Recipient

Cator Medical Centre

Pin Request correction

First report 23 Oct 2013•Latest report 23 Oct 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Multi-service care provider. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Cator Medical Centre linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Jacqueline Allwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacqueline Allwood attended a GP with several days of calf pain and concern about a family history of thrombosis. She was not referred to hospital to exclude DVT and later died from pulmonary thromboembolism secondary to DVT. Concerns included whether registration, assessment and referral processes supported early diagnosis and referral, and whether the consulting GP understood and followed appropriate standards for history-taking and examination.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cator Medical Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of registration, assessment and referral documentation and consultation records to facilitate early diagnosis of DVT and low-threshold referral to A&E

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The registration, assessment and referral forms and consultation records of and between the Urgent Care Centre and Cator Medical Practice may not facilitate the early diagnosis of DVT and the need for a low threshold of referral to A&E. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cator Medical Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make changes to reduce risks of harm to patients

    Wider context from the report

    “(2). Taking as a whole the evidence of the consulting GP, Dr Adlakha, it cannot be said that the public can be assured that he understands and accepts normative standards of practice with respect to history and examination and that he has made or will make changes in order to reduce risks of harm to patients. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cator Medical Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of assurance that the consulting GP understands and accepts normative standards of practice for history and examination

    Wider context from the report

    “(2). Taking as a whole the evidence of the consulting GP, Dr Adlakha, it cannot be said that the public can be assured that he understands and accepts normative standards of practice with respect to history and examination and that he has made or will make changes in order to reduce risks of harm to patients. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026