6 Dec 2024 Champagauri Bhatt and Dipak Bhatt · Prevention of Future Deaths report North London
View report summary
Concerns raised 8 Inadequate information management for analysis and learning from white goods fires View source Failure by fire-investigating companies to notify authorities of investigation outcomes View source Lack of sharing of recall and replacement decision data and rationale for condensate pumps and RFI filters View source Moisture ingress into condensate pumps causing tracking faults, resistive heating and fire View source Failure of product risk assessments to account for occupants and their actions View source Lack of sharing of warranty replacement data for condensate pumps and RFI filters View source Failure to provide fire-durable identification plates on appliances View source Inadequate manufacturing standards for mains- and sub-mains-operated condensate pumps and RFI filters View source See 5 more concerns
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Champagauri Bhatt and Dipak Bhatt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
On 29 March 2023, a fire caused by an electrical fault in a tumble dryer led to inhalation injuries and the deaths of Champagauri and Dipak Bhatt. Concerns included moisture ingress into condensate pumps causing faults and fire, and the need for improved data sharing, product safety standards, fire investigation reporting, risk assessment, and appliance identification.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate information management for analysis and learning from white goods fires
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires .
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure by fire-investigating companies to notify authorities of investigation outcomes
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations .
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of sharing of recall and replacement decision data and rationale for condensate pumps and RFI filters
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Moisture ingress into condensate pumps causing tracking faults, resistive heating and fire
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire .
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure of product risk assessments to account for occupants and their actions
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates .
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of sharing of warranty replacement data for condensate pumps and RFI filters
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters .
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to provide fire-durable identification plates on appliances
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards.
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate manufacturing standards for mains- and sub-mains-operated condensate pumps and RFI filters
Wider context from the report “During the inquest a London Fire Brigade witness made suggestions for more effective data sharing and use and It was apparent future deaths may occur unless action is taken.
(1) That ingress of moisture into condensate pumps may result in tracking faults causing resistive heating and fire.
(2) That changes in information management would result in better analysis of, and learning from, white goods fires.
(3) Manufacturers to give the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade (LFB) to support their fire prevention work data on parts replaced on warranty for condensate pumps and RFI filters.
(4) Working group CPL / 61 look at standards of manufacture of mains and sub mains operated condensate pumps and RFI filters, to improve standards .
(5) Manufacturers to share data on decisions and rationale behind recall / replacement of condensate pumps and RFI filters Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) as the regulator and London Fire Brigade to support their fire prevention work.
(6) Companies investigating fires to notify Trading Standards and the Office of Product Safety Standards (OPSS) of the outcome of those investigations.
(7) Manufacturers to be required to use the OPSS risk assessment methodology, PRISM, when conducting risk assessments to account for persons in a property and their actions, i.e. sleeping whilst a product is taking advantage of lower electricity rates.
(8) Identification plates on appliances that will not be destroyed by fire akin to those on vehicles.
” Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation OPSS should address the report’s wider recommendations because they require a national approach.
