Recurring concern

Inadequate control of falls risks

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 31 Oct 2013•Latest report 21 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes assessment, care planning, equipment, supervision, handover, referral, reporting, post-fall response and assurance explicitly dedicated to falls risk.

Not included

  • Generic mobility, staffing or environmental failures not explicitly tied to falls
  • The occurrence of a fall without an identified control deficiency
  • Falls from windows where the asserted control is the design or restriction of the window
Reports
165

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
285

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
349

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care14
Care Quality Commission9
Barts Health NHS Trust6
Office of the Chief Coroner5
Aneurin Bevan University LHB4
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust4
Royal London Hospital4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust4
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust3
Hc-One Limited3
Swansea Bay University Local Health Board3
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust3
Barchester Healthcare Limited2
Borough Care Ltd2
Cardiff & Vale University LHB2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Sefton, St Helens and Knowsley

    AI-generated summary

    Julia MURPHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julia Murphy, known as Sheila, died in hospital on 9 April 2023 after a fall in her care home caused a hip fracture and her condition deteriorated. The report raises concerns about repeated falls, incomplete or inaccurate referrals to the falls prevention team, inadequate escalation, and failure to formally seek one-to-one supervision funding where appropriate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide appropriate falls prevention for a resident with evolving dementia

    Wider context from the report

    “Julia had 21 falls, the final fall led to her death. The 3 referral forms sent to falls prevention were incomplete, misleading and/or inaccurate. An action plan in respect of preventing future deaths from falls/falls prevention/the learning following these events was not presented at Inquest nor did there appear to be a clear plan to address inter alia; 1. Accurate/timely reporting of falls/accurate timely, completion of referral forms to the falls prevention team . 2. Escalation when such a significant number of falls were sustained by 1 frail, elderly person. 3. Meeting the needs of the resident with evolving dementia, particularly in respect of mobility, supervision, falls prevention and risk assessment. 4. Formally requesting 1-1 supervision funding when necessary/as appropriate on a case by case basis. 5. Training/development/organisational learning following these events re falls prevention and accurate reporting/escalation. The above list is not exhaustive and the care home management/owners will be best placed to develop their own action plan following the death of Julia. ”

    Source location

    Julia MURPHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide training and development on falls prevention

    Wider context from the report

    “Julia had 21 falls, the final fall led to her death. The 3 referral forms sent to falls prevention were incomplete, misleading and/or inaccurate. An action plan in respect of preventing future deaths from falls/falls prevention/the learning following these events was not presented at Inquest nor did there appear to be a clear plan to address inter alia; 1. Accurate/timely reporting of falls/accurate timely, completion of referral forms to the falls prevention team . 2. Escalation when such a significant number of falls were sustained by 1 frail, elderly person. 3. Meeting the needs of the resident with evolving dementia, particularly in respect of mobility, supervision, falls prevention and risk assessment. 4. Formally requesting 1-1 supervision funding when necessary/as appropriate on a case by case basis. 5. Training/development/organisational learning following these events re falls prevention and accurate reporting/escalation. The above list is not exhaustive and the care home management/owners will be best placed to develop their own action plan following the death of Julia. ”

    Source location

    Julia MURPHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately and promptly report falls and complete falls-prevention referral forms

    Wider context from the report

    “Julia had 21 falls, the final fall led to her death. The 3 referral forms sent to falls prevention were incomplete, misleading and/or inaccurate. An action plan in respect of preventing future deaths from falls/falls prevention/the learning following these events was not presented at Inquest nor did there appear to be a clear plan to address inter alia; 1. Accurate/timely reporting of falls/accurate timely, completion of referral forms to the falls prevention team . 2. Escalation when such a significant number of falls were sustained by 1 frail, elderly person. 3. Meeting the needs of the resident with evolving dementia, particularly in respect of mobility, supervision, falls prevention and risk assessment. 4. Formally requesting 1-1 supervision funding when necessary/as appropriate on a case by case basis. 5. Training/development/organisational learning following these events re falls prevention and accurate reporting/escalation. The above list is not exhaustive and the care home management/owners will be best placed to develop their own action plan following the death of Julia. ”

