days a year, 24 hours a day.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Emergency Duty Team and police contact processes adequately support urgent out-of-hours referrals; SCARF need not be shared outside office hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Scarf Process is not designed to be used as an emergency referral out of hours. There is a clear, well known and well used process for officers, in that they must contact the Emergency Duty Team outside hours, if they need urgent social care intervention. The EDT has a single number that is published on the SCC website https://www.surreycc.gov.uk/adults/care-and-support/contact . This has not changed for many years. In terms of the Police the relevant numbers are included within all of the Mental Health briefing products (briefing slides, routine orders) and the force Mental Health guide which is available via officer’s mobile devices and their intranet hub. The number is also included within all of their training products relating to s136.”

    Source location

    Response-from-Surrey-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 September 2024

    Open published response
  6. Milton Keynes

    AI-generated summary

    Leah Shannon Croucher · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leah Shannon Croucher left home to walk to work on 15 February 2019 but did not arrive, and her body was found in a Milton Keynes house in October 2022. The inquest concluded that she was unlawfully killed. The report raises concerns about the supervision of a known repeat sex offender and information sharing between the police and probation service.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share information between agencies supervising sex offenders

    Wider context from the report

    “Leah Croucher was unlawfully killed by a man who was subject to supervision by the probation service and the police. Despite that supervision he was in breach of the terms of his probation and was able to kill Leah when it was known that he was a predator and danger to females. There should be a fundamental review of the process for monitoring sex offenders in the community and the sharing of information between all agencies particularly the police and probation service to ensure that a similar death can be prevented. ”

    Source location

    Leah Shannon Croucher · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Oversee a review of multi-agency processes for monitoring sexual offenders and exchanging police and probation information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Chair of the SMB has accepted that the Board should oversee a piece of work to review the effectiveness of the multi-agency processes for monitoring sex offenders and for information exchange between police and probation. This will build on the extensive learning which came from the MAPPA Serious Case Review (SCR) and associated action plan, which is due to be implemented in full by August 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS - Probation Service South Central
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review information-sharing practice at pre-sentence report stage and throughout order or licence management, concluding by 31 March 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the Probation Service, we will focus our review on information sharing practice at the pre-sentence report stage and throughout the management of an order or licence, building on the actions set out in the internal Serious Further Offence (SFO) review. The Pathfinder to Improved Pre-Sentence Advice (PIPA) project is piloting in the South Central Probation Region. This project aims to improve the quality of Pre-Sentence advice to the Judiciary. This includes reviewing cases further in advance of upcoming hearings. This gives staff more time to gather information from other agencies and consider the implications for risk and the suitability of various sentencing options. We will specifically consider how this is supporting the preparation of reports on registered sex offenders in light of this case.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS - Probation Service South Central
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider how the PIPA project supports preparation of reports on registered sex offenders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the Probation Service, we will focus our review on information sharing practice at the pre-sentence report stage and throughout the management of an order or licence, building on the actions set out in the internal Serious Further Offence (SFO) review. The Pathfinder to Improved Pre-Sentence Advice (PIPA) project is piloting in the South Central Probation Region. This project aims to improve the quality of Pre-Sentence advice to the Judiciary. This includes reviewing cases further in advance of upcoming hearings. This gives staff more time to gather information from other agencies and consider the implications for risk and the suitability of various sentencing options. We will specifically consider how this is supporting the preparation of reports on registered sex offenders in light of this case.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS - Probation Service South Central
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue improving ViSOR delivery as the region’s primary multi-agency information-sharing system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will work with the national Assessment and Management of Sexual Offending (AMSO) Team within HMPPS to share the findings from our review, to support any learning on a national basis, disseminating any outcomes or proposed practice changes which arise from it. This will include continued improvement of the effective and efficient delivery of ViSOR as the primary means of multi-agency information sharing in the region. National projects are ensuring that all areas are working to establish the use of ViSOR as a business-as-usual system in sentence management. Over the last 3 years these projects have seen a steady rise in the number of HMPPS staff with access to ViSOR, rising from less than 300 to more than 3500. These numbers continue to increase by approximately”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS - Probation Service South Central
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide capacity to train 40 staff monthly in ViSOR.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “300 a month and the intention is that more than 12,000 HMPPS members of staff will have access to ViSOR by the time it is replaced by a more dynamic and agile system (MAPPS) in 2026. In South Central ViSOR usage has been increased steadily and now 35% of in scope staff have access to the database. We will continue to provide capacity to train 40 staff a month and pending vetting being timely will deliver full access in a year.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS - Probation Service South Central
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver full ViSOR access to in-scope South Central staff within a year, subject to timely vetting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “300 a month and the intention is that more than 12,000 HMPPS members of staff will have access to ViSOR by the time it is replaced by a more dynamic and agile system (MAPPS) in 2026. In South Central ViSOR usage has been increased steadily and now 35% of in scope staff have access to the database. We will continue to provide capacity to train 40 staff a month and pending vetting being timely will deliver full access in a year.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS - Probation Service South Central
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Lee-Ann Sarah INCE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lee-Ann Sarah Ince was a victim of domestic abuse in a coercive and controlling relationship and was found unresponsive attached to a ligature on 9 May 2023. The inquest identified concerns that agencies did not fully recognise coercive control, the impact of “love bombing” on her mental health, information shared by her children, or her physical-health-related vulnerability and dependence on the perpetrator.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share information effectively between agencies supporting victims of domestic abuse

