Recipient

Beeston Health Centre

Pin Request correction

First report 23 Aug 2013•Latest report 23 Aug 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Beeston Health Centre linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    JILL FELICITY SINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jill Felicity Sinson had schizophrenia, an anxiety-related disorder, non-epileptic seizures, and a history of self-harm and suicidal tendencies. She was last seen alive on 3 September 2012 and was found lifeless at her home on 10 September 2012; life was pronounced extinct by paramedics. The concerns included inadequate GP monitoring, failure to review or refer her after a GP surgery consultation, insufficient consideration of her medical history when prescribing medication unsupervised, and failure to act appropriately on correspondence from her Consultant Psychiatrist.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Beeston Health Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review relevant computerised medical records during clinical consultation

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) When the Deceased was seen at the GP surgery by a Staff Nurse on the 3rd July 2012 – (a) the Deceased’s presentation on that occasion was such as to necessitate a review by a GP and/or referral to the Deceased’s Consultant Psychiatrist, but no such review and/or referral was considered, and (b) due regard was not paid to the Deceased’s computerised medical records prior to and/or in the course of consulting with the Deceased on that occasion, as information provided by the Deceased to the said Staff Nurse was fundamentally incorrect which was apparent from earlier entries in the Deceased’s said records ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Beeston Health Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider and act on Consultant Psychiatrist correspondence

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Upon receipt of correspondence from the Deceased’s Consultant Psychiatrist, due regard was not paid to the contents thereof and appropriate action was not taken. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Beeston Health Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange necessary General Practitioner review or Consultant Psychiatrist referral

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) When the Deceased was seen at the GP surgery by a Staff Nurse on the 3rd July 2012 – (a) the Deceased’s presentation on that occasion was such as to necessitate a review by a GP and/or referral to the Deceased’s Consultant Psychiatrist, but no such review and/or referral was considered, and (b) due regard was not paid to the Deceased’s computerised medical records prior to and/or in the course of consulting with the Deceased on that occasion, as information provided by the Deceased to the said Staff Nurse was fundamentally incorrect which was apparent from earlier entries in the Deceased’s said records ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Beeston Health Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for self-harm and suicidal tendencies when supplying unsupervised medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The Deceased was prescribed a significant quantity of medication on a monthly basis, such medication being given in possession and unsupervised, without due consideration for the Deceased’s medical history of self-harm and suicidal tendencies, which history was recorded on the Deceased’s computerised medical records. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Beeston Health Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide regular General Practitioner monitoring

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Deceased’s General Practitioner did not ensure the Deceased was monitored regularly, or at all, by a General Practitioner but preferred to rely upon the care she received from the CMHT. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026