Recurring concern

Unreliable implementation of medication changes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 8 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to implementing a medication change, including communicating and acknowledging the change, updating prescriptions or administration records, coordinating implementation between specialist and primary or community care, and arranging required monitoring or follow-up.

Not included

  • Excludes medication prescribing, administration, supply or monitoring failures where no medication change is involved.
  • Excludes generic communication, documentation, staffing or coordination deficiencies unless they directly impair implementation of a medication change.
  • Excludes failures concerning medication reconciliation or dosage verification when the reported unsafe condition is not implementation of a medication change.
  • Excludes clinical decisions about whether to change medication when the implementation process itself is not deficient.
Reports
22

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
24

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
35

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England3
Department of Health and Social Care2
NHS Northamptonshire Integrated Care Board2
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
Belmarsh Prison1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Brook Medical Centre1
Brunswick Ward at Lindridge1
Care UK1
Carewatch (Mid Bucks)1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust1
East London NHS Foundation Trust1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian tied a fatal ligature in her room on Longview Ward on 17 April 2021 and died two days later in hospital. The principal concerns included inadequate and falsified observations, insufficiently trained and staffed ward personnel, poor communication about ligaturing and self-harm, medication-recording errors, failures involving Oxevision, and other care and record-keeping deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of pharmacist scrutiny of medication changes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Elise’s medication changes whilst in mental health hospital were not correctly entered onto the medication chart: a. Elise asked for changes to her medication and then reported that these changes were not therapeutic. It was agreed with her consultant that her previous regime would be implemented. The medication was crossed out and removed from the prescription chart. Sertraline 200mg was re-prescribed by the consultant but not entered onto the medication chart and not administered. b. Nursing staff did not query the sudden cessation of medication for treating mental health with no replacement or explanation given. Elise suffered a significant deterioration in her mental health during this time, the frequency and severity of ligatures increased, and Elise had to be placed under section 3 Mental Health Act. c. There was no pharmacist scrutiny just prior to the Bank Holiday and the medication error was only noted when questioned by Elise’s family when she went on home leave. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enter and administer re-prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Elise’s medication changes whilst in mental health hospital were not correctly entered onto the medication chart: a. Elise asked for changes to her medication and then reported that these changes were not therapeutic. It was agreed with her consultant that her previous regime would be implemented. The medication was crossed out and removed from the prescription chart. Sertraline 200mg was re-prescribed by the consultant but not entered onto the medication chart and not administered. b. Nursing staff did not query the sudden cessation of medication for treating mental health with no replacement or explanation given. Elise suffered a significant deterioration in her mental health during this time, the frequency and severity of ligatures increased, and Elise had to be placed under section 3 Mental Health Act. c. There was no pharmacist scrutiny just prior to the Bank Holiday and the medication error was only noted when questioned by Elise’s family when she went on home leave. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss medication changes at multidisciplinary reviews and re-check prescriptions during those reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To strengthen medicines management, medication changes are discussed at the MDT and prescriptions are re-checked during this review.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff through supervision to apply professional curiosity and challenge when medication changes require clarification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response Staff have been reminded via supervision sessions of the importance of applying professional curiosity and challenge as needed.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic prescribing and medicines administration safeguards against omitted medicines during prescription-chart changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has since intruded an electronic prescribing and medicines administration (ePMA) system. This new system provides safeguards around prescribing. ePMA will help prevent inadvertent omission of medicines which could occur when a paper drug chart reached completion and has to be rewritten.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A pharmacist’s physical ward presence may not always be possible, although remote prescription screening provides an alternative safeguard.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response In April 2021 three pharmacist posts were based at Colchester, one of which was vacant, one working from home due to COVID shielding, leaving only one (the most junior) on site. So whilst the clinical pharmacy rota included a weekly visit, that may not have been possible every week.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Wendy Siobhan EYLES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wendy Siobhan Eyles died aged 55 on 31 October 2024 after being struck by a train at Kettering Station; the inquest concluded that appropriate mental health support and intervention had not been provided. Concerns included the absence of a protocol for patients receiving both private and NHS psychiatric care, risks from poor communication about medication changes, and possible lack of NHS awareness of private psychiatric treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate medication changes between private and NHS psychiatric providers