    Wider context from the report

    “Her children had expressed their concerns to their school. The school had been proactive in sharing those concerns but there was little evidence that other agencies were then listening to “the voice of the child”. This meant that agencies who had direct contact with her did not have a full grasp of the situation or her vulnerability. The inquest was told that if information is not effectively shared and the voice of the child is lost there is an increased risk to the victim. ”

    Source location

    Lee-Ann Sarah INCE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Terence Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Terence Davenport, who had severe dementia, was pushed by another resident at Kings Park Nursing Home on 23 May 2022, suffered a fractured neck of femur, and died at Tameside General Hospital on 24 September 2022 after declining following surgery. Concerns included his prolonged stay in an acute hospital because a suitable care placement was unavailable, and inadequate information sharing about the other resident’s aggressive behaviour, which meant risks to staff and residents were not understood.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of safeguarding information sharing between local authorities, care homes and police

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The inquest was told that resident who pushed Mr Davenport was not suitable for placement at the care home where the incident happened. The care home where previous incidents had occurred was out of area. The inquest was told that lack of information sharing between two GM local authorities, the care homes involved and GMP meant that the safeguarding issue was not recognised. It was unclear if this was due to an effective information sharing protocol not existing between local authorities/care homes/GMP in Greater Manchester or it not being adhered to. However, the impact was that the risk of harm was not understood, and staff and residents were put at risk. ”

    Source location

    Terence Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present the case learning to Tameside care home managers and deliver a further session on discharge and transfers between community and acute settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally learning from this report will be presented to Tameside Care Home Managers in December 2023; the learning will focus on sharing risk information across settings as well as completing robust pre-admission risk assessments. An additional face to face session will take place in February; this will be attended by ICFT Trust Colleagues with a focus on issues around discharge and transfer between community and acute settings.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 October 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share learning through the Greater Manchester System Quality Group on robust information sharing when patients move across settings and localities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) Wider Learning via NHS Greater Manchester – learning will be shared via the GM System Quality Group around ensuring robust information being shared when patients are moving across settings and localities, this is particularly important currently due to current pressures on discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 October 2023

