Recurring concern

Inadequate provision of food for care residents

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 26 Sep 2014•Latest report 24 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in the end-to-end provision of food to care residents, including shortages, unsuitable or limited dietary options, preparation or presentation failures, and failure to provide required mealtime assistance.

Not included

  • Excludes generic staff shortages unless they are specifically tied to inadequate food provision.
  • Excludes shortages of general equipment unless the evidence specifically ties the equipment failure to food provision.
  • Excludes unrelated shortages of placements, beds, clinical staff, interpreting services or other resources.
  • Excludes fluid-intake monitoring or documentation failures unless they are part of a directly evidenced food-provision deficiency.
Reports
14

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
15

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
25

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission3
Department of Health and Social Care2
Adelaide Medical Centre, London1
Bolton Borough Council1
Bramling Cross Registrations Limited1
Bupa Care Homes (GL) Limited1
Cardinal HC Limited1
Care First Homes1
Caring UK Limited1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Harbour Healthcare Ltd.1
Hill Care Group1
Hilltop Court Nursing Home1
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Patrick Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patrick Griffin died on 17 August 2025 at the Stamford Unit, Tameside General Hospital, from bronchopneumonia against a background of Alzheimer’s disease. He had been admitted from residential care, where it was recognised that he needed support with dietary and fluid intake and full assistance with hygiene and personal care. On admission, he was dehydrated and had not opened his bowels for seven days; the inquest found that a number of his basic care needs had not been met.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate dietary and fluid intake support

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Griffin lived with advanced dementia and moved into Moss Cottage on temporary basis on 18 July 2025 to afford his wife and main carer a period of respite. I am concerned that, despite it being recognised that Mr Griffin needed support with dietary and fluid intake, and full assistance with hygiene and personal care, when admitted to hospital on 6 August 2025, he was noted: 1) To be dehydrated; and 2) Not to have opened his bowels for 7 days. ”

    Source location

    Patrick Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train all care staff and nurses in communication, documentation, reporting, nutrition, malnutrition and dehydration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The leadership team at Moss Cottage were placed on a performance plan and provided with additional training and mentoring to strengthen their skillset and address the issues identified. All Care Staff and Nurses have been allocated and completed the following training:”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate relevant record-keeping, care, nutrition, hydration, bowel-care, accountability, delegation and leadership policies through the quality compliance software reading list.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All Care Staff and Nurses have received the following policies and procedures via a reading list on the quality compliance software programme that is in use:”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise daily handovers to record dietary intake, fluid consumption and elimination for earlier intervention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The daily handover has been reviewed, and we have added additional sections, which include dietary intake, fluid consumption and elimination, to aide early intervention.”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add fluid-balance charts and bowel activity to the manager’s daily walk-round checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, a new Management Team is now in place at Moss Cottage, and the Manager is spot checking and auditing that documentation is robust throughout the week and the Senior Governance Manager is auditing monthly. Fluid balance charts and bowel activity have been added to the Managers daily walk round.”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Elaine Jean GRIFFITHS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elaine Jean Griffiths died at Northampton General Hospital on 7 October 2022 from COVID pneumonitis, with congestive cardiac failure and a fall resulting in a fractured neck of femur also recorded. Concerns included incomplete fluid and diet charts, uncertainty about her gluten and dairy intolerance, limited suitable food options, and family-provided food not being recorded; the report states these matters were not causative of death in this case.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited food options for patients requiring gluten- and dairy-free, bite-sized diets

    Wider context from the report

    “Given the importance of accurately monitoring both fluid and food intake in this context, I have the following concerns albeit I did not find that these matters were causative of death in the present case:- A) The Ward Sister said in her evidence that “on occasional days, the fluid and diet charts were only partially completed”. B) There was confusion about whether or not Mrs G was gluten and dairy intolerant. A Mental Health Nurse recorded on 31.08.22 “she was eating and drinking poorly as she follows a gluten and dairy free diet and reported the ward only give her lentil casseroles”. However, the Consultant/Orthogeriatric said in his evidence “.she had very poor oral intake and family were insisting she had an allergy to gluten and lactose despite Mrs Griffiths denying this”. C) The family say that the choice of options for those with gluten and dairy intolerance and also requiring bite sized food was very limited, which disproportionately affects the elderly. D) The family say that the fluid and diet charts were not accurate as the family were bringing in food and this was not being recorded. As the charts were inaccurate, this would also have made it more difficult for the dietician to offer meaningful advice. ”

