Recurring concern

Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 11 Sep 2013•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the end-to-end process for managing clinical investigation results when the result is not reliably made available to, brought to the attention of, correctly checked or interpreted by, and acted upon by the responsible clinical team.

Not included

  • Excludes failures concerning treatment monitoring or prescribing unless the assertion specifically concerns management of the resulting investigation result.
  • Excludes generic documentation, staffing, training or communication deficiencies that are not explicitly tied to the management of an investigation result.
  • Excludes administrative or test-ordering failures where no result-management deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes failures involving non-clinical items, equipment or processes unrelated to clinical investigation results.
Reports
108

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
138

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
168

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care15
NHS England12
Care Quality Commission7
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB5
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust4
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust4
Barts Health NHS Trust3
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency3
Recipient name withheld3
Royal London Hospital3
Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust2
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Ralph Stephen Goslin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ralph Stephen Goslin, an inpatient detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, was found unresponsive in a bath on 21 June 2014 and died later that day in hospital. A concern was raised that a junior doctor did not recognise his sodium valproate level as subtherapeutic because of the reference range shown, delaying recognition of his failure to take anti-epilepsy medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of sodium valproate blood test reference ranges to clearly indicate the therapeutic range

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The junior doctor at St Pancras Hospital who first reviewed the UCH blood test result giving Mr Goslin’s sodium valproate level as less than 3, did not realise that this was sub therapeutic, because the reference range was given as less than 100, rather than 50-100 as it is in some other hospitals. This meant that Mr Goslin’s failure to take his anti epilepsy medication was not recognised as quickly as it could have been. ”

    Source location

    Ralph Stephen Goslin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Audrey Christine DAWS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Audrey Christine Daws was admitted to Derriford Hospital with chest pain and other symptoms, but her chest X-ray was delayed and its result was not identified promptly. The X-ray eventually showed air under the diaphragm indicating a perforation; she underwent surgery, deteriorated and died. The principal concerns were inadequate handover of outstanding investigations and delays in ordering, performing and reviewing the X-ray.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in medical review of investigation results

    Wider context from the report

    “2. A chest X-ray should have been ordered at the time of Mrs Daws admission into the emergency department. One was ordered approximately four hours later but it was not performed for nearly 17 hours. This was described as “inexplicable” during the Inquest hearing. It is plainly undesirable for an investigation that is considered urgent to be delayed for so long without anyone identifying the issue. Related to this issue is that once the X-ray was performed, the result was not seen by medical staff for over 24 hours. No satisfactory explanation was put forward as to why this occurred. ”

    Source location

    Audrey Christine DAWS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use ward patient plans and boards to track investigations, tests and urgent treatment, with daily nursing and medical review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Each ward has a plan for every patient (this involves a whiteboard with a clear plan of daily investigations together with the tests ordered and expected for each patient, which can be tracked by nursing and medical staff). A second board, which includes tests or treatment which are urgent for the on-call doctors is evident by the nurses station. The plans for each patient are discussed on a daily basis with nursing and medical staff.”

    Source location

    2014-0318-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 July 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require review of outstanding tests and verbal and written handover before transferring MAU patients to wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is a full handover of every patient on the MAU with outstanding tests – no patient is transferred until all tests have been reviewed and there has been a verbal and written handover to the receiving team on the ward.”

    Source location

    2014-0318-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 July 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct formal handovers for every on-call team to transfer information and identify outstanding tests and concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There are now formal shift handovers for every on-call team, both within the week and weekend, which manage the transfer of information between shifts and identify outstanding tests and cases of concern.”

    Source location

    2014-0318-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 July 2014

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Gary Bradshaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gary Bradshaw attended hospital with groin pain and kidney stones, later developed hyperparathyroidism and died during a hospital admission. The report identified concerns including delays and errors in diagnosis and testing, prescribing bendroflumethiazide before blood-test results, discharge before full investigation, inadequate escalation and fluid monitoring, and incomplete clinical records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Misinterpretation of blood or urine test results communicated to the General Practitioner

    Wider context from the report

    “4. There was a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the results to the General Practitioner as to whether these results related to blood or urine tests.(Stockport NHS Trust) ”

    Source location

    Gary Bradshaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable clinicians to electronically check all outpatient tests ordered in their name.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The above blood tests were ordered but the patient was prescribed and administered Bendroflumathiazide before the results were known, something which the expert witness described as contraindicated ████████ accepted at inquest that it should not have prescribed Bendroflumathiazide without knowing the serum calcium results and will not do so in the future. He had expected to review the results within a week and review his decision but unfortunately that did not happen as he expected.”

    Source location

    2014-0232-Response-2
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require consultants to follow up, or establish systems to follow up, every blood test and other investigation they order.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action All consultants have been given clear instruction that it is their responsibility to ensure that they follow up, or ensure that they have systems in place to follow up, any blood tests or any other investigation that they order.”

    Source location

    2014-0232-Response-2
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual NHS Trusts are responsible for reviewing their own standards for laboratory result reporting and alerts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to your concerns about the reporting of blood test results, NICE do not stipulate laboratory reference values or ‘flags’ on when to alert clinicians to blood test results. As this is not something that falls within NICE’s remit, it is for individual NHS Trusts to review their own standards.”