Verbatim wording from the response “CTSI would also like to see OPSS look at the wider recommendations made in the report as we believe these require a national approach to address national issues.” Source location Response from Chartered Trading Standards Institute
Open published response
7 Mar 2018 Mrs Elizabeth Marion Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report Inner West London
View report summary
Concerns raised 13 Failure to provide accessible appliance registration for people with limited computer literacy View source Delays in launching appliance repair or withdrawal campaigns View source Failure to make linked fire alarms a contractual requirement for telecare clients View source Failure to escalate fire-alarm activations to the fire brigade within 30 seconds View source Artificially differentiated fire-safety treatment of watch-only and wider telecare clients View source Failure to visibly flag unlinked fire alarms in client records View source Unlinked household fire alarms in telecare users' homes View source Failure to identify and replace unlinked fire alarms in a timely and auditable manner View source Lack of working relationships with local fire brigades to facilitate client home fire-risk assessments View source Inadequate staff training on standards-compliant fire-alarm response View source Failure to train staff to recognise and escalate linked and unlinked fire-alarm sounds View source Lack of a central appliance-owner registration and contact mechanism View source Failure of telecare systems to maintain communication throughout clients' properties View source See 10 more concerns
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Mrs Elizabeth Marion Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Mrs Elizabeth Marion Griffin, who was wheelchair bound due to advanced multiple sclerosis, was alone at home in bed when a dishwasher fire started on 14 July 2017. She activated her pendant alarm, but the responder did not recognise the smoke alarm, could not communicate effectively with her, and did not call the fire brigade; Mrs Griffin later died in hospital on 21 August 2017 from smoke inhalation injuries and bronchopneumonia. The concerns included delayed action by the dishwasher manufacturer, lack of appliance-owner registration and contact, and shortcomings in telecare arrangements, including unlinked fire alarms, responder training, communication, and escalation procedures.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to provide accessible appliance registration for people with limited computer literacy
Wider context from the report “3. That any such campaign be also targeted at those who are less computer literate and consideration be given as to how to address their needs in relation to registration .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Delays in launching appliance repair or withdrawal campaigns
Wider context from the report “1. That it simply took too long for Whirlpool UK to launch the repair/withdrawal campaign .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to make linked fire alarms a contractual requirement for telecare clients
Wider context from the report “8. That telecare systems providers and WWA in particular, insist that their clients, who by definition are vulnerable, have linked fire alarms as a contractual requirement for both new and existing clients in the same way that such providers insist on the provision to them by the client of keys to the clients’ homes.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to escalate fire-alarm activations to the fire brigade within 30 seconds
Wider context from the report “7. That telecare system operators and WWA in particular, apply the British Standards Institute requirement to call for the help of the fire brigade after 30 seconds maximum of trying to contact a client if the client’s fire alarm goes off .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Artificially differentiated fire-safety treatment of watch-only and wider telecare clients
Wider context from the report “4. That there is an artificial distinction between service users and clients who are “watch” only services, and those with wider telecare support . Either type of client would be vulnerable to fire .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to visibly flag unlinked fire alarms in client records
Wider context from the report “12. That telecare systems providers and WWA in particular, highlight on the front screen of the client details, if that client has an unlinked fire alarm , until such a time as the unlinked alarm is replaced by a linked one, so as to alert call responders that sounds heard in the back ground or call may represent an activated fire alarm and thus the fire brigade may need to be called to the client’s home by the call responder.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Unlinked household fire alarms in telecare users' homes
Wider context from the report “5. That users of telecare systems have the fire alarms in their homes directly linked to the telecare systems .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to identify and replace unlinked fire alarms in a timely and auditable manner
Wider context from the report “9. That telecare systems providers and WWA in particular, take active steps to identify clients without linked fire alarms and arrange for them to be replaced with linked fire alarms and that this should be done in a timely and auditable fashion .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of working relationships with local fire brigades to facilitate client home fire-risk assessments
Wider context from the report “13. That telecare systems providers and WWA in particular, develop working relationships with their local fire brigades to facilitate fire risk assessments visits to the homes of the clients by the fire brigade being offered to telecare clients and accepted by them.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate staff training on standards-compliant fire-alarm response
Wider context from the report “10. That telecare systems providers and WWA in particular, train their staff on the appropriate response to the activation of a fire alarm and that this should be according to the standards laid down by the British Standards Institute .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to train staff to recognise and escalate linked and unlinked fire-alarm sounds
Wider context from the report “11. That telecare systems providers and WWA in particular, train their staff as to what fire alarm activation sounds like whether from a linked or unlinked alarm and that they should call the fire brigade appropriately if they are heard by the responder to be activated .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of a central appliance-owner registration and contact mechanism
Wider context from the report “2. That there should be a safety campaign encouraging owners of appliances to register their details through a central portal such as AMBIA so that if concerns about an appliance arise they may be promptly contacted .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure of telecare systems to maintain communication throughout clients' properties
Wider context from the report “6. That telecare systems be organised such that a client operating a pendant alarm can talk with the responder no matter where the client is within their property such as to allow a client with mobility problems to be in proper communication with their telecare system operator at all times .
” Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Responsibility for the matter rests with trading standards departments run by local authorities.
Verbatim wording from the response “I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that the Chartered Trading Standards Institute is a private company and professional body for trading standards officers, as such this matter is not something that we are able to get involved with as we have no powers, this would be a matter for trading standards departments that are run by local authorities.” Source location 2018-0072-Response-by-CTSI
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation The matter falls outside the organisation’s authority because it has no powers to intervene.