    Source location

    Julia MURPHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret AUSTIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Austin died at Stanley Park Care Home on 17 September 2023, following an unwitnessed fall from her bed on 1 July 2023 that caused a pubic rami fracture and contributed to her overall decline. Concerns included incomplete and discrepant documentation about managing her high falls risk, lack of evidence that the risk management plan was reviewed as her risks changed or after falls, and outstanding falls-risk training for most care-home staff at the date of the inquest.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of falls risk training for care home staff

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Staff training in relation to falls risk remained outstanding at the date of the Inquest for the majority (3/4) of staff at the care home. ”

    Source location

    Margaret AUSTIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate and inconsistent documentation of falls risk management

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased was known to be at high risk of falls and the documentation in relation to how to manage that known high risk of falls was not comprehensive and contained significant discrepancies as to what should, in fact, be in place, and contained no rationale for why further measures which may have been considered appropriate were not in situ or considered appropriate or necessary. ”

    Source location

    Margaret AUSTIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review risk management plans when risks change or after falls

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was no evidence that the risk management plan was reviewed as the deceased's risks changed nor in the aftermath of documented falls. ”

    Source location

    Margaret AUSTIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include the falls-specific training package in mandatory induction and annual refresher training for staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst at the time of inquest hearing the training numbers for the specific falls risk package were as stated, I wish to provide reassurance that all staff had undertaken their mandatory training both in terms of induction and annual refresher training. This includes elements of falls risk assessment and management as part of the moving and handling, emergency first aid at work and basic life support training. At the time, the falls prevention module was development training to enhance staff understanding rather than a mandatory requirement.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review risk management plans and clarify documentation, review, updating and clinical-rationale expectations for staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Stanley Park has taken a number of steps to improve documentation around assessment and management of falls, including documentation to reflect the rationale sitting behind clinical decision making. The steps taken are as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make falls-documentation compliance and quality a continuing review point in annual appraisals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “December 2023. Compliance and quality in terms of falls documentation will remain a review point in annual appraisals going forward.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review accident and incident reports to identify required responses and further falls-mitigation measures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “b. The management team are reviewing all accident and incident reports to ensure that appropriate actions in response have been identified, including any further mitigation steps such as sensory equipment, roll mats and requests to the GP for a secondary care falls referral.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss accidents and incidents in weekly clinical reviews and assign actions to update assessments and management plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “c. Accidents and incidents are being discussed during the weekly clinical review meetings, with specific actions being assigned to staff members around ensuring that the individual's assessment and management plan is updated.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have the Deputy Manager review assessments and plans to triangulate care and verify completion of assigned clinical-review actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “d. Assessments and plans are being reviewed by the Deputy Manager to ensure triangulation of care and to confirm that actions set in the clinical review meetings have been fully completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit high-risk patients’ assessments and management-plan documentation to verify appropriate assessment and recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the learning from points (1) and (2) above has been fully embedded, an audit was carried out (starting first with high risk patients to ensure timely review) with the purpose of verifying that care needs have been appropriately assessed and that the assessment and subsequent management plan is properly documented. This audit was completed on 31 December 2023 and demonstrates that staff are compliant with the standards expected of them. There is a planned programme of ongoing audit to ensure that the improved standards are maintained.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain improved falls-documentation standards through an ongoing audit programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the learning from points (1) and (2) above has been fully embedded, an audit was carried out (starting first with high risk patients to ensure timely review) with the purpose of verifying that care needs have been appropriately assessed and that the assessment and subsequent management plan is properly documented. This audit was completed on 31 December 2023 and demonstrates that staff are compliant with the standards expected of them. There is a planned programme of ongoing audit to ensure that the improved standards are maintained.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff of reassessment triggers, including after hospital discharge and return to the home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the review and discussions outlined in respect of point (1) above, during these same processes the Home Manager has ensured that staff are appropriately recognising when falls/risks assessments and management plans need to be reviewed and updated and that the reviews are being carried out in a timely manner. The specific actions in relation to this point are as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The specific falls-prevention package was developmental rather than mandatory; all staff had completed mandatory training containing falls-risk elements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Staff training in relation to falls risk remained outstanding at the date of the Inquest for the majority (3/4) of staff at the care home.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response
  3. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Raymond Lionel Eggleton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Raymond Lionel Eggleton died in hospital on 25 January 2023 after falling on a medical unit, sustaining a fractured neck of femur and head injuries, and subsequently developing dysphagia, immobility, delirium and aspiration pneumonia. The principal concerns were that his falls risk assessment did not use all available information about his previous falls and postural hypotension, resulting in inadequate supervision, and that the ward lacked sufficient flexibility and resilience to respond dynamically to vulnerable patients’ enhanced care needs, particularly during night shifts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete initial falls risk assessments using all available information

