Recipient

Canary Wharf Group PLCIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Jun 2018•Latest report 22 Jun 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Public limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Canary Wharf Group PLC linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: Sir George Iacobescu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Canary Wharf Group plc.

    Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Samuel Patrick CLARKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samuel Patrick Clarke, aged 19, accessed a construction site in the early hours of New Year’s Day 2018 and fell from height. He was not found until 2 January 2018 and had died from postural asphyxia following the fall and traumatic injury, with ethanol intoxication also recorded. Concerns included continued unauthorised access through a turnstile, the absence of a company contingency plan to support searches for intruders, and the adequacy of security officers’ torches.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Canary Wharf Group PLC; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a site contingency plan for searching for intruders

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I heard evidence that, since Samuel’s death, site security officers have been given instructions to call the police if they are aware of an intruder on site who has not been located. However, no consideration has been given to a company contingency plan, for example to draft in staff who are familiar with the site to help with a search. Would this be possible? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Canary Wharf Group PLC; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate torch equipment for site security officers

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The site security officers explained to me that they were equipped with battery operated regular sized torches, rather than large flashlights. No consideration has been given to improving their equipment in this regard. Could it be? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Canary Wharf Group PLC; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to secure the turnstile against unauthorised access

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I was told by the senior construction manager of Canary Wharf Contractors Limited that the gap under the turnstile where Samuel accessed the site has been reduced by 5cms since his death, from 30cms to 25cms, by adding a strip of plywood to the bottom. I am concerned that the turnstile is still accessible to unauthorised personnel – including to children. I heard at inquest that there are 800 tradespeople on site and I wonder whether one of them has the skills to make the turnstile secure? ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026