    Wider context from the report

    “One of the findings of the Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) was that ".. there is no protocol for patients open to private and NHS psychiatry at Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust. The Psychiatrist’s role in patient care is to review and recommend appropriate medication and it is problematic if two Consultants are overseeing this at the same time. It can cause confusion and detriment to the patient if medication changes are not communicated between parties and represents a risk to patient safety... It is notable that CMHT operational managers from across the service differ in their views on the appropriateness of a patient being open to NHS and private services at the same time...". It also emerged at Inquest that a NHS Consultant may not be aware that the patient is also receiving private psychiatry. Where the GP is notified of private psychiatry, it does not trigger a notification to NHS mental health services. Notification of the dual treatment may then be entirely dependent upon the information being shared by the patient. ”

    Source location

    Wendy Siobhan EYLES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Wendy Siobhan EYLES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wendy Siobhan Eyles died on 31 October 2024 after being struck by a train at Kettering Station having climbed down from the platform. The report identified concerns about the lack of a protocol for patients receiving both private and NHS psychiatric care, including risks that medication changes and treatment arrangements may not be communicated between services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate medication changes between private and NHS psychiatric providers

    Wider context from the report

    “One of the findings of the Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) was that “.. there is no protocol for patients open to private and NHS psychiatry at Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust. The Psychiatrist’s role in patient care is to review and recommend appropriate medication and it is problematic if two Consultants are overseeing this at the same time. It can cause confusion and detriment to the patient if medication changes are not communicated between parties and represents a risk to patient safety... It is notable that CMHT operational managers from across the service differ in their views on the appropriateness of a patient being open to NHS and private services at the same time..”. It also emerged at Inquest that a NHS Consultant may not be aware that the patient is also receiving private psychiatry. Where the GP is notified of private psychiatry, it does not trigger a notification to NHS mental health services. Notification of the dual treatment may then be entirely dependent upon the information being shared by the patient. ”

    Source location

    Wendy Siobhan EYLES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Thompson Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thompson Elliott, a care home resident, was admitted to hospital with chest pains and discharged with changed opioid medication. Because the discharge letter could not be located, both old and new opioids were administered, resulting in an overdose; he later contracted influenza A in hospital and died after respiratory failure. The principal concerns were unclear procedures, inadequate medication recording and administration, and inconsistent staff decisions when discharge information was unavailable.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clarify medication changes before continued administration

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence has revealed significant concerns with regard to the recording and administration of medication, when patients return to the care home, and a discharge letter cannot be located following a period in hospital. I am concerned that the evidence was that if a patient returned to the care home with new medication prescribed whilst in hospital to replace previously prescribed medication, and the patient’s discharge letter could not be immediately located, there would be uncertainty amongst staff as to the correct procedure to follow in such circumstances. Medication that had been stopped whilst in hospital due to its impact upon the patient’s kidneys continued to be administered on 18th and 19th December 2024, before it could be clarified with either the hospital or GP which was the correct medication. The new medication was not administered on either of those days. The evidence revealed that the new medication was not immediately recorded onto the patient’s electronic medication record (EMAR) and held in a cupboard pending clarification. Despite no clarification and following a 24-hour delay, it was then incorrectly added to the record as new and additional medication - not replacement medication. The medication had been changed to oxycodone due to the impact oramorph was having upon the patient’s kidneys. Due to the administration error in recording oxycodone as new and therefore additional medication, the patient was then given both oramorph and the new oxycodone medication on the morning and afternoon of 20th December 2024 which was 2 days following his discharge. This resulted in an opioid overdose. I am concerned that the evidence was such that it was not possible to determine exactly what efforts, if any, were made by staff to clarify the medication position with the hospital on either 18th, 19th or 20th December 2024 but medication continued to be administered. On 21st December 2024 a team leader was able to speak to the hospital and despite being advised that if there was no discharge letter to take all medications and clarify the position with the GP, a decision was made to only administer the old medication of oramorph and there no attempts to contact the GP. There were no attempts to contact 111 or Recovery at Home for advice. I am concerned that the evidence revealed that there was no policy or guidance document setting out the procedures, which staff must follow in such circumstances, which created confusion and inconsistent decision making resulting in a medication overdose and continued use of a medication that had been stopped in hospital due to the harm it was causing to the patient’s kidneys. The evidence raises a further concern that the procedure still remains unclear despite internal reviews following the death. I shall be glad to be told of any learning arising from this death and timescales and results of your review. ”

    Source location

    Mr Thompson Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and disseminate a visual flow chart guiding staff through medication checks when residents return from hospital without discharge documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To remind staff, a visual flow chart has been introduced at the care home to provide clear, step-by-step guidance for staff involved in supporting residents returning from hospital where there is no accompanying discharge letter to support changes in medication. A copy of this flow chart, which has been shared and discussed with staff to embed awareness of it, accompanies this letter (enclosure 1). This flowchart is laminated and attached to the medication keys as an immediate prompt to staff. Additionally, there are copies of this flow chart in poster format on the wall of the care home's treatment room and there is a further copy contained within a dedicated discharge file held in the Deputy Manager's office. This dedicated file has been brought in following this case and contains the flow chart prompt and copies of Care UK's relevant up-to-date policies to which I refer below.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce hospital-return, discharge and medication-management policies through mandatory read-and-sign confirmation and refresher training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The care home leadership has reinforced Care UK's 'Admissions and Discharge Policy' (enclosure 2) and the 'How to Guide - Supporting a Resident Returning from Hospital' (enclosure 3) as well as the 'Medications Management Policy' (enclosure 4). These documents provide clear guidance to staff as to what to do in circumstances where a resident arrives and/or returns to the care home from hospital and there is insufficient/absent information regarding their discharge and attendant medications. All staff have completed a mandatory "read and sign" process to confirm that they have read and understood these documents, all of which have been discussed with staff as part of further refresher training sessions undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff to escalate hospital-return medication queries, obtain same-day clarification and document communications, actions and handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Discussion and further refresher training with all relevant staff has emphasized the need to ensure home management is informed immediately of any concerns regarding residents returning from hospital and that checks are undertaken with the hospital. The training has reinforced that if the hospital cannot be reached for an answer, colleagues should check with the GP and failing that contact the 111 service.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss imminent and new hospital discharges at daily and weekly clinical meetings so required information and follow-up actions are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home Manager and/or Deputy will ensure that any imminent or new discharges to the care home are discussed at the daily 10@10 meetings and weekly clinical review meetings to ensure staff are aware of the discharges, the relevant information is obtained and any matters requiring follow-up are actioned. In addition, it is also important to note that there is always a member of the management team available (seven days a week) and so at any time the discharge process is taking place, there are senior staff available to help deal with/advise on any issues arising with the discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with hospital Trusted Assessors to streamline secure, prompt sharing of discharge information and support safe transitions of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The care home has continued to work closely with the Trusted Assessor team at the hospital which discharged Mr Elliott to try to streamline communication/interaction in relation to discharges. The aim is to ensure all documents are securely and promptly shared including via NHS email if possible to support timely and safe transitions of care from hospital to the care home. This work is ongoing but the care home and its hospital partners share a commitment to best practice to achieve these aims. As noted above, the Home Manager has held meetings with the local hospital's Trusted Assessors to discuss the care home's discharge policies to ensure agreement and buy in to the process.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Nicholas J D’Ourou · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nicholas J D’Ourou, who had been admitted to Highgate Acute Mental Health Centre as a voluntary patient, was found on 15 April 2024 with a ligature around his neck and died from asphyxiation. The report raises concerns about inconsistent practice and limited guidance for cross-titrating psychiatric medication, and about the lack of patient observation, including electronic monitoring, in psychiatric wards.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of consistent guidance for cross-titration of psychiatric medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I heard evidence that cross-titration of medication, when changing from one regimen to another, is commonplace in psychiatric care but that how to undertake this process is determined predominantly by each individual prescriber’s own practice, rather than any local or national guidance. The local psychiatric Trust provided evidence that they were in the process of developing local guidance. However, this was proving to be complicated, owing to the range of settings in which cross-titration may be carried-out (i.e. primary care, community psychiatry care, in-patient care), the complexity of the medications prescribed and a lack of evidence regarding how this should be undertaken. I am concerned that this commonplace and important process is seemingly undertaken on the basis of limited consensus and that the variation in care provided could result in future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Nicholas J D’Ourou · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clinicians and patients with cross-titration safety advice through publications and relevant prescribing guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. On the issue of cross titration, the College recognises that an effective understanding of how to do this by clinicians is crucial as part of a safe prescribing regime. While not necessarily consolidated as part of one specific document on the topic, the College has provided advice to clinicians and patients on this issue, particularly in the context of antidepressants and anti-psychotics. Examples of publications that do cover this to some extent include:”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Psychiatrists
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 February 2025