    Source location

    Elaine Jean GRIFFITHS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Analyse modified menus and operate a multidisciplinary Menu Planning Group to improve inclusive options for complex dietary requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to meet the National Standards for healthcare food and drink, the Trust appointed a Food Services Dietitian in March 2025. Since taking up post, the Dietitian has completed a comprehensive analysis of the existing texture of the modified menu to assess nutritional adequacy, allergen safety and alignment with patient needs. Following these reviews, we have established a Multidisciplinary Menu Planning Group which has brought together catering, dietetics, nursing and patient representatives in order to improve the food menu design and to ensure a consistent and inclusive availability of suitable options, including those patients with complex dietary requirements.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Procure a meal provider offering a broader range of allergen-free meals and implement interim allergy-safe menu measures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is also progressing with the procurement of a new meal provider that will offer a more comprehensive range of allergen free meals. We anticipate the full service to be in place by mid-2026 and in the interim period we are implementing measures to strengthen allergy safe options for patients. These measures have included the introduction of a dedicated snack menu that caters for patients with both swallowing difficulties and food allergies, as well as an increased range of suitable dessert options. Menus will also be updated to ensure coding for allergens is clearer.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce dedicated snack and expanded dessert options for patients with swallowing difficulties or food allergies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is also progressing with the procurement of a new meal provider that will offer a more comprehensive range of allergen free meals. We anticipate the full service to be in place by mid-2026 and in the interim period we are implementing measures to strengthen allergy safe options for patients. These measures have included the introduction of a dedicated snack menu that caters for patients with both swallowing difficulties and food allergies, as well as an increased range of suitable dessert options. Menus will also be updated to ensure coding for allergens is clearer.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response
  3. Northumberland

    AI-generated summary

    Joan WHITWORTH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Whitworth, a resident of Oaks Care Home with advanced dementia and a DNACPR order, died there on 3 March 2023 after choking caused by massive aspiration. Concerns included the adequacy of the speech and language assessment, staff training and induction, delayed intervention when she showed signs of choking, and food being prepared contrary to her diet plan.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure food provided conforms to residents' identified diet plans

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Normal Diet IDDSI L7 easy chew and to avoid difficult textures. I am concerned that a chef in evidence at the inquest was not aware that breaded fish was not a suitable food stuff in the diet identified for the deceased. I am concerned that other residents could be fed inappropriate food stuffs that are not in line with their identified diet plans. ”

    Source location

    Joan WHITWORTH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver an IDDSI diet competency assessment to all staff and require completion by 30 September 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1e. We have developed and issued a competency assessment to check staff knowledge of IDDSI diets.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use revised agency induction forms to verify first aid, mandatory training, modified-diet awareness and daily nutritional-report awareness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3a. We have reviewed the induction forms for all agency roles that we use in our homes to ensure that they capture information that allows us to see that agency care assistants have up-to-date first aid training. For agency senior care assistants and nurses we have modified our form to ensure we check that mandatory training is in place and in date, and that residents modified diets are discussed and the worker is aware of the IDDSI and nutritional report that is reviewed daily.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver face-to-face modified-food preparation training to Hill Care cooks and chefs, including practical preparation of different consistencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4a. A specialist IDDSI training provider has been sourced and face to face training in preparation of modified foods is being delivered to all Hill Care Cooks and Chefs between the dates 13 September 2025 and 22 October 2025. This training will give chefs and cooks the opportunity to practically prepare meals of different consistencies and further their knowledge regarding appropriate and inappropriate foods for specific IDDSI level diets. The chef and cook at The Oaks will attend on 13th September and 24th September 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a competency assessment for all catering team members.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4b. We have developed and introduced a competency assessment to all members of the catering team.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide serving-trolley reference sheets showing each resident’s IDDSI level and nutritional needs, with daily review at flash meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4c. We have introduced a reference sheet which highlights every residents’ IDDSI level and additional nutritional needs which is available to all staff on each serving trolley. This form is reviewed at the daily ‘flash’ meeting to ensure that changes in need are documented without delay.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a pre-meal safety pause to confirm dining-room awareness of special diets and correct meal provision, with Regional Manager observation during visits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4d. Following the death of Mrs Whitworth, we introduced a safety pause before real meals. This consists of the senior person on duty confirming that the team within the dining room are aware of any special diets and that the kitchen have provided the correct diet. The Regional Managers observe this to monitor practice when they visit the home.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The measures described are considered sufficient to satisfy the concerns, so no further safety work is proposed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We trust that these measures are sufficient to satisfy your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response
  4. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Alfred SPARROW · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alfred Sparrow, who lived with vascular dementia, became a resident at The Meadows Nursing Home on 11 September 2023 and died there on 1 December 2023 after fluctuating food and fluid intake, increasing frailty and a significant deterioration. Concerns included staff not always assisting him with food and fluid intake as required by his care plan, a care-note entry recording that he drank tea about two hours after his death, and the failure of the nursing home manager’s investigation to identify that false entry and the related deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide required assistance with food and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Mr. Sparrow had a longstanding diagnosis of vascular dementia, and his care plan stated that he required full assistance and support from staff at mealtimes with regard to his intake of food and fluids, and that he would not support himself if food and drink was placed in front of him. Despite the care plan, entries in Mr. Sparrow’s care notes, while recording his food and fluid intake, made no mention of whether a staff member at The Meadows Nursing Home was assisting him in this regard. Having heard the evidence at the inquest, I was satisfied, and found as a matter of fact, that staff at The Meadows Nursing Home did not always assist Mr. Sparrow with his food and fluid intake; ”