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the Inquest, I also heard evidence from Sister Jones and in addition to the challenge of getting the staffing levels commensurate to the patients needs and safeguarding patients there does appear to be an issue that causes me a concern as regards the ability to dynamically respond to a need for enhanced supervision especially entering into night shifts. Sister Jones when questioned was open and extremely candid in her answer that at those times nursing staff could not always support those additional needs in the short term because of the challenge to get additional personal at short notice in circumstances where the nursing team were under pressure due to the complexities and demands of patient’s needs. There is in my view no flexibility and resilience within the system to dynamically adapt and respond to changing patients enhanced needs exacerbated by the fact that especially during the winter months those beds are mainly occupied by the elderly. It is easier during day shifts to respond but there clearly appears to be an issue especially going into night shifts. There were 2 issues here, firstly the initial falls risk assessment on LAMU which was not undertaken taking advantage of all available information which in my view led to an incorrect assessment of Ray’s supervision needs. His fall was observed by another member of the nursing staff and therefore my view is that only arm’s length supervision would have avoided the fall and that there were sufficient indicators on two occasions prior to the event occurring. The failure here in relation to the initial assessment was down to the volume of work and not in my view laziness or anything of that nature on the part of nursing staff. Flowing from the first issue a further issue relates to the resilience and the ability to respond dynamically with changing patients on the ward so as to ensure that vulnerable patients with a high degree of risk of falling, like Ray, are properly safeguarded. ”

    Source location

    Raymond Lionel Eggleton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate staffing governance and deployment processes using acuity data, enhanced-care assessments and three-times-daily staffing meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has robust safe staffing processes which are in line with national guidance and evidence based. This includes a 6 monthly safe staffing report to Trust Board which includes details of the Chief Nurses yearly establishment reviews with the ward managers. Nurse to patient ratios, benchmarking data, patient acuity, quality metrics and enhanced care data are reviewed as part of the Chief Nurse yearly establishment reviews.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the enhanced-care policy, documentation and teaching to clarify assessment requirements and supervision levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has had an enhanced care policy in place for several years. The Deputy Divisional Directors of Nursing are working with the Falls Team and undertaking a review of the current policy, paperwork and teaching. This work has an emphasis on the correct assessment and clear definitions of levels of supervision e.g. line of sight and within arm’s reach. This is supported by a ‘Stay in the bay’ approach when health care support workers are providing enhanced care. This mandates that before the designated staff leaves, this duty has to be handed over to another member of staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Trial the enhanced-care and ‘Stay in the bay’ approach on three wards, with daily review of assessments, care gaps and education.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has had an enhanced care policy in place for several years. The Deputy Divisional Directors of Nursing are working with the Falls Team and undertaking a review of the current policy, paperwork and teaching. This work has an emphasis on the correct assessment and clear definitions of levels of supervision e.g. line of sight and within arm’s reach. This is supported by a ‘Stay in the bay’ approach when health care support workers are providing enhanced care. This mandates that before the designated staff leaves, this duty has to be handed over to another member of staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a handover tool that records patients’ falls risks in greater detail.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The other area of focus is to improve the handover process on the patient’s risk of falling and a new handover tool is being developed which will highlight the falls risk in more detail.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Acute Medical Unit training on multifactorial falls assessment, including risks, information sources and supervision levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Falls team will be providing additional training in the Acute Medical Unit on Multifactorial falls assessment, this training will include the essential components and sources of information required to support a personalised assessment, identifying key risks and level of supervision.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response
  4. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Gerald Roy Cruse · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gerald Cruse fell from a bed while being assisted to use the toilet in an ambulance cohort area after admission following a fall at home. He sustained multiple rib fractures, a haemopneumothorax and surgical emphysema, later developed pneumonia, and died in hospital. Concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment and recognition by ambulance staff, a lack of identified learning after investigation, and wider concerns about the organisation of care for older patients requiring both surgical and geriatric medical input.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ambulance staff to recognise falls risk and initiate further action

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) The other two ambulance staff did not seem to understand that Mr Cruse was a falls risk, they did not consider that he was at a greater risk of falls and did not consider that any further action should have been considered or taken. ”

