Recipient

700 Club

Pin Request correction

First report 28 Feb 2014•Latest report 28 Feb 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Housing · Registered provider of social housing. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
1stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from 700 Club linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Richard Philip WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard White was a resident at Hope House who took an overdose of cyclizine and zopiclone on 9 June 2013 and subsequently died from cyclizine toxicity. The concerns were that Hope House’s medication policy was not made known to the prescriber or others involved, was not set out in a protocol or policy statement, and that no such document was available.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to 700 Club; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide the medication administration and holding policy in a protocol or policy statement to relevant staff

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That the policy of Hope House with regard to the administration and holding by staff of medication was not made known to ████████ when she wrote the prescriptions; 2) That the policy was not provided in a protocol, or policy statement, to ████████, or indeed, ████████ and ████████ 3) That no such protocol or policy statement was available. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to 700 Club; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make the medication administration and holding policy known to prescribers

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That the policy of Hope House with regard to the administration and holding by staff of medication was not made known to ████████ when she wrote the prescriptions; 2) That the policy was not provided in a protocol, or policy statement, to ████████, or indeed, ████████ and ████████ 3) That no such protocol or policy statement was available. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to 700 Club; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of a protocol or policy statement on medication administration and holding

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That the policy of Hope House with regard to the administration and holding by staff of medication was not made known to ████████ when she wrote the prescriptions; 2) That the policy was not provided in a protocol, or policy statement, to ████████, or indeed, ████████ and ████████ 3) That no such protocol or policy statement was available. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for safeguarding clients regarding prescribed medication lies with GPs, not the organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am writing to your practice on behalf of the 700 Club to remove any ambiguity relating to the storage or administration of medication by our organization. We do not, as a matter of policy, either store medication on behalf of our clients, nor do we administer medication to clients. Prescriptions issued to our clients by your practice should take the above information into account, particularly if that client is vulnerable and there is a concern that the client may use that medication inappropriately (self-harm, selling on). The responsibility for safeguarding clients in regard to prescribed medication lies with GP's.”

    Source location

    2014-0085-Response-by-700-Club2
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 February 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026