Recipient

Barnsley Borough Council

Pin Request correction

First report 8 May 2026•Latest report 8 May 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · English metropolitan district council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Barnsley Borough Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Ollie Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ollie Lee, who had a history of suicidal thoughts and self-harm, died by suicide on 6 October 2024. The principal concerns were poor communication and engagement between the agencies involved, including failures to share information about self-harm and CAMHS discharge, which resulted in missed opportunities for continued mental health support. Important discussions about Ollie’s preferred name and pronouns were also not recorded or acted upon.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnsley Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of communication and engagement between agencies involved in Ollie’s care

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Poor communication and engagement between the agencies involved with Ollie including her school, CAMHS and targeted early help. 2) A lack of communication and engagement between targeted early help and CAMHS despite both agencies being aware that the other was involved. This led to a confusing picture and a missed opportunity for Ollie to remain open to CAMHS and receive psycho social intervention and continued support from CAMHS. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnsley Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on Ollie’s stated pronoun preference

    Wider context from the report

    “3) There was no record of important discussions that occurred between early help and the school and Ollie’s preference in relation to pronouns was not acted upon. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Barnsley Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record important discussions between early help and the school

    Wider context from the report

    “3) There was no record of important discussions that occurred between early help and the school and Ollie’s preference in relation to pronouns was not acted upon. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026