Recurring concern
Unreliable access to cross-force domestic abuse information
First reported 24 Mar 2020•Latest report 2 Oct 2025
What this concern includes
Includes failures in police systems and arrangements for making reported domestic-abuse and other safeguarding-relevant non-crime information available across force boundaries, including Police National Database access, national availability, searchability and related access controls for frontline risk assessment.
Not included
- Excludes domestic-abuse risk assessment, investigation, disclosure, bail and protective-action failures where cross-force information access is not the deficient control.
- Excludes generic police information-sharing or database-access problems without a domestic-abuse safeguarding context.
- Excludes failures to act on complete and accessible cross-force domestic-abuse information when the information-access process itself operated reliably.
- Excludes criminal-conviction, border-control and unrelated police information systems unless the assertion specifically concerns cross-force domestic-abuse information.
- Reports
- 2
- Individual concerns
- 2
- Date range
- 2020–2025
- Stated actions
- 4
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Limited access for frontline police officers to the Police National Database for cross-border domestic abuse history checks
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Action
Stabilise the Police National Database by addressing legacy challenges before wider police-intelligence transformation.
Stated by Home Office
-
Concerns raised1
Lack of a national resource for non-crime information relevant to safeguarding potential victims of domestic abuse
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Action
Use the Athena integrated platform to share intelligence, custody, crime and non-crime records across participating forces.
Stated by Hertfordshire Constabulary -
Action
Work towards improving opportunities for sharing police-held data across force boundaries.
Stated by Hertfordshire Constabulary -
Action
Use the circumstances of Kellie Sutton’s death and the report observations to inform the LEDS consultation response.
Stated by Hertfordshire Constabulary
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Position
National development of joined-up police data systems is undertaken by the Home Office through NLEDP; the constabulary’s stated role is consultation input.
Stated by Hertfordshire Constabulary
Data last updated 7 September 2026