Recipient

Barnet Assist

First report 21 Feb 2022•Latest report 21 Feb 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Local authority service. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Barnet Assist linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Sean Ennis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sean Ennis was found in his flat after a fire and died in hospital from the consequences of smoke inhalation. The principal concerns included incomplete fire-risk assessment and inadequate smoke detection and telecare arrangements for a vulnerable resident, including the alarm centre not knowing he was a smoker and not responding when he did not answer calls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out comprehensive fire risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “1. All Responsible Persons should carry out a comprehensive fire risk assessment that details the fire safety provisions that are in the property and where identified ensure that the recommended safety measures have been applied. It is not appropriate to ‘carry over’ identified actions from one fire risk assessment to another, without addressing those risks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of compulsory telecare regulation and minimum standards

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The London Fire Brigade believe that a review should be undertaken with regards to Telecare legislation and regulations. Currently this is an unregulated area and although there are British Standards and industry guidance, these are not compulsory. Legislation should clearly identify a Local Authority’s or responsible person(s) acting on behalf of the Local Authority’s responsibility to assess vulnerable individuals for telecare. This should include a checklist of factors, which should be assessed at regular intervals, with a clearly defined trigger for recommendation for telecare including linking to smoke detection and personal pendants. Legislation should also ensure minimum standards are enforced, practices are standardised and sanctions are available for serious breaches. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate fire prevention systems in premises housing vulnerable individuals

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Premises that knowingly house and provide a service for vulnerable individuals should ensure that their fire prevention, detection and response systems are adequate and appropriate. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to address identified fire risks from fire risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “1. All Responsible Persons should carry out a comprehensive fire risk assessment that details the fire safety provisions that are in the property and where identified ensure that the recommended safety measures have been applied. It is not appropriate to ‘carry over’ identified actions from one fire risk assessment to another, without addressing those risks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out person-centred risk assessments for sheltered and assisted living residents

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Person Centred Risk Assessments should have been carried out for the residents of Knightlees Court and should be carried out as best practice for residents in Sheltered Accommodation /Assisted Living properties to ensure that needs are met and appropriate measures are in place to safeguard them. PCRAs should be reviewed on a regular basis, no less than every 12 months or when circumstances for the individual change, to ensure that support is appropriate to the individual’s current level of need. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate fire detection systems in premises housing vulnerable individuals

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Premises that knowingly house and provide a service for vulnerable individuals should ensure that their fire prevention, detection and response systems are adequate and appropriate. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to offer telecare to vulnerable people in need

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Telecare is not always offered to vulnerable people or if individuals do receive it, is not always linked to smoke alarms or AFSS. Telecare is often at the cost of the individual or Local Authority which may be why a full telecare system is not offered or installed. The Telecare Services Association should consider exploring a sustainable funding source to enable all vulnerable residents in need of telecare to be provided with a full system. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of Telecare Services Association accreditation

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Barnet Assist are not Telecare Services Association (TSA) accredited, it is recommended that they become accredited. TSA accreditation ensures that companies agree to providing telecare that meets a set of standards, can receive additional training and encourages consistency in the industry. This should positively impact all service users. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to regularly review person-centred risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Person Centred Risk Assessments should have been carried out for the residents of Knightlees Court and should be carried out as best practice for residents in Sheltered Accommodation /Assisted Living properties to ensure that needs are met and appropriate measures are in place to safeguard them. PCRAs should be reviewed on a regular basis, no less than every 12 months or when circumstances for the individual change, to ensure that support is appropriate to the individual’s current level of need. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate fire response systems in premises housing vulnerable individuals

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Premises that knowingly house and provide a service for vulnerable individuals should ensure that their fire prevention, detection and response systems are adequate and appropriate. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnet Assist; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to link telecare to smoke alarms or AFSS

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Telecare is not always offered to vulnerable people or if individuals do receive it, is not always linked to smoke alarms or AFSS. Telecare is often at the cost of the individual or Local Authority which may be why a full telecare system is not offered or installed. The Telecare Services Association should consider exploring a sustainable funding source to enable all vulnerable residents in need of telecare to be provided with a full system. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026