Recipient

Ambulnz Community Partners Ltd.

Pin Request correction

First report 9 Sep 2013•Latest report 9 Sep 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Independent healthcare provider. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ambulnz Community Partners Ltd. linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Daffydd Barker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Daffydd Barker became unwell after taking MDMA at a large event on 9 December 2012 and was transported to Salford Royal Hospital, where he was pronounced deceased; his cause of death was confirmed as MDMA toxicity. Concerns included the absence of clear guidance for independent medical providers to pre-alert hospitals about critically ill incoming patients, resulting in the hospital not being prepared for his arrival, and difficulties accessing the resuscitation unit overnight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ambulnz Community Partners Ltd.; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear national guidance and routing for independent providers to pre-alert hospitals and place them on standby

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There appears to be no national guidance on how independent national providers of medical services (particularly those covering large scale public events) can put NHS hospitals on standby for incoming urgent patients, something which is normal procedure for the regional ambulance services. 2. There is confusion as to whether the independent providers should place a call to the regional ambulance services who would then act as “gatekeeper” in forwarding this information to the respective hospital. 3. Without clear guidance there is a risk that the most critically ill people who are being transported to hospital are at risk as the hospitals have received no pre-alert, have not had the opportunity to place teams on standby and are not expecting their arrival. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ambulnz Community Partners Ltd.; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of ambulance crew access to coded hospital entrance keypads

    Wider context from the report

    “4. In certain hospitals at particular times i.e. overnight this problem is exacerbated by the fact that the resus reception is not manned constantly and this may cause delays in ambulance crew gaining access especially if the entrance has a coded key pad which they also do not have access to. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ambulnz Community Partners Ltd.; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain continuous staffing of resuscitation receptions

    Wider context from the report

    “4. In certain hospitals at particular times i.e. overnight this problem is exacerbated by the fact that the resus reception is not manned constantly and this may cause delays in ambulance crew gaining access especially if the entrance has a coded key pad which they also do not have access to. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026