Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust

Private and voluntary organisations · Registered charity

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Jun 2022•Latest report 22 Jun 2022

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
3

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Connor Peter Marron · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Connor Peter Marron was struck and fatally injured by a train on 2 January 2022 near Hornsey Railway Station after leaving a public house to return to Alexander Palace. Concerns included inadequate lighting and signage near the stream and railway fence, and a fence that was not adequate to prevent access to the railway track.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of lighting beside the stream and railway fence

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was no lighting beside the stream or the railway fence, nor any signs identifying the stream, its depth and any warning of danger. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of signs identifying the stream, its depth and warnings of danger

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was no lighting beside the stream or the railway fence, nor any signs identifying the stream, its depth and any warning of danger. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of signs assisting with locating a way out from the venue grounds

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There were no signs in that area to assist with locating a way out from that part of the venue's grounds. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate fencing preventing ingress to the railway track

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The fence separating the venue grounds from the railway track was not adequate to prevent ingress to the railway track. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    APPCT disputes that locating an exit from this open park area is challenging and therefore will not erect exit signs there.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With particular reference to Matter of Concern 2, we do not share your concern that it is challenging for a park user to locate an exit from this area of the park. This is an open area of the park and with multiple options through which to exit the park and choose a number of adjoining roads. We are also very conscious of the precedent that such a decision could create for all park operators across the UK.”

    Source location

    Response from Alexandra Palace
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The stream lighting and railway-fence adequacy matters concern assets APPCT does not own or operate and therefore do not require action by APPCT.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “railway assets owned by Network Rail. To access the railway boundary fence, an individual must first leave the park onto public streets and cross the New River; two locations owned by third parties.”

    Source location

    Response from Alexandra Palace
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026