Recipient

Bucher Municipal Limited

First report 16 Apr 2021•Latest report 16 Apr 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
4

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
2stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Bucher Municipal Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. County of Ceredigion

    AI-generated summary

    Roy Charles Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roy Charles Evans, aged 55, died from injuries sustained when a road sweeper he was operating on Cefnllan Hill, Aberystwyth, went out of control and collided with a stone wall on 13 July 2018. The principal concerns were that the vehicle had a worn tyre, a fractured trailing arm pivot and missing indicator side repeater lamps, and that these faults should have resulted in the vehicle being taken out of service before the collision.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bucher Municipal Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Missing indicator side repeater lamps

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The Vehicle Examination Report prepared by Vehicle Examiner ████████ of the Driver and Vehicle Standard Agency noted that the offside rear tyre was worn with little tread depth visible. b. The offside rear trailing arm pivot had fractured resulting in excessive abnormal movement of the trailing arm which would cause stability control to the compromise. That defect should have rendered the vehicle not fit for service. c. Maintenance documentation indicated that indicator side repeater lamps were missing. These are listed as immediate prohibitions within the categorised of the defects manual. d. The conclusion of the Dyfed Powys Collision Investigators Report indicated that these three faults would have been categorised as immediate prohibitions and due to this the sweeper should have been taken out of service following the inspection on the 9ᵗʰ July 2018 and should not have been in use until the faults had been rectified. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bucher Municipal Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient tread depth on the offside rear tyre

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The Vehicle Examination Report prepared by Vehicle Examiner ████████ of the Driver and Vehicle Standard Agency noted that the offside rear tyre was worn with little tread depth visible. b. The offside rear trailing arm pivot had fractured resulting in excessive abnormal movement of the trailing arm which would cause stability control to the compromise. That defect should have rendered the vehicle not fit for service. c. Maintenance documentation indicated that indicator side repeater lamps were missing. These are listed as immediate prohibitions within the categorised of the defects manual. d. The conclusion of the Dyfed Powys Collision Investigators Report indicated that these three faults would have been categorised as immediate prohibitions and due to this the sweeper should have been taken out of service following the inspection on the 9ᵗʰ July 2018 and should not have been in use until the faults had been rectified. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bucher Municipal Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to remove a vehicle from service when immediate-prohibition faults are identified

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The Vehicle Examination Report prepared by Vehicle Examiner ████████ of the Driver and Vehicle Standard Agency noted that the offside rear tyre was worn with little tread depth visible. b. The offside rear trailing arm pivot had fractured resulting in excessive abnormal movement of the trailing arm which would cause stability control to the compromise. That defect should have rendered the vehicle not fit for service. c. Maintenance documentation indicated that indicator side repeater lamps were missing. These are listed as immediate prohibitions within the categorised of the defects manual. d. The conclusion of the Dyfed Powys Collision Investigators Report indicated that these three faults would have been categorised as immediate prohibitions and due to this the sweeper should have been taken out of service following the inspection on the 9ᵗʰ July 2018 and should not have been in use until the faults had been rectified. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bucher Municipal Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fractured offside rear trailing arm pivot causing excessive abnormal movement

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The Vehicle Examination Report prepared by Vehicle Examiner ████████ of the Driver and Vehicle Standard Agency noted that the offside rear tyre was worn with little tread depth visible. b. The offside rear trailing arm pivot had fractured resulting in excessive abnormal movement of the trailing arm which would cause stability control to the compromise. That defect should have rendered the vehicle not fit for service. c. Maintenance documentation indicated that indicator side repeater lamps were missing. These are listed as immediate prohibitions within the categorised of the defects manual. d. The conclusion of the Dyfed Powys Collision Investigators Report indicated that these three faults would have been categorised as immediate prohibitions and due to this the sweeper should have been taken out of service following the inspection on the 9ᵗʰ July 2018 and should not have been in use until the faults had been rectified. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supply each machine with a technical manual and operator guide specifying daily, weekly and 300-hour maintenance checks, including tyre pressure and condition checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. We supply a technical manual with each machine which includes an operator’s guide. This guide specifies the maintenance required for the machine including daily checks, weekly checks and the ongoing service requirements which should be performed every 300 hours of operation.”

    Source location

    2021-0112-Response-from-Bucher-Municipal-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide customers with lifelong servicing and maintenance information, spare parts, technical training, and maintenance and repair services through the service network.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. We provide all customers with information necessary to service and maintain the machine for the whole of its life. We offer spare parts and technical training for all machines. Through our own service network, we also offer a maintenance and repair service either at the customer’s premises or our own.”

    Source location

    2021-0112-Response-from-Bucher-Municipal-Ltd_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Regular maintenance, identifying defects, assessing roadworthiness and withdrawing the machine were not the manufacturer's responsibility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Bucher Municipal are the original manufacturer of the machine that was involved in the accident. Our customer, Ceredigion County Council, purchased the machine in November 2014. In this case we were neither the user nor maintainer of the machine and as such we were not responsible for the regular maintenance of the machine. During the period the machine was in service we carried out several repairs either under warranty or at the request of Ceredigion County Council. None of our interventions are likely to have had any bearing on the accident and the last intervention we made was in July 2017.”

    Source location

    2021-0112-Response-from-Bucher-Municipal-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 April 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026