Health and care · NHS trust. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.
Reports
2
Naming this recipient
Published responses
150%
Found for named reports
Concerns addressed
5
Across all linked responses
Stated actions
24
Described in responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports naming this recipient by issue year.
Evidence profile
Report topics
Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.
150%published responses found
24stated actions described
Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.
Concerns and recipient responses
Statements from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised4
Failure of communication between consultant obstetric and anaesthetic staff in time critical situations
Failure to assess maternal risks following admission
Absence of local policy directing the approach to time critical obstetric and anaesthetic situations
Failure to gather, record and communicate intrapartum risk information
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.9
Action
Develop Human Factors and Ergonomics Training Workshops led by a consultant anaesthetist to address systems and behavioural influences on outcomes.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Update the Obstetric Cholestasis Guideline with bile-acid-specific delivery timing and urgent senior review requirements for severe disease.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Embed simulation-based training using obstetric emergencies, incidents, case reviews and patient experience to improve emergency teamwork and learning.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Strengthen the anaesthesia guideline for Category 1 caesarean sections, including five-minute multidisciplinary review and conversion to general anaesthesia where appropriate.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Embed multidisciplinary PROMPT training for anaesthetists, obstetricians and midwives using an evidence-based human-factors approach.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Develop a risk-based RAG rating system to standardise prioritisation of induction-of-labour cases.
Status unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Create and publish an induction-of-labour process map covering activity assessment, escalation, safeguards against delay and multidisciplinary prioritisation.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Implement an Induction of Labour Prioritisation Proforma to record risks, prioritisation decisions, multidisciplinary agreement and delays.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Action
Create and publish a Category 1 caesarean section and fetal bradycardia process map covering escalation, anaesthetic decisions, effective anaesthesia and delivery timelines.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.3
Position
Existing records, handovers, ward rounds, SBAR communication and coordinator oversight were relied upon to communicate risk and prioritise inductions.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Position
The delay in commencing induction was considered reasonable because unit activity prevented accommodating the patient earlier.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
Position
The case was not considered to require emergency caesarean delivery at admission, a view supported by independent reviews.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised2
Absence of discharge papers for patients neurologically assessed with head injuries
Failure of care-home referral procedures for patients suffering seizures after recently sustained head trauma
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
Pin
Request correction
Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations