Recurring concern

Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 Aug 2013•Latest report 31 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the named or directly corresponding escalation-policy process, including policy clarity, dissemination, staff understanding, embedding, use when triggers arise and assurance that escalations are made through the required route.

Not included

  • Excludes generic escalation failures where no escalation policy or equivalent bounded policy process is identified.
  • Excludes generic staff training, communication or staffing deficiencies unless they directly impair understanding or use of the escalation policy.
  • Excludes failures in the substantive response after an escalation has been correctly made.
  • Excludes escalation processes belonging to a separately named system or pathway when that system provides the more specific supported boundary.
Reports
35

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
35

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
59

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission6
Department of Health and Social Care3
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust3
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board2
ADS (Addiction Dependency Solutions)1
Anson Court Residential Home1
Bamford Grange Care Home1
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Belong Limited1
Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services1
Borough Care Ltd1
Calderdale Borough Council1
Cann House Care Home1
Caremark (Chiltern & Three Rivers)1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mr John Hay · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr John Hay, who lived alone and received domiciliary care, suffered an unwitnessed fall at home on 26 September 2024 and later died from a subdural haemorrhage on 2 October 2024. The report raised concerns about incomplete risk assessment, unclear escalation for medical input after a fall, and unclear processes for addressing missing or spent medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear process for escalating cases to obtain medical input

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The process/system for escalation to get medical input was unclear. In the current case, it was accepted with the benefit of hindsight that when a frail elderly person on blood thinners suffers a fall, a medical assessment should probably be done. However, after the morning visit, it was Mr Hay himself who made the decision (despite having suffered a fall and having a diagnosis of dementia) without input from his family. At the time of the evening visit, the care team contacted the son for a decision rather than simply assessing the situation and making a decision. ”

    Source location

    Mr John Hay · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make contact management a key focus of future monitoring visits at the Care Bureau and wider provider services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, West Northamptonshire Council has engaged with the Adult Quality Team, who have been made aware of your concerns. They have confirmed that contact management will be a key focus during future monitoring visits at the Care Bureau, as well as across wider provider services.”

    Source location

    Response from West Northamptonshire Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an Emergency Action Plan in new Care Plans, signposting fall-response actions and emergency-service escalation for service users and families.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Emergency Action Plan: we are updating our Care Plans to include a clear Emergency Action Plan which will signpost to service users and their families the actions carers will take in certain circumstances. To ensure we continue to deliver person-centred care, this before-the-fact clarity is important. It has always been TCB’s policy that input from emergency must be sought in the case of falls, but it is clear that this was inconsistently applied in JH’s case. Our new falls risk (see above) makes it clear that advice from either 111 (unwitnessed falls) or 999 (witnessed falls) must be sought. Service users (with capacity) and their family (where relevant) can then factor that advice into their own decision making. We have implemented this for new Care Plans in May 2026 and will add this to existing Care Plans as they are periodically reviewed.”

    Source location

    Response from The Care Bureau
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present the case as a lessons-learned study to Registered Managers and require dissemination to care and office staff in their branches.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. Lessons Learned: JH’s case will be presented as a lessons learned case study to all Registered Managers at our next Registered Managers’ meeting, with a specific focus on the tension between person-centred care and escalation obligations. The Registered Managers will then share the case study with both care and office staff in their respective branches.”

    Source location

    Response from The Care Bureau
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implemented measures are considered sufficient to address the concerns and reduce the likelihood of similar issues arising.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Taking all of the above into account, West Northamptonshire Council is satisfied that appropriate measures have been implemented to address the concerns and reduce the likelihood of similar issues arising in the future.”

