Recurring concern
Unreliable duty system arrangements for safe clinical coverage
- Reports that mention this concern
- 3
- Times this concern has been raised
- 3
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 2
What this concern includes
Includes failures in explicitly identified duty-system arrangements that affect safe clinical coverage, including inadequate robustness, insufficient time within duty-doctor arrangements, unclear coverage or operational weaknesses that leave patients without an effective duty response.
What is not included
- Excludes generic staffing, workload or workforce-capacity concerns where no duty-system arrangement is identified.
- Excludes individual clinical assessment, treatment or escalation failures that are not part of a deficient duty system.
- Excludes ordinary shift, rota or break arrangements where they do not affect the safety or effectiveness of duty-system clinical coverage.
- Excludes non-clinical duty systems and operational command arrangements unrelated to clinical patient coverage.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient time in the duty doctor system to deal with patients appropriately
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Church Lane Surgery
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Church Lane Surgery
Add three unbooked telephone slots and three face-to-face slots to each duty doctor’s shift.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to provide timely access to the Duty Doctor for deteriorating patients
This report raised 7 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Implement a dedicated NHS wireless network enabling junior doctors’ smartphones to use Wi-Fi calling at identified Kingsmill locations, and distribute user guidance.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
A crash bleep was discounted because the duty doctor covered multiple sites and could not provide an immediate response.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure of effective and robust duty system arrangements
This report raised 5 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026