Recipient

AR1 Homecare Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 30 May 2019•Latest report 30 May 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
7stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from AR1 Homecare Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Moran · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Moran, who lived alone with a care plan and had dementia and limited mobility, died in hospital after a cooker grill was left alight and a subsequent fire-related incident caused smoke inhalation. The concerns were that carers had been instructed to switch off appliances and remove cooker knobs, but the cooker had not been properly turned off and removing the knobs did not appear to be an appropriate way to make the appliance safe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to AR1 Homecare Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use an appropriate method for making the cooker safe

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There had clearly been instructions given by the family that the deceased was a fire risk and they had agreed with carers they should switch off appliances and remove the cooker knobs, and place them out of reach of the deceased. The cooker had not been properly turned off by the carer before the knobs had been removed. (2) Removal of knobs did not appear to be an appropriate method of making the appliance safe. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to AR1 Homecare Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly turn off the cooker before removing the knobs

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There had clearly been instructions given by the family that the deceased was a fire risk and they had agreed with carers they should switch off appliances and remove the cooker knobs, and place them out of reach of the deceased. The cooker had not been properly turned off by the carer before the knobs had been removed. (2) Removal of knobs did not appear to be an appropriate method of making the appliance safe. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add appliance-safety requirements to generic client risk assessments, including retaining appliance knobs and recommending Fire Officer visits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Document 1: This is a Generic Risk Assessment we take when we visit any potential clients, the assessor will go through this, I would like to draw your attention to page 4 where we have added that under no circumstances do we remove any knobs from appliances, and recommend the request of a Fire Officer to visit”

    Source location

    2019-0181-Response-by-AR1-Homecare-Ltd-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use risk-assessment analysis and action procedures for electrical and gas appliances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Document 2: Is a Risk Assessment Analysis / Action we use for electric and any gas appliances”

    Source location

    2019-0181-Response-by-AR1-Homecare-Ltd-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026