ALLMI Limited

Private and voluntary organisations · Professional membership body

First report 14 Jun 2024•Latest report 14 Jun 2024

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from ALLMI Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Michael HARRISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Harrison, a scaffolding-firm driver, died after a HIAB crane arm came down on him while he was unloading scaffolding on 26 February 2021. The concerns included the remote control not being isolated, the potential for inadvertent crane operation, and the absence of an obvious audible sound when the crane arm was operated.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to ALLMI Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an audible warning during HIAB crane arm operation

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest it was evident that the HIAB design had no obvious audible sound when the crane arm was being operated by Mr Harrison. When giving evidence the 3D Scaffolding managing director stated that in a review of the safety of the remote control and risk of inadvertent operation of the crane in similar circumstances, he had subsequently made a written request for an audible sound and consideration of a two-handed remote operation design. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    An existing operational warning requirement makes an additional audible warning unnecessary and potentially confusing alongside other crane warnings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The requirement for an operational warning already exists (see Section 4).”

    Source location

    Response From ALLMI
    Page 13 · response
    Published 25 June 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026