Recurring concern

Inadequate control of falls risks

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 31 Oct 2013•Latest report 21 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes assessment, care planning, equipment, supervision, handover, referral, reporting, post-fall response and assurance explicitly dedicated to falls risk.

Not included

  • Generic mobility, staffing or environmental failures not explicitly tied to falls
  • The occurrence of a fall without an identified control deficiency
  • Falls from windows where the asserted control is the design or restriction of the window
Reports
165

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
285

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
349

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care14
Care Quality Commission9
Barts Health NHS Trust6
Office of the Chief Coroner5
Aneurin Bevan University LHB4
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust4
Royal London Hospital4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust4
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust3
Hc-One Limited3
Swansea Bay University Local Health Board3
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust3
Barchester Healthcare Limited2
Borough Care Ltd2
Cardiff & Vale University LHB2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Colin Colley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Colin Colley, who had dementia, frailty and a high assessed risk of falls, suffered an unwitnessed fall from a hospital bed after being left unsupervised with bed rails in place. He sustained a fatal brain bleed and died after transfer to the University Hospital of Wales. The principal concern was insufficient staff confidence and training in falls risk assessments, enhanced supervision and use of the Enhanced Supervision Document.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of confidence among nursing staff and healthcare support workers in the use and implications of falls risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Evidence was taken from nurses at St David’s that there remains a lack of confidence in both qualified nursing staff, healthcare assistants and healthcare support workers in the use of and implication of risk assessments around falls, and the use of and importance of enhanced supervision and the Enhanced Supervision Document. I am concerned that unless more training is provided and refreshed frequently, there is a risk of future deaths occurring, particularly given the cohort being nursed at that hospital and the turnover of staff. ”

    Source location

    Colin Colley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue rolling out falls prevention and management training, including preceptorship and healthcare support worker induction, while monitoring compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Expanding falls prevention and management training has been a particular focus for the Health Board, with St David’s Hospital serving as an early pilot site. Training sessions were provided to St David’s staff in September, October, and December 2024, with additional dates offered in May and June 2025. To date, 59% of qualified nurses have completed the training. We aim to reach compliance figures of a minimum of 85%. Study days have been booked, and the target compliance figure of 70 should be achievable by July 2025, provided there are no cancellations due to other pressures. The trajectory will be monitored to achieve and maintain in excess of 85% compliance by year end.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain the Falls Strategy Lead role to coordinate falls training and related improvement work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The falls training delivered within the Health Board was developed from a successful programme within Mental Health Services for Older People (MHSOP), which demonstrated a reduction in falls following the training sessions. This training was adapted to ensure suitability for physical health areas by a multidisciplinary team as part of the Dragon’s Heart Institute’s Spread and Scale Academy. A Falls Strategy Lead was recruited in July 2023 to support the coordination of training and other falls-related work.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the digital multifactorial falls risk assessment within the Welsh Nursing Care Record at St David’s Hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A digital version of the MFRA is part of the suite of risk assessments within the Welsh Nursing Care Record (WNCR), which is live across St David’s Hospital. This provides additional data on the completion of the MFRA, which can be used to inform specific areas of focus for falls training. The Health Board has also led a proposal to update the digital MFRA, making it easier for staff to complete and placing a greater focus on actions taken to reduce patients’ falls risks. Compliance with falls guidance and documentation of falls risks is audited via the Tendable platform and feeds into the Health Board’s nursing dashboard.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lead a proposal to update the digital multifactorial falls risk assessment to simplify completion and strengthen risk-reduction actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A digital version of the MFRA is part of the suite of risk assessments within the Welsh Nursing Care Record (WNCR), which is live across St David’s Hospital. This provides additional data on the completion of the MFRA, which can be used to inform specific areas of focus for falls training. The Health Board has also led a proposal to update the digital MFRA, making it easier for staff to complete and placing a greater focus on actions taken to reduce patients’ falls risks. Compliance with falls guidance and documentation of falls risks is audited via the Tendable platform and feeds into the Health Board’s nursing dashboard.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response
  2. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    June PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Phillips lived in a care home and, while taking clopidogrel, fell on 7 April 2023 and subsequently deteriorated. She was admitted to hospital on 24 April, where a CT scan confirmed a large traumatic subdural haemorrhage; she died on 30 April 2023. The substantive concerns were inaccurate care home records, failure to update fall-risk assessments, and an inadequate post-falls investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to update falls prevention risk assessments after falls and deterioration in condition

