Recipient

Abbeyslade Surgery

First report 9 May 2014•Latest report 9 May 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Abbeyslade Surgery linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Lisa Webb · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lisa Webb died suddenly and unexpectedly at home on 10 March 2012, aged 44. The inquest recorded natural causes, including adult respiratory distress syndrome and lower respiratory tract infection, with sleep apnoea and chronic asthma noted. Expert evidence raised concerns about the general practitioner's assessment and management of her asthma and respiratory symptoms, including the prescription of Diazepam.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbeyslade Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use pulse oximetry in respiratory assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “Expert evidence was heard that: (1) The management of asthma by the general practitioner on 9th March 2012, when she presented post-operatively with fast breathing and anxiety, was sub-optimal and creates potential risks for other patients. a) Enquiries about her asthma and use of inhalers were not made, before a diagnosis was made of anxiety related hyperventilation (which was not in previous medical history) b) Fast breathing was observed and recorded (sic hyperventilating and mild wheeze, but the respiratory rate not recorded, nor was her pulse rate. c) Her peak flow rate was not recorded. There was only one record of its being measured in the years of general practice care and that was in 2008, when she was given a steroid inhaler. d) Pulse oximetry was not used (2) The prescription of Diazepam, although it did no harm in this instance, was poor treatment for anxiety, it should not be prescribed in sleep apnoea; and ideally should be avoided in respiratory distress. The GP said that he would not have given it in an asthmatic unless she had it before (of which there was no record) and that he was unaware of the diagnosis of sleep apnoea (of which diagnosis there was also no medical record). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbeyslade Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to measure and record peak flow rate

    Wider context from the report

    “Expert evidence was heard that: (1) The management of asthma by the general practitioner on 9th March 2012, when she presented post-operatively with fast breathing and anxiety, was sub-optimal and creates potential risks for other patients. a) Enquiries about her asthma and use of inhalers were not made, before a diagnosis was made of anxiety related hyperventilation (which was not in previous medical history) b) Fast breathing was observed and recorded (sic hyperventilating and mild wheeze, but the respiratory rate not recorded, nor was her pulse rate. c) Her peak flow rate was not recorded. There was only one record of its being measured in the years of general practice care and that was in 2008, when she was given a steroid inhaler. d) Pulse oximetry was not used (2) The prescription of Diazepam, although it did no harm in this instance, was poor treatment for anxiety, it should not be prescribed in sleep apnoea; and ideally should be avoided in respiratory distress. The GP said that he would not have given it in an asthmatic unless she had it before (of which there was no record) and that he was unaware of the diagnosis of sleep apnoea (of which diagnosis there was also no medical record). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbeyslade Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enquire about asthma and inhaler use before diagnosing anxiety-related hyperventilation

    Wider context from the report

    “Expert evidence was heard that: (1) The management of asthma by the general practitioner on 9th March 2012, when she presented post-operatively with fast breathing and anxiety, was sub-optimal and creates potential risks for other patients. a) Enquiries about her asthma and use of inhalers were not made, before a diagnosis was made of anxiety related hyperventilation (which was not in previous medical history) b) Fast breathing was observed and recorded (sic hyperventilating and mild wheeze, but the respiratory rate not recorded, nor was her pulse rate. c) Her peak flow rate was not recorded. There was only one record of its being measured in the years of general practice care and that was in 2008, when she was given a steroid inhaler. d) Pulse oximetry was not used (2) The prescription of Diazepam, although it did no harm in this instance, was poor treatment for anxiety, it should not be prescribed in sleep apnoea; and ideally should be avoided in respiratory distress. The GP said that he would not have given it in an asthmatic unless she had it before (of which there was no record) and that he was unaware of the diagnosis of sleep apnoea (of which diagnosis there was also no medical record). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbeyslade Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record respiratory and pulse rates

    Wider context from the report

    “Expert evidence was heard that: (1) The management of asthma by the general practitioner on 9th March 2012, when she presented post-operatively with fast breathing and anxiety, was sub-optimal and creates potential risks for other patients. a) Enquiries about her asthma and use of inhalers were not made, before a diagnosis was made of anxiety related hyperventilation (which was not in previous medical history) b) Fast breathing was observed and recorded (sic hyperventilating and mild wheeze, but the respiratory rate not recorded, nor was her pulse rate. c) Her peak flow rate was not recorded. There was only one record of its being measured in the years of general practice care and that was in 2008, when she was given a steroid inhaler. d) Pulse oximetry was not used (2) The prescription of Diazepam, although it did no harm in this instance, was poor treatment for anxiety, it should not be prescribed in sleep apnoea; and ideally should be avoided in respiratory distress. The GP said that he would not have given it in an asthmatic unless she had it before (of which there was no record) and that he was unaware of the diagnosis of sleep apnoea (of which diagnosis there was also no medical record). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbeyslade Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to avoid prescribing Diazepam for anxiety in sleep apnoea or respiratory distress

    Wider context from the report

    “Expert evidence was heard that: (1) The management of asthma by the general practitioner on 9th March 2012, when she presented post-operatively with fast breathing and anxiety, was sub-optimal and creates potential risks for other patients. a) Enquiries about her asthma and use of inhalers were not made, before a diagnosis was made of anxiety related hyperventilation (which was not in previous medical history) b) Fast breathing was observed and recorded (sic hyperventilating and mild wheeze, but the respiratory rate not recorded, nor was her pulse rate. c) Her peak flow rate was not recorded. There was only one record of its being measured in the years of general practice care and that was in 2008, when she was given a steroid inhaler. d) Pulse oximetry was not used (2) The prescription of Diazepam, although it did no harm in this instance, was poor treatment for anxiety, it should not be prescribed in sleep apnoea; and ideally should be avoided in respiratory distress. The GP said that he would not have given it in an asthmatic unless she had it before (of which there was no record) and that he was unaware of the diagnosis of sleep apnoea (of which diagnosis there was also no medical record). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check patients’ histories, previous consultations, outstanding reviews, long-term conditions and medication during consultations, arrange overdue reviews, request appropriate tests, and record advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action: Since Ms Webb’s death I make sure that during consultations I check the past history of significant problems and reviews, checks done and review previous consultations. I also check to see if there are any reviews outstanding and either complete them myself or ask the patient to make an appointment at reception for a review. I also record this advice within the patient’s electronic record.”

    Source location

    2014-0213-Response-by-Basildon-Road-Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 May 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Diazepam was prescribed because the known symptoms were not contraindicated; sleep apnoea was undisclosed and would have changed the prescribing decision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time I did not know that Ms Webb had sleep Apnoea. She had never indicated any symptoms to suggest that she had this condition and the symptoms she described on the day were not contraindicated with Diazepam.”

    Source location

    2014-0213-Response-by-Basildon-Road-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 May 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
67%33%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026