Recipient

British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association

First report 26 Nov 2024•Latest report 26 Nov 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Trade association. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
3

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jon-Paul PRIGENT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jon-Paul Prigent died on 30 July 2020 when a soil-laden trailer decoupled from its tractor, overturned, and compressed the car in which he was sitting, causing asphyxiation. The principal concerns were the absence of periodic independent testing for agricultural tractors and trailers, the lack of required safety features to prevent decoupling, and the risks posed by worn, overloaded, and unevenly loaded equipment used on public roads.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of current agricultural tractor and trailer safety arrangements to keep pace with changing road use

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Tractors and trailers are increasingly large and carrying heavier loads due to farm consolidation and are correspondingly traveling further distances on public roads to reach more distant areas on larger farms, and agri-business depots and processing sites. The current safety arrangements have probably failed to keep up to date and relevant and were more suited to an era when agricultural use tractors and trailers might simply have been crossing a road to get form one field to another. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of periodic independent vehicle testing for tractors and trailers used on roads for agricultural purposes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Tractors and trailers driven on roads for ‘agricultural purposes’ are not subject to periodic independent vehicle testing. This places the responsibility for checking roadworthiness on the user which is clearly dependent on the diligence and competence of the user. It is therefore highly likely that some tractors and trailers are being driven on roads for ‘agricultural purposes’ in unroadworthy and unsafe condition, as was clear in Mr Prigent’s inquest. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to require safety features preventing decoupling of tractors and trailers used on public roads

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Tractors and trailers driven on roads at below a speed of 25 miles per hour are not required to be fitted with safety features to prevent decoupling (e.g. a safety chain, or dual safe braking system). Therefore, if decoupling occurs there is nothing to prevent independent and uncontrolled travel of the trailer. 3. Basic hitch hook and ring coupling systems for tractors and trailers are very simple and convenient for ease and speed of coupling and use on farms but present clear risk when used on public roads without safety features to prevent decoupling. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the Agricultural Tractor-Trailer Scheme, combining roadworthiness inspections, brake performance testing, technician approval and refresher training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While there is no requirement for the roadworthiness of tractors and trailers to be independently tested, BAGMA does operate a voluntary scheme. The Agricultural Tractor-Trailer Scheme (ATTS) incorporates both roadworthiness inspection and brake performance testing in one package. In our view, the ATTS is the only testing regime that provides a robust assessment of the roadworthiness of agricultural tractors and trailers as no other scheme incorporates brake performance testing alongside roadworthiness inspection.”

    Source location

    Response from Agricultural Engineers Association and British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce, update and disseminate guidance on legal requirements and practical measures for safe tractor and trailer braking.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recognising that much of the responsibility for ensuring the safety of tractor and trailer braking rests with the user and the service technicians that support them, the AEA has produced detailed guidance on both the legal requirements and the practical steps needed to ensure that braking systems are safe and well maintained. Our Look Behind You guide was first published in 2010 and was updated in 2020, incorporating interactive elements, such as short videos and animations, helping to improve understanding of key aspects of safety. The guide has been widely distributed through machinery dealers and is also available online at: https://aea.uk.com/look-behind-you/. It was supported by most of the main suppliers of tractors and agricultural trailers to the UK market.”

    Source location

    Response from Agricultural Engineers Association and British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Secretary of State for Transport is responsible for deciding whether to amend legislation on agricultural tractor and trailer safety requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While roadworthiness testing would go a long way to addressing the concerns identified in this case, the coroner’s report also identifies deficiencies in the current legislation around use of agricultural tractors and trailers on the road. The AEA and BAGMA would support changes to legislation, in particular to address the current lack of any requirement for either ‘Breakaway Failsafe’ trailer brakes or a secondary coupling (such as a safety chain) between the towed and towing vehicle, if the vehicles don’t exceed 40 km/h. Of course, any decision on amendments to legislation rests with the Secretary of State for Transport. However, the AEA and BAGMA stand ready to provide any advice required to inform that decision.”

    Source location

    Response from Agricultural Engineers Association and British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Secretary of State for Transport must decide whether to introduce compulsory roadworthiness testing for agricultural tractors and trailers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Turning to future actions, as the coroner’s report notes, there is currently no requirement for independent roadworthiness testing for agricultural tractors and trailers, where they are solely used for agricultural activities. The AEA and BAGMA have long supported calls for such a regime to be introduced, particularly for the larger and heavier vehicles that are now commonplace. While any decision on making such a scheme compulsory must be made by the Secretary of State for Transport, AEA and BAGMA would be happy to offer to take the lead in administering a scheme.”

    Source location

    Response from Agricultural Engineers Association and British Agricultural and Garden Machinery Association
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026