    Open published response
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Chloe Anne Tapp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Chloe Anne Tapp, a 20-year-old with epilepsy and other medical conditions, suffered seizures and respiratory and cardiac arrest on 7 October 2021 and died in hospital on 8 October 2021. The principal concerns included delays transferring her to adult neurology, a telephone consultation despite her being non-verbal, an incorrect and inadequately documented medication tapering regime, and unanswered attempts to obtain clarification. Broader concerns were raised about staffing shortages, unsafe backlogs and difficulties responding to patients and carers within the neurology department.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provision of medication tapering instructions based on incorrect doses

    Wider context from the report

    “A handwritten note of a tapering regime based on incorrect doses was sent to Chloe. ”

    Source location

    Chloe Anne Tapp · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a GIRFT review visit to Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust’s neurology department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having considered your Report and the concerns raised, a GIRFT visit to Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust has been arranged to review the specific situation within their Neurology department.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The consultant had time to establish Chloe’s dose because it was documented and clinic capacity was available before the appointment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Chloe’s then current dose was readily available to the Consultant prior to her appointment, it was listed on the second page of the GP letter 10 August 2021. We have reviewed the clinic that took place on 3 September 2021 and can confirm that prior to Chloe’s appointment there was one unfilled clinical slot. This is a slot we plan to keep free for urgent/ unexpected cases; and there was one further patient who did not attend. We therefore consider the consultant had time to establish Chloe’s current dose prior to the consultation.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Many concerns about Chloe’s care fall within the NHS Foundation Trust’s remit rather than NHS England’s national programme or policy remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In your Report you raise concerns over pressures being placed on neurology departments and that there was a recognised shortage of neurologists amid an increase in demand. This response focuses on the concerns raised relevant to NHS England national programme or policy. Many of your concerns around the quality of care delivered to Chloe sit within the remit of Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, and I note that you have also addressed your Report to them.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response
  7. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Joshua Ethan BURGESS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joshua Ethan Burgess, who had epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, died at home on 19 November 2022 after vomiting and aspirating during an epileptic seizure. The report identifies concerns about communication and prescribing processes for Brivaracetam, including failures to update the prescription, medication being withheld for several days, and a subsequent increase to 10ml twice daily despite information that 4ml twice daily was appropriate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer medication-change correspondence to a clinician for consideration

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Neurology department of the Royal Stoke University Hospital operated a system whereby it did not instruct the prescribing GP to amend the prescription of Brivaracetam when changes to dosage had been agreed with Mr Burgess’ mother. The evidence from the Consultant Neurologist was that an assumption was made that when changes to medication had been discussed and agreed that Mr Burgess’ mother would attend the GP surgery to discuss the changes in medication. The same witness gave evidence that it was assumed a pharmacist within the GP surgery would read the correspondence from the neurology department and make the necessary changes to prescriptions without express instructions to do so. 2. The “workflow” within the Brook Medical Centre was such that letters sent from the Neurology department discussing changes in medication (albeit not containing a request to amend the prescription) were processed by support staff and not referred to a clinician to consider and so no changes were made to the prescription. 3. The letter of 27 July 2022 from the Neurology department to Brook Medical Centre seeking clarification as to the correct dosage of Brivaracetam was processed by support staff and a summary medications sent without referral to a clinician. 4. Godfrey Care were informed by Mr Burgess’ mother and the Neurology department of Royal Stoke University that the appropriate dose of Brivaracetam was 4ml twice daily. Medication was withheld between 22-26 July 2022 due to the information not being in writing from the prescriber, however the evidence at inquest was that 10ml twice daily was commenced on 26 July 2022 following a call to the 111 service. ”

    Source location

    Joshua Ethan BURGESS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review internal policies and procedures against the coroner’s concerns and identify necessary changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Godfrey Care Response We intend to review our internal policies and procedures considering the coroners concerns and identify where changes need to be made. Below, we respond to the coroner’s areas of concern, setting out what we have already done, what we are doing now, and what we intend to do in the future.”