    Open published response
  9. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Lucy Anne Walles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lucy Anne Walles died in hospital on 23 February 2022 after jumping from a bridge on 16 February 2022. She had mild learning disabilities and a history of self-harm, and had recently disclosed thoughts of jumping from the bridge. The principal concerns related to safeguarding, mental health provision, and inter-agency communication, including the handling of safeguarding referrals and the provision of support after her contact with mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of systems to make involved agencies aware of safeguarding referrals and concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “Reading Borough Council 1) Time scales for review and triage of safeguarding referrals. 2) Requirements to speak to the individual about whom safeguarding concerns have been raised. 3) Training around Section 42 and when a report meets the threshold for neglect or abuse. This training should also consider what options are available if a concern does not meet the threshold for a Section 42 enquiry. 4) Systems for making other involved agencies aware of safeguarding referrals and concerns. 5) In relation to each of the above points, whether RBC should reflect the above changes in formal (written) policy, as well as delivering training. 6) Improving interaction amongst agencies involved, and consideration of the threshold for arranging joint meetings to discuss service users, whether they meet Section 42 thresholds or not. The evidence we heard is that this is now being actively encouraged. Should there be written guidance about this somewhat subjective issue ? 7) Whether they consider that the resourcing of this service is adequate and safe. 8) Systems for auditing, and what will happen if the auditing reveals ongoing issues. ”

    Source location

    Lucy Anne Walles · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the One Team community mental health model with multi-agency working, clear safety plans, named workers, feedback, and wider community support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS Trusts are changing and improving the way mental health services are provided in the community to support people with mental illness. In Berkshire Health Care we are calling this programme of work “One Team”. This transformation of services is happening across the country following the publication of the Community Mental”

    Source location

    Response from Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make the Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Team operational to discuss complex cases, share information, formulate risk, and determine suitable pathways and care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Team Complex cases can be discussed to enable a clear formulation of risk and needs. This forum will ensure the person gets the most suitable pathway and care plan to enable the patient to achieve their personal and treatment goals. It is also a place where important information can be shared across agencies pathways, for example,the ARRs worker could present a case here to ensure the correct pathway is in place, adult social care staff can attend to share any concerns. This function will be operational by December 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 June 2023

    Open published response
  10. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Patrick Soames · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patrick Soames died by suicide on 21 June 2021 after a final month involving repeated serious self-harm, including cutting, medication overdose and excessive alcohol misuse, with multiple hospital attendances. The principal concerns were that information about his risk was fragmented across NHS Trusts, police forces, local authorities and geographical areas, with no effective system to consolidate or flag his recent self-harm history nationally.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share or provide access to critical self-harm risk information for directly involved NHS Trusts

    Wider context from the report

    “1. 5 NHS Trusts and 3 police forces in different geographic areas had contact with Patrick in the final month of his life and each thereby gained some information about the risk to him. However, that information was by reason of the agencies falling into different geographic areas. There was no single effective global focus for the information being acquired piecemeal about Patrick’s pattern of serious self-harming behaviour. The various agencies were significantly impeded in forming a single clear picture of Patrick’s pattern of behaviour (which was particularly necessary in circumstances where he was not engaging and therefore not assisting in providing a complete history himself). 2. GPs act as a repository for information about contact with other clinical agencies (such as attendances at accident and emergency departments) and therefore serve as a point of contact for information about past history. However, I heard evidence at inquest from accident and emergency consultants that it is either not possible to access information held by a GP outside of GP surgery hours or where it is possible to do so that is only available if the GP is in the same geographic area as the accident and emergency department. Several of Patrick’s attendances at accident and emergency departments were out of GP surgery hours. 3. I was informed at inquest that one local authority (in whose area Patrick resided) had been made aware by police of the risk to Patrick following one of his self-harm incidents (in respect of a particularly important piece of information) and had relayed that information to a 6th NHS Trust (not one of the 5 from which I heard evidence at inquest) but Patrick did not reside in that Trust area. Those Trusts which did have direct contact with Patrick were never made aware of that piece of information nor had any means of accessing it. 4. I heard evidence that there is no national ‘risk flagging’ system: for example, when a person attends an accident and emergency department having self-harmed, the fact of a previous self-harm attendance at a different accident and emergency department is not systematically flagged up. 5. In summary, there was no single effective global focus consolidating the information which was flowing into the various agencies about Patrick; no global focus to which those agencies could in turn refer in emergency to obtain the totality of information about Patrick’s recent pattern of behaviour; no national ‘risk flagging’ system to alert those agencies to his significant recent history. ”

    Source location

    Patrick Soames · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026