Recipient

A-One+

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Sep 2014•Latest report 13 May 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

50%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from A-One+ linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Harold James Davies · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harold James Davies, aged 91, died in a road traffic collision on the evening of 8 November 2015 after his Volvo collided with a Jaguar at the junction of Station Road and the A.46 in Nottinghamshire. The principal concern was that this was the third fatality at the junction since 2010, with concerns about the absence of a date for funding or commencing proposed remedial safety work and the potential need for additional warning signs and a lower speed limit.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to A-One+; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in approval and commencement of remedial junction safety work

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Highways England and their maintenance contractor A-One+ have undertaken an extensive risk assessment of the junction and there is a proposal to undertake the following remedial safety work: (a) vehicle activated signs on both carriageways of the A.46 to alert oncoming traffic of the presence of vehicles at the junction waiting to join or cross the carriageways (b) the installation of slim line bollards at the Station Road junction (c) appropriate demarcation of the central reservation/turning area. 3. Evidence was given at the inquest that there is no date for the approval of funding or the commencement of the remedial safety work. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to A-One+; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Repeated fatal collisions at the junction involving vehicles emerging from Station Road

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Although the current road layout and existing safety provisions did not cause or contribute to the particular circumstances of this collision, I am concerned that this is the 3rd fatality at this junction since 2010. The 2 most recent fatalities in January 2014 and November 2015 involving, vehicles emerging from Station Road into the northbound carriageway. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to A-One+; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    60mph speed limit on the Station Road approach to the junction for unfamiliar drivers

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The national speed limit on Station Road on its approach to the junction with the A.46 is 60mph. The SCIO gave evidence that additional warning signs and a possible reduction in speed limit on the approach would provide additional safety for drivers who were unfamiliar with the Station Road and its approach to the junction. Nottinghamshire Police has offered to meet with Nottinghamshire County Council, the authority responsible for the maintenance of Station Road, and undertake a risk assessment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highways England is responsible for securing funding for the recommended junction safety improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unfortunately, A-one+ has taken this matter as far as it can and it is now the responsibility of Highways England to secure funding for the improvements.”

    Source location

    Response from A One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Nottinghamshire County Council is solely responsible for safety concerns concerning the Station Road approach to the A46 junction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you quite rightly noted at the Inquest, your concerns in relation to the approach from Station Road to the junction with the A46 is the sole responsibility of Nottinghamshire County Council.”

    Source location

    Response from A One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further junction improvements cannot be progressed because A-one+ lacks authority to undertake additional work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unfortunately, A-one+ has taken this matter as far as it can and it is now the responsibility of Highways England to secure funding for the improvements.”

    Source location

    Response from A One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 May 2016

    Open published response

  2. Teesside

    AI-generated summary

    Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 2 May 2012, Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET was a passenger in a car involved in a head-on collision after a female driver travelled the wrong way along the A66 eastbound carriageway. Concerns included unclear advance signage for the no-entry slip road and temporary no-entry signs that could be knocked over and become unnoticeable; two further drivers reportedly later used the exit slip road in the same way.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to A-One+; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of temporary no-entry signs to remain noticeable at the slip road exit

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) At present there are temporary large ‘no entry’ signs at the exit of the slip road junction which have, on occasions, been knocked over and subsequently rendered unnoticeable. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to A-One+; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continuing hazard of drivers entering the exit slip road

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) It has been brought to the Coroners attention that since Mr Gonnet’s passing a further two drivers have driven down the exit slip road, in the same manner as the female driver who caused Mr Gonnet’s passing. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to A-One+; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of advance road-sign information identifying the slip road as no entry

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It is unclear in advance of approaching the junction that the slip road upon which the female drove is ‘no entry’ slip road. There is no information in this regard on the road signs surrounding the junction. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

50%
50%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
33%67%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026