Recipient

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

First report 9 May 2018•Latest report 21 Jan 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
4

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Chelsea and Westminster Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Sidra Aliabase · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sidra Aliabase was born prematurely at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital and later died there aged 3 weeks after being wrongly prescribed sodium acid phosphate instead of sodium chloride at approximately five times the recommended neonatal dose. The report describes concerns about communication between paediatric cardiology and hospital teams, delayed planning and diagnosis for long QT syndrome, reliance on appropriate cardiology advice, and prescribing systems that may contribute to errors involving similarly named drugs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Drug-selection errors associated with drop-down menu prescribing for similarly named drugs

    Wider context from the report

    “4. That drop-down menu prescribing is more likely to lead to errors in drug selection for drugs of similar names. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish early-pregnancy diagnostic planning systems for at-risk newborns with long QT

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That systems for making plans for diagnosing long QT in newborns at risk need to be put in place early in pregnancy in case of premature delivery. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of on-call paediatric cardiology communication between team members and hospital teams seeking advice

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That communications by the on call paediatric cardiology team at GOSH are not as they should be when they communicate between themselves and hospital teams that contact them for advice. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of neonatal doctors to obtain primary advice from the in-house visiting paediatric cardiology team

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That Chelsea and Westminster neonatal doctors should take advice primarily from its in house visiting paediatric cardiology team for babies likely to be in hospital for some time, even if care is later transferred to another hospital service for long term follow up. ”
    Open source report
  2. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Elton Deutekom · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elton suffered acute hypoxic-ischaemic injury following a placental abruption during labour and was delivered by forceps at 04:35 on 12 January 2022; despite resuscitation, he was recognised as life extinct at 05:12. The report identifies failures to recognise and respond to abnormal CTG changes, and raises wider concerns about neonatal death referrals, disclosure of evidence, record-keeping, staffing, supervision and CTG monitoring.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to disclose evidence relevant to deaths to the coroner under the duty of candor

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That Chelsea and Westminster hospital may not be complying with the duty of candor to disclose evidence relevant to a death to the coroner until forced to by court directions made in public, which thus raises the same concern as above. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient supervision of newly qualified midwives managing women in labour

    Wider context from the report

    “5. That newly qualified midwives should have more supervision whilst they are managing women in labour. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provision of assistance to write neonatal death records retrospectively

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That following neonatal deaths assistance is given to midwifery staff as to how to write records in retrospect and contemporaneous handwritten notes are destroyed possibly reducing the accuracy of the records and thus risking that lessons may not be learned that may save the lives of others. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of neonatologists to pass sufficient and appropriate information to pathologists during consented post-mortem examinations

    Wider context from the report

    “8. That the neonatologists at Chelsea and Westminster are not passing sufficient and appropriate information to the pathologists when consented post- mortem examinations occur such that the cause of death found by the pathologist may be inaccurate. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a regular CTG review system on the central CTG monitoring board

    Wider context from the report

    “6. That there is no regular review system for CTGs on the central CTG monitoring board. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to appropriately refer neonatal deaths to the coroner

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That Chelsea and Westminster Hospital are not appropriately referring neonatal deaths to coroner- either late or not at all, and this raises the possibility that lessons may not be learned from the investigation of these deaths that may save the lives of others. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of neonatologists to appropriately report deaths to the coroner

    Wider context from the report

    “9. That neonatologists in other hospitals may not be appropriately reporting deaths to the coroner. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of Medical Examiner access to obstetric records when reviewing deaths

    Wider context from the report

    “7. That in some hospitals the Medical Examiners do not have access to obstetric records when reviewing deaths. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Understaffing of the labour ward

    Wider context from the report

    “4. That the labour ward is understaffed. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Destruction of contemporaneous handwritten notes following neonatal deaths

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That following neonatal deaths assistance is given to midwifery staff as to how to write records in retrospect and contemporaneous handwritten notes are destroyed possibly reducing the accuracy of the records and thus risking that lessons may not be learned that may save the lives of others. ”
    Open source report
  3. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Kai TAKAGI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kai Takagi attended Chelsea and Westminster Hospital on 11 June 2021 with severe stomach pain and left before an abnormal blood result, suggestive of acute pancreatitis, was received. The hospital planned to contact him but did not do so, and he was found dead at home on 14 June 2021; the stated medical cause of death was acute peritonitis from a perforated gastric ulcer. Concerns included inadequate tracking and follow-up of patients who leave with outstanding abnormal test results, reliance on oral handover, and incomplete implementation of a clinician-led review system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to track outstanding diagnostic results for patients leaving the Accident and Emergency Department

