Recipient

Anetic Aid Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 5 Jan 2015•Latest report 5 Jan 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Anetic Aid Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    James Wilson Fyfe · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Wilson Fyfe died on 21 April 2011 from pneumonia significantly contributed to by a cervical spine fracture sustained when he fell from a hospital trolley after its cot side gave way. Concerns related to the trolley remaining raised but unlocked due to design, maintenance and use issues, and to uncertainty about whether the known hazard had been communicated to other users of the trolley.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Anetic Aid Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to highlight the cot-side locking problem in all trolley maintenance schedules

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It was the Jury’s determination on the evidence that the cot side was able to remain in a raised but unlocked position due in part to both the design and maintenance of the trolley. While evidence was given that the Trust had subsequently introduced improved service sheets and had involved the assistance of Anetic Aid Limited in maintenance, repair and training of use of the trolley, it was unclear as to whether this specific problem had been highlighted as needing careful attention in all maintenance schedules for the trolley. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Anetic Aid Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate and notify trolley users of the known cot-side locking risk

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The Jury were informed that MHRA were aware of the investigations of the incident trolley but that it did not appear that the issue had been escalated and notified to all Hospital Trusts and agencies that used this type of trolley. The MHRA’s actions in being informed of this potential hazard remain unclear, with particular reference to passing on the known risk to such trolley users. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026