    Source location

    Response from Godfrey Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a local medication policy covering medication receipt, transcription, altered labels, missed doses, written prescribing confirmation and triangulation between prescribers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Reviewed Policies and Procedures The following actions will be implemented by 1st April 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Godfrey Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require GP review and triage of all neurology correspondence received by Brook Medical Centre.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. We have discussed the above process with nominated individuals from the ICS. Due to the timeframes that would be required for the creation of standardised template for clinic letters within the ‘Medisec’ system across the Trust, we are reiterating the Trust standards and ████████ has agreed, with immediate effect, that all clinic letters received from neurology will be reviewed by a GP at Brook Medical Centre. This has been implemented due to the acknowledgement that neurological conditions are often complex, and it is more likely that they will require frequent medication changes, titration and/or closer monitoring.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Page 4 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standardised Medisec clinic-letter template specifying medication changes and clear prescribing actions for primary care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The Trust’s outpatient clinic letter standards describe the structure of clinic letters based on standard headings. You will recall that ████████ (GP) gave evidence at the inquest to the effect that there were areas in the acute Trust setting which already provided discharge information which he considered to be of a ‘gold standard.’ The Trust is committed to working towards improving compliance with these standards. To support this, we are working towards creation of a standardised template in our ‘Medisec’ system (system where letters are created). This will include a section for changes to medications and clear actions for those in the primary care setting, for example, instructions for the prescribing GP to amend prescriptions.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have a GP review and triage all neurology correspondence and clinic letters received by Brook Medical Centre.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. We have discussed the above process with nominated individuals from the ICS. Due to the timeframes that would be required for the creation of standardised template for clinic letters within the ‘Medisec’ system across the Trust, we are reiterating the Trust standards and ████████ has agreed, with immediate effect, that all clinic letters received from neurology will be reviewed by a GP at Brook Medical Centre. This has been implemented due to the acknowledgement that neurological conditions are often complex, and it is more likely that they will require frequent medication changes, titration and/or closer monitoring.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A standardised clinic-letter template cannot be created immediately because implementation across the Trust requires substantial timeframes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. We have discussed the above process with nominated individuals from the ICS. Due to the timeframes that would be required for the creation of standardised template for clinic letters within the ‘Medisec’ system across the Trust, we are reiterating the Trust standards and ████████ has agreed, with immediate effect, that all clinic letters received from neurology will be reviewed by a GP at Brook Medical Centre. This has been implemented due to the acknowledgement that neurological conditions are often complex, and it is more likely that they will require frequent medication changes, titration and/or closer monitoring.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Page 4 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN was found collapsed on the bathroom floor at his home on 28 November 2022 and was confirmed deceased shortly afterwards. The medical cause of death was determined to be sudden cardiac death in schizophrenia. Concerns included inadequate systems for monitoring, communicating and acting on high clozapine levels and medication changes, as well as deficiencies in internal investigation, understanding of clozapine and pharmacy resourcing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to safely effect medication changes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Medication changes: After a review on 14/10/22, when a high level of clozapine was noted from a blood test on 03/05/22, the consultant indicated that medication should reduce on the next prescription. This was communicated by email to the care coordinator however this was not read or acted upon. The inquest heard how there was no safe system to effect medication changes. ”

    Source location

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a specialist Pharmacy Clozapine Team to support assay follow-up, staff training and clozapine prescribing practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The Trust has multidisciplinary experts on the subject of clozapine. There is also expertise in the Pharmacy Clozapine Team; to support follow up of raised clozapine plasma assays but more importantly to support all teams involved with the use of clozapine with training in the handling of clozapine and promotion of the trust clozapine prescribing guidelines and procedures. This team is expected to be established by September 2023. All these colleagues will be made known to staff for any advice that is needed. Staff can also ask for help through their manager, who can signpost them accordingly. This will help improve the skills and experience in responding to results on clozapine levels appropriately with the care of the patient at the centre of all decisions.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide electronic prescribing guidance and communicate procedures for implementing clozapine dose changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the learning there will be clear guidance on prescribing on the electronic system and communication of how best to do this when a dose change is required.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement significant changes to clozapine processes and procedures following the August 2020 report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. August 2020 Regulation 28 Report”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response
  9. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Mr. Donald Vernon Compton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Donald Vernon Compton, aged 87, was admitted to hospital after developing Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Covid-19, and died on 14 February 2021. The principal concerns were prescribing and dispensing errors involving Co-trimoxazole despite a known trimethoprim allergy, including failures by hospital staff and a GP to identify the risk. A separate medication error involving excessive amiodarone dosing was also identified.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement Amiodarone dose down-titration

