Recipient

Chelmsford Prison

Pin Request correction

First report 6 Sep 2015•Latest report 6 Sep 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Justice · Prison or young offender institution. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Chelmsford Prison linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Warren Martin Sampson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Warren Martin Sampson had been remanded to HM Prison Chelmsford and was subject to an ACCT when he was found hanging in his cell. Concerns included inconsistent attendance and recording at ACCT reviews, no process for following up non-attendance at first-night healthcare screening, and no system ensuring officers were familiar with local directives and instructions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelmsford Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a process for following up non-attendance at Reception Healthcare first night screening

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The lack of a process for following up non- attendance at the Reception Healthcare first night screening ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelmsford Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system ensuring that all officers are familiar with local directives and instructions

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The lack of a system for ensuring that all officers are familiar with local directives and instructions ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelmsford Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ad hoc attendance of representatives from all disciplines, especially Healthcare, at ACCT reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The “ad hoc” attendance at ACCT reviews of representatives from all disciplines especially Healthcare. The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelmsford Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of written evidence of contributory input from other agencies in ACCT documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The “ad hoc” attendance at ACCT reviews of representatives from all disciplines especially Healthcare. The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026