Recipient

Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council

First report 17 May 2021•Latest report 17 May 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Welsh county borough council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Lynne Pamela Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lynne Lawrence tripped on an uneven pavement on 21 September 2020 and sustained a head injury that was not initially diagnosed on scan. She later collapsed, suffered an intracerebral haemorrhage worsened by warfarin, and died in hospital on 23 September 2020; the report raised concern about the condition of the pavement and potential risks to people, especially those with reduced mobility.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Uneven pedestrian pavement

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Condition of Pavement on At the time of her fall, Mrs Lawrence was walking along a narrow pedestrian pavement near ████████, Alma Street, Brynmawr, Newport, NP23. The video footage available to me at the inquest demonstrated that the pavement was uneven. Whilst I could not conclude that it was the unevenness of the pavement that caused Mrs Lawrence to fall, nonetheless I consider that this is a factor which could people's lives at risk in the future, especially the elderly with reduced mobility. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train and accredit highway inspectors to assess public highway condition at specified competency levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Highway Authority deploys Highway Inspector’s to undertake a regime of inspections to monitor the condition and repair needs of the public highway, they have received and passed accredited training programmes for specific competency levels to allow them to assess the condition of the public highway.”

    Source location

    2021-0158-Response-from-Blaenau-Gwent-County-Borough-Council-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement asset hierarchies, inspection frequencies and repair regimes for managing highway and footway maintenance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Details of asset hierarchy, inspection and repair regimes are adopted by the Council and implemented. For the purpose of managing maintenance Councils allocate a hierarchy level to each road and footway to establish inspection frequencies and repair regimes. The most significant factor affecting the risk presented to users is the level of use. As no footfall data is available in many situations across the council, officer judgement is used to estimate footfall for different footways in order to apply the CSSW principles.”

    Source location

    2021-0158-Response-from-Blaenau-Gwent-County-Borough-Council-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt risk-based highway service levels informed by the national code and CSSW principles, exceeding national minimum safety and maintenance intervention standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To assist authorities in meeting their duties National Guidance is provided and the methods adopted are based upon the contents of the following “Well-Managed Highway Infrastructure: A Code of Practice (CoP), UK Roads Liaison Group, 2016”. The Code is designed to promote the adoption of an integrated asset management approach to highway infrastructure based on the establishment of local levels through risk-based assessment. The Authority have developed their own levels of service based on the above Code, along with adopting the County Surveyors”

    Source location

    2021-0158-Response-from-Blaenau-Gwent-County-Borough-Council-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The raised paving is below the intervention threshold and is not considered a risk to highway users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Highway Inspections prior to the accident in July 2020 and post accident in January 2021 have not identified defects approaching this standard >25mm. A further assessment on receipt of the Regulation 28 report has been undertaken and although the footway reconstruction has raised paving <16mm (photo’s attached) they are not at a standard that the Highway Authority would intervene or consider a risk to highway user and as such there are no proposals for BGBCBC Highway Authority to take remedial works actions at this location.”

    Source location

    2021-0158-Response-from-Blaenau-Gwent-County-Borough-Council-Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing risk-based inspection and repair standards are considered sufficient, so no remedial works are proposed at this location.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Highway Inspections prior to the accident in July 2020 and post accident in January 2021 have not identified defects approaching this standard >25mm. A further assessment on receipt of the Regulation 28 report has been undertaken and although the footway reconstruction has raised paving <16mm (photo’s attached) they are not at a standard that the Highway Authority would intervene or consider a risk to highway user and as such there are no proposals for BGBCBC Highway Authority to take remedial works actions at this location.”

    Source location

    2021-0158-Response-from-Blaenau-Gwent-County-Borough-Council-Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026