    Source location

    Alfred SPARROW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The resident retained some ability to feed himself, so full mealtime assistance was not always necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner’s first concern revolves around the care provided to Mr Sparrow during mealtimes. His care plan at his previous care home specified that he required full assistance with food and fluid intake due to his diagnosis of vascular dementia. However, care notes documenting his food and fluid intake did not clearly indicate whether he was being assisted, raising concerns that Mr Sparrow might not always have received the assistance required, potentially putting his health at risk.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardinal Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 August 2025

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    John Fallon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Fallon, who had dementia and was resident at Downshaw Lodge Care Home, choked on partially chewed meat while eating lunch without his dentures on 13 March 2022. The concerns included the lack of routine SALT assessments and diet changes when residents eat without dentures, delays in replacing or updating dentures due to limited dental services, and the absence of routinely available suction machines in care homes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely alter care home residents' diets to reflect reduced chewing capacity

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that although he needed his dentures to chew in a satisfactory way, SALT assessments are not routinely carried out where an individual goes from eating with dentures to eating without dentures. As a consequence the diet is not routinely altered in a care home setting to reflect the reduced chewing capacity; ”

    Source location

    John Fallon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing policy considers food-only swallowing difficulties manageable through food texture changes without specialist SALT assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As outlined in the Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (TGICFT) Community Dysphagia Policy, swallowing assessments are usually only given to patients who are thought to have swallowing difficulties with fluids, not with food, although the two are likely to coincide. This policy has been shared with colleagues in the community. The Trust would not accept a referral for a swallowing assessment from a care home if the patient’s swallowing difficulty was thought to only be with food. This is because difficulties in swallowing food can be managed by changing the texture of the food that is given to the patient and does not require a specialist assessment, although the Trust would offer advice and support if needed. Under Regulation 9 of the CQC guidance – Person Centred Care, the responsibility for diet modification lies with the care home.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for modifying residents’ diets lies with the care home under person-centred care requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As outlined in the Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (TGICFT) Community Dysphagia Policy, swallowing assessments are usually only given to patients who are thought to have swallowing difficulties with fluids, not with food, although the two are likely to coincide. This policy has been shared with colleagues in the community. The Trust would not accept a referral for a swallowing assessment from a care home if the patient’s swallowing difficulty was thought to only be with food. This is because difficulties in swallowing food can be managed by changing the texture of the food that is given to the patient and does not require a specialist assessment, although the Trust would offer advice and support if needed. Under Regulation 9 of the CQC guidance – Person Centred Care, the responsibility for diet modification lies with the care home.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 November 2022