    Source location

    2014-0232-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2014

    Open published response
  4. Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Erryl Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Erryl Jones was admitted for bowel surgery and remained in hospital as his health declined. Delays in reporting and acting on the results of an emergency CT scan led to a significant delay in further surgery. The principal concern was that CT scan results should be made available promptly to the relevant departments and acted upon without delay where appropriate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make CT scan results promptly available to departments involved in patient care

    Wider context from the report

    “That when a CT scan is performed the results should be made available promptly to the departments involved in the care of the patient and where appropriate the results should be acted upon without delay and within a reasonable time-scale. ”

    Source location

    Robert Erryl Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on CT scan results without delay within a reasonable time-scale

    Wider context from the report

    “That when a CT scan is performed the results should be made available promptly to the departments involved in the care of the patient and where appropriate the results should be acted upon without delay and within a reasonable time-scale. ”

    Source location

    Robert Erryl Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor emergency CT scan reporting times through routine sampling.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Health Board fully recognises the need to ensure CT scan results should be made available promptly and will ensure that this is routinely monitored. The Radiology department will be undertaking sampling of the scan to report time for emergency CT scans.”

    Source location

    2014-0190-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure test results are available to all relevant clinical teams when patients are under the care of multiple teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Any test results which are given verbally, as maybe the case in an emergency situation, must also be appropriately documented in the patient record. We will also ensure that where patients may be under the care of several different clinical teams that test results are made available to any members of those teams.”

    Source location

    2014-0190-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to ensure requesting clinical teams review diagnostic results and document review and resulting actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff will be reminded of the need to ensure that the results of any diagnostic test that is requested must be reviewed by the clinical team responsible for requesting the test. It must be documented in the patient’s notes that the results have been reviewed and any resultant action recorded.”

    Source location

    2014-0190-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 March 2014

    Open published response
  5. Teesside

    AI-generated summary

    Noel Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Noel Williams fell and sustained a fracture of the neck of the right femur on 2 December 2010, which led to her death despite surgical repair. The inquest identified a failure to communicate recent haemoglobin test results to the anaesthetist and surgeon, potentially affecting assessment of fitness for surgery and treatment planning.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate recent haemoglobin test results to clinicians assessing fitness for surgery

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the evidence given in this inquest evidence was received that there had been a failure of communication in communicating the results of haemoglobin level tests. It was further revealed by the evidence that the haemoglobin level was an important factor in considering a patient's fitness for surgery. The evidence further revealed that had the information concerning the most recent haemoglobin tests carried out on the deceased passed the surgery may have been delayed or alternative treatment plans put in place. Whilst the evidence did also indicate that there were risks in delaying surgery there nonetheless had been an admitted failure to communicate the results of recent haemoglobin tests to the anaesthetist and surgeon performing the index surgery. Clearly if the results of a haemoglobin test are an essential part of the assessment of fitness for surgery then the ability to communicate the most recent tests indicates a potential failure which could cause or contribute to future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Noel Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Keith Ronald Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Ronald Martin attended A&E with chest pain and left-arm tingling, but there were delays in triage, investigations, treatment and senior review. He later deteriorated with a myocardial infarction, was transferred for emergency treatment, and died after the infarction was described as incompatible with life. The concerns included failure to appreciate and act promptly on his symptoms and raised troponin, unclear chest-pain management protocols, and inadequate documentation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in receiving ECG and blood test results

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The length of time taken to receive the results of these tests ”

    Source location

    Keith Ronald Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony Bernard McCormick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony Bernard McCormick was admitted to hospital with gastrointestinal symptoms, vomiting, lethargy, fever and rigors, and was later found to have liver abscesses and gallstones. He underwent surgery but developed pneumonia and sepsis and died on 31 May 2011; the post-mortem found extensive empyema and sepsis. Concerns included delays in urgent admission, diagnosis, specialist referral and surgery, failures in communication and clinical review, and gaps in appropriate antibiotic treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide urgent admission and further investigation after significant test results

    Wider context from the report

    “1. When the results of the blood tests taken at Macclesfield Hospital on 27 January 2011 were received this should have resulted in an urgent admission to hospital and further investigations undertaken to establish the source of the symptoms. This did not happen and suggests failures in communication and senior clinical review and appreciation of the significance of the presenting symptoms. 2. There was a significant failure to appreciate the seriousness of the condition, the need for urgent treatment and associated raised mortality risks upon the receipt of the results of the CT scan on 28 February 2011 showing the presence of multiple liver abscesses and gallstones. These are all factors which it would be reasonable to expect senior clinicians to appreciate and plan accordingly. ”

    Source location

    Anthony Bernard McCormick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Caroline LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Caroline LEE died in circumstances recorded in a narrative verdict, which is not provided here. The concerns identified were that medical staff failed to recognise the significance of abnormal potassium results and that laboratory staff failed to inform ward staff about them.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the laboratory to inform ward staff of abnormal potassium results

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) failure of the medical staff to recognise the significance of the potassium results (2) failure of the laboratory to inform the Ward staff of the abnormal potassium results ”

    Source location

    Caroline LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of medical staff to recognise the significance of potassium results

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) failure of the medical staff to recognise the significance of the potassium results (2) failure of the laboratory to inform the Ward staff of the abnormal potassium results ”

    Source location

    Caroline LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026