    Source location

    Gerald Roy Cruse · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete falls risk assessments in accordance with JRCALC guidelines

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The paramedic working within the cohort area did not complete a falls risk assessment in accordance with the JRCALC guidelines following the admission of a patient who had just had a fall at home. ”

    Source location

    Gerald Roy Cruse · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The JRCALC holistic falls assessment cannot be reliably implemented in ACA because it is time-consuming and incompatible with dynamic, high-turnover work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Falls Risk Assessment Tool: As described the ergonomics and human factors involved in ACA are clearly different from a typical ambulance patient interaction. The type of holistic risk assessment recommended by JRCALC cannot be reliably implemented in a clinical context like ACA. This recommended assessment is in-depth and necessarily time consuming, and would be unrealistic to implement in an ACA context due to ACA’s dynamic nature and high turnover of patients. We should therefore look to implement an adapted Falls Risk Assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Bristol Ambulance
    Page 12 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response
  5. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Iris Elaine Fordham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Iris Elaine Fordham was admitted to hospital after an unwitnessed fall and concerns about her ability to keep herself safe due to Alzheimer’s disease. Failures to complete a falls risk assessment, falls care plan and enhanced care assessment led to the removal of 1:1 care, after which she sustained a fractured neck of femur in a further unwitnessed fall. She underwent surgical repair and died in a step-down care centre; concerns included poor clinical record-keeping, failures in falls-risk management and the absence of action through disciplinary or regulatory channels.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete falls care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The consequence of (2) was that no falls care plan was completed. ”

    Source location

    Iris Elaine Fordham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete falls risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The Trust failed to complete a falls risk assessment of Ms Fordham. ”

    Source location

    Iris Elaine Fordham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Sheila Rosamund JOHNSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheila Rosamund JOHNSON died at Butterfly Hospice on 14 February 2021 after an unwitnessed fall at her care home caused multiple rib fractures and fatal injuries. Concerns included an inadequate generic falls prevention policy, unlocked doors to unoccupied rooms, an unlit night light in common areas, no bell-ringing signage, and inadequate records of nightly observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequacy of the generic falls prevention policy

    Wider context from the report

    “1.An inadequate generic falls prevention policy appeared to be in place. ”

    Source location

    Sheila Rosamund JOHNSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Personalise generic care-home policies, including the falls prevention and management policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Normally a Policy, when an update is sent to me, is forwarded to the Home. The Manager goes through it and personalises it for the Home. Depending on the policy, it generally requires the care home name added and small changes made where necessary.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Care Centre 2
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Personalise generic care-home policies, including the falls prevention and management policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Normally a Policy, when an update is sent to me, is forwarded to the Home. The Manager goes through it and personalises it for the Home. Depending on the policy, it generally requires the care home name added and small changes made where necessary.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Care Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The comprehensive falls prevention policy is legally and operationally adequate, although generic policies will be personalised for the home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. An inadequate generic falls prevention policy appeared to be in place Our Policies are supplied by a professional company that takes into account latest legislations in terms of Legal, Health & Safety, CQC, Safeguarding, etc. They are specifically written for care homes. We use them as it ensures we are compliant with these different areas.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Care Centre 2
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The comprehensive falls prevention policy, supplied by a professional provider and accessible to staff, was considered sufficient despite its generic format.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. An inadequate generic falls prevention policy appeared to be in place Our Policies are supplied by a professional company that takes into account latest legislations in terms of Legal, Health & Safety, CQC, Safeguarding, etc. They are specifically written for care homes. We use them as it ensures we are compliant with these different areas.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Care Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response
  7. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Eileen Marguerite WALSH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eileen Marguerite WALSH, who had dementia and general frailty, fell unwitnessed at Broadland View Care Home, sustained a fractured neck of femur, and died on 3 March 2020. The inquest found that required hourly checks were not completed, her bed was not lowered, and the PIR sensor and pressure mat alarms did not sound; her death was contributed to by neglect. Concerns included incomplete night-working and monitoring arrangements, unreliable or editable care records, unclear policies on sleeping during night shifts, alarms that could not be heard everywhere, and failures to identify and learn from care and safeguarding concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to address falls risks and faulty sensor mats

