Recipient

Abbott Laboratories Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 13 Dec 2022•Latest report 13 Dec 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
2stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Abbott Laboratories Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Yvonne Rankin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Yvonne Rankin, aged 68, died at the University Hospital of Wales on 14 January 2021 after an infection at her PEG site returned and she quickly developed sepsis, despite extensive medical treatment. The concerns were that Yvonne and her family did not understand the specific signs of sepsis, which may have delayed calling 999, and whether sepsis information cards could be provided to patients and carers with PEGs or those at known risk of infection in the community.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Abbott Laboratories Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that patients and carers understand the specific signs of sepsis

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) although family and Yvonne were told that they could refer any concerns to various professionals including the Abbott nurse, they did not understand the specific signs of sepsis to watch out for; (2) had family understood the signs of sepsis, it is likely that they would have rung 999 much sooner; and (3) It may be that patient/carer information cards setting out the common signs of sepsis already exists. Would it be possible to give out such information cards to patients/carers with PEGs and/or those who are at known risk of infection who are in the community? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure new patients seen by the ANA team receive updated sepsis-sign information, supplying the literature when patients do not have it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For clarity, the Abbott Nurse Advisor team is employed by CHASE and, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott), their role is to fulfil an enteral feeding nursing service, as part of an NHS Contract Specification. Abbott currently holds an enteral feeding contract with Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (Cardiff and Vale UHB).”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry and share Adult and Paediatric Symptom Cards with patients showing infection signs and their relevant family members or carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For clarity, the Abbott Nurse Advisor team is employed by CHASE and, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott), their role is to fulfil an enteral feeding nursing service, as part of an NHS Contract Specification. Abbott currently holds an enteral feeding contract with Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (Cardiff and Vale UHB).”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cardiff and Vale UHB is responsible for updating patient information and purchasing symptom cards addressing sepsis signs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Abbott and Cardiff and Vale UHB have reviewed how the requirements of the Regulation 28 Report can be met and the following has been agreed between the parties on 3 February 2023:”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Patient information may only be issued when authorised by Cardiff and Vale UHB under the existing contract specification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For clarity, the Abbott Nurse Advisor team is employed by CHASE and, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott), their role is to fulfil an enteral feeding nursing service, as part of an NHS Contract Specification. Abbott currently holds an enteral feeding contract with Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (Cardiff and Vale UHB).”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026