    Source location

    Response from West Northamptonshire Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response
  2. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela George, aged 70, died at Derriford Hospital on 30 June 2023 after being urgently admitted with suspected sepsis. The report identified missed opportunities to carry out required blood tests, manage a breast infection, document and escalate a fall and medical concerns, assess and record capacity, and maintain relevant care-home policies and records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of escalation policies

    Wider context from the report

    “6. There was little or no evidence of policies in place generally at the home and in particular on medication, escalation and reporting of concerns . ”

    Source location

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a clinical escalation protocol requiring early medical review when symptoms do not improve.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A consolidated clinical escalation protocol is being implemented, requiring early medical review where symptoms do not improve.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and consolidate operational policies covering medication, infection control, incidents, escalation, safeguarding, concerns and hospital discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A full review and consolidation of all operational policies has been completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Store operational policies centrally in a digital governance system accessible to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Policies are now centrally stored within a digital governance system, accessible to all staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Richard Charles Worswick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard Charles Worswick, who had Parkinson’s disease, frailty and complex health needs, developed an infected spinal wound and died from sepsis at Stepping Hill Hospital on 19 May 2025. The principal concerns were unclear communication and documentation of the wound-care plan between the hospital and care home, together with unclear escalation arrangements and limited documentation of concerns and escalation attempts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear escalation policy for wound care concerns when residents arrive

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that when he was discharged to the care home from the acute hospital that the care home felt that they did not understand what was required regarding wound care because the care plan regarding wound care was not clear .The Trust did not have a copy of what information had been provided. As a consequence of this, there was a lack of clarity regarding wound management. The Trust did not, the inquest was told have a clear procedure that ensured that there was a clear, effective and documented communication system in relation to care plans that included wound management. The home did not have a clear escalation policy for actions to be taken when a resident arrived, and their staff were unclear how they were being asked to manage a wound by the hospital. In addition, the documentation surrounding concerns and attempts to escalate was limited. ”

    Source location

    Richard Charles Worswick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue staff refresher guidance on hospital readmission, wound-care monitoring and relevant policy requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result of the Inquest findings and I can confirm that the following action has been taken to ensure proper adherence to the existing policies and procedures going forwards particularly with regard to the re-admission of residents to the Home from hospital and arrangements for monitoring of wound care and clinical observations:”

    Source location

    Response from Bamford Grange Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement enhanced observations to identify subtle deterioration and flag cases requiring urgent escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to reinforcing the above, the following additional action has been taken to improve the care provision going forwards:”

    Source location

    Response from Bamford Grange Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2025

    Open published response
  4. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Sally Mills · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sally Mills choked on prescribed medication at home on 23 July 2023 after experiencing difficulty swallowing during its administration, and died later that day in hospital. The principal concerns were gaps in first-aid understanding for an unresponsive person and failures to appropriately escalate difficulties encountered during medication administration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of knowledge and embedding of the escalation policy

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Escalation of issues encountered by care assistants being appropriately escalated. Whilst the evidence demonstrated efforts have been made in this regard, such as a new checklist, and new policy dated September 2023; the evidence revealed lack of knowledge of the policy and embedding of it. ”

    Source location

    Sally Mills · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the medication concerns policy and first aid procedures with staff at the scheduled December team meeting, including emergency scenarios and policy access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 2 - Escalation of issues encountered by Care Assistants Evidence demonstrated efforts have been made in this regard, such as a new checklist and new policy dated September 2023; the evidence revealed a lack of knowledge of the policy and the embedding of it. The care team are the organisation’s eyes and ears on the ground and as such we are reliant on them to communicate their concerns to the office in a timely manner. It became apparent that further work should be undertaken to embed section 2.27 (Raising Concerns) of the Medication Procedures September 2023 (the ‘Policy’) and ensure staff are familiar with and understand its requirements. We have decided that the Policy will also be discussed with staff at the full team meetings held in December.”

    Source location

    Response from Caremark (Chiltern & Tree Rivers)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Emphasise contacting the office when in doubt during new-joiner induction and explore professional curiosity through full-team meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The requirement to contact the office when in doubt will also be emphasised as part of our induction programme for new joiners. The scenarios listed in the Policy are not exhaustive, we recognise the need to encourage and empower our care team to exercise professional curiosity and that will also be explored in our full team meetings. We would be happy to share the minutes of the meetings if that would be helpful.”

    Source location

    Response from Caremark (Chiltern & Tree Rivers)
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend induction with in-person walkthroughs of policies and procedures, questions, understanding assessments and support identification before new joiners begin caring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Caremark’s expectations We have decided to extend our induction programme to include an in person walk through of our policies and procedures, please see the programme attached. The walk through will facilitate discussion, allow time for questions and enable the team members delivering the session to assess the extent to which new joiners understand Caremark’s expectations. The sessions will also provide an opportunity to identify new joiners who may require additional support before they can commence caring for our clients. New joiners will not be placed on rotas until the team is satisfied, they understand the requirements of our policies.”