    Open published response
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Cristofaro PRIOLO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cristofaro Priolo, an 80-year-old man with progressive Alzheimer’s dementia who lived in a nursing home, choked on cauliflower cheese on 25 November 2020 and died. The report identifies concerns that his food was not prepared or fed in accordance with his assessed needs, and that staff failed to provide appropriate first aid, recognise cardiac arrest, and attempt effective CPR.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prepare food safely for people at risk of choking

    Wider context from the report

    “A BUPA internal investigation has already taken place and identified some learning points. However, there are matters outstanding around training and audit. Obviously, the cauliflower for Mr Priolo should have been prepared properly for him by the catering staff, but quite apart from that, Mr Priolo’s carers were never assessed when they were feeding him. Whilst the carer who was feeding him when he choked knew that he needed small, soft mouthfuls that he should be allowed to swallow completely before offering the next, that is not what happened. He was fed a large quantity of cauliflower cheese, it seems relatively quickly, that was undercooked to the point of being almost raw, making it much too hard for him to swallow safely. Staff, including qualified nursing staff, then failed to give appropriate first aid. Even 18 months after the event when they were giving evidence in court this week – the inquest had been delayed to allow a police investigation – some staff were unable to describe the correct treatment for choking. Most significantly, nursing staff failed to recognise that Mr Priolo had suffered a cardiac arrest. They then failed to attempt CPR. After the arrival of paramedics, one member of nursing staff did attempt to give chest compressions, but these were ineffective. That is likely to be the result of panic and distress. These are common feelings in an emergency situation, but the risk of them overwhelming resuscitation efforts may be reduced by frequent appropriate training. ”

    Source location

    Cristofaro PRIOLO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen and embed the Highgate Mealtime Champion role to oversee mealtime support and compliance with dietary requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The role of “Mealtime Champion” was strengthened in the Highgate. The person fulfilling this role in the Highgate assists with the mealtime experience of residents and ensures that any dietary”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce and strengthen the Mealtime Champion role across the care-home portfolio.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The role of Mealtime Champion generally is included and defined within our Mealtime Experience document, which applies to all our care homes. As a general point, this role will be reinforced and strengthened throughout our portfolio. The Mealtime Champion is defined in the document as being someone who is in charge of coordinating the mealtime experience for residents, and actively supervises the meal service. They need to ensure that residents receive the appropriate levels of nutrition, hydration and supervision, to avoid instances such as choking.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement UK-wide kitchen quality assurance checks for food temperature, thorough cooking and required consistency before food leaves the kitchen.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Bupa will implement a process to ensure food is quality assured prior to leaving the kitchen. This will be clearly described in our HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) policy and documented next to the temperature checks within our standard paperwork. This new process will ensure that all food leaves the kitchen, a) at the right temperature and b) cooked thoroughly or the correct consistency. This would address and identify any repeat of undercooked food leaving the kitchen. This process will not be unique to the Highgate, it will be adopted UK wide across our portfolio.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review HACCP, nutrition, mealtime, IDDSI and induction materials to align policies and training with safe dietary assistance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. A review of the HACCP policy, Nutrition and Weight Management policy, Mealtime Experience Standards, and associated training such as the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) will take place to ensure the actions described in this response are reflected in policy and training. This will include a review of induction material (Nutrition and Hydration) to ensure staff are taught how to assist residents with dietary intake in a safe way applicable to their needs.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and roll out role-specific IDDSI descriptor videos across the organisation, updating the Mealtime Experience document afterwards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Bupa, in collaboration with Robot Coupe, will develop a suite of short videos, targeted to film in July 2022, on each of the IDDSI descriptors levels. This should be completed by the end of August 2022 and will be made available across the organisation and rolled out to employees subject to their roles. The Mealtime Experience document (referred to earlier in this response) will be reviewed in line with the IDDSI work we are planning and will be updated once the videos have been produced.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enforce the Resident Mealtime Form process and maintain its monthly or needs-based review for resident-specific dietary information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. The Resident Mealtime Form (completed by the nursing and care team at the point of a resident’s admission and used by the catering team) will be enforced. This will ensure that the existing process is operating effectively. This form is designed to capture resident specific information such as allergies, modified diet requirements or specific cutlery required. The form is reviewed monthly or more frequently as required. At Highgate, a copy of this form is kept within the Home’s SaLT folders, including the SaLT folder kept in the kitchen. The SaLT folder includes for each of the Home’s residents: dietary information, the Resident Mealtime Form, eating/drinking protocols, IDDSI recommendations for residents, recommendations/advice from SaLT, the IDDSI framework and guidance on this, and blank SaLT referral forms.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate lessons learned and changed catering processes to Chef Managers and catering teams across the business.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. The Director of Hotel Services and Customer First will communicate with all Chef Managers and their teams and relay the lessons learned. This will ensure there is awareness across the business of what happened at The Highgate, how we can learn from this and what we have changed as a result of it. Our catering teams can then implement the new processes. We are also exploring ways of providing face to face training for our catering teams on the requirements of IDDSI and are making available frozen IDDSI accredited meals from our suppliers so that our services can access appropriately modified meals as a contingency.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make frozen IDDSI-accredited meals available from suppliers as a contingency for appropriately modified meals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. The Director of Hotel Services and Customer First will communicate with all Chef Managers and their teams and relay the lessons learned. This will ensure there is awareness across the business of what happened at The Highgate, how we can learn from this and what we have changed as a result of it. Our catering teams can then implement the new processes. We are also exploring ways of providing face to face training for our catering teams on the requirements of IDDSI and are making available frozen IDDSI accredited meals from our suppliers so that our services can access appropriately modified meals as a contingency.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add safe-feeding materials and a competency check to the Nutrition and Hydration training module.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. We have asked for additional materials and a competency check to be added to the current Nutrition and Hydration training module and we will work with our Learning and Development team to ensure this happens.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Wayne Preston, who lacked capacity and lived in supported accommodation, suffered a series of falls and traumatic brain injuries before developing urosepsis associated with a catheter that was not replaced within the guidance period, followed by bronchopneumonia. The report identified concerns about inaccurate documentation, unsuitable placement and wards, inadequate coordination and ownership of care, failures to hold best interests meetings, and insufficient understanding of his lack of capacity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure food is served at a safe temperature