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The risk assessment for prevention of falls was not updated when it should have been after her fall on 07/04/23 and when her condition deteriorated. There is a concern that this create a risk of further deaths as risk assessments are not up to date. ”

    Source location

    June PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate investigation of post-fall incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The post falls investigation did not adequately investigate the circumstances of the fall. There is a concern that this creates a risk of future deaths as lessons are not learnt from incidents. ”

    Source location

    June PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update falls risk assessments within 24 hours and document follow-up in care records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The documentation following a resident having a fall in the home is as follows the falls risk assessment (screening for tools part one and part two) are updated within 24 hours this is then followed through and documented within the care records. A root analysis tool along with an incident investigation form has now been implemented.”

    Source location

    Response from Willow Grange Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold staff meetings reinforcing accurate incident assessment, timely reporting and compliance with policy and guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. Staff meetings have been held following June Phillips fall where it has been discussed the importance of documenting and reporting accurately and timely. A Staff meeting took place as of 11th March 2025 to inform the staff of the Coroners Court hearing regarding June Phillips and to discuss the importance of completing an accurate assessment of each accident and incident and also reacting promptly and in accordance to policy and updated guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from Willow Grange Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a documentation lead role to oversee falls and risk assessments, with monthly accident audits and timely responses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “14. We have implemented a lead of documentation who is responsible for checking and over seeing i.e. falls and risk assessments. All accidents are audited monthly and responded to accordingly and in a timely manner.”

    Source location

    Response from Willow Grange Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement root-cause analysis and incident-investigation tools for falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The documentation following a resident having a fall in the home is as follows the falls risk assessment (screening for tools part one and part two) are updated within 24 hours this is then followed through and documented within the care records. A root analysis tool along with an incident investigation form has now been implemented.”

    Source location

    Response from Willow Grange Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2025

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth James CLAYTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth James Clayton was admitted to Tameside General Hospital after falls at home and later had an unobserved fall in the Emergency Department while waiting about eight hours for an inpatient bed. He fractured his neck of femur, underwent surgery, deteriorated with complications, and died at the hospital. The concerns included prolonged Emergency Department waits, an environment and equipment that were not suited to prolonged observation of high-risk patients, limited bed availability linked to delayed discharges, and uncertainty about consistent national falls-risk management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of height-adjustable hospital beds for patients cared for on Emergency Department trolleys

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that a key factor in the fall was the prolonged time Mr Clayton was in the Emergency Department waiting for a bed to become available on a ward. The evidence was that he had been in the emergency department for about 8 hours when he fell. The inquest was told that the design of an Emergency Department is not suited to a need for prolonged observation of high risk patients. In addition generally patients are cared for on hospital trolleys which cannot be lowered in the way a hospital bed can be which further increases the risk of falls. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth James CLAYTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent falls risk management in Emergency Departments

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The inquest was told that for patient safety it was important, that whilst there were delays in ED throughput of patients, that a robust falls risk management system was in place. Tameside Hospital had put additional measures in place to manage falls risk in ED in a more consistent way but it was unclear what steps were in place nationally to manage falls risk in a consistent way in Emergency Departments. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth James CLAYTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Edmond EASTMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Eastman was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and later suffered an unwitnessed fall on 28 July 2024 while in hospital. He sustained an irreversible brain bleed and died in hospital that evening as a direct result of the injury. Concerns included delays in CT scans after falls, widespread communication and record-keeping issues, failure to follow post-fall procedures, and possible wider skills or knowledge deficits among staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Wider staff skills and knowledge deficit affecting post-fall care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. As set out above, there was clear evidence that the Trust has put extensive measures in place to address the issue of staff having not followed the Trust’s own post-fall procedures and protocols. However, I am concerned that the issue may not be limited to just those particular protocols and may be indicative of a wider skills/knowledge deficit. ”