    Source location

    Response from Caremark (Chiltern & Tree Rivers)
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Withhold new joiners from rotas until the team is satisfied they understand the organisation’s policy requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Caremark’s expectations We have decided to extend our induction programme to include an in person walk through of our policies and procedures, please see the programme attached. The walk through will facilitate discussion, allow time for questions and enable the team members delivering the session to assess the extent to which new joiners understand Caremark’s expectations. The sessions will also provide an opportunity to identify new joiners who may require additional support before they can commence caring for our clients. New joiners will not be placed on rotas until the team is satisfied, they understand the requirements of our policies.”

    Source location

    Response from Caremark (Chiltern & Tree Rivers)
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Brian John COLBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Colby was an in-patient recovering from elective surgery and receiving treatment for aspiration pneumonia when he suffered a spontaneous catastrophic intracranial event on 16 September 2023; he died later that evening after being transferred for assessment and placed on a palliative care pathway. The principal concerns were delays and ineffective communication in recognising and escalating his deterioration, arranging an urgent CT scan, communicating clinical plans, and recording urgent matters. The report also raised concerns about unclear escalation and record-keeping procedures and whether further training had adequately addressed clinicians’ authority to initiate CT scan arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear protocols for escalation of deteriorating patients

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) At or about 10:00 on 16 September 2023, Mr Colby’s vital signs and observations showed a drop in his Glasgow Coma Score from 15/15 (at 09:00) to 11/15, and a clinically significant rise in his blood pressure. I heard evidence that this change in his vital signs and observations was enough to warrant requesting a CT scan to ascertain the cause or causes of the change in clinical presentation. Despite this, I found that this was not escalated as a cause for concern at the time. I heard that the on-call consultant for the intensive care unit (ICU) was not made aware of any deterioration in Mr Colby’s presentation until 12:42 that afternoon. The concern here is that there did not appear to be any, or any clear, protocol(s) in place for the escalation of a deteriorating patient. ”

    Source location

    Brian John COLBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce urgent deterioration escalation through Resident Doctor communications, safety alerts, telephone or face-to-face consultant contact, and appropriate diagnostic-test ordering.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Communications to all Resident Doctors as well as an Internal safety alert circulated reinforcing escalation protocols; when Resident Doctors are concerned about a deteriorating patient, these concerns must be escalated to the consultant responsible for the patient as soon as possible via a phone call or face to face conversation. We have ensured that all clinical departments have acknowledged the alert as being read and understood. | 20 June 2024; 10 July 2024 | Completed”

    Source location

    Response from HCA Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Resident Doctor workshops covering escalation protocols, inquest learning, responsibilities, and responding to deteriorating patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Roll out of Resident Doctors Workshops; These training workshops ran over 3 sessions throughout July 2024 for all Resident Doctors and included learning from Mr Colby’s inquest as well as a reiteration of all HCA protocols and policies relating to escalation and responding to the deteriorating patient. We have also reiterated the importance of escalating to a Consultant as soon as possible when a patient is noted to be deteriorating.”

    Source location

    Response from HCA Healthcare
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Empower ICU Nurses-in-Charge to escalate deteriorating patients to Resident Doctors and directly to Consultants when required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Within the ICU environment, we have emphasised to the Nurses-in-Charge the importance of escalating concerns from the bedside to Resident Doctors. It has also been reinforced to Nurses-in-Charge to ensure that Resident Doctors are supported to escalate as soon as possible all deteriorating patients to the Consultant. The Nurse-in-Charge is also empowered to escalate directly to the Consultant if required.”