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The inquest heard that whilst an in-patient he was served a pudding that was so hot that, while eating it unsupervised, he dropped it on himself and suffered a burn. The burn did not contribute to his death but did cause significant additional discomfort. ”

    Source location

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Trafford Council was responsible for a safeguarding investigation if the hospital referred the burn incident under section 42.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the Manchester Foundation Trust completed its own internal root cause analysis it is not clear whether they referred this incident to Trafford Council for a section 42 Safeguarding Investigation under the Care Act 2014. As the host authority, Trafford Council would have been responsible for undertaking the investigation had it been referred to them by the hospital but they would have notified Bolton Council if this was the case as Bolton was the authority where Mr Preston was ordinarily resident.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local authorities, service providers and the Care Quality Commission are responsible for acting on allegations of poor care, neglect or abuse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Government is committed to preventing and reducing the risk of harm to adults in vulnerable situations. Under the Care Act 2014, we expect local authorities to ensure that the services they commission are safe, effective and of high quality. We also expect those providing the service, local authorities and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to take swift action where anyone alleges poor care, neglect or abuse.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response
  8. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Theresa Maria BUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Theresa Maria BUTTON underwent a liver transplant, remained in hospital for approximately 15 weeks, suffered multiple complications including a stroke, developed pneumonia, and died on 7 December 2017. Concerns included staffing levels and whether limited nursing capacity affected implementation of treatment plans, nutritional care, communication with family members, and contemporaneous record-keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure patients can access food in an appropriate position

    Wider context from the report

    “3. In this case the deceased was frail and losing weight due to not eating. A family member witnessed her food being left on her tray whilst she was laid flat and hence unable to access it with the result that it went cold and she did not eat, despite the concern relating to her nutritional condition. ”

    Source location

    Theresa Maria BUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete Healthcheck auditing of ward J83 nutrition and hydration documentation and care standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has in place an audit process referred to as the ward/department Healthcheck. This provides a systematic overview of performance across a range of key areas that influence or reflect the standards of care, patient outcomes and experience of care delivered in the Trust. The data can be viewed at organisational, CSU and ward level, providing both a local and strategic picture. A copy of the completed Healthcheck for ward J83 over a 12 months period in relation to nutrition and hydration has been included with this letter. You will note that the ward results demonstrate a very high level of compliance across the key areas identified.”

