Recipient

Bromford Lane Care Home

First report 24 Aug 2021•Latest report 24 Aug 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Bromford Lane Care Home linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Michael HARTE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Michael HARTE died on 19 March 2021 in hospital after deterioration from multi-organ failure and sepsis caused by a bacterial skin infection and cellulitis. The principal concern was that skin inspections and monitoring in the care home between 14 and 18 March 2021 were not properly recorded, indicating a possible systemic failure in record-keeping and a risk to vulnerable residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bromford Lane Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that skin inspection observations are correctly and adequately recorded

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The evidence of ████████ suggested that proper skin inspections and skin monitoring were not carried out between 14th to 18th March 2021 as, had they been carried out, they would have been documented and recorded in detailed body maps. 2. The evidence of ████████ suggests that skin inspections were carried out but were not recorded. It was admitted by ████████ in evidence that there was a failure to keep proper and adequate records by staff. 3. At inquest I found that, on the balance of probabilities, inspections were carried out but observations were not recorded and records were not kept. 4. It was unclear whether this was a "one-off" incident or whether it reflected a systemic issue. On reflection, the fact that records were not taken or kept over a period of four consecutive days (as opposed to one isolated day), is indicative of a systemic issue that staff are not ensuring that their observations are correctly and adequately recorded. 5. It is clear that a failure to ensure that there is a correctly working system of record taking poses a risk of future deaths occurring, especially in the context of extremely frail and vulnerable adults/residents who in a position of dependency by virtue of their frailty or vulnerability. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026