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The Care Quality Commission carried out an inspection in February 2023, nearly 3 years following Mrs Walsh’s death, and raised similar concerns as raised during this inquest, including: a) Safeguarding concerns had not always been appropriately identified and referred b) Risks relating to falls were not dealt with, including a faulty sensor mat was still in place some days later c) Since a historic issue of staff neglect, further incidents of poor staff performance were identified and effective action had not always been taken. It is stated this failure to learn lessons placed people at risk of harm d) Recent audits carried out by the Home had not identified concerns found by the CQC ”

    Source location

    Eileen Marguerite WALSH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install and operate a monitoring system linking room-entry records, sensor mats, audible alarms and response-time reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “V. New monitoring system: This is part of our continuous improvement plans. The Medication system means that accurate recording of room checks, and response times will all be documented, and a detailed report can be obtained. There are sounders in all locations within the home ensuring that all staff can always hear the emergency alarms during their shift.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase maintenance alarm checks from monthly to weekly and replace faulty sensor mats immediately, with additional resident observations until repairs are completed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the daily checks recorded by the seniors, the mat was then reported as working until 10.02.2023 when there was a fault mended by Maintenance. The mat was reported as working every day from 10.02.2023 up until the inspection on 20.02.2023. It was working on 19.02.2023 when tested which was the day before the inspector arrived. iii. Sensor mats are checked 3 times a day, once by the day senior, once by the night senior, which is recorded on the Senior Task Checklist and then again by the Care Manager/Deputy on their daily walk round. The Maintenance team alarm checks have now been increased from Monthly to Weekly. If mats require changing, they have always been documented either on the senior task list, the managers walk round, or the maintenance checklist, dependent on who changes the mat. This information is also handed over on the handover report.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check sensor mats three times daily and record testing, faults, replacements and handover information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the daily checks recorded by the seniors, the mat was then reported as working until 10.02.2023 when there was a fault mended by Maintenance. The mat was reported as working every day from 10.02.2023 up until the inspection on 20.02.2023. It was working on 19.02.2023 when tested which was the day before the inspector arrived. iii. Sensor mats are checked 3 times a day, once by the day senior, once by the night senior, which is recorded on the Senior Task Checklist and then again by the Care Manager/Deputy on their daily walk round. The Maintenance team alarm checks have now been increased from Monthly to Weekly. If mats require changing, they have always been documented either on the senior task list, the managers walk round, or the maintenance checklist, dependent on who changes the mat. This information is also handed over on the handover report.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Sensor-mat risks are addressed through checks three times daily, immediate replacement, increased observations and maintenance arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This member of staff was suspended after the medication near misses, investigated, then dismissed and reported to the Disclosure and Barring Service, before the CQC inspection took place. (8b) Risks relating to falls were not dealt with, including a faulty sensor mat was still in place some days later. I. On the day of inspection, a sensor mat was found to be faulty and changed immediately, as is normal practice. The Care Manager had not done their daily walk round of the service when they test the sensor mats, because of the arrival of the CQC Inspector. II. It is common in care that sensor mats can become faulty or stop working, and there is a process in place for testing and replacing them. For the mat in question there had been a fault recorded on 27.01.2023 where the mat and the box had been replaced on the 28.01.2023 by the maintenance team.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response
  8. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Harold Wilberforce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harold Wilberforce fell at home on 16 January 2023, sustained a broken hip and was taken to hospital, where he contracted bronchopneumonia and died on 28 January 2023. Concerns included the lack of medical examination after the fall, the pharmacy delivery agent’s lack of awareness of his dementia, the absence of relevant staff training, and unclear roles and responsibilities when elderly service users are found to have fallen.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training for pharmacy delivery staff on responding to service-user falls at home

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Evidence was provided on behalf of the pharmacy that there was no training provided to staff members in respect of how to deal with and what actions should be taken when a service user is found to have had a fall at their home address by a pharmacy delivery agent. Evidence was also heard that the majority of service users were elderly persons. ”

    Source location

    Harold Wilberforce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Set training requirements for unregistered pharmacy staff, including delivery drivers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Delivery drivers themselves are not registered or directly regulated by us; nevertheless we have published guidance to ensure a safe and effective pharmacy team and we set requirements for the training of unregistered staff (which includes delivery drivers).”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess the pharmacy’s safeguarding risks and factor the concern into inspection timing and focus decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From what has been described to us, on this occasion it does appear that there has been a failure to safeguard a vulnerable service-user. As the issues you have raised fall more into the category of how the pharmacy is being operated, we have referred the matter to our local Inspector who covers this particular pharmacy. They will assess the risks posed by the issues you have described, and determine what follow-up action may be appropriate. The Inspector will also factor this information into their decision-making”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enrol all delivery agents on the Delivering Medicines Safely and Effectively training programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also contacted our staff training providers, the NPA, to identify any necessary update course for our delivery agents. They have responded by making us aware of a training programme titled: Delivering Medicines Safely and Effectively. We have reviewed the content of the course and are satisfied that this covers all the concerns and provides clarity for our staff in these circumstances.”