    Source location

    Carl Edmond EASTMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide falls-protocol and post-fall-management education through junior-doctor induction and ongoing nursing and medical team education.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of ongoing education for medical and ward nursing teams, emphasis will be placed on the importance of the Trust’s falls protocol at night, which will be included and provided to nursing and medical teams, in conjunction with the hospital at night Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver regular falls-prevention simulation training, including protocol, post-fall management, documentation, escalation and prevention, to nursing and medical staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is agreement that a robust and sustainable education plan for falls must be implemented. Following the death of Mr. Eastman, a post falls simulation programme was developed and is in the process of being delivered to all nursing staff. All Clinical Practice Educators have been trained as champions to deliver the falls simulation training to ward staff. Progress of the establishment of this body of work is currently being monitored through the Senior Nurse Matrons’ meeting which takes place weekly, and all areas involved are required to report progress of this implementation by early May 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response
  5. Hertfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Joshua Jay Weavers · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joshua Jay Weavers died on 4 March 2021 after jumping from a railway bridge and being struck by a high-speed train. The report raises concerns about lengthy waits for autism spectrum disorder assessments, delays in implementing assessment-service reforms, and bridge safety measures that did not meet current guidance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of bridge safety measures to meet current guidance for preventing pedestrian jumping or falling

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That the safety measures in place on the ████████ to guard against pedestrians either jumping or falling from the bridge do not meet current guidance, and therefore gives rise to a risk of future deaths occurring. ”

    Source location

    Joshua Jay Weavers · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Liaise with Network Rail and undertake Principal Inspections of both bridges to assess their structural condition.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To inspect the footbridge and southern road bridge safely, we need Network Rail's permission for a time when the railway is closed and the overhead power lines turned off. We will use the next Principal Inspection to assess the feasibility of raising or replacing the parapets with new, higher versions. We are currently liaising with Network Rail and will undertake the Principal Inspection at the first opportunity. Once this is complete, we will be able to better understand the feasibility and costs of parapet improvements and consider the most appropriate course of action.”

    Source location

    Response from Hertfordshire Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the inspection findings to assess the feasibility and costs of raising or replacing the parapets and consider the appropriate improvement options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To inspect the footbridge and southern road bridge safely, we need Network Rail's permission for a time when the railway is closed and the overhead power lines turned off. We will use the next Principal Inspection to assess the feasibility of raising or replacing the parapets with new, higher versions. We are currently liaising with Network Rail and will undertake the Principal Inspection at the first opportunity. Once this is complete, we will be able to better understand the feasibility and costs of parapet improvements and consider the most appropriate course of action.”

    Source location

    Response from Hertfordshire Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Parapet heights cannot safely be raised until inaccessible structural areas are assessed using up-to-date condition information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We explored simple ways to raise the height of the parapets on the footbridge but unfortunately, concluded that this could not be done safely without up-to-date information on the condition of the structure, parts of which are impossible to access”

    Source location

    Response from Hertfordshire Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Closing the footbridge is not considered a safer response because diversion could increase unsafe pedestrian crossings and exacerbate isolation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We therefore considered an alternative approach of closing the footbridge. This would create a lengthy diversion for pedestrians to access the southern road bridge and an increased risk of pedestrians crossing the dual carriageway at an unsafe location.”

    Source location

    Response from Hertfordshire Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bridge inspections require Network Rail permission, railway closure and overhead power isolation before feasibility of parapet improvements can be assessed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To inspect the footbridge and southern road bridge safely, we need Network Rail's permission for a time when the railway is closed and the overhead power lines turned off. We will use the next Principal Inspection to assess the feasibility of raising or replacing the parapets with new, higher versions. We are currently liaising with Network Rail and will undertake the Principal Inspection at the first opportunity. Once this is complete, we will be able to better understand the feasibility and costs of parapet improvements and consider the most appropriate course of action.”

