Recipient

Amberley Hall Care Home

First report 27 Oct 2023•Latest report 27 Oct 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Amberley Hall Care Home linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Alan WHATLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Alan Whatling entered Amberley Hall Care Home for rehabilitation and later became unwell, with deteriorating NEWS2 scores leading to hospital admission on 10 April 2023. He died on 26 April 2023, with the medical cause of death recorded as infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with frailty and old age. Concerns included incomplete food and fluid records, failures to call emergency services when required, inadequate observation frequency, and gaps in care-record documentation and follow-up.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record observations in Care Records

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Some of Mr Whatling’s observations were recorded on a piece of paper and were not logged in his Care Records ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify gaps in records through routine management oversight

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The Manager only became aware of gaps in the records following concerns raised by the family. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate NEWS2 scores to the 111 call taker

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The evidence so far revealed is that 111 call taker was not made aware Mr Whatling had scored NEWS2 7. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to take observations hourly

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Mr Whatling’s observations were not taken hourly as required. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incomplete food and fluid charting

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Whatling was not eating and drinking very much. A food and fluid chart was not fully completed. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to call emergency services for a NEWS2 score of 9

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Emergency services were not called on 8 April 2023 when Mr Whatling scored NEWS2 9 as required. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to take action following a patient's death

    Wider context from the report

    “7. There is no evidence that any action has been taken following Mr Whatling’s death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Amberley Hall Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient food and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Whatling was not eating and drinking very much. A food and fluid chart was not fully completed. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026