    Source location

    Response from Orchard 2000 Pharmacy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supervise delivery agents’ completion of the safety training and provide support through pharmacy managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have now enrolled all our delivery agents for this programme and they are being supervised by our pharmacy managers to ensure completion and support with the programme.”

    Source location

    Response from Orchard 2000 Pharmacy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delivery drivers are not directly regulated by the regulator.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Delivery drivers themselves are not registered or directly regulated by us; nevertheless we have published guidance to ensure a safe and effective pharmacy team and we set requirements for the training of unregistered staff (which includes delivery drivers).”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pharmacy owners are responsible for ensuring unregistered staff receive appropriate training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our guidance states that pharmacy owners are responsible for making sure that the whole pharmacy team – both registered pharmacy professionals and all unregistered staff – provide safe and effective care and pharmacy services. Staff members, and anyone involved in providing pharmacy services, must be competent and empowered to safeguard the health, safety and wellbeing of patients and the public in all that they do.”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The regulator does not mandate training details for particular scenarios because pharmacy support staff have diverse roles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Pharmacy owners are also accountable for making sure their unregistered staff meet our requirements for training. The scope of work of pharmacy support staff is hugely diverse, so we do not mandate specific detail about particular scenarios. We specify a set of learning outcomes which all support staff must achieve. These include outcomes relating to:”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The regulator’s role covers registered pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, not unregistered delivery drivers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, not all those who work within a pharmacy company, such as delivery drivers, are required to be registered professionals, and our role only covers individuals who are registered pharmacists or pharmacy technicians.”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delivery drivers are not generally expected to receive training specifically for managing a service-user’s fall at home or to enter patients’ homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This matter relates to pharmacy support staff. The roles and responsibilities of pharmacy support staff, such as delivery drivers, will be defined by the pharmacy. They, however, must be suitably qualified for the roles that they do. GPhC requirements for the education and training of pharmacy support staff includes being able to recognise and raise appropriate safeguarding concerns, particularly involving vulnerable adults. However, delivery drivers would not be expected to receive training specifically with how to manage a situation where a service-user has had a fall at home, and would also not normally enter patient’s homes.”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The pharmacy defines support staff roles, while its Superintendent pharmacist is responsible for ensuring their training and competencies meet requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This matter relates to pharmacy support staff. The roles and responsibilities of pharmacy support staff, such as delivery drivers, will be defined by the pharmacy. They, however, must be suitably qualified for the roles that they do. GPhC requirements for the education and training of pharmacy support staff includes being able to recognise and raise appropriate safeguarding concerns, particularly involving vulnerable adults. However, delivery drivers would not be expected to receive training specifically with how to manage a situation where a service-user has had a fall at home, and would also not normally enter patient’s homes.”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response
  9. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jennifer Evelyn RACKLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jennifer Evelyn Rackley died at Wexham Park Hospital on 15 January 2022 after a fall at her nursing home on 17 December 2021. Concerns included that her bed may have been in the centre of the room with only one sensor mat despite her high falls risk, and that the care home's reported investigation had no written record and could not identify the carers involved.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient sensor mat provision for a high-falls-risk resident

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It seems likely that Jennifer’s bed was in the centre of the room, with one sensor mat only, despite a high falls risk. ”

    Source location

    Jennifer Evelyn RACKLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to position a high-falls-risk resident’s bed appropriately

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It seems likely that Jennifer’s bed was in the centre of the room, with one sensor mat only, despite a high falls risk. ”

    Source location

    Jennifer Evelyn RACKLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann CLEMENTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann CLEMENTS was a resident at Perry Trees Centre following surgery for a hip fracture. She was incorrectly assessed as being at medium rather than high risk of falls, fell unwitnessed, and sustained a further hip fracture. She later developed pneumonia and sepsis and died in hospital on 23 October 2022. The concerns included gaps in enhanced supervision training, induction and falls-risk assessment training for staff including agency staff, and audits that checked compliance but not correctness.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate falls risk assessment training during staff induction

