First report 16 Feb 2015•Latest report 16 Feb 2015
Recipient record
Reports, concerns and published responses
Private and voluntary organisations · Air transport operator. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.
Reports
1
Naming this recipient
Published responses
100%
Found for named reports
Concerns addressed
4
Across all linked responses
Stated actions
2
Described in responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports naming this recipient by issue year.
Evidence profile
Report topics
Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.
100%published responses found
2stated actions described
Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.
Concerns and recipient responses
Statements from British Airways Plc linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
Dorset
Concerns raised5
Failure to account for genetic variation in susceptibility to exposure
Lack of real-time monitoring for organo-phosphate compounds in cabin air
Exposure of aircraft cabin occupants to organo-phosphate compounds causing health damage
Health impairment of aircraft controllers endangering aircraft occupants
Presence of organo-phosphate compounds in aircraft cabin air
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
Action
Maintain a system for monitoring cabin-air contamination events.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 February 2015.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.2
Position
Existing government and regulatory guidance, compliance with legislation, research monitoring and event monitoring are considered sufficient.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Position
Available evidence does not support a risk of future deaths from cabin air contamination requiring further action.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.