    Source location

    Response from Hertfordshire Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response
  6. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa Savage died on 25 April 2023 at the University Hospital of North Durham from bronchopneumonia, following a fall from her bed at Redwell Hills Care Home on 18 March 2023 and subsequent injuries and decline in health. The concerns included unclear fall-reporting arrangements, ineffective monitoring of her mobilisation, inadequate post-fall medical assessment, missing or insufficient care records, and failure to promptly reassess her care plan after falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide effective, individually tailored monitoring measures for residents at high risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence is clear that the provided sensor mat was not an efficient way of monitoring Mrs Savage when she attempted to mobilise. It was well known in the home that Mrs Savage defeated it's purpose by moving or unplugging it. There seems to have been a lack of thought as to an alternative measure. The wall mounted sensor, for example was seen by the expert as a reasonable measure - the home manager said he could consider them and the regional manager indicated they were used in the company, but not at the care home where Mrs Savage was residing. It seems to me the council should have an armoury of measures to pick from to tailor to the needs of the individual resident not just limited to one particular measure. The risk of death is obvious to others if persons at high risk of falls are not known to be moving by those charged with looking after them. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply the Group Falls Policy and supporting flowcharts covering falls protocols, referrals, care planning, risk assessment and post-fall actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Falls Process Flowchart has formed part of the new system in place after April 2021. Since April 2021, all care and clinical team members must complete falls awareness training, delivered by a learning management system complemented by on-site face to face training.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Analyse falls incidents monthly, validate home practice through regional reviews and use trend monitoring to identify and address emerging risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Each home in the Group is required to complete an incident analysis each month which is produced via the RADAR system, this is then validated during the Regional Manager Provider Validation Review which is”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind Home Managers about available falls-reduction equipment and include equipment availability in regular audits of home practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the concerns noted at the inquest, regional teams have reminded all Home Managers as to the scope of equipment available to them through the Group procurement department, to support falls reduction. This equipment is available to any resident, in accordance with their assessed needs and risk assessment. Regional teams will incorporate this into their regular audit of home practices.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review care plans and risk assessments after falls, near misses or other changes in need, updating them where required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mrs Savage had been admitted to the Home initially as a temporary placement on 14 December 2022. For new admissions, upon receipt of a referral or enquiry, details about the person to be admitted to our homes will be taken and a pre-admission assessment will be completed. The information obtained at the pre-admission stage will seek to include everything that the home requires to ensure that the needs of the person can be met safely, and to ensure that there is continuity of care, treatment and support for the person, and this information is used to commence formulation of care plans and risk assessments, including mobility needs and falls risk. All risk assessments are to be completed within 12 hours of admission and care plans finalised within 72 hours, these documents are reviewed monthly as a minimum, or as a change in resident need is identified.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    It cannot be established that Mrs Savage would have responded better to a different sensor measure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Group has access to a range of sensor equipment to support the needs of residents, including infrared motion detectors. Sensor mats are often favoured as they alert teams to a resident attempting to mobilise and can be moved with the resident if they choose to sit in lounge areas, for example. Infrared motion detectors can be troublesome for residents who can walk short distances independently as they will ring constantly when the resident is moving around their bedroom and the noise and consequential agitation that may be experienced may lead to further risk of harm or injury. It cannot be said with any certainty that Mrs Savage would have responded better to a different sensor measure, but it is acknowledged that the care provided to Mrs Savage following her falls on 1 February and 18 March 2023 was reactive rather than”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
  7. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Jean MULLEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jean Mullen, an 87-year-old woman, was found collapsed and unresponsive at the bottom of the stairs at home after her pendant alarm was triggered on 22 June 2024; the inquest concluded that her death was accidental, involving a fall from height, fracture of the neck and subdural haemorrhage. Concerns included the failure to provide a recommended grab rail, failure to escalate a fall in the shower or reassess her mobility and equipment needs, and incomplete recording of stair-related risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide recommended safety equipment in the home

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest I heard evidence regarding communications between various departments of Adult Social Care and Home First and in particular STEPS. There had been an assessment by the therapist at Doncaster Royal Infirmary regarding Mrs Mullen returning to a safe home environment and what support and equipment would be required to allow that to take place. This included an assessment in the home with social workers present. A care package was provided by STEPS and it quickly became apparent that long term care and support would be required in the home and thus an application was completed on the 12th April. Mrs Mullen's family referred to them being informed that a grab rail would be required at the top of the stairs near the bathroom to help Mrs Mullen navigate to the bathroom thus reducing the risk of falls. This was not provided. A fall occurred when Mrs Mullen was in the shower but the carers failed to escalate this and made no referrals for any further assessment to take place in relation to Mrs Mullen's mobility and ability to continue living safely at her home address. Further this was a missed opportunity to assess whether any other aids or equipment were needed to support her. Had this taken place it is likely that the absence of the grab rail would have been identified. This was a further missed opportunity. Finally, the care and support placement referred to in the second exhibit to ████████'s report made no reference to the issue of stairs and the risk of falling that they presented. ”

    Source location

    Jean MULLEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Follow up delays in providing recommended aids and equipment for service users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(2) Following up on recommendations for aids and equipment required to ensure a safe home environment for elderly persons such as Mrs Mullen: where a recommendation has been made for aids and equipment, this will be ordered by the professional making the recommendation. The Council will always follow up any delay in provision and assist in any way possible.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relevant professionals, rather than social care staff, must assess risks and recommend or order aids and equipment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “➢ It should be noted that carers and social care staff are not qualified to diagnose medical conditions or to make recommendations for aids and equipment. Their role is to raise any perceived concerns and to direct the person in question to the relevant professional for advice, usually an occupational therapist, physiotherapist, or District Nurse. All staff are aware of this process and do not require permission to take such steps.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Ian Gilmore HEGARTY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Hegarty was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and later sustained an unwitnessed fall in hospital when the allocated staff member left the bay, causing a right femur fracture. His condition deteriorated and he died on 17 June 2024; the principal concern was that the care plan intended to reduce falls risk was not followed, with insufficient reassurance at the time of the inquest that the risk was being addressed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow falls-risk care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That the plan of care put in place specifically to reduce the risk of falls for multiple patients was not followed. I heard evidence that an internal investigation into the matter has been commenced but is not yet concluded. As such, there was insufficient reassurance, at the time of the inquest, that the risk is being addressed. ”

    Source location

    Ian Gilmore HEGARTY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct weekly documentation audits, assurance meetings, metrics reviews and ward action planning across all six divisional wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. | Weekly documentation audits & action plans”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ward-based falls and enhanced-care risk-assessment training with senior-nurse oversight and refresher documentation sessions for staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. | Training, Falls and Enhanced Care risk assessments”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response
  9. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Prichard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Prichard, a resident of Moorlands Lodge Care Home, had an unwitnessed fall on 28 March 2024 after a delayed response to her call bell and later died in hospital from a traumatic acute subdural haemorrhage. The concerns included the absence of a falls minimisation plan, outdated and conflicting care-plan information, persistent delays in responding to call bells, and inadequate oversight and auditing of these issues.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide falls minimisation plans for residents at risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “- Mrs Prichard did not have a falls minimisation plan in place and the Manager of the care home was not aware that Avery Healthcare had a falls minimisation plan document which needed to be completed for residents at risk of falls. The Coroner is therefore concerned that other residents who are at risk of falls do not have falls minimisation plans in place. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Prichard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide wearable emergency alert devices to residents not assessed as high risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “- Since Mrs Prichard’s death Moorlands Lodge Care Home has introduced watches which can be worn on the wrist and used to attract immediate attention in the event of a fall or other medical emergency. However, the watches have only been provided to residents who have been assessed as high risk of falls, meaning that others who have a fall, or another type of medical emergency, are still reliant on the pendant call button to gain assistance. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Prichard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of oversight and auditing to identify non-completion of falls minimisation plans