    Source location

    2018-0333-Response-by-The-Leeds-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 March 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Records show regular hoisting and eating encouragement; missed hoisting often followed the patient’s refusal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mrs Button’s nursing needs, clinical treatment and support requirements were reviewed on a daily basis. Enhanced care and intentional rounding were utilised to support Mrs Button.”

    Source location

    2018-0333-Response-by-The-Leeds-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 March 2019

    Open published response
  9. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Flora Marion BABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Flora Marion Baber was admitted to the Royal Free Hospital from Compton Lodge Care Home on 25 January 2018 with increased confusion, slurred speech and difficulty breathing, and died there about a month later. Concerns included inadequate access to fluids, inappropriate food and eating assistance, delays in speech and language referral and treatment of oral thrush, an apparently sleeping staff member, inappropriate responses to toileting requests, and failure to record her opioid sensitivity across healthcare settings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide appropriately pureed food and eating assistance

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Whilst record keeping showed Dr Baber as having been given appropriate food and drink whilst on the ward in hospital, I heard that sometimes her nearest fluid was out of her reach on a bedside table too far from the bed. Also, she did not always receive appropriately pureed food or the assistance that she needed to eat. ”

    Source location

    Flora Marion BABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake two independent unannounced spot checks of food, eating assistance, fluid access and required hydration support within the next month.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to assure ourselves further, two independent unannounced spot checks within the next month will be undertaken to evaluate whether patients are being given appropriate food and the necessary assistance to eat. We will also assess that fluids are within reach where appropriate and whether assistance is given if required.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Royal-Free-London-Hospitsl-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a rolling HCA education programme covering nutrition, safe swallowing, continence care, toileting assistance and learning from the case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore the clinical practice educator will include nutrition, safe swallow, continence care, and assistance with toileting in the HCA study days, which will be a rolling programme of education. She will also discuss this case at the study days as an opportunity to raise awareness of the patient experience. Finally, our hospital quality governance manager will present the learning from this case at the next Health Services for Elderly People specialty governance meeting.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Royal-Free-London-Hospitsl-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Records indicated adequate hydration, appropriate dietary provision and no evidence of dehydration apart from one slightly raised sodium level.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The patient was given a pureed diet from 13 February 2018 when it was recommended by the Speech and Language therapist following their assessment. Up until this point, the patient had been on a soft food diet and as already stated in your PFD Report, the food and fluid intake charts indicate that the patient was eating this. A soft diet consists of food such as mash, soup, custard, sauce, etc. The patient was also prescribed and administered Ensure, a nutrition supplement, from 31 January 2018. When patients are prescribed specific diets, this is included on the SBAR (daily handover sheet) so that all staff are aware on a daily basis.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Royal-Free-London-Hospitsl-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Jane Olive Parker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jane Olive Parker, who had dementia and a history of choking episodes, was found unresponsive approximately 40 minutes after eating an inappropriate meal unobserved in her room on 24 August 2016. Post-mortem examination found un-chewed food in her airway, and the recorded conclusion was death from aspiration of food, contributed to by neglect. Concerns included poor understanding and preparation of modified diets, and failures to escalate choking episodes to the Speech and Language Team for reassessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the diet preparation system to provide food in the correct format before serving

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Within the care home the system for preparing the correct diets types was such that food would come up to be served and would then need to be put into the correct format by the care staff. There was no regular system of the kitchen sorting and marking food to be served for individual residents with specific dietary requirements such as Mrs Parker. Following Mrs Parker’s death both the Local Authority in question and the Care Home provider had taken steps to improve systems within their care homes but it was unclear if there was national work in place to ensure care homes and their kitchens ensured clearly marked food was provided for residents with modified diets; ”

    Source location

    Jane Olive Parker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular kitchen sorting and marking of food for residents with specific dietary requirements

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Within the care home the system for preparing the correct diets types was such that food would come up to be served and would then need to be put into the correct format by the care staff. There was no regular system of the kitchen sorting and marking food to be served for individual residents with specific dietary requirements such as Mrs Parker. Following Mrs Parker’s death both the Local Authority in question and the Care Home provider had taken steps to improve systems within their care homes but it was unclear if there was national work in place to ensure care homes and their kitchens ensured clearly marked food was provided for residents with modified diets; ”

    Source location

    Jane Olive Parker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026