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Falls risk assessment training is on the essential role training programme, however, I am concerned that this area is not covered suitably on induction of staff to the centre. This leaves a gap, particularly with agency staff, and I am not satisfied that with the current processes, agency staff will be fully versed on the completion of these risk assessments. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann CLEMENTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to audit falls risk assessments for correctness

    Wider context from the report

    “3. I was told that since this incident, falls risk assessments are being audited for compliance. I was also told that they are not being audited for correctness. I am therefore concerned that errors, and consequently, staff training needs, would not be picked up in these audits. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann CLEMENTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create an action plan covering falls assessment, enhanced supervision training and falls-risk-assessment auditing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An in-depth action plan has been created around improvement to our falls assessment training, our enhanced supervision training, and how audit falls risk assessments, led by the Divisional Director of Nursing and Therapies for the Adult & Specialist Rehabilitation (A&SR) Division. This will set out both the Trust wide and divisional actions required to address your concerns, along with agreed action owners and timescales for delivery. This action plan will be submitted to the Chief of Nursing and Therapies for approval by 25 July 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver an Essential to Role training week for new starters within two months of commencing, including falls and enhanced supervision training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Division will hold an Essential to Role training week which will follow the new starter’s Induction week. The aim is for all new starters to complete the Essential to Role training week within 2 months of commencing in post. Falls training, including Enhanced Supervision training will be incorporated into this programme. The division are also undertaking a review of how we robustly oversee this competency with all existing staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update temporary-staff ward induction checklists to include essential falls-risk-assessment and falls-prevention content.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Each ward has a local induction checklist for temporary staff (bank and agency) who have not worked on the ward previously. The Lead Matron has reviewed the induction checklist to ensure that essential elements of Falls Risk Assessments and Falls Prevention are included. Auditing of this checklist will be the responsibility of each Matron and discussed as part of the Inpatients Quality Review meeting.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit temporary-staff induction checklists through Matrons and discuss findings at inpatient quality review meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Each ward has a local induction checklist for temporary staff (bank and agency) who have not worked on the ward previously. The Lead Matron has reviewed the induction checklist to ensure that essential elements of Falls Risk Assessments and Falls Prevention are included. Auditing of this checklist will be the responsibility of each Matron and discussed as part of the Inpatients Quality Review meeting.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the launched Essential Care Framework to support clinical-team self-assessment and incorporate falls-training improvements into it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has recently launched an Essential Care Framework which provides the guidance and the tools to enable clinical teams to self assess how well they meet what matters most to our patients and their relatives. This is being led by our Chief of Nursing and Therapies. The work being carried out to improve our falls risk assessments training and our enhanced supervision training will be incorporated into this framework.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct spot-check reviews of falls-risk assessments during care rounding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The completion of a falls risk assessment has been audited for compliance for some time as part of the Trust’s Essential Care Indicators (ECIs) audit. ECI’s take place monthly in the inpatient areas and are undertaken by the matron for each site. The discussion and learning from the round table has prompted additional measures to be introduced which will ensure that the assessment accurately reflects the risk of the patient falling and interventions required. The Matron will be undertaking spot check reviews of falls risk assessments as part of the current care rounding. In addition, the division will develop a quarterly falls prevention effectiveness audit. This will audit correctness of falls risk assessments and impact of care plans. The findings of the audits, and progress with subsequent actions, will be shared and monitored within the Inpatient Quality & Safety Committee.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a quarterly falls-prevention effectiveness audit covering assessment correctness and care-plan impact.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The completion of a falls risk assessment has been audited for compliance for some time as part of the Trust’s Essential Care Indicators (ECIs) audit. ECI’s take place monthly in the inpatient areas and are undertaken by the matron for each site. The discussion and learning from the round table has prompted additional measures to be introduced which will ensure that the assessment accurately reflects the risk of the patient falling and interventions required. The Matron will be undertaking spot check reviews of falls risk assessments as part of the current care rounding. In addition, the division will develop a quarterly falls prevention effectiveness audit. This will audit correctness of falls risk assessments and impact of care plans. The findings of the audits, and progress with subsequent actions, will be shared and monitored within the Inpatient Quality & Safety Committee.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026