Recipient

Abbotswood

Pin Request correction

First report 7 Jun 2024•Latest report 7 Jun 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Abbotswood linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Alan Richard LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 17 December 2023, Alan Richard LEE choked on a food bolus after being given dinner in his flat and died before the ambulance arrived. Staff who attended did not appear to recognise that he may have been choking, so no lifesaving techniques were attempted.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbotswood; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider possible choking

    Wider context from the report

    “The issue of concern is that despite the fact that Mr Lee had recently been given his dinner and there was evidence that some or part of it had been consumed, the staff who attended, following Mr Lee using his alarm, did not appear to consider that he may have been choking. Therefore, no life saving techniques were attempted. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbotswood; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to attempt life-saving techniques

    Wider context from the report

    “The issue of concern is that despite the fact that Mr Lee had recently been given his dinner and there was evidence that some or part of it had been consumed, the staff who attended, following Mr Lee using his alarm, did not appear to consider that he may have been choking. Therefore, no life saving techniques were attempted. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026