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Patients that leave the hospital Accident and Emergency Department with outstanding blood results or other diagnostic tests are not followed up and “tracked” in the same way that in-patients are, thus giving rise to the risk that they are missed and urgent follow-up care is not actioned or offered. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient hospital capacity for callback of patients leaving the Accident and Emergency Department

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) That as reliance on Accident and Emergency departments for routine out of hours health care increases, the burden of call back also increases for hospitals for patients who have left at a time when their departments are already over-stretched in dealing with admissions and those presenting to the department, thus increasing the risk that patients will not be called back for urgent follow-up assessment or treatment which may be life-saving. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement periodic clinician-led review of abnormal diagnostic results

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) That a periodic clinician led review of all abnormal blood results (and other test results), which the hospital has explored since I raised the matter in the hearing has not been fully implemented giving rise to the risk that patients who have left the hospital with potentially life-threatening conditions suggested by the tests may not be contacted urgently asking them to return thus increasing the risk of their untimely deaths. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of independently auditable callback handover

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) That the system remains heavily dependent on oral handover, which is not amenable to independent audit as it assumes a person has done what was asked of them. Short of an individual doctor being asked if the call back had been actioned, there is no way of checking that it has. ”
    Open source report
  4. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Edward Joyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edward Joyce suffered an accidental scalding injury on 19 November 2017 and later developed septic shock from infected burns. He became severely unwell on 22 November and died despite attempts at resuscitation. Concerns included that a temperature of 38.9°C did not trigger an urgent hospital referral and was not recorded when his mother telephoned the hospital, and that parents were not advised to bring him back to hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide advice to return to hospital after reported high temperature following a burn

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence at the inquest was that a temperature reading above 38°C following a burn to a young child is highly concerning, and could be an early sign of septicaemia and toxic shock syndrome. (1) The temperature reading of 38.9°C at the GP did not trigger an urgent referral to hospital. (2) Eddie’s mother was clear that she reported this temperature reading to the nurse at Chelsea & Westminster when she telephoned soon after the GP appointment. This reading is not recorded in the telephone note and the parents were not told to bring Eddie back to hospital. (3) The evidence was that scalding injuries amongst children are very common but that toxic shock syndrome is very rare. In their evidence the hospital witnesses helpfully considered whether the information leaflet could be reviewed so as to assist other health professionals who may be less aware of the potential significance of high temperature following a burn and availability of a 24 hour telephone advice from the burns unit. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to trigger urgent hospital referral for high temperature following a burn

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence at the inquest was that a temperature reading above 38°C following a burn to a young child is highly concerning, and could be an early sign of septicaemia and toxic shock syndrome. (1) The temperature reading of 38.9°C at the GP did not trigger an urgent referral to hospital. (2) Eddie’s mother was clear that she reported this temperature reading to the nurse at Chelsea & Westminster when she telephoned soon after the GP appointment. This reading is not recorded in the telephone note and the parents were not told to bring Eddie back to hospital. (3) The evidence was that scalding injuries amongst children are very common but that toxic shock syndrome is very rare. In their evidence the hospital witnesses helpfully considered whether the information leaflet could be reviewed so as to assist other health professionals who may be less aware of the potential significance of high temperature following a burn and availability of a 24 hour telephone advice from the burns unit. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record reported high temperature in telephone notes

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence at the inquest was that a temperature reading above 38°C following a burn to a young child is highly concerning, and could be an early sign of septicaemia and toxic shock syndrome. (1) The temperature reading of 38.9°C at the GP did not trigger an urgent referral to hospital. (2) Eddie’s mother was clear that she reported this temperature reading to the nurse at Chelsea & Westminster when she telephoned soon after the GP appointment. This reading is not recorded in the telephone note and the parents were not told to bring Eddie back to hospital. (3) The evidence was that scalding injuries amongst children are very common but that toxic shock syndrome is very rare. In their evidence the hospital witnesses helpfully considered whether the information leaflet could be reviewed so as to assist other health professionals who may be less aware of the potential significance of high temperature following a burn and availability of a 24 hour telephone advice from the burns unit. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026