    Source location

    Response from HCA Healthcare
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and strengthen critical-care procedures defining escalation, record-keeping, communication, staffing, and medical-care responsibilities, and share them with relevant staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. We have revised and strengthened the Standard Operating Procedures for;”

    Source location

    Response from HCA Healthcare
    Page 8 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and distribute the Resident Doctor induction handbook to prohibit text messaging for urgent escalation and require telephone or face-to-face communication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. We have updated the new Resident Doctor Induction Handbook to make it explicitly clear that escalation of a deteriorating patient must be undertaken via telephone call or face to face and that escalation via text message is not an appropriate form of communication to escalate urgent clinical concerns. This updated Handbook has been provided to all current Resident Doctors and will be provided to all new Resident Doctors in future. The Handbook will be regularly reviewed and updated going forward as required. | 31 July 2024 and on-going | Completed”

    Source location

    Response from HCA Healthcare
    Page 10 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response
  6. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Jacob Lee Shorter · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacob Lee Shorter, who was receiving support after leaving long-term foster care, died after entering the train tracks at Heeley Loop in Sheffield on 1 January 2024 and being struck by a train. The report raised concern that an independent visitor’s knowledge of Jacob’s previous suicidal ideation was not shared with his foster carer or other relevant people, and that the training and escalation arrangements for such disclosures were unclear.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear escalation route for mental health concerns or disclosures

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Whilst the Independent Visitor was made aware of previous suicidal ideation this was not passed on to the foster carer or anyone else. Calderdale were unable to tell me of the training they receive or the escalation route for concerns or disclosures of this type. There is a clear risk that if this type of information is not passed on and adequate training is not provided in terms of mental health then this could cause future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Jacob Lee Shorter · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Independent Visitor volunteers to follow a safeguarding code and health-and-safety procedure specifying when concerns must be reported or disclosed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All Independent Visitors Volunteers adhere to the Council’s “Safeguarding Code of Conduct for Independent Visitors.” The Code forms part of the agreement for Independent Visitors to work as a volunteer. The Safeguarding Code is specific and sets out the circumstances in which disclosure should take place by stating:”

    Source location

    Response from Calderdale Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 June 2024

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Frederick Martin Gerard Boyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frederick Martin Gerard Boyd, a resident of Lakes Care Home with a long-term catheter, complained of severe abdominal pain on 10 September 2023 and was found unresponsive in bed at about 6am the following day. A postmortem found that he died from peritonitis due to a bladder perforation caused by long-term catheterisation. Concerns included the lack of clear systems for monitoring and escalating care when a resident was unwell, limited documentation, and limited managerial oversight of documentation quality.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear and poorly understood escalation system for unwell patients

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The evidence before the inquest indicated that the system for escalation where a patient was unwell was unclear and not understood by staff. ”

    Source location

    Frederick Martin Gerard Boyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain clear protocols for identifying unwell residents and escalating concerns to district nursing teams and digital health coordinators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our current Residential services, have clear protocols for knowing their residents ‘well’ status and how to identify if they are ‘unwell’, as well as how to escalate via local district nursing teams and Digital Health Care coordinators.”

    Source location

    Response from Lakes Care Centre and CQC
    Page 10 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The assessment found no issues with escalation systems or staff understanding, and digital health services were generally used appropriately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Inspectors did not identify any issues in respect of systems for escalation and staff understanding of this during our assessment and on-site activity. Feedback from the digital health service, the local clinical assessment service covering all care homes in Tameside, was that it was generally being used appropriately. Partner agencies felt things were improving overall and were complimentary about the staff working for the service who it was felt generally knew service user’s needs.”

    Source location

    Response from Lakes Care Centre and CQC
    Page 6 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response
  8. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Michael James NYE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael James Nye attended the Royal Berkshire Hospital with sepsis caused by a Streptococcus A skin and soft tissue infection, but was initially diagnosed with an upper arm DVT. His condition deteriorated and he suffered two cardiac arrests, with his death verified on 15 November 2022. Concerns included delays in blood tests, CT scanning, escalation to the Intensive Care Unit and prescribing antibiotics, as well as overcrowding, inadequate escalation arrangements and training needs concerning atypical sepsis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of effective night-time Internal Escalation Policy measures

    Wider context from the report

    “d. The lack of a specific night time Internal Escalation Policy. A number of the general Internal Escalation Policy measures are not effective at night; ”