Verbatim wording from the response “I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that the Chartered Trading Standards Institute is a private company and professional body for trading standards officers, as such this matter is not something that we are able to get involved with as we have no powers, this would be a matter for trading standards departments that are run by local authorities.” Source location 2018-0072-Response-by-CTSI
Open published response
5 Nov 2014 Santosh Benjamin Muthiah · Prevention of Future Deaths report North London
View report summary
Concerns raised 10 Insufficient capacitor safety requirements to prevent hazards on failure View source Lack of requirements to isolate or protect refrigeration-appliance insulation from ignition View source Failure to identify appliance fire causes and appliance identifiers after fire damage View source Lack of second-hand market controls for recalled or safety-notice products View source Failure to routinely pass identified domestic appliance fire information to Trading Standards or manufacturers View source Underestimation of capacitor-related fire risk in Beko fridge-freezer risk assessment View source Inconsistent guidance on product risk notification and corrective action View source Lack of awareness of the safety notice for recalled Beko fridge-freezer models View source Inconsistent product safety risk assessments omitting or variably weighting serious injury factors View source Lack of requirements for less flammable or better-contained plastic materials in refrigeration appliances View source See 7 more concerns
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
×
AI-generated summary
Santosh Benjamin Muthiah · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Santosh Benjamin Muthiah died after a fire spread through his home while he and his family were sleeping, with the medical cause recorded as cerebral anoxia due to inhalation of fire fumes. The report raised concerns about the identification and communication of appliance-fire information, risks from recalled and second-hand refrigeration appliances, product safety risk assessments, guidance and notification practices, and the construction and components of refrigeration appliances, including capacitors.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Insufficient capacitor safety requirements to prevent hazards on failure
Wider context from the report “24. I heard evidence for the LFB witnesses, in particular ████████, who gave evidence about the serious concerns they hold about the ongoing risk posed by capacitor failures resulting in fires. These concerns are twofold, relating generally to capacitors and the industry standards and in relation to Beko appliances.
25. Paragraph 24.8 of British Standard BS EN 60335-1:2012 ‘Household and similar electrical appliances; Safety; Part 1 - General requirements.’ applies to the type of capacitors used in refrigeration appliances. It states that they shall not cause a hazard in the event of failure.
26. This requirement is considered to be met by one or more of the following conditions:
a. The capacitors are of a class of safety protection P2 according to IEC 60252-1;
b. The capacitor is housed within a metallic or ceramic enclosure that will prevent the emission of flame or molten material resulting from failure of the capacitor;
c. The distance of separation of the outer surface of the capacitor to adjacent non-metallic parts exceeds 50mm;
d. Adjacent non-metallic parts within 50 mm of the outer surface of the capacitor withstand the needle-flame test of Annex E;
e. Adjacent non-metallic parts within 50 mm of the outer surface of the capacitor are classified as at least V-1 according to IEC 60695-11-10, provided that the test sample used for the classification was no thicker than the relevant part of the appliance.
27. I accept and agree with the concern raised by the LFB that the above requirement does not ensure that capacitors do not pose a hazard . This creates a risk to the safety of consumers.
28. The LFB FIT has experience of failures of P2 capacitors and failures leading to ignition of metal casing capacitors (contrary to a. and b. above).
29. Further, it is clear that the mechanisms of failure of a capacitor can bypass the required 50mm distance (contrary to c. above). Furthermore, in the case of a refrigeration appliance, the base of the compressor compartment is often two metal bars used for mounting components, leaving the floor surface exposed (for example a flammable carpet).
30. The LFB believes that the requirements regarding capacitors referred to in paragraph 50 above (citing paragraph 24.8 British Standard BS EN 60335-1 : 2012) are not robust enough to prevent capacitors from presenting a hazard , which creates a risk to the safety of consumers.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of requirements to isolate or protect refrigeration-appliance insulation from ignition
Wider context from the report “20. I heard evidence from the LFB witnesses who gave evidence concerning the inherent risks that refrigeration appliances present due to their construction. The polyurethane insulation material used in most refrigeration appliances represents a high fuel load, is highly flammable and when on fire burns to create dangerous gases.