    Wider context from the report

    “Prescribing and dispensing errors 1. At the time, the All Wales electronic prescribing tool (eDAL) permitted prescribers to avoid reading the section concerning known allergies; 2. The commonly prescribed antibiotic Co-trimoxazole comprises two constituent drugs trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. Allergies were not noted as Co-trimoxazole but to the constituent drug, trimethoprim. 3. Prescribing hospital doctors; overseeing pharmacist; and ward nurses all failed to pick up on this discharge prescribing and dispensing error suggesting drug safety on discharge is an area for scrutiny and input to ensure a similar error is avoided a patient safety is maximised. 4. That the Torbay GP also made an error in prescribing Co-trimoxazole to Mr. Compton in the knowledge he was allergic to trimethoprim indicates the lack of specific knowledge about this antibiotic and its constituent elements. It may also reflect a more general lack of knowledge about constituent components of commonly prescribed drugs. 5. A different prescribing error was made in respect of this same patient whilst under the care of RGH. The down titration of Amiodarone was overlooked resulting in too high a dose being administered over several days. ”

    Source location

    Mr. Donald Vernon Compton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Francis Xavier Cooney · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Francis Xavier Cooney fell at home, underwent surgery for a scalp laceration, developed delirium during his hospital stay, and was discharged home after an occupational therapy assessment. Following discharge he became more confused and anxious about changes to his medication, and on 27 January 2020 he was found hanging from the bannister and declared deceased. The principal concern was that medication changes were not communicated directly to his daughter and next of kin, who held lasting power of attorney, leaving her unable to explain the changes or reassure him; the report also raised concern about the lack of a root cause analysis or similar investigation into the communication breakdown.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate inpatient medication changes to carers of patients with cognitive impairment

    Wider context from the report

    “2. For patients with a cognitive impairment there is a risk that if changes to medication made during an inpatient stay are not communicated directly to those caring for them, confusion will arise which could result in the medication being erroneously omitted or overdosed. 3. Dr. ████████ acknowledged that if Mr. Cooney had been a patient on the Geriatric Ward, rather than a plastic surgery patient, she would have communicated the fact and reason for change to Ms. ████████ directly. She said she did not do so in this case because, as a Consultant providing an opinion for a patient under the care of another team, she did not view it as her responsibility. 4. Dr. ████████ said that her practice had now changed, and she would always communicate such a decision to the NOK of a patient with a cognitive impairment. She was also aware that the facts of this case would be raised with other geriatricians within the Trust. However, it was not clear that this awareness will result in consideration of a new instruction/procedure that for all patients with dementia and/or significant cognitive impairment, any changes to medications made during an inpatient stay should be communicated to the NOK/carer by the clinician making the change regardless of the capacity in which they come to be reviewing the patient. ”

    Source location

    Francis Xavier Cooney · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refresh training across all wards on discharge medication review, communication with relatives or carers, and recording and actioning blister-pack requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will be undertaking a refresh of training across all wards on the importance of”

    Source location

    2020-0154-Response-from-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce communication with relatives and carers of cognitively impaired patients through medical staff communication and departmental clinical governance meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, I will communicate with the medical staff reinforcing the importance of communication with relatives and carers where patients have a cognitive impairment and the learning from this case will be cascaded through departmental clinical governance meetings.”

    Source location

    2020-0154-Response-from-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing processes are considered sufficient to ensure medication changes are appropriately discussed with patients, relatives or carers at discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the decision to reduce the medication was discussed with Mr Cooney, and it was considered at the time that he had understood the information provided, in light of his fluctuating confusion, it is recognised that Mr Cooney’s daughter should have been informed of the changes that had been made and unfortunately this did not happen and this is a matter of regret. We are satisfied that this was an unfortunate individual error and that there are processes in place to ensure discussion as to medications do take place appropriately on the discharge of patients.”

    Source location

    2020-0154-Response-from-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 October 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026