Recipient

Caerphilly County Borough Council

Pin Request correction

First report 13 Mar 2014•Latest report 13 Mar 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Welsh county borough council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Caerphilly County Borough Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    JANETTE SUTHERLAND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 24 October 2013, Janette Sutherland lost control of her vehicle near Risca, left the carriageway and collided with a concrete headwall, sustaining fatal injuries. The report identified the drainage channel and concrete headwall as hazards and raised concern that no safety barrier was present to prevent vehicles leaving the carriageway and striking the headwall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Caerphilly County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Road-user hazard from a drainage channel and concrete headwall adjacent to the carriageway

    Wider context from the report

    “The presence of the drainage channel and concrete headwall represent a hazard to road users and a safety barrier should be erected to prevent vehicles from leaving the carriageway and impacting with the concrete headwall. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the detailed road-restraint site survey required for the Road Restraint Risk Assessment Process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to comply with current standards for dealing with the requirements for road restraint systems, a detailed survey must first be conducted at the site. The survey was carried out on the 27th March 2014 and the data will be retrieved as soon as possible for us to fulfil the Road Restraint Risk Assessment Process (RRAP). We will endeavour to complete the RRAP in a timely manner and will provide details of any findings/outcomes at the earliest opportunity.”

    Source location

    2014-0114-Response-by-Caerphilly-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Retrieve survey data and complete the Road Restraint Risk Assessment Process, providing its findings and outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to comply with current standards for dealing with the requirements for road restraint systems, a detailed survey must first be conducted at the site. The survey was carried out on the 27th March 2014 and the data will be retrieved as soon as possible for us to fulfil the Road Restraint Risk Assessment Process (RRAP). We will endeavour to complete the RRAP in a timely manner and will provide details of any findings/outcomes at the earliest opportunity.”

    Source location

    2014-0114-Response-by-Caerphilly-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The site complied with design standards at construction, so there was no design-standard departure requiring retrospective changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A report undertaken at the request of Gwent Police concluded there was no departure in respect of design standards at time of construction and there is no mandatory requirement to implement changes in design standards retrospectively.”

    Source location

    2014-0114-Response-by-Caerphilly-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 March 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
33%67%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026