Bampton Surgery

Health and care · Healthcare site

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Feb 2016•Latest report 22 Feb 2016

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Bampton Surgery linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Patricia Mary Medland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Mary Medland died from exposure to heat and fire smoke after starting a fire using petrol as an accelerant; there was no evidence of third-party involvement. She was suffering from severe mental illness, and a concern was that her daughter was identified in a care plan as a protective factor without being told about the care plan, diagnosis, or her role, potentially limiting her ability to recognise relapse.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bampton Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share the care plan and protective-factor information with the daughter

    Wider context from the report

    “The care plan in place for the deceased correctly recognised the daughter as having an important role in her mother's life, and the evidence was that generally information was shared between the family. On this occasion, the daughter was not aware of the care plan, or that she was considered to be a protective factor. Had she know, she may have been in a better position to consider if there was any evidence of relapse in her mother's mental health. It was accepted at inquest that the practice had not discussed this as a matter for further discussion and debate, although the unexpected death of this patient had been considered by the practice in their regular meetings. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bampton Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to discuss and debate the identified care concern

    Wider context from the report

    “The care plan in place for the deceased correctly recognised the daughter as having an important role in her mother's life, and the evidence was that generally information was shared between the family. On this occasion, the daughter was not aware of the care plan, or that she was considered to be a protective factor. Had she know, she may have been in a better position to consider if there was any evidence of relapse in her mother's mental health. It was accepted at inquest that the practice had not discussed this as a matter for further discussion and debate, although the unexpected death of this patient had been considered by the practice in their regular meetings. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss information sharing with patients and encourage consent to share relevant information with relatives and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We agreed that the sharing of appropriate information with nearest relatives and carers should be encouraged and we will always discuss this with the patient. In most cases this will require their express consent and we would only share information without consent if we believed the patient or others would be at immediate serious risk if we did not ████████. I enclose a copy of our Care Plan covering letter which encourages the patient to share information, together with the Care Plan templates that we use.”

    Source location

    Response from Brampton Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use care-plan covering letters and templates that encourage patients to share information with relatives and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We agreed that the sharing of appropriate information with nearest relatives and carers should be encouraged and we will always discuss this with the patient. In most cases this will require their express consent and we would only share information without consent if we believed the patient or others would be at immediate serious risk if we did not ████████. I enclose a copy of our Care Plan covering letter which encourages the patient to share information, together with the Care Plan templates that we use.”

    Source location

    Response from Brampton Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026