21. There is no legal requirement or industry standard that this insulation material is isolated from or protected from ignition by a failure in another component within the appliance , which represent a risk of ignition, such as the compressor, capacitor or ancillary components. This represents a serious risk to the safety of consumers .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to identify appliance fire causes and appliance identifiers after fire damage
Wider context from the report “1. I heard evidence from various witnesses, including the LFB but also from Beko and ████████ formerly of Intertek, that there are often problems in identifying, not just the specific cause of an appliance fire, but even the manufacturer, model and serial number of the appliance in question due to the severity of the fire damage . This has a knock on effect on Fire & Rescue Services’ (“FRS’s”), Trading Standards (“TS”) and manufacturers’ ability to accurately identify a pattern or trend within fires from appliances which may evidence a specific manufacturing or component problem.
2. This creates a risk that the nature and extent of a potential problem with a particular manufacturer or particular appliance is not fully known and therefore underestimated with the consequence that the risk to the lives of consumers may also be underestimated.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of second-hand market controls for recalled or safety-notice products
Wider context from the report “8. I heard evidence from the LFB witnesses who gave some evidence that defective products on the second hand market pose a continuing risk to consumers.
9. There is no clear system in place to ensure that products subject to a safety notice or recall are not sold, unmodified, on the second hand market . By way of example, the LFB has recently identified several unmodified Beko fridge freezers which are subject to the safety notice, for sale in a second hand retailer. This lack of regulation or market surveillance of the second hand market poses a risk to consumers .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to routinely pass identified domestic appliance fire information to Trading Standards or manufacturers
Wider context from the report “6. This is not the case routinely elsewhere in the country. There may be a variety of reasons for this, including the difficulty in identifying the appliances due to fire damage, and the more limited resources and expertise in the investigation of the causes of fires that other FRS’s have in contrast to the fortunate position of the LFB.
7. Whatever the reasons there is a risk in existence where such information that is gathered by FRS’s in relation to fires involving domestic electrical appliances (where the appliance can be identified) is not routinely passed to the appropriate TS Home or Primary Authority or indeed to the manufacturer . TS is taking decisions on whether to take any action in relation to a particular manufacturer or a particular appliance on less than all the available information. If they were provided with more accurate information about the incidences of appliance fires they would be in a better position to take action where necessary.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Underestimation of capacitor-related fire risk in Beko fridge-freezer risk assessment
Wider context from the report “31. I heard evidence from LFB witnesses who gave evidence of their concerns that serious failures in Beko Frost Free Fridge Freezers (“FFFF’s”) manufactured between 2000 and 2006 are continuing resulting in a serious risk to the safety of consumers. ████████ gave evidence of the numbers of fires which the LFB FIT have investigated to date, the appliance models and the causes of the fires. The LFB have written to Beko concerning these fires and the risk the appliances represent. This concern relates in large part to capacitor failures.
32. Although it is right to say that there was some evidence that there may be an “industry wide problem” i.e. that this risk is not specific to Beko, this alone does not address the risk which exists in Beko products and nor have the LFB been concerned enough in relation to the risk presented by other manufacturer’s products to write to any of them.
33. The LFB were provided with a risk assessment from Beko dated 26 April 2012 which states that the risk is “low” such that no action is necessary or proposed. The LFB is concerned that this underestimates the risk to the safety of consumers , particularly as Beko witnesses’ own evidence seemed to highlight that they consider the capacitor as a potential ignition source in fires .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inconsistent guidance on product risk notification and corrective action
Wider context from the report “16. I heard from Beko witnesses and also, in particular, ████████ that there are inconsistencies between the EU Commission Guidance and the UK Trade Association Guidance on corrective action and the requirement to notify an enforcement authority .
17. The AMDEA guidance says that if the outcome of the risk assessment is that there is a “moderate” risk, the manufacturer is not required to notify TS but the BIS guidance says that a “moderate” risk outcome requires notification to TS.
18. Manufacturers therefore are in difficulty in consistently applying guidance and in carrying out their notification obligations where there is the requisite level of risk to consumers.
