Recipient

Ayuntamiento de La Oliva

Pin Request correction

First report 18 Apr 2016•Latest report 18 Apr 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Local authority. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ayuntamiento de La Oliva linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Lee Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Lee Thompson died from drowning on 10 August 2015 after being overwhelmed by surf and waves while bathing in the sea in Fuerteventura. Concerns included inadequate or defective lifesaving and resuscitation equipment, lifeguards’ lack of training in its use, and delays in obtaining replacement equipment and emergency medical assistance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ayuntamiento de La Oliva; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain ambubags in a condition that permits oxygen flow

    Wider context from the report

    “• The emergency bag did not contain suction equipment to clear the airways • A hole in the ambubag used in the resuscitation attempts prevented the flow of oxygen • The defibrillator used during resuscitation was inoperable given it was found to have no batteries • Delay of 45 minutes to obtain a replacement defibrillator • Absence of equipment to dry the casualty • Substantial delay before the arrival of the ambulance and doctor for emergency treatment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ayuntamiento de La Oliva; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance and doctor arrival for emergency treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “• The emergency bag did not contain suction equipment to clear the airways • A hole in the ambubag used in the resuscitation attempts prevented the flow of oxygen • The defibrillator used during resuscitation was inoperable given it was found to have no batteries • Delay of 45 minutes to obtain a replacement defibrillator • Absence of equipment to dry the casualty • Substantial delay before the arrival of the ambulance and doctor for emergency treatment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ayuntamiento de La Oliva; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of suction equipment for clearing airways

    Wider context from the report

    “• The emergency bag did not contain suction equipment to clear the airways • A hole in the ambubag used in the resuscitation attempts prevented the flow of oxygen • The defibrillator used during resuscitation was inoperable given it was found to have no batteries • Delay of 45 minutes to obtain a replacement defibrillator • Absence of equipment to dry the casualty • Substantial delay before the arrival of the ambulance and doctor for emergency treatment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ayuntamiento de La Oliva; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure a functioning defibrillator is immediately available

    Wider context from the report

    “• The emergency bag did not contain suction equipment to clear the airways • A hole in the ambubag used in the resuscitation attempts prevented the flow of oxygen • The defibrillator used during resuscitation was inoperable given it was found to have no batteries • Delay of 45 minutes to obtain a replacement defibrillator • Absence of equipment to dry the casualty • Substantial delay before the arrival of the ambulance and doctor for emergency treatment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ayuntamiento de La Oliva; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of equipment to dry the casualty

    Wider context from the report

    “• The emergency bag did not contain suction equipment to clear the airways • A hole in the ambubag used in the resuscitation attempts prevented the flow of oxygen • The defibrillator used during resuscitation was inoperable given it was found to have no batteries • Delay of 45 minutes to obtain a replacement defibrillator • Absence of equipment to dry the casualty • Substantial delay before the arrival of the ambulance and doctor for emergency treatment. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026