    Source location

    Michael James NYE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop, govern and secure approval for a revised night-time Internal Escalation Policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this inquest hearing, the trust’s senior urgent care group leads across ED, ICU, the Critical care outreach and the hospital out of hours team, are working towards writing a revised night time Internal Escalation Policy. This currently has a completion date of August 2024 by which time, it will have gone through the trust’s governance process and signed off by key stakeholders. A copy will be shared with HM Assistant Coroner via their office by 13 September 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response
  9. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Katherine Sarah FLYNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katherine Sarah Flynn, aged 34, underwent surgery for a malignant brain tumour and subsequently became dependent on an external ventricular drain. She died on 6 March 2022 after the drain stopped draining, hydrocephalus developed, and the drain was found to have dislodged. Concerns included failures to escalate reduced drainage and leakage to the medical team, and unclear guidance on escalation when a drain stopped draining but continued to oscillate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear nursing escalation policy when an external ventricular drain stops draining but continues to oscillate

    Wider context from the report

    “The case is a complex death where the immediate cause of death was blockage of an external ventricular drain resulting in hydrocephalus and coning. The written policy at this Trust, at the time, was not entirely clear about how the nursing staff should escalate things when a drain stopped draining but was still seen to be oscillating. Though some Trusts have developed their own policy on this area, these are varying as there is currently no standard national policy dealing with this issue. This is a risk which needs to be highlighted at a national level. ”

    Source location

    Katherine Sarah FLYNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and NHS nurse specialists to develop an action plan and national guideline for external ventricular drain management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is proposed that the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) co-lead with NHS Nurse Specialists to develop an action plan and national guideline for EVD management. A short life Working Group (comprising both Surgeons and Specialist Nurses) should be considered as the way forward with input from NHS England’s National Patient Safety Team. The Patient Safety Team plans to reach out to the SBNS, who we note that you also sent your Report to.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Obtain permission to share the Plymouth EVD management SOP with clinical leads on request.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the Coroner’s Report we ask you to review any SOP, or develop a SOP for your unit where necessary. Colleagues in Plymouth developed an SOP for the management of EVDs in Intensive Care. While this Regulation 28 will initiate review I have obtained permission from the authors for this to be shared with the Clinical Leads on request (to Suzanne).”

    Source location

    Response from Society of British Neurological Surgeons
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing local policies, educational materials and professional guidance address EVD care, while locally relevant policies remain appropriate for individual neurosurgical units.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While there is currently no NHS-wide national policy available regarding nursing care of patients with EVDs, local policies (examples of which are included in the footnote below¹) and educational material regarding best practice are readily available. There is also national nursing guidance available from the British Association of Neuroscience Nurses regarding Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Management. Leading Clinical Neurosurgery colleagues have also reviewed your Report and advised that every neurosurgical unit will have their own work skill mix and resources and be expected to develop locally relevant policies that would be valuable, relevant and safe. We note that in Katherine’s case, local policy was unfortunately not followed.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual Trusts are responsible for reviewing or developing local EVD standard operating procedures where necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the Coroner’s Report we ask you to review any SOP, or develop a SOP for your unit where necessary. Colleagues in Plymouth developed an SOP for the management of EVDs in Intensive Care. While this Regulation 28 will initiate review I have obtained permission from the authors for this to be shared with the Clinical Leads on request (to Suzanne).”

    Source location

    Response from Society of British Neurological Surgeons
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response
  10. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Igor Kacper SZALAPSKI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Igor hanged himself in his room at a hostel for homeless young people on 30 April 2023. Concerns included failures to re-contact the crisis team after staff found him drowsy and incoherent, insufficient meaningful staff contact and welfare checks, inadequate engagement with partner agencies and family contact, a lack of self-harm and suicide awareness training, and a chaotic hostel culture.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of policy on when to increase welfare checks

    Wider context from the report

    “However, I have read the report since. It went into some detail and identified that, when Igor was found at 6.25pm, no staff member had undertaken a welfare check of him since half past midnight, whereas there should have been at least one per shift. I was told at inquest that staff were disciplined about this after Igor’s death. At the time of Igor’s death, there was no national policy on when to increase welfare checks. I was told that there is now national guidance. ”

    Source location

    Igor Kacper SZALAPSKI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an organisational welfare-check procedure defining routine and increased checks, authorisation, duration and recording requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3.2.7 Concern 7: “At the time of Igor’s death, there was no national policy on when to increase welfare checks. I was told that there is now national guidance.””

    Source location

    Response from DePaul
    Page 16 · response
    Published 21 November 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026