19. I accept the LFB submissions that such inconsistency creates a risk that TS not being notified and therefore action not being taken in circumstances when it arguably should be highlighting a risk to consumers.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of awareness of the safety notice for recalled Beko fridge-freezer models
Wider context from the report “10. I heard evidence from the LFB witnesses of their concerns that serious failures in Beko Frost Free Fridge Freezers (“FFFF’s”) manufactured between 2000 and 2006 are continuing resulting in a serious risk to the safety of consumers. ████████ gave evidence of the numbers of fires which the LFB FIT have investigated to date, the appliance models and the causes of the fires.
11. The LFB submits that there remains a risk in relation to the lack of or minimal awareness of the current safety notice in relation to these Beko models .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inconsistent product safety risk assessments omitting or variably weighting serious injury factors
Wider context from the report “12. I heard a great deal of evidence concerning the process of risk assessment and the factors to be taken into account when considering the potential seriousness of injury and the likelihood of a risk eventuating.
13. It is the view of the LFB that the following matters should always be taken in to account when carrying out a product safety risk assessment:
a. Sleeping risk – i.e. the fact that a person is more vulnerable to the risks of fire when asleep;
b. The most serious consequence of a product failure i.e. in the case of fire, serious injury or death;
c. The potential long term physical impact on persons who have suffered burns injuries;
d. The possible psychological impact on persons who have suffered the trauma of a fire.
14. It was clear from the evidence that there have been and continue to be different approaches to risk assessment adopted . The evidence from ████████ and the evidence from the face of the Arcelik and Intertek Risk Assessments (in documentary form) made at the material times over a period of a number of years show that some of these factors are not taken into account and some may be taken into account to a variable degree .
15. Failing to take these factors into account expressly creates a risk that the seriousness of injury, and consequently, potentially the seriousness of the overall risk is underestimated .
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of requirements for less flammable or better-contained plastic materials in refrigeration appliances
Wider context from the report “23. The plastic materials which are used for filling, strengthening and insulating refrigeration appliances are highly flammable and increase the fuel load of these appliances posing a continuing risk to consumers . It is possible to use alternate, non-flammable or less flammable materials. It is also possible to better contain such combustible components or insulation. There is no such requirement at present which creates a risk to the safety of consumers .
” Open source report
Concerns raised 3 Lack of regulation of the sale of large amounts of toxic or potentially fatal gases View source Risk to public health from toxic or potentially fatal gases View source Lack of Trading Standards powers to take action or prosecute View source
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Sindy Louise Woodhall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Sindy Louise Woodhall had longstanding addictions to alcohol and butane and propane, which she misused regularly. She was found collapsed in the street on 24 October 2013, was taken to hospital, and subsequently died; the concerns included the sale of large amounts of potentially fatal gases to her by retailers aware of her addiction, along with lack of regulation and limited Trading Standards powers.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of regulation of the sale of large amounts of toxic or potentially fatal gases
Wider context from the report “1. During the course of the inquest, it transpired that cans of the aforementioned gases were being sold to the deceased by local retailers who were fully aware of her addiction/problems. Whilst morally reprehensible, there was no law to prevent them from selling large amounts of the toxic/potentially fatal gases to the deceased .
2. Lack of regulation.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Risk to public health from toxic or potentially fatal gases
Wider context from the report “4. Risk to public health.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chartered Trading Standards Institute; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of Trading Standards powers to take action or prosecute
Wider context from the report “3. No powers afforded to Trading Standards to take action/prosecute.
” Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation The private professional body has no powers to become involved in this matter.
Verbatim wording from the response “I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that the Trading Standards Institute is a private company and professional body for trading standards officers, as such this matter is not something that we are able to get involved with as we have no powers, this would be a matter for trading standards departments that are run by local authorities.” Source location 2014-0292-Response-by-Trading-Standards-Institute
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Responsibility for this matter rests with trading standards departments run by local authorities.
Verbatim wording from the response “I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that the Trading Standards Institute is a private company and professional body for trading standards officers, as such this matter is not something that we are able to get involved with as we have no powers, this would be a matter for trading standards departments that are run by local authorities.” Source location 2014-0292-Response-by-Trading-Standards-Institute
Open published response
Pin
Request correction
Addressed to “Trading Standards Institute”, a former name of Chartered Trading Standards Institute.
Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations