Recipient

Association of Pallet Networks

Pin Request correction

First report 16 Mar 2023•Latest report 16 Mar 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Trade association. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Association of Pallet Networks linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Yorkshire and York

    AI-generated summary

    John Anthony IBBOTSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Anthony Ibbotson, a 57-year-old warehouse operative, was found at work with a pallet on top of his back on 21 September 2020 and was pronounced dead shortly afterwards. The inquest heard that pallets were more likely than not double stacked directly on top of one another, although it was unclear what caused the pallet to fall. Concerns included limited awareness of relevant pallet-stacking standards, insufficient information passed through the supply chain, the absence of labelling for single-deck pallets, and training that did not include the prohibition on stacking them.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Association of Pallet Networks; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of information passed down the supply chain about the supply and use of single-deck pallets

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The lack of information that is presently passed down the supply chain as to the supply and use of the ‘single deck’ pallets. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Association of Pallet Networks; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of awareness of relevant standards for stacking single-deck pallets

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was a lack of awareness of the content of the relevant British Standards, European Standards and International Standards as they relate to the stacking of single deck pallets. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Association of Pallet Networks; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to label pallets to indicate whether they are single-deck pallets for stacking purposes

    Wider context from the report

    “Single deck pallets Pallets are not currently labelled to indicate whether they should be stacked as a single- deck pallet. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026