    Wider context from the report

    “- The Coroner is concerned that Avery Healthcare’s oversight and auditing measures failed to identify that the call bell response time policy was not being implemented at Moorlands Lodge Care Home for many months and further failed to identify that falls minimisation plans were not being completed for residents. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Prichard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete falls risk assessments and multifactorial assessments and minimisation plans for residents identified as at risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All residents have a falls risk assessment completed on admission. For those residents identified as having an increased risk of falls, a further multifactorial falls risk assessment is indicated and completed on the electronic care planning system.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train the General Manager in the organisation’s falls-minimisation protocols and policies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The new General Manager has been trained in Avery Healthcare’s falls minimisation protocols and policies to ensure proper implementation, consistency and to continue to drive improvements.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade further falls-risk training to strengthen staff knowledge and risk-management documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Further Falls risk training has been cascaded to specifically coach staff and develop their knowledge, understanding and reasoning in respect of their completion of entries in the care plans with a higher emphasis of the risk management to be embedded within all the care documentation.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate updated falls-prevention policies and multifactorial falls-risk screening tools to managers for team implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Falls Prevention Policy and Multi-Factorial Falls Risk Screening Tool was sent to all Home Managers and General Managers to read and familiarise themselves with the changes and to update their staff and teams.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold weekly clinical-risk meetings to analyse incidents, review risks and care plans, and assign actions with ownership and timescales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Weekly Clinical Risk meetings are held within the Home, chaired by the General Manager and/or Deputy manager to analyse falls, accident and incidents, infections, admission, weight loss and medication reviews. Actions are agreed with timescales and ownership.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce an internal audit framework covering call-bell response times and falls-minimisation plans, with results shared with staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A new internal audit framework has been introduced, focusing on critical areas such as call bell response times and falls minimisation plans. All audit results will be shared transparently with staff to foster accountability.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reconfigure the call-bell system to escalate unanswered calls after three minutes to an emergency tone.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Furthermore, there has now been a full review and reconfiguration of the call bell system. This work will ensure that any call bell activated from any source, i.e. pendant or call point will ring for 3 minutes on the ordinary tone. If the call bell is not answered within 3 minutes, the call bell will be automatically escalated and change to an emergency call bell which has a different tone. The team are aware that emergency bells must be answered immediately, and this response is a whole home approach. This new system has made the use of the wrist-worn emergency watches unnecessary.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and operate a care-plan tracker with daily management checks and monthly care-record audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A Care Plan Tracker has been introduced. This is a live document which records all care plans required for each resident and the date they were last reviewed. This is checked daily by the Home Manager. The tracker is completed and reviewed in”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct Quality Team compliance inspections to oversee audit findings and ensure actions are completed promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Internal Compliance Inspections are conducted by the Quality Team, which oversee all audit findings and ensure that actions are completed promptly and consider whether they may prompt an inspection on emerging risks.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The reconfigured call bell system makes wrist-worn emergency watches unnecessary for high-risk residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• As of November 2024, wrist-worn emergency watches for high-risk residents have been discontinued.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Robert TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert TAYLOR, who had prostate cancer, chronic liver disease and later high grade acute myeloid leukaemia, fell in hospital on 11 June 2024 after enhanced nursing observations had been identified as necessary but not put in place. He sustained traumatic subdural and subarachnoid haemorrhages and died on 21 June 2024. Concerns were raised about the lack of enhanced observations and the quality of the Trust’s post-death investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of post-death investigations to address central issues relating to falls

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The witness and the investigation report did not address the central issue relating to the fall and this raises a concern about the quality of post death investigations being undertaken by the Trust. This raises a concern for future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Robert TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise nursing witness-statement templates with prompts covering the incident, preceding care, post-fall care and learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the inquest the Lead Nurse for falls has worked with the legal services team to revise the templates used for the nursing witness statement to ensure that witnesses are capturing essential information in relation to a fall to assist the Coroner at Inquest. The template provides additional prompts to enable the witness to write a logical account of the incident, including the patients care leading up to the fall, how the fall occurred, and post fall care, including any learning identified.”

    Source location

    Response-from-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Involve specialist nursing leads from the beginning of Coronial investigations and inquest processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, our Legal Services Team will ensure that specialist nurse leads for the Trust, for example those involved in Falls and Tissue Viability, will be involved from the start of a Coronial investigation or inquest process to ensure they have full awareness of issues and can contribute to an investigation from a highly experienced professional standpoint.”

    Source location

    Response-from-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prepare inquest witnesses through individual and group meetings, calls and meetings with instructed solicitors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding witnesses summonsed to attend inquests, the Legal Services Team are ensuring that our staff are fully prepared to attend an inquest by arranging individual and group meetings and telephone calls with witnesses and their managers together with meetings with our instructed solicitors to ensure that staff are supported and are as prepared as fully as they can be to give evidence at the inquest. In addition, a series of training for ward managers and nursing staff is being rolled out commencing early next year across all our hospital sites.”

    Source location

    Response-from-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 October 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026