Recipient

Bailey Trailers Limited

First report 5 Oct 2021•Latest report 5 Oct 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
6stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Bailey Trailers Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Aaron Darie James Fretwell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aaron Darie James Fretwell died after an agricultural trailer body descended while he was working beneath it, causing crush injuries. Concerns included the absence of a propping device and warning signs on the trailer, and evidence that other agricultural trailers may also have lacked these safety features, creating concern about comparable future accidents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bailey Trailers Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of warning signs directing that trailer bodies be propped before work underneath

    Wider context from the report

    “1. No propping device was fitted to the trailer, which is understood to have been manufactured by Bailey Trailers Ltd in about 2002. 2. No warning signs were affixed to the trailer directing that the trailer body should be propped before anyone worked underneath it. 3. Trailers manufactured by 2002 should have complied with BS EN 1853: 1999 and/or the supply of machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 which required a mechanical support to be installed to facilitate maintenance work to be carried out safely. 4. Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated that many types of agricultural trailers were in use without such propping devices or warning signs, which gives rise to concern that comparable accidents could occur in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bailey Trailers Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of mechanical propping devices on agricultural trailers

    Wider context from the report

    “1. No propping device was fitted to the trailer, which is understood to have been manufactured by Bailey Trailers Ltd in about 2002. 2. No warning signs were affixed to the trailer directing that the trailer body should be propped before anyone worked underneath it. 3. Trailers manufactured by 2002 should have complied with BS EN 1853: 1999 and/or the supply of machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 which required a mechanical support to be installed to facilitate maintenance work to be carried out safely. 4. Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated that many types of agricultural trailers were in use without such propping devices or warning signs, which gives rise to concern that comparable accidents could occur in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Design tipping trailers so routine maintenance does not require work beneath a raised body.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Company has designed the tipping trailers in a way which eliminates the need for maintenance to be carried out underneath a raised body which in itself would introduce potential risks which would need to be managed and reduced by engineering controls, i.e. by use of a prop.”

    Source location

    2021-0331-Response-from-Bailey-Trailers-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Manufacture all tipping body models with hinged mechanical body props as standard safety features.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Notwithstanding that point, the Company can confirm that all of its tipping body models are now manufactured with body props as a standard feature as per paragraph 4.7.2 of BS EN 1853:2017 which states that “a mechanical support hinged to the trailer, in conformity with the requirements given in EN ISO 4254-1:2015, 4.11 shall be provided to secure the body in high position during maintenance operations”.”

    Source location

    2021-0331-Response-from-Bailey-Trailers-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use safety decals to reinforce that users should not raise the trailer body unless necessary and securely supported.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “raise the body, the design of the trailer permits normal maintenance activities and adjustments to be undertaken without the need to raise the tipping body. In extraordinary circumstances where it may become necessary to raise the body, deploy the [mechanical body] support as described below”. The Manual reiterates the warning that users should “never work beneath the raised trailer body unless it is securely propped and supported”, and guidance is also given on how to deploy and stow the body support safely. Relevant safety decals (or signs) continue to be used to reinforce this point about not tipping the body unless absolutely necessary in the opinion of the user.”

    Source location

    2021-0331-Response-from-Bailey-Trailers-Ltd_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the Operation and Maintenance Manual to require safe deployment of body supports and prohibit work beneath an unsecured raised body.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The general safety instructions within the Company’s revised Operation & Maintenance Manual for all tipping body trailers now states, “For normal maintenance and repairs it is not necessary to”

    Source location

    2021-0331-Response-from-